Outcomes of maze procedure and mitral valve surgery in atrial functional mitral regurgitation: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) is a newly discovered condition associated with longstanding atrial fibrillation. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the outcomes of the maze procedure and mitral regurgitation (MR) surgery in AFMR and atrial fibrillation in comparison with those in degenerative MR (DMR). METHODS: Patients who underwent mitral valve repair/replacement with a maze procedure at a hospital (July 2012-August 2021) were included. We excluded patients aged below 18 years undergoing concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting or atrial septal defect repair and those with MR etiology other than ARMR or DMR. RESULTS: We included 35 patients with AFMR and 50 patients with DMR. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. Long-term outcomes revealed no significant differences in the ratio of cardiac mortality, stroke, or hospital readmission. However, after the maze procedure, the sinus rhythm restoration rate was significantly lower (62% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001), a junctional rhythm state (p < 0.001) and permanent pacemaker insertion for sick sinus syndrome (SSS) (p = 0.03) were significantly more common in AFMR than DMR. On postoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), the pulmonary artery systolic pressure was significantly less decreased in the AFMR group than in the DMR group compared with that on preoperative TTE (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: AFMR showed excellent mitral valve surgery outcomes, similar to DMR, but had a significantly higher risk of pacemaker insertion for SSS after the maze procedure.

Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation in elderly patients undergoing high risk cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating outcomes of concurrent Cox-Maze procedures in elderly patients undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery. MEHODS: We retrospectively identified patients aged over 70 years with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) from 2011 to 2017 who had two or more other cardiac procedures. They were subdivided into two groups: 1. Cox-Maze IV AF ablation. 2. No-Surgical AF treatment. A propensity match score was used to generate a homogeneous cohort and to eliminate confounding variables. Heart rhythm was assessed from Holter reports or 12-lead ECG. Follow-up data was collected through telephone consultations and medical records. RESULTS: There were 239 patients. Median follow up was 61 months. 70 patients had Cox-Maze IV procedures (29.3%). Demographic, intra- and post-operative outcomes were similar between groups although duration of pre-operative AF was shorter in Cox-Maze group (p = 0.001). There was no significant 30-day mortality difference in propensity matched cohorts (n = 84. P = 0.078). Sinus rhythm at annual and latest follow-up was 84.9% and 80.0% respectively in Maze group - 160 patients (66.9%) were alive at long-term follow-up with good survival outcomes in Cox Maze group. There was a high proportion of patients in NYHA 1 status in Cox-Maze group. No differences observed in freedom from stroke (p = 0.80) or permanent pacemaker (p = 0.33) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical ablation is beneficial in elderly patients undergoing high-risk surgery - promoting excellent long-term freedom from AF and symptomatic / prognostic benefits, without added risk. Therefore, surgical risk should not be reason to deny benefits of concomitant AF-ablation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not required.

Atrial Tachycardia Masquerading as Atrial Fibrillation Following Bi-Atrial MAZE Procedure.

A 34-year-old woman presented with palpitations and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Workup revealed anterior mitral valve prolapse with severe mitral regurgitation. She was referred for surgical repair and underwent a mitral valve replacement, tricuspid valve repair, and bi-atrial cryoMAZE procedure with left atrial appendage ligation. Her postoperative course was complicated by inferior wall myocardial infarction. She subsequently presented with palpitations and underwent electrophysiology study and ablation. This case illustrates pitfalls associated with the surgical MAZE procedure and highlights the challenges in postoperative atrial arrhythmias diagnosis and management.

Treating Atrial Fibrillation is No Maze: A Reminder to Heart Teams for Concomitant Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Cardiac Surgery.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia and is often found during times of other cardiac pathologies that require surgical management including coronary revascularization and valve surgery. Surgical ablation of AF, most frequently performed through the Cox-Maze IV procedure, is highly effective in restoring sinus rhythm. Despite robust society guideline recommendations for concomitant surgical ablation (CSA) for AF, the practice has yet to be widely adopted. In this review, we discuss the current indications for CSA, its efficacy in maintaining freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias, stroke, and adverse long-term outcomes, the safety profile of SA when performed alongside cardiac surgical cases, and challenges with its implementation across the most common concomitant cardiac operations. In conclusion, we present a reminder to multidisciplinary heart teams to consider CSA when indicated for their patients.

Optimal patient selection for maze procedure in patients undergoing mitral valve disease.

OBJECTIVES: Although risk factors for unsuccessful Maze procedure have been demonstrated, an appropriate patient selection is still controversial. In our institute, Maze procedure is indicated for those whom normal sinus rhythm (NSR) was reestablished by intraoperative direct cardioversion (DC) after ventricular unloading by total cardiopulmonary bypass. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of our indication criteria for Maze procedure in patients with mitral valve disease. METHODS: Between October 2012 and October 2021, MAZE was indicated in 55 patients in whom normal sinus rhythm (NSR) was reestablished by intraoperative direct current cardioversion (DC). Three endpoints and predictors were examined: disappearance of atrial fibrillation (AF), NSR, and A-wave detection. RESULTS: Restoration of NSR by intraoperative DC was confirmed in 43 patients, and these patients underwent MAZE. AF disappeared in 39 patients (90.7%), and F-wave ≥ 0.1 mV was a significant predictive factor (odds ratio (OR) 20.99, 95% CI 1.22-1079.06). NSR was reestablished in 36 patients (83.7%), and F-wave ≥ 0.1 mV (odds ratio 15.62, 95% CI 1.62-359.86) + AF history ≤ 3 years (OR 8.30, 95% CI 1.09-177.04) were significant predictors. A-wave detection was confirmed in 26 patients (60.5%), and left atrial diameter ≤ 55 mm was a significant predictor (OR 5.22, 95% CI 1.28-24.79). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative DC after ventricular unloading resulted effective patient selection for concomitant Maze procedure. F-wave and AF history were predictive factor of electrical restoration of AF, and left atrial diameter was predictive factor of restoration of atrial function.

Outcomes of Concomitant Maze Procedure in Tricuspid Repair for Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the impact of concomitant Maze procedure on the clinical and rhythm outcomes, and echocardiographic parameters in tricuspid repair for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Patients who had severe TR and persistent AF and underwent tricuspid valve (TV) repair were included in the study. Both primary TR and secondary TR were included in the current study. The study population was stratified according to Maze procedure. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) at 15 years post-surgery. Propensity-score matching analyses was performed to adjust baseline differences. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-one patients who underwent tricuspid repair for severe TR and persistent AF from 1994 to 2021 were included, and 198 patients (53.4%) underwent concomitant Maze procedure. The maze group showed 10-year sinus rhythm (SR) restoration rate of 55%. In the matched cohort, the maze group showed a lower cumulative incidence of cardiac death (4.6% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.131), readmission for heart failure (8.1% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.073), and MACCE (21.1% vs. 42.1%, P = 0.029) at 15 years compared to the non-maze group. Left atrial (LA) diameter significantly decreased in the maze group at 5 years (53.3 vs. 59.6 mm, P < 0.001) after surgery compared to preoperative level, and there was a significant difference in the change of LA diameter over time between the two groups (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: The Maze procedure during TV repair in patients with severe TR and persistent AF showed acceptable SR rates and lower MACCE rates compared to those without the procedure, while also promoting LA reverse remodeling.

Safety and efficacy of Cox-Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Cox-Maze procedure is currently the gold standard treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the effectiveness of the Cox-Maze procedure after concomitant mitral valve surgery (MVS) are not well established. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Cox-Maze procedure versus no-maze procedure n in AF patients undergoing mitral valve surgery through a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (Cochrane Library, Issue 02, 2017) databases were performed using three databases from their inception to March 2023, identifying all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Cox-Maze procedure versus no procedure in AF patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. Data were extracted and analyzed according to predefined clinical endpoints. RESULTS: Nine RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this systematic review with 663 patients in total (341 concomitant Cox-Maze with MVS and 322 MVS alone). Across all studies with included AF patients undergoing MV surgery, the concomitant Cox-Maze procedure was associated with significantly higher sinus rhythm rate at discharge, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up when compared with the no-Maze group. Results indicated that there was no significant difference between the Cox-Maze and no-Maze groups in terms of 1 year all-cause mortality, pacemaker implantation, stroke, and thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review suggested that RCTs have demonstrated the addition of the Cox-Maze procedure for AF leads to a significantly higher rate of sinus rhythm in mitral valve surgical patients, with no increase in the rates of mortality, pacemaker implantation, stroke, and thromboembolism.

[Long-term Outcomes of the Maze Procedure Omitting the Ablation Line to The Superior Vena Cava].

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to avoid postoperative sick sinus syndrome( SSS), we omit the ablation line to the superior vena cava( SVC) in the Cox-mazeⅢ lesion set. We report the long-term outcomes, including the freedom from SSS. METHODS: We studied 102 patients who underwent bi-atrial maze procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation (Af) from 2009 through 2023. Bipolar radio frequency ablation or cryoablation was used except for right-side atriotomy and right atriotomy. Cryoablation was used for atrioventricular annulus. The patient age was 68±9.4. Duration of Af was 3.4±6.5 years (unknown 9 cases). The amplitude of f-wave in V1 was 0.182±0.095 mV and it was<0.1 mV in 19 (18.6%). Diameter of the left atrium was 50±8.9 mm, and left atrial volume index was 89±37 ml/m2. Ninety-one (89.2%) patients underwent concomitant mitral valve surgery. RESULTS: Survival rate was 99% at 1 year and 96% at 5 years. Freedom from Af was 92% at 1 year and 88% at 5 years. Freedom from permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) was 87% at 1 year and 83% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Defibrillation rate and the incidence of PPI was comparable to those in previous reports after standard Cox-mazeⅢ. SSS after maze for persistent Af seem due to patient.

[The Long Outcome of the Left Atrial Appendage Preserving Maze Procedure].

We retrospectively study the outcome of left atrial appendage (LAA) preserving maze procedure, focus on thrombus formation in left atrium( LA), postoperative stroke, and LA function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 131 patients (mean age, 68.2y;77 men and 54 women) who underwent maze procedure for atrial fibrillation( Af) between 2008 and 2020. Full maze was performed for 116 patients with long-standing persistent Af or persistent Af. Pulmonary vein isolation alone was performed for 15 patients with paroxysmal Af. The mean follow-up period was 2.9( 10.1-0.4) years. RESULTS: In perioperative results, there were no death, cerebral infarction, and reoperation in this series. At discharge, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after the surgery, sinus rhythm was maintained in 92%, 87%, 83%, 77%. Pacemaker was implanted in 8( early 3, late 5) patients. Despite adequate anticoagulant therapy, one patient developed cerebral infarction a month postoperatively. In other patients, there was no cerebral infarction in short-term nor long-term. CONCLUSIONS: The LAA preserving maze procedure was not a risk factor of cerebral infarction under appropriate medication. However, close follow-up is essential.

[Modification of Maze Procedure in Nippon Medical School:Striving Towards Restoration of Sinus Rhythm with Physiological Activation of Atria].

Atrial fibrillation surgery is beneficial for restoring sinus rhythm and maintaining the physiological atrial contraction to prevent left atrial thrombus formation. The radial procedure, a good alternative to the maze procedure, has been performed at Nippon Medical School;it was designed to maintain physiological atrial excitation and blood flow. The design reduces the incision line and avoids conduction delay in the atrium through the use of ablation devices and intraoperative mapping of atrial excitation patterns. In addition, it preserves sinus node function and cardiac conduction pathway;this could prevent postoperative pacemaker implantation.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery With Concomitant Cox Maze Procedure Is as Effective as a Median Sternotomy With Decreased Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: A right minithoracotomy (RMT) is a minimally invasive surgical approach that has been increasingly performed for the concomitant Cox maze IV procedure (CMP) and mitral valve surgery (MVS). Little is known regarding whether long-term rhythm and survival outcomes are affected by the RMT as compared with the traditional median sternotomy (MS) approach. METHODS: Between April 2004 and April 2021, 377 patients underwent the concomitant CMP and MVS, of whom 38% had RMT. Propensity score matching yielded 116 pairs. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) was assessed with prolonged monitoring annually for 8 years. Survival, rhythm, and perioperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The unmatched RMT cohort had a greater freedom from ATA recurrence at 1 year (99% vs 90%, P = 0.001) and 3 years (94% vs 86%, P = 0.045). The matched RMT cohort had longer cardiopulmonary bypass (median: 215 [199 to 253] vs 170 [136 to 198] min, P < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp (110 [98 to 124] vs 86 [71 to 102] min, P < 0.001) times but shorter intensive care time (48 [24 to 95] vs 71 [26 to 144] h, P = 0.001) and length of stay (8 [6 to 11] vs 10 [7 to 14] h, P < 0.001). More pacemakers (18% vs 4%, P < 0.001) and postoperative transfusions (57% vs 41%, P = 0.014) occurred in the MS cohort. The 30-day mortality (P = 0.651) and 8-year survival (P = 0.072) was not significantly different between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Early 1-year and 3-year freedom from ATA recurrence was better in the RMT cohort compared with the MS cohort. Despite longer operative times, the RMT cohort had shorter lengths of stay, fewer postoperative transfusions, and fewer pacemakers placed.

Application of Cut-and-Sew Technique in Thoracoscopic Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery and Concomitant Maze Procedure.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation is one of the common complications of mitral valve disease. Currently, in the absence of freezing equipment, it's still impossible to fully conduct a minimally invasive Cox-maze IV procedure to treat atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical data of 28 patients who underwent thoracoscopic minimally invasive mitral valve full maze surgery in our hospital from October 2021 to September 2022; 13 patients were male and 15 were female, three suffered from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and 25 suffered from permanent atrial fibrillation; average age was 61.88±8.30 years, and mean preoperative left atrial diameter was 47.12±8.34 mm. Isolation of left atrial posterior wall (box lesion) was completed in all patients by cut-and-sew technique and bipolar clamp ablation. RESULTS: For these subjects, the median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 169 (109.75-202.75) minutes, aortic cross-clamping time was 106 (77.75-125.50) minutes, and ventilator assistance time was 6.5 (0-10) hours. Among them, eight subjects had the endotracheal tubes removed immediately after surgical operation. Three subjects were in the blanking period; two subjects still had atrial fibrillation at three months after operation, one of whom resumed sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion therapy; and all the remaining 23 subjects had sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION: The minimally invasive cut-and-sew technique for electrical isolation of left pulmonary veins can improve sinus conversion rate of patients suffering from both mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation. In selected subjects, it is safe and has good results in the short-term postoperative period.

Left Atrium Volume Reduction Procedure Concomitant With Cox-Maze Ablation in Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Rhythm Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The management of an enlarged left atrium (LA) in mitral valve (MV) disease with atrial fibrillation (AF) is still being debated. It has been postulated that a reduction in LA size may improve patient outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to assess rhythm and clinical outcomes of combined surgical AF treatment with or without LA volume reduction (LAVR) in patients undergoing MV surgery. METHODS: A systematic review was performed and all available literature to May 2022 was included. The primary endpoint was analysis of early and late mortality and rhythm outcomes. Secondary outcomes included early and late cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and permanent pacemaker implantation. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 2,808 potentially relevant articles, and 19 papers were eventually included. The pooled estimated rate of 30-day mortality was 3.76% (95% CI 2.52-5.56). The incidence rate of late mortality and late cardiac-related mortality was 1.75%/year (95% CI 0.63-4.84) and 1.04%/year (95% CI 0.31-3.53), respectively. At subgroup analysis when comparing the surgical procedure with and without AF ablation, the ablation subgroup showed a significantly lower rate of postoperative CVA (p<0.0001) and higher restoration to sinus rhythm at discharge (p=0.0124), with only a trend of lower AF recurrence at 1 year (p=0.0608). At univariable meta-regression, reintervention was significantly associated with higher late mortality (p=0.0033). CONCLUSION: In enlarged LA undergoing MV surgery, LAVR combined with AF ablation showed a trend of improved rhythm outcomes when compared with AF ablation without LAVR. Each LAVR technique has its advantages and disadvantages, which must be managed accordingly.

Prediction model of atrial fibrillation recurrence after Cox-Maze IV procedure in patients with chronic valvular disease and atrial fibrillation based on machine learning algorithm. / åŸºäºŽæœºå™¨å­¦ä¹ çš„æ ¢æ€§ç“£è†œç— åˆå¹¶å¿ƒæˆ¿é¢¤åŠ¨æ‚£è€ è¡ŒCox迷宫IV手术后心房颤动复发风险预测模型.

OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, and Cox-maze IV procedure (CMP-IV) is a commonly employed surgical technique for its treatment. Currently, the risk factors for atrial fibrillation recurrence following CMP-IV remain relatively unclear. In recent years, machine learning algorithms have demonstrated immense potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, predicting patient outcomes, and devising personalized treatment strategies. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of CMP-IV on treating chronic valvular disease with AF, utilize machine learning algorithms to identify potential risk factors for AF recurrence, construct a CMP-IV postoperative AF recurrence prediction model. METHODS: A total of 555 patients with AF combined with chronic valvular disease, who met the criteria, were enrolled from January 2012 to December 2019 from the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University and the Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital of the Army Medical University, with an average age of (57.95±7.96) years, including an AF recurrence group (n=117) and an AF non-recurrence group (n=438). Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the sinus rhythm maintenance rate, and 9 machine learning models were developed including random forest, gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), bootstrap aggregating, logistic regression, categorical boosting (CatBoost), support vector machine, adaptive boosting, and multi-layer perceptron. Five-fold cross-validation and model evaluation indicators [including F1 score, accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the curve (AUC)] were used to evaluate the performance of the models. The 2 best-performing models were selected for further analyze, including feature importance evaluation and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis, identifying AF recurrence risk factors, and building an AF recurrence risk prediction model. RESULTS: The 5-year sinus rhythm maintenance rate for the patients was 82.13% (95% CI 78.51% to 85.93%). Among the 9 machine learning models, XGBoost and CatBoost models performed best, with the AUC of 0.768 (95% CI 0.742 to 0.786) and 0.762 (95% CI 0.723 to 0.801), respectively. Feature importance and SHAP analysis showed that duration of AF, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, postoperative heart rhythm, preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, preoperative left atrial diameter, preoperative heart rate, and preoperative white blood cell were important factors for AF recurrence. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms can be effectively used to identify potential risk factors for AF recurrence after CMP-IV. This study successfuly constructs 2 prediction model which may enhance individualized treatment plans.

Outcome of mitral repair combined with Cox-maze procedure for atrial functional mitral regurgitation with heart failure with recovered ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVES: Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) in patients with heart failure with recovered ejection fraction has received insufficient attention. This study analysed the prognosis and outcomes of mitral valve (MV) repair combined with the Cox-maze procedure. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of patients with AFMR with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% was conducted. All patients received guideline-directed medical therapy. Those with recovered ejection fraction underwent MV repair combined with the Cox-maze procedure. Mortality, atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, mitral regurgitation (MR) and postoperative tricuspid regurgitation were assessed using the inverse probability weighting (IPW) method. RESULTS: In total, 312 patients were enrolled in this study between 2010 and 2019, 247 of whom underwent MV repair combined with the Cox-maze procedure [full recovery (LVEF > 50%): n = 132, partial recovery (LVEF of 40-50%): n = 115]. IPW-adjusted survival of patients with LVEF ≥50% and LVEF 40-50% showed no significant difference [hazard ratio (HR): 2.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-10.38, P = 0.33]. However, patients with LVEF ≥50% had better IPW-adjusted long-term freedom from recurrent MR [HR: 2.44 (1.28-4.63), P = 0.0065] and AF recurrence [HR: 1.85 (1.06-3.21), P = 0.030] than those with LVEF of 40-50%. CONCLUSIONS: MV repair combined with the Cox-maze procedure was effective and feasible in patients with severe AFMR with heart failure with recovered ejection fraction. Additionally, patients with LVEF ≥50% after guideline-directed medical therapy undergoing these combined procedures had better long-term freedom from recurrent AF and MR than those with LVEF of 40-50%.

Effect of cryothermic and radiofrequency Cox-Maze IV ablation on atrial size and function assessed by 2D and 3D echocardiography, a randomized trial. To freeze or to burn.

BACKGROUND: Atrial linear scars in Cox-Maze IV procedures are achieved using Cryothermy (Cryo) or radiofrequency (RF) techniques. The subsequent postoperative left atrial (LA) reverse remodelling is unclear. We used 2- and 3-dimensional echocardiography (2-3DE) to compare the impact of Cryo and RF procedures on LA size and function 1 year after Cox-maze IV ablation concomitant with Mitral valve (MV) surgery. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with MV disease and AF were randomized to Cryo (n = 35) or RF (n = 37) ablation. Another 33 patients were enroled without ablation (NoMaze). All patients underwent an echocardiogram the day before and 1 year after surgery. The LA function was assessed on 2D strain by speckle tracking and 3DE. RESULTS: Forty-two ablated patients recovered sinus rhythm (SR) 1 year after surgery. They had comparable left and right systolic ventricular function, LA volume index (LAVI), and 2D reservoir strain before surgery. At follow-up, the 3DE extracted reservoir and booster function were higher after RF (37 ± 10% vs. 26 ± 6%; p < 0.001) than Cryo ablation (18 ± 9 vs. 7 ± 4%; p < 0.001), while passive conduit function was comparable between groups (24 ± 11 vs. 20 ± 8%; p = 0.17). The extent of LAVI reduction depended on the duration of AF preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: SR restoration after MV surgery and maze results in LA size reduction irrespective of the energy source used. Compared to RF, the extension of ablation area produced by Cryo implies a structural LA remodelling affecting LA systolic function.

Long-Term Outcomes of the Maze Procedure Combined with Endoatriectomy for Patients with Calcified Left Atria.

PURPOSE: Left atrial calcification (LAC) is found in long-lasting rheumatic valvular disease and is almost always accompanied by atrial fibrillation (AF). In the presence of LAC, endoatriectomy is required when performing the maze procedure. However, the technical feasibility of endoatriectomy and the long-term outcomes of the maze procedure in patients with LAC are uncertain. METHODS: The medical records of 18 consecutive patients who underwent combined endoatriectomy and maze procedure were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Accompanying operations were mitral valve replacement (n = 16) and commissurotomy (n = 2). There was 1 operative death from sepsis following mediastinitis. When patients were divided into "broad" (n = 11) and "limited" (n = 7) groups, with the extent of LAC either greater or less than half of the left atrium, respectively, there was no intergroup difference in postoperative complications. During follow-up (median, 11.4 years), AF recurred in 11 patients. At the last follow-up visits, electrocardiography revealed significantly fewer patients in the broad group maintaining sinus rhythm (1/11 vs 4/6, P = 0.03). The 10-year AF recurrence-free survival rates were 13.9% and 66.7% in the broad and limited groups, respectively (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The maze procedure combined with endoatriectomy seems technically feasible with acceptable long-term rhythm outcomes if the LAC extent is limited.

Incidence of and risk factors for pacemaker implantation after the modified Cryo-Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: The Maze procedure is a well-established treatment for atrial fibrillation. However, it is sometimes associated with bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation. We assessed the rates of in-hospital and late-onset pacemaker implantation after the modified Cryo-Maze procedure and explored the risk factors for pacemaker implantation. METHODS: This study enrolled a series of 751 patients who underwent the modified Cryo-Maze procedure at our institution between 2001 and 2020. Multivariable Fine-Gray regression was used to analyze the risk factors for late-onset pacemaker implantation. RESULTS: Twelve patients (1.6%) underwent in-hospital pacemaker implantation, and 55 patients (7.3%) underwent late-onset pacemaker implantation during a median follow-up of 4.5 years (interquartile range, 1.4-10.0). The most common primary indication for pacemaker implantation was sick sinus syndrome (56 patients [7.5%]), followed by complete atrioventricular block (11 patients [1.5%]). The cumulative incidence of late-onset pacemaker implantation with death as a competing risk was 2.8% at 1 year, 7.7% at 5 years, and 10.8% at 10 years. Risk factors for late-onset pacemaker implantation included a longer preoperative atrial fibrillation duration (hazard ratio, 1.14; P < .001) and an older age (hazard ratio, 1.05; P = .001). The mortality, cumulative incidence of cerebrovascular accidents, and rate of atrial fibrillation recurrence were not significantly different between patients with and without pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Longer preoperative atrial fibrillation duration and older age are risk factors for late-onset pacemaker implantation after the modified Cryo-Maze procedure. However, the incidence of pacemaker implantation is not associated with increased morbidity or atrial fibrillation recurrence.