Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 47
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 16: E115, 2019 08 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31441767

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In January 2018, new vendor eligibility standards for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) were fully implemented to increase availability of healthy staple and perishable foods. We examined changes in SNAP vendor participation and availability of fresh fruits and vegetables (FFV) both short-term (2015 vs 2018) and long term (2003 vs 2018) in an urban, low-income community. METHODS: We conducted food store assessments from late June through early September of 2003, 2009, 2012, 2015, and 2018 in Albany, New York. SNAP status was assessed by using the US Department of Agriculture's list of SNAP-authorized stores and in-store verification. RESULTS: Numbers of SNAP vendors were 77 in 2003, 92 in 2009, 103 in 2012, 115 in 2015, and 109 in 2018. We observed a marginally significant (P = .049) short-term (2015, 85.9% vs 2018, 73.9%) decline in SNAP participation among convenience stores but no significant short-term changes in FFV availability among either SNAP or non-SNAP vendors. In long-term (2003 through 2018) trends, we found significant (P < .01) increases in SNAP participation among farmers markets and nonprofit organizations. The proportion of SNAP vendors stocking only 1 type of FFV also significantly increased, which was likely related to a consumer trend of favoring bananas as a grab-and-go snack. CONCLUSION: Despite the decline of SNAP participation among convenience stores, which primarily came from increased program withdrawals, the new SNAP rule did not substantially alter FFV availability after 6 to 8 months of its full implementation. Long term, policy efforts increased SNAP participation among farmers markets.


Subject(s)
Commerce , Food Assistance , Food Supply , Commerce/organization & administration , Commerce/standards , Commerce/statistics & numerical data , Consumer Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Food Assistance/organization & administration , Food Assistance/statistics & numerical data , Food Assistance/trends , Food Supply/methods , Food Supply/standards , Fruit/supply & distribution , Humans , Nutrition Policy , Poverty , Program Evaluation , United States , Vegetables/supply & distribution
2.
Ecol Food Nutr ; 58(3): 265-280, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30977395

ABSTRACT

Food insecurity has been a persistent problem in the U.S., and yet over the past three decades, federally funded food programs have become more restrictive. Scholars and policymakers have inquired whether the nonprofit sector is increasing its food provision activities to address this unmet need. This study analyzes data from the U.S. Census and a nationally representative survey of religious congregations in the U.S. to examine trends in food insecurity and congregation-based food provision between 1998 and 2012. The objective of the study is to investigate the extent to which congregation-based food provision fluctuated with national food insecurity prevalence for the overall population, and for subgroups vulnerable to this condition. Results show an over-time correspondence between the prevalence of food-insecure households and the prevalence of congregations that provide food. Parallel patterns are observed between food insecurity in disproportionately affected subpopulations (e.g., African-Americans and immigrants) and food provision in the congregations likely to serve those households. These findings indicate that congregations are helping meet the needs of food-insecure households. However, research suggests that congregations and nonprofits are not an adequate substitute for federally funded programs. Policy recommendations include expanding access to federally funded programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to more immigrants and other groups vulnerable to food insecurity, as well as providing more systematic financial or federal support and quality control of congregation-based efforts.


Subject(s)
Faith-Based Organizations/trends , Food Assistance/trends , Food Supply/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Prevalence , United States , Vulnerable Populations
3.
Demography ; 55(1): 189-221, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29380273

ABSTRACT

Refundable tax credits and food assistance are the largest transfer programs available to able-bodied working poor and near-poor families in the United States, and simultaneous participation in these programs has more than doubled since the early 2000s. To understand this growth, we construct a series of two-year panels from the 1981-2013 waves of the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement to estimate the effect of state labor-market conditions, federal and state transfer program policy choices, and household demographics governing joint participation in food and refundable tax credit programs. Overall, changing policy drives much of the increase in the simultaneous, biennial use of food assistance and refundable tax credits. This stands in stark contrast from the factors accounting for the growth in food assistance alone, where cyclical and structural labor market factors account for at least one-half of the growth, and demographics play a more prominent role. Moreover, since 2000, the business cycle factors as the leading determinant in biennial participation decisions in food programs and refundable tax credits, suggesting a recent strengthening in the relationship between economic conditions and transfer programs.


Subject(s)
Family , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Public Assistance/trends , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Food Assistance/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Public Policy , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Taxes/trends , United States
4.
Salud Publica Mex ; 60(3): 319-327, 2018.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29746749

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the coverage and targeting of Social Food Assistance Programs (SFAP) in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from 9 137 households of the Halfway National Health and Nutrition Survey 2016 (Ensanut MC 2016) who receive SFAP. The distribution of the SFAP by place of residence, index of socioeconomic status and SFAP relevance were analyzed. RESULTS: 44% of households receive some SFAP, with a higher concentration in indigenous households (70%), a very low socioeconomic level (70%), and moderate and severe food insecurity. The SFAP with the greatest coverage were Prospera (21%), Liconsa (9%), School Breakfasts Program (17%) and the Support Program for Older Adults; of these the best-focused program was Prospera. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to review the resources of the programs and direct them to the population with greater deficiencies and greater nutritional vulnerability.


OBJETIVO: Describir la cobertura y focalización de los Programas de Ayuda Alimentaria (PAA) en México. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se obtuvo información de 9 137 hogares de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición Medio Camino (Ensanut MC) 2016 sobre los PAA que reciben. Se analizó la distribución de los PAA por lugar de residencia, índice de nivel socioeconómico y pertinencia los PAA. RESULTADOS: El 44% de los hogares recibe algún PAA, con mayor concentración en hogares indígenas (70%), de muy bajo nivel socioeconómic (70%) y en inseguridad alimentaria moderada y severa. Los PAA con mayor cobertura fueron Prospera (21%), Liconsa (9%), Programa de Desayunos Escolares (17%) y el Programa de Adultos Mayores; de éstos, el programa mejor focalizado fue Prospera. CONCLUSIONES: Es necesario revisar los recursos de los programas y dirigirlos a la población con mayores carencias y mayor vulnerabilidad nutricional.


Subject(s)
Food Assistance/trends , Government Programs , Health Surveys , Humans , Mexico , Nutrition Surveys , Program Evaluation
5.
BMC Geriatr ; 17(1): 162, 2017 07 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28738897

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although it has long been known that a broad range of factors beyond medical diagnoses affect health and health services use, it has been unclear whether additional income can decrease health service use. We examined whether Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) receipt is associated with subsequent nursing home entry among low income older adults. METHODS: We examined the 77,678 older adults dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare in Maryland, 2010-2012. Zero inflated negative binomial regression, adjusting for demographic and health factors, tested the association of either lagged SNAP enrollment or lagged benefit amount with nursing home admission. We used Heckman two-step model results to calculate potential savings of SNAP enrollment through reduced nursing home admissions and reduced duration. RESULTS: Only 53.4% received SNAP in 2012, despite being income-eligible. SNAP participants had a 23% reduced odds of nursing home admission than nonparticipants (95% CI: 0.75-0.78). For SNAP participants, an additional $10 of monthly SNAP assistance was associated with lower odds of admission (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.93-0.93), and fewer days stay among those admitted (IRR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99). Providing SNAP to all 2012 sample nonparticipants could be associated with $34 million in cost savings in Maryland. CONCLUSIONS: SNAP is underutilized and may reduce costly nursing home use among high-risk older adults. This study has policy implications at the State and Federal levels which include expanding access to SNAP and enhancing SNAP amounts.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination/trends , Food Assistance/trends , Nursing Homes/trends , Patient Admission/trends , Poverty/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Eligibility Determination/economics , Female , Food Assistance/economics , Humans , Male , Maryland/epidemiology , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/trends , Medicare/economics , Medicare/trends , Nursing Homes/economics , Patient Admission/economics , Poverty/economics , United States/epidemiology
6.
Prev Med ; 91: 204-210, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27527573

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In 2009, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) implemented new food packages to improve dietary intake among WIC participants. This paper examines how the healthfulness of food purchases among low-income households changed following this reform. METHODS: Point-of-sale data for 2137 WIC-participating and 1303 comparison households were obtained from a regional supermarket chain. The healthfulness of purchased foods and beverages was determined per their saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content. A pre-post assessment (2009-2010) of the product basket healthfulness was completed using generalized estimating equation models. Data were analyzed in 2015. RESULTS: At baseline, healthy products accounted for most of the food volume purchased by WIC participants, but beverages were dominated by moderation (less healthy) items. With new subsidies for fruit, vegetables and whole grains, the WIC revisions increased the volume of healthy food purchases of WIC-participating households by 3.9% and reduced moderation foods by 1.8%. The biggest improvements were reductions in moderation beverages (down by 24.7% in volume), driven by milk fat restrictions in the WIC food package revisions. The healthfulness of the product basket increased post-WIC revisions; mainly due to a reduction in the volume of moderation food and beverages purchased (down by 15.5%) rather than growth in healthy products (up by 1.9%). No similar improvements were seen in a comparison group of low-income nonparticipants. CONCLUSIONS: After the WIC revisions, the healthfulness of participant purchases improved, particularly for beverages. Efforts to encourage healthy eating by people receiving federal food assistance are paying off.


Subject(s)
Beverages/statistics & numerical data , Food Assistance/trends , Nutrition Policy/trends , Food Assistance/economics , Fruit/economics , Humans , New England , Nutritive Value , Poverty , Vegetables/economics
7.
Food Nutr Bull ; 37 Suppl 1: S6-S13, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27005492

ABSTRACT

The United States has a long history of food assistance for humanitarian need. The Food for Peace Act of 1954 established the United States' permanent food assistance program which has fed over 3 billion people in 150 countries worldwide through thousands of partner organizations. In 60 years, the program has evolved and will continue to do so. Recently, the program has gone from a focus on quantity of food shipped to quality food assistance from improved products, programs, and processes to effectively meet the needs of different vulnerable groups. The current debate focuses on the appropriateness of using fortified blended foods to prevent and treat malnutrition during the first 1000 days of life. Dairy ingredients have been at the center of this debate; they were included initially in fortified blended, removed in the 1980s, and now reincorporated into fortified therapeutic and supplemental foods. Improved quality food baskets and effective nutrition programming to prevent and treat malnutrition were developed through multisectoral collaboration between government and nongovernment organizations. The US Agency for International Development has focused on improving nutrition through development programs often tied to health, education, and agriculture. The years since 2008 have been a particularly intense period for improvement. The Food Aid Quality Review was established to update current food aid programming products, program implementation, cost-effectiveness, and interagency processes. Trials are underway to harmonize the areas of multisectoral nutrition programming and gather more evidence on the effects of dairy ingredients in food aid products.


Subject(s)
Dairy Products , Food Assistance , Nutritive Value , Agriculture , Child, Preschool , Education , Food Assistance/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Assistance/trends , Food Quality , Food, Fortified , Health Promotion , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Malnutrition/prevention & control , Malnutrition/therapy , Nutritional Status , United States
8.
Am J Public Health ; 105(3): e63-5, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25602878

ABSTRACT

We examined the correlation between trends in meals provided through food pantries and long-term unemployment from 2002 through 2012. The New York State Hunger Prevention and Nutrition Assistance Program provided about 192 million meals through food pantries in 2012-double the number before the Great Recession. Annual food pantry use was strongly correlated with long-term unemployment and remained on an upward trend from 2006 through 2012, even after the Great Recession had ended. These findings suggest that efforts to reduce hunger and food insecurity should continue to be priorities.


Subject(s)
Food Assistance/economics , Food Services/economics , Food Supply/economics , Hunger , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data , Economic Recession/statistics & numerical data , Food Assistance/statistics & numerical data , Food Assistance/trends , Food Services/statistics & numerical data , Food Services/trends , Humans , New York , Regression Analysis
12.
Pediatrics ; 149(2)2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35039867

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is a federal program that improves the health of low-income women (pregnant and postpartum) and children up to 5 years of age in the United States. However, participation is suboptimal. We explored reasons for incomplete redemption of benefits and early dropout from WIC. METHODS: In 2020-2021, we conducted semistructured interviews to explore factors that influenced WIC program utilization among current WIC caregivers (n = 20) and caregivers choosing to leave while still eligible (n = 17) in Massachusetts. By using a deductive analytic approach, we developed a codebook grounded in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Themes across both current and early-leaving participants included positive feelings about social support from the WIC clinic staff and savings offered through the food package. Participants described reduced satisfaction related to insufficient funds for fruits and vegetables, food benefits inflexibility, concerns about in-clinic health tests, and in-store item mislabeling. Participants described how electronic benefit transfer cards and smartphone apps eased the use of benefits and reduced stigma during shopping. Some participants attributed leaving early to a belief that they were taking benefits from others. CONCLUSIONS: Current and early-leaving participants shared positive WIC experiences, but barriers to full participation exist. Food package modification may lead to improved redemption and retention, including increasing the cash value benefit for fruits and vegetables and diversifying food options. Research is needed regarding the misperception that participation means "taking" benefits away from someone else in need.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/trends , Food Assistance/standards , Food Assistance/trends , Poverty/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
14.
Pediatrics ; 147(2)2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33495370

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), one of the largest US safety net programs, was revised in 2009 to be more congruent with dietary guidelines. We hypothesize that this revision led to improvements in child development. METHODS: Data were drawn from a cohort of women and children enrolled in the Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood study from 2006 to 2011 (Shelby County, TN; N = 1222). Using quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis, we compared measures of growth, cognitive, and socioemotional development between WIC recipients and nonrecipients before and after the policy revision. RESULTS: The revised WIC food package led to increased length-for-age z scores at 12 months among infants whose mothers received the revised food package during pregnancy (ß = .33, 95% confidence interval: 0.05 to 0.61) and improved Bayley Scales of Infant Development cognitive composite scores at 24 months (ß = 4.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.11 to 7.57). We observed no effects on growth at age 24 months or age 4 to 6 years or cognitive development at age 4 to 6 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides some of the first evidence that children of mothers who received the revised WIC food package during pregnancy had improved developmental outcomes in the first 2 years of life. These findings highlight the value of WIC in improving early developmental outcomes among vulnerable children. The need to implement and expand policies supporting the health of marginalized groups has never been more salient, particularly given the nation's rising economic and social disparities.


Subject(s)
Child Development/physiology , Child Health/trends , Food Assistance/trends , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/trends , Adult , Child , Child Health/economics , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Food Assistance/economics , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Nutrition Policy/economics , Nutrition Policy/trends
16.
Food Nutr Bull ; 41(1): 8-17, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31514536

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Global food insecurity persists despite continued international attention, necessitating evidence-based food assistance interventions that adequately address nutritional concerns. In June 2018, the US Agency for International Development's Office of Food for Peace through the Food Aid Quality Review (FAQR) project sponsored a "Food Assistance for Nutrition Evidence Summit" to share evidence relevant to policy and programmatic decision-making and to identify critical evidence gaps. OBJECTIVE: This article presents 4 priority areas to advance nutrition in the international food assistance agenda generated through presentations and discussions with the food assistance community at the Evidence Summit. METHODS: Priority areas were identified after the Evidence Summit using a combination of FAQR team discussions, review of presentations and official notes, and supporting literature. RESULTS: Key priority areas to advance nutrition in the international food assistance agenda are as follows: (1) increase research funding for food assistance in all contexts, paying particular attention to emergency settings; (2) research and adopt innovative ingredients, technology, and delivery strategies in food assistance products and programs that encourage long-term well-being; (3) redefine and expand indicators of nutritional status to capture contextual information about the outcomes of food assistance interventions; and (4) augment communication and collaboration across the food assistance ecosystem. CONCLUSIONS: These priorities are critical in a time of increased humanitarian need and will be key to fostering long-term resilience among vulnerable groups.


Subject(s)
Food Assistance/trends , Global Health/trends , Health Priorities/trends , International Cooperation , Nutritional Sciences/trends , Congresses as Topic , Food Insecurity , Humans
17.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 49(1): 27-40, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31790646

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationships among participants' demographic, social, and health characteristics and positive screening scores for symptoms of postpartum depression (PPD); to examine the feasibility of referring to a case management program women with symptoms of PPD who are accessing Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) services; and to identify barriers to screening and treatment programs for women with symptoms of PPD. DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional study followed by a process evaluation. SETTING: Two WIC clinics in a large southeastern U.S. city. PARTICIPANTS: One group (n = 302) included women with infants younger than 12 months who were screened for symptoms of PPD. The second group (n = 31) included case managers (n = 7), nutritionists (n = 12), advisory board members (n = 7), and student volunteers (n = 5) who participated in focus groups. METHODS: We conducted an initial screening of women for symptoms of PPD using the two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2). Participants with scores of 2 or greater (n = 73) were asked to complete the nine-item PHQ (PHQ-9) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Participants were referred for case management services if they scored 10 or greater on the PHQ-9 or Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (n = 29) and agreed to the referral (n = 19). We transcribed and analyzed the qualitative data recorded during focus groups. RESULTS: Participants with no health insurance and limited support in caring for their infants were more likely to report symptoms of PPD. Overall, 302 women were screened for PPD, indicating the feasibility of PPD screening in WIC clinics. Of the 19 participants referred to case management, 47% (n = 9) accessed care. The results of focus groups illuminated barriers to screening and treatment programs for women at the individual, local, and macrosystem levels. CONCLUSION: Our findings show the feasibility of PPD screening in WIC clinics. However, some participants did not receive mental health services after referral because of various barriers, which highlights the need to integrate mental health providers into WIC clinics.


Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Food Assistance/trends , Mass Screening/methods , Referral and Consultation/trends , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities/organization & administration , Depression, Postpartum/psychology , Female , Food Assistance/organization & administration , Humans , Mass Screening/trends
18.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(6): e205824, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32589228

ABSTRACT

Importance: Increased work requirements have been proposed throughout federal safety net programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Participation in SNAP is associated with reduced food insecurity and improved health. Objectives: To determine whether SNAP work requirements are associated with lower rates of program participation and to examine whether there are racial/ethnic disparities or spillover effects for people with disabilities, who are not intended to be affected by work requirements. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationally representative, pooled cross-sectional study examined how changes in SNAP work requirements at state and local levels in the US are associated with changes in food voucher program participation. The study combined information on state and local SNAP work requirements with repeated cross-sections from the 2012 through 2017 American Community Survey (with outcomes covering 2013 to 2017). The analytical approaches were based on difference-in-difference and triple-difference methods, after controlling for other economic and social factors. The sample included low-income adults without dependents, stratified by racial/ethnic group and disability status. The study also included parents who would otherwise meet work requirement criteria as a comparison group to estimate triple-difference models. This accounted for otherwise unobserved factors affecting trends in SNAP participation within local areas. Data were analyzed from January 2019 through March 2020. Exposure: Residence in areas where SNAP work requirements apply. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome is SNAP participation measured by whether anyone in the household received food vouchers at any point over the prior 12 months. Results: The final analytical sample included 866 000 low-income adults (weighted mean [SE] age, 33.6 [0.01] years; 42.5% [SE, 0.07%] men). The racial/ethnic breakdown was 56.5% (SE, 0.07%) non-Hispanic white respondents, 19.4% (SE, 0.06%) non-Hispanic black respondents, 17.7% (SE, 0.06%) Hispanic respondents, 2.5% (SE, 0.02%) Asian respondents, and 3.9% (SE, 0.03%) respondents of other or multiple races. In final triple-difference models, work requirements were associated with a 4.0 percentage point decrease in participation (95% CI, -0.048 to -0.032; P < .001) for childless adults without disability, equivalent to a 21.2% reduction in SNAP participation (95% CI, -25.5% to -17.0%). For childless adults with disability, work requirements were associated with a 4.0 percentage point reduction (95% CI, -0.058 to -0.023; P < .001), equivalent to 7.8% fewer SNAP participants with disability (95% CI, -11.2% to -4.4%). When the final models were stratified by race/ethnicity, benefit reductions were larger for non-Hispanic black adults (7.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.092 to -0.051; P < .001) and Hispanic adults (5.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.072 to -0.038; P < .001) than for non-Hispanic white adults (2.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.035 to -0.016; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Because of the association of SNAP with food security and health, work requirements that lead to benefit loss may create nutritional and health harm for low-income Americans. These findings suggest that there may be racially disparate consequences and unintended harm for those with disability.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Employment/legislation & jurisprudence , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Food Assistance/statistics & numerical data , Food Assistance/trends , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family Characteristics , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Poverty , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , White People/statistics & numerical data
19.
Pediatrics ; 146(3)2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32859735

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Food insecurity has been associated with obesity, but previous studies are inconsistent and few included infants. We examined associations between household food security and infant adiposity and assessed the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as effect modifiers. We hypothesized that infants from food-insecure households would have greater adiposity, with attenuation by WIC and SNAP. METHODS: We repeatedly measured 666 infants from the southeastern United States in 2013-2017. We categorized households as high, marginal, low, or very low using the US Household Food Security Survey Module. Outcomes were BMI z score, subscapular and triceps skinfold-for-age z score, the sum of subscapular and triceps skinfolds, the ratio of subscapular and triceps skinfolds, and BMI z score ≥1 (at risk for overweight). We used covariate-adjusted repeated-measures linear and logistic regressions. RESULTS: Of infants, 68.6% were Black and 60.5% had household incomes <$20 000. Interactions between food security and WIC and/or SNAP were not significant. Compared with infants from high food security households, infants from very low food security households had higher BMI z scores (0.18 U; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 0.35), higher subscapular skinfold-for-age z scores (0.31 U; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.59), a higher sum of subscapular and triceps skinfolds (0.53 mm; 95% CI 0.002 to 1.07), and greater odds of being at risk for overweight (odds ratio 1.55; 95% CI 1.14 to 2.10). Infants from low food security households had greater odds of being at risk for overweight (odds ratio 1.72; 95% CI 1.17 to 2.10). CONCLUSIONS: In larger and longer studies, researchers should examine food security and adiposity in young children.


Subject(s)
Adiposity/physiology , Family Characteristics , Food Supply/economics , Nutrition Surveys/economics , Pediatric Obesity/economics , Pediatric Obesity/epidemiology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Food Assistance/economics , Food Assistance/trends , Humans , Infant , Male , Nutrition Surveys/trends , Pediatric Obesity/diagnosis , Southeastern United States/epidemiology
20.
Indian J Pediatr ; 86(6): 542-547, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30637675

ABSTRACT

The National Programme for Nutrition Support for Primary Education was initiated in 1995 with two major objectives: universalisation of primary education and improvement in nutritional status of primary school children. The Central Government provided 100 g of wheat /rice per day free of cost to children studying in classes I-V in all Government, local body and Government aided primary schools. Kerala, Orissa, Tamil Nadu, Chattisgarh and MP provided hot cooked meals using the cereals provided but all other states and UTs provided 3 kg cereals/month to children with 80% attendance. By 2001, over 100 million students in 7,92,000 schools were covered under the programme. There was some improvement in enrolment but the programme had no impact on classroom hunger. In 2001 the Supreme Court of India ruled that Mid-day meal (MDM) is a legal entitlement for all school children and that the government should provide a hot cooked mid-day meal for 200 d to all primary school children. In the last decade, universal primary education and MDM have been achieved. MDM is providing hot cooked meals every day to about 100 million children. Cereal content of MDM is adequate but pulse and vegetable content of MDM are inadequate; these lacunae have to be addressed. School health services in co-ordination with MDM can identify under-nourished, normal and over-nourished children by using Body mass index (BMI) for age, and provide appropriate counseling and care. If this practice is institutionalized and routinely followed, there can be substantial improvement in nutritional status of children.


Subject(s)
Food Assistance , School Health Services , Child , Food Assistance/trends , Forecasting , Humans , India , Nutritional Status , School Health Services/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL