Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 369
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
J Infect Dis ; 222(Suppl 5): S301-S311, 2020 09 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32877548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Persons who inject drugs (PWID) are at a disproportionately high risk of HIV infection. We aimed to determine the highest-valued combination implementation strategies to reduce the burden of HIV among PWID in 6 US cities. METHODS: Using a dynamic HIV transmission model calibrated for Atlanta, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, and Seattle, we assessed the value of implementing combinations of evidence-based interventions at optimistic (drawn from best available evidence) or ideal (90% coverage) scale-up. We estimated reduction in HIV incidence among PWID, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for each city (10-year implementation; 20-year horizon; 2018 $ US). RESULTS: Combinations that maximized health benefits contained between 6 (Atlanta and Seattle) and 12 (Miami) interventions with ICER values ranging from $94 069/QALY in Los Angeles to $146 256/QALY in Miami. These strategies reduced HIV incidence by 8.1% (credible interval [CI], 2.8%-13.2%) in Seattle and 54.4% (CI, 37.6%-73.9%) in Miami. Incidence reduction reached 16.1%-75.5% at ideal scale. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based interventions targeted to PWID can deliver considerable value; however, ending the HIV epidemic among PWID will require innovative implementation strategies and supporting programs to reduce social and structural barriers to care.


Subject(s)
Epidemics/prevention & control , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Preventive Medicine/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Adult , Cities/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Users/statistics & numerical data , Epidemics/economics , Epidemics/statistics & numerical data , Female , HIV Infections/economics , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , HIV Testing/economics , Health Care Costs , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Opiate Substitution Treatment/economics , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/economics , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/organization & administration , Prevalence , Preventive Medicine/organization & administration , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/economics , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Cancer ; 126 Suppl 10: 2379-2393, 2020 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32348566

ABSTRACT

When breast cancer is detected and treated early, the chances of survival are very high. However, women in many settings face complex barriers to early detection, including social, economic, geographic, and other interrelated factors, which can limit their access to timely, affordable, and effective breast health care services. Previously, the Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) developed resource-stratified guidelines for the early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. In this consensus article from the sixth BHGI Global Summit held in October 2018, the authors describe phases of early detection program development, beginning with management strategies required for the diagnosis of clinically detectable disease based on awareness education and technical training, history and physical examination, and accurate tissue diagnosis. The core issues address include finance and governance, which pertain to successful planning, implementation, and the iterative process of program improvement and are needed for a breast cancer early detection program to succeed in any resource setting. Examples are presented of implementation, process, and clinical outcome metrics that assist in program implementation monitoring. Country case examples are presented to highlight the challenges and opportunities of implementing successful breast cancer early detection programs, and the complex interplay of barriers and facilitators to achieving early detection for breast cancer in real-world settings are considered.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Health Plan Implementation/methods , Consensus , Delivery of Health Care , Developing Countries , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Female , Global Health , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Socioeconomic Factors
3.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 570, 2020 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32552763

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In principle, risk-stratification as a routine part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) should produce a better balance of benefits and harms. The main benefit is the offer of NICE-approved more frequent screening and/ or chemoprevention for women who are at increased risk, but are unaware of this. We have developed BC-Predict, to be offered to women when invited to NHSBSP which collects information on risk factors (self-reported information on family history and hormone-related factors via questionnaire; mammographic density; and in a sub-sample, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms). BC-Predict produces risk feedback letters, inviting women at high risk (≥8% 10-year) or moderate risk (≥5 to < 8% 10-year) to have discussion of prevention and early detection options at Family History, Risk and Prevention Clinics. Despite the promise of systems such as BC-Predict, there are still too many uncertainties for a fully-powered definitive trial to be appropriate or ethical. The present research aims to identify these key uncertainties regarding the feasibility of integrating BC-Predict into the NHSBSP. Key objectives of the present research are to quantify important potential benefits and harms, and identify key drivers of the relative cost-effectiveness of embedding BC-Predict into NHSBSP. METHODS: A non-randomised fully counterbalanced study design will be used, to include approximately equal numbers of women offered NHSBSP (n = 18,700) and BC-Predict (n = 18,700) from selected screening sites (n = 7). In the initial 8-month time period, women eligible for NHSBSP will be offered BC-Predict in four screening sites. Three screening sites will offer women usual NHSBSP. In the following 8-months the study sites offering usual NHSBSP switch to BC-Predict and vice versa. Key potential benefits including uptake of risk consultations, chemoprevention and additional screening will be obtained for both groups. Key potential harms such as increased anxiety will be obtained via self-report questionnaires, with embedded qualitative process analysis. A decision-analytic model-based cost-effectiveness analysis will identify the key uncertainties underpinning the relative cost-effectiveness of embedding BC-Predict into NHSBSP. DISCUSSION: We will assess the feasibility of integrating BC-Predict into the NHSBSP, and identify the main uncertainties for a definitive evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of BC-Predict. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04359420).


Subject(s)
Anxiety/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Child , Clinical Trials as Topic , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Mass Screening/psychology , Medical History Taking , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Program Evaluation , Risk Assessment/economics , Risk Assessment/methods , Self Report/statistics & numerical data , State Medicine/economics , State Medicine/organization & administration , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
Future Oncol ; 16(31): 2551-2567, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32715776

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide. The current COVID-19 pandemic represents an unprecedented challenge leading to care disruption, which is more severe in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) due to existing economic obstacles. This review presents the global perspective and preparedness plans for breast cancer continuum of care amid the COVID-19 outbreak and discusses challenges faced by LMIC in implementing these strategies. Prioritization and triage of breast cancer patients in a multidisciplinary team setting are of paramount importance. Deescalation of systemic and radiation therapy can be utilized safely in selected clinical scenarios. The presence of a framework and resource-adapted recommendations exploiting available evidence-based data with judicious personalized use of current resources is essential for breast cancer care in LMIC during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Health Resources/economics , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Clinical Decision-Making , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Developing Countries , Female , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Humans , Medical Oncology/economics , Medical Oncology/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Selection , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Triage/organization & administration , Triage/standards , Workforce/economics , Workforce/organization & administration
5.
J Asthma ; 57(8): 820-828, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31082287

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Asthma evidence-based interventions (EBI) are implemented in the home, school, community or primary care setting. Although families are engaged in one setting, they often have to navigate challenges in another setting.Objective: Our objective is to design and implement a comprehensive plan which integrates EBI's and connects the four sectors in underserved communities such as Philadelphia.Methods: September 2015-April 2016 we implemented a three-pronged strategy to understand needs and resources of the community including 1) focus groups and key informant interviews, 2) secondary data analysis and 3) pilot testing for implementation to determine gaps in care, and opportunities to overcome those gaps.Results: Analysis of the focus group and key informant responses showed themes: diagnosis fear, clinician time, home and school asthma trigger exposures, school personnel training and communication gaps across all four sectors. EBI's were evaluated and selected to address identified themes. Pilot testing of a community health worker (CHW) intervention to connect home, primary care and school resulted in an efficient transfer of asthma medications and medication administration forms to the school nurse office for students with uncontrolled asthma addressing a common delay leading to poor asthma management in school.Conclusion: Thus far there has been limited success in reducing asthma disparities for low-income minority children. This study offers hope that strategically positioning CHWs may work synergistically to close gaps in care and result in improved asthma control and reduced asthma disparities.


Subject(s)
Asthma/prevention & control , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Status Disparities , School Health Services/organization & administration , Adolescent , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/economics , Child , Child, Preschool , Community Health Services/economics , Evidence-Based Medicine/economics , Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Female , Focus Groups , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Income , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Minority Health/economics , Philadelphia , Pilot Projects , Qualitative Research , School Health Services/economics
6.
Mycoses ; 63(7): 746-754, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32358860

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We aimed to implement and to assess the impact of the antifungal stewardship programme (AFSp) on prescription appropriateness of antifungals, management and outcomes of candidaemia patients, and antifungal consumption and costs at our solid organ transplant (SOT) institute. METHODS: Local epidemiology of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) from 2009 to 2017 was analysed in order to prepare an effective AFSp, implemented in January 2018. It included suspension of empirical antifungal prescriptions after 72 hours (antifungal time-out), automated alert and infectious disease (ID) consult for empirical prescriptions and for every patient with IFI, and indication for step-down to oral fluconazole when possible. We used process measures and results measures to assess the effects of the implemented programme. RESULTS: The ASFp led to significant improvements in selection of the appropriate antifungal (40.5% in pre-AFS vs 78.6% in post-AFS), correct dosing (51.2% vs 79.8%), correct length of treatment (55.9% vs 75%) and better management of patients with candidaemia. Analysis of prescribed empirical antifungal revealed that defined daily doses (DDDs) per 100 patient days decreased by 36.7% in 2018 compared to the average of pre-AFSp period, with important savings in costs. CONCLUSION: This AFSp led to a better use of antifungal drugs in terms of appropriateness and consumption, with stable clinical and microbiological outcomes in patients with IFI.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Health Plan Implementation/methods , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy , Invasive Fungal Infections/epidemiology , Candidemia/drug therapy , Candidemia/epidemiology , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Organ Transplantation , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Program Evaluation , Prospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers
7.
J Health Polit Policy Law ; 45(5): 801-816, 2020 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32589221

ABSTRACT

The ACA created a new type of nonprofit health insurance entity, the "Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan" ("co-op"). Most of the newly created co-ops soon lost money, and only 4 of the original 23 remain. We interviewed key stakeholders and conducted in-depth case studies of 3 of these co-ops. We discovered that politicians and regulators made it unlikely the program could succeed, that most of the co-ops did not have the management capacity to overcome these political obstacles, and that even those with good managers lacked the needed fiscal resilience. We also considered lessons suggested for those proposing a newly created "public option." The main one is that a successful public option requires a supportive political environment, strong management, and significant fiscal capacity, none of which comes easily. A better route may be a quasi-public option in which the government subcontracts the operation of its newly created plan to a private firm. Although it is uncertain whether federal regulators have the capacity to hold such private for-profit firms accountable, pragmatism suggests that a combination of public-sector regulation and private-sector implementation may be the most direct path toward a US version of affordable universal coverage.


Subject(s)
Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Not-For-Profit Insurance Plans/organization & administration , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organization & administration , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Humans , Not-For-Profit Insurance Plans/economics , Private Sector , Public Sector , Risk Adjustment/economics , Risk Adjustment/organization & administration , United States
8.
Can J Surg ; 63(6): E542-E550, 2020 11 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33253512

ABSTRACT

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a global surgical qualityimprovement initiative. Little is known about the economic effects of implementing multiple ERAS guidelines in both the short and long term. Methods: We performed a return on investment (ROI) analysis of the implementation of multiple ERAS guidelines (for colorectal, pancreas, cystectomy, liver and gynecologic oncology procedures) across multiple sites (9 hospitals) in Alberta using 30-, 180- and 365-day time horizons. The effects of ERAS on health services utilization (length of stay of the primary admission, number of readmissions, length of stay of the readmissions, number of emergency department visits, number of outpatient clinic visits, number of specialist visits and number of general practitioner visits) were assessed by mixed-effect multilevel multivariate negative binomial regressions. Net benefits and ROI were estimated by a decision analytic modelling analysis. All costs were reported in 2019 Canadian dollars. Results: The net health system savings per patient ranged from $26.35 to $3606.44 and ROI ranged from 1.05 to 7.31, meaning that every dollar invested in ERAS brought $1.05 to $7.31 in return. Probabilities for ERAS to be cost-saving were from 86.5% to 99.9%. The effects of ERAS were found to be larger in the longer time horizons, indicating that if only the 30-day time horizon had been used, the benefits of ERAS would have been underestimated. Conclusion: These results demonstrated that ERAS multiguideline implementation was cost-saving in Alberta. To produce a better ROI, it is important to consider a broad range of health service utilizations, long-term impact, economies of scale, productive efficiency and allocative efficiency for sustainability, scale and spread of ERAS implementations.


Contexte: L'initiative de récupération améliorée après la chirurgie (RAAC) est un projet international d'amélioration de la qualité en chirurgie. On en sait peu sur les retombées économiques, tant à court qu'à long terme, de la mise en œuvre de multiples lignes directrices de RAAC. Méthodes: Nous avons réalisé une analyse du rendement sur l'investissement (RSI) visant la mise en œuvre de multiples lignes directrices de RAAC (pour les opérations colorectales, pancréatiques, hépatiques ou d'oncologie gynécologique et la cystectomie) dans 9 hôpitaux albertains sur un horizon temporel de 30, 180 et 365 jours. L'incidence de la RAAC sur l'utilisation des services de santé (durée du séjour à l'hospitalisation initiale, nombre de réadmissions, durée du séjour à la réhospitalisation et nombre de visites à l'urgence, en consultation externe, chez un spécialiste et chez un omnipraticien) a été évaluée à l'aide d'un modèle multiniveau de régressions binomiales négatives à effets mixtes multivariés. Les bénéfices nets et le RSI ont été estimés à l'aide d'un processus de modélisation analytique décisionnelle. Tous les coûts ont été rapportés en dollars canadiens de 2019. Résultats: Les économies nettes du système de santé allaient de 26,35 $ à 3606,44 $ par patient, et le RSI variait de 1,05 à 7,31; chaque dollar investi dans l'initiative de RAAC a donc généré un retour sur l'investissement de 1,05 $ à 7,31 $. Les probabilités d'économie grâce au RAAC allaient de 86,5% à 99,9%. Les retombées générées augmentaient avec un horizon temporel à plus long terme, ce qui suggère que l'utilisation unique d'un horizon temporel de 30 jours aurait mené à une sousestimation des bénéfices. Conclusion: Les résultats montrent que la mise en œuvre de multiples lignes directrices de RAAC a permis des économies en Alberta. En vue d'obtenir un RSI optimal, il est important de tenir compte d'une grande variété d'utilisations des services de santé, des retombées à long terme, des économies d'échelle, de l'efficacité productive et de l'efficience des allocations pour la pérennité, la mise à l'échelle et la diffusion des projets de mise en œuvre de RAAC.


Subject(s)
Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Enhanced Recovery After Surgery/standards , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Surgical Procedures, Operative/rehabilitation , Aged , Alberta/epidemiology , Cost Savings/economics , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/economics , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects
9.
PLoS Med ; 16(4): e1002788, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31039158

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) still represents a major public health problem in Latin America, with low success and high default rates. Poor adherence represents a major threat for TB control and promotes emergence of drug-resistant TB. Expanding social protection programs could have a substantial effect on the global burden of TB; however, there is little evidence to evaluate the outcomes of socioeconomic support interventions. This study evaluated the effect of a conditional cash transfer (CCT) policy on treatment success and default rates in a prospective cohort of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data were collected on adult patients with first diagnosis of pulmonary TB starting treatment in public healthcare facilities (HCFs) from 16 health departments with high TB burden in Buenos Aires who were followed until treatment completion or abandonment. The main exposure of interest was the registration to receive the CCT. Other covariates, such as sociodemographic and clinical variables and HCFs' characteristics usually associated with treatment adherence and outcomes, were also considered in the analysis. We used hierarchical models, propensity score (PS) matching, and inverse probability weighting (IPW) to estimate treatment effects, adjusting for individual and health system confounders. Of 941 patients with known CCT status, 377 registered for the program showed significantly higher success rates (82% versus 69%) and lower default rates (11% versus 20%). After controlling for individual and system characteristics and modality of treatment, odds ratio (OR) for success was 2.9 (95% CI 2, 4.3, P < 0.001) and default was 0.36 (95% CI 0.23, 0.57, P < 0.001). As this is an observational study evaluating an intervention not randomly assigned, there might be some unmeasured residual confounding. Although it is possible that a small number of patients was not registered into the program because they were deemed not eligible, the majority of patients fulfilled the requirements and were not registered because of different reasons. Since the information on the CCT was collected at the end of the study, we do not know the exact timing for when each patient was registered for the program. CONCLUSIONS: The CCT appears to be a valuable health policy intervention to improve TB treatment outcomes. Incorporating these interventions as established policies may have a considerable effect on the control of TB in similar high-burden areas.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Health Policy , Public Policy , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antitubercular Agents/economics , Argentina/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/standards , Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data , Health Policy/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Psychosocial Support Systems , Public Policy/economics , Remuneration , Socioeconomic Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tuberculosis/economics , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
10.
Liver Transpl ; 25(5): 787-796, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30758901

ABSTRACT

End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of PC providers improves patient satisfaction, and evidence from other chronic diseases demonstrates reduced costs of care and potentially increased survival. Better integration of PC is imperative but hindered by patient and provider misconceptions about its role in the care of patients with ESLD, specifically among candidates for liver transplantation. Additionally, reimbursement barriers and lack of provider knowledge may contribute to PC underutilization. In this review, we discuss the benefits of PC in ESLD, the variability of its delivery, and key stakeholders' perceptions about its use. Additionally, we identify barriers to more widespread PC adoption and highlight areas for future research.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , End Stage Liver Disease/therapy , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Palliative Care/organization & administration , End Stage Liver Disease/diagnosis , End Stage Liver Disease/economics , End Stage Liver Disease/mortality , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/trends , Humans , Liver Transplantation , Palliative Care/economics , Palliative Care/trends , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/organization & administration , Reimbursement Mechanisms/trends , Severity of Illness Index , Stakeholder Participation , Waiting Lists
11.
Sex Transm Dis ; 46(8): 502-506, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31295216

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medicaid expansion has led to unique opportunities for sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics to improve the sustainability of services by billing insurance. We evaluated changes in patient visits after the implementation of insurance billing at a STD clinic in a Medicaid expansion state. METHODS: The Rhode Island STD Clinic offered HIV/STD screening services at no cost to patients until October 2016, when insurance billing was implemented. Care for uninsured patients was still provided for free. We compared the clinic visits in the preinsurance period with the postinsurance period using t-tests, Poisson regressions, and a logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 5560 patients were seen during the preinsurance (n = 2555) and postinsurance (n = 3005) periods. Compared with the preinsurance period, the postinsurance period had a significantly higher average number of patient visits/month (212.9 vs. 250.4, P = 0.0016), including among patients who were black (36.8 vs. 50.3, P = 0.0029), Hispanic/Latino (50.8 vs. 65.8, P = 0.0018), and insured (106.3 vs. 130.1, P = 0.0025). The growth rate of uninsured (+0.10 vs. +4.11, P = 0.0026) and new patients (-4.28 vs. +1.07, P = 0.0007) also increased between the two periods. New patients whose first visit was before the billing change had greater odds (adjusted odds ratio, 2.68, 95% confidence interval, 2.09-3.44; P < 0.0001) of returning compared with new patients whose first visit was after the billing change. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of insurance billing at a publicly funded STD clinic, with free services provided to uninsured individuals, was associated with a modest increase in patient visits and a decline in patients returning for second visits.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care/psychology , Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance Coverage/economics , Insurance, Health/economics , Male , Sexual and Gender Minorities/statistics & numerical data , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , United States
12.
Transfusion ; 59(9): 2840-2848, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31222775

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are among the highest consumers of allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (PLT) components. The impact of patient blood management (PBM) efforts on HSCT recipients is poorly understood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This observational study assessed changes in blood product use and patient-centered outcomes before and after implementing a multidisciplinary PBM program for patients undergoing HSCT at a large academic medical center. The pre-PBM cohort was treated from January 1 through September 31, 2013; the post-PBM cohort was treated from January 1 through September 31, 2015. RESULTS: We identified 708 patients; 284 of 352 (80.7%) in the pre-PBM group and 225 of 356 (63.2%) in the post-PBM group received allogeneic RBCs (p < 0.001). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) RBC volumes were higher before PBM than after PBM (3 [2-4] units vs. 2 [1-4] units; p = 0.004). A total of 259 of 284 pre-PBM patients (91.2%) and 57 of 225 (25.3%) post-PBM patients received RBC transfusions when hemoglobin levels were more than 7 g/dL (p < 0.001). The median (IQR) PLT transfusion quantities was 3 (2-5) units for pre-PBM patients and 2 (1-4) units for post-PBM patients (p < 0.001). For patients with PLT counts of more than 10 × 109 /L, a total of 1219 PLT units (73.4%) were transfused before PBM and 691 units (48.8%) were transfused after PBM (p < 0.001). Estimated transfusion expenditures were reduced by $617,152 (18.3%). We noted no differences in clinical outcomes or transfusion-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Patient blood management implementation for HSCT recipients was associated with marked reductions in allogeneic RBC and PLT transfusions and decreased transfusion-related costs with no detrimental impact on clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Blood Safety , Health Plan Implementation , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Aged , Blood Safety/adverse effects , Blood Safety/economics , Blood Safety/methods , Blood Safety/standards , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Erythrocyte Transfusion/adverse effects , Erythrocyte Transfusion/economics , Erythrocyte Transfusion/standards , Erythrocyte Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Health Plan Implementation/standards , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission/economics , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Outcome Assessment , Patient Readmission/economics , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety/economics , Patient Safety/standards , Platelet Transfusion/adverse effects , Platelet Transfusion/economics , Platelet Transfusion/methods , Platelet Transfusion/standards , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Tertiary Care Centers/standards , Transfusion Reaction/economics , Transfusion Reaction/epidemiology , Transfusion Reaction/therapy
13.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 21(6): e13175, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31539459

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic allergy de-labeling using penicillin allergy skin testing (PAST) can reduce the use and cost of alternative, non-ß-lactam antibiotics in general inpatient populations. This strategy's role in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients is unclear. METHODS: This study aimed to determine the effect of a pre-transplant PAST protocol on antibiotic use, days of therapy (DOT), and cost in an immunocompromised population at a single center from 7/1/2010-2/1/2019. Patients who received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and those who underwent transplantation in the outpatient setting were excluded. RESULTS: Of 1560 patients who underwent inpatient HSCT during the study period, 208 reported ß-lactam allergy (136/844 [16%] pre- and 72/716 [10%] post-implementation; P < .001). PAST was performed on 7% and 54% of HSCT recipients pre- and post-implementation, respectively. Only two positive PAST were noted. There were no adverse reactions to PAST. There were no significant differences in the disease and transplant characteristics between the two groups. Days of therapy and cost of alternative antibiotics significantly decreased post-implementation (mean 788 vs 627 days, P = .01; mean $24 425 vs $17 518, P = .009). CONCLUSION: Penicillin allergy skin testing adjudicates reported ß-lactam allergy in HSCT recipients, lowering use, DOT, and cost of alternative antibiotics and promoting effective formulary agents to treat immunocompromised HSCT recipients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Penicillins/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Antimicrobial Stewardship/economics , Antimicrobial Stewardship/standards , Clostridioides difficile/immunology , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/immunology , Drug Costs , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Female , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Penicillins/administration & dosage , Penicillins/economics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , Skin Tests/economics , Young Adult
14.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 557, 2019 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31088443

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, the rate of cesarean delivery increased dramatically in rural China under the fee-for-service (FFS) system. In September 2011, the New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) agency in Yong'an county in Fujian province of China adopted a policy of reforming payment for childbirth by transforming the FFS payment into episode-based bundled payment (EBP), which made the cesarean deliveries less profitable. Thus, this study was conducted to determine the effect of EBP policy on reducing cesarean use and controlling delivery costs for rural patients in the NCMS. METHODS: Data from the inpatient information database of the NCMS agency from January 2010 to March 2013 was collected, in which Yong'an county was employed as a reform county and 2 other counties as controls. We investigated the effects of EBP on cesarean delivery rate, costs of childbirth and readmission for rural patients in the NCMS using a natural experiment design and difference in differences (DID) analysis method. RESULTS: The EBP reform was associated with 33.97% (p<0.01) decrease in the probability of cesarean delivery. The EBP reform, on average, reduced the total spending per admission, government reimbursement expenses per admission, and out-of-pocket (OOP) payments per admission by ¥ 649.61, ¥ 575.01, and ¥ 74.59, respectively. The OOP payments had a net decrease of 14.24% (p<0.01); whereas the OOP payments as a share of total spending had a net increase of 8.72% (p<0.01). There was no evidence of increase in readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the EBP policy has achieved at least a short-term success in lowering the increase of cesarean delivery rate and costs of childbirth. Considering both the cesarean rate and the OOP payments as a share of total spending after the reform were still high, China still has a long way to go to achieve the ideal level of cesarean rate and improve the benefits of deliveries for rural population.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/economics , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Policy/economics , Patient Readmission/economics , Adult , China/epidemiology , Compensation and Redress , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data
15.
Matern Child Health J ; 23(5): 623-632, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30600516

ABSTRACT

Objectives We aimed to examine the extent to which health plan expenditures for infertility services differed by whether women resided in states with mandates requiring coverage of such services and by whether coverage was provided through a self-insured plan subject to state mandates versus fully-insured health plans subject only to federal regulation. Methods This retrospective cohort study used individual-level, de-identified health insurance claims data. We included women 19-45 years of age who were continuously enrolled during 2011 and classified them into three mutually exclusive groups based on highest treatment intensity: in vitro fertilization (IVF), intrauterine insemination (IUI), or ovulation-inducing (OI) medications. Using generalized linear models, we estimated adjusted annual mean, aggregate, and per member per month (PMPM) expenditures among women in states with an infertility insurance mandate and those in states without a mandate, stratified by enrollment in a fully-insured or self-insured health plan. Results Of the 6,006,017 women continuously enrolled during 2011, 9199 (0.15%) had claims for IVF, 10,112 (0.17%) had claims for IUI, and 23,739 (0.40%) had claims for OI medications. Among women enrolled in fully insured plans, PMPM expenditures for infertility treatment were 3.1 times higher for those living in states with a mandate compared with states without a mandate. Among women enrolled in self-insured plans, PMPM infertility treatment expenditures were 1.2 times higher for mandate versus non-mandate states. Conclusions for Practice Recorded infertility treatment expenditures were higher in states with insurance reimbursement mandates versus those without mandates, with most of the difference in expenditures incurred by fully-insured plans.


Subject(s)
Fertility Agents/economics , Government Programs/economics , Adult , Female , Government Programs/methods , Government Programs/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/trends , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/methods , Humans , Infertility/drug therapy , Infertility/economics , Insurance Coverage/standards , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , State Government , United States
16.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 32(5): 643-648, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31356361

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the safety and feasibility of outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) from the perspectives of short-term complications, long-term functional outcomes, patient satisfaction and financial impact, and to provide evidence-based guidance on how to establish an outpatient TJA programme. RECENT FINDINGS: TJA has been recently transitioned from an exclusively inpatient procedure for all Medicare and Medicaid patients to an outpatient surgery in properly selected total knee arthroplasty patients. This change may decrease costs while maintaining comparable rates of readmission, adverse events, positive surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. SUMMARY: With a standardized clinical pathway, outpatient TJA can be safe and effective in a subset of patients. Essential components of a successful outpatient TJA programme include proper patient selection, preoperative patient/family education, perioperative multidisciplinary coordination and opioid-sparing analgesia, and early and effective postdischarge planning. More studies are needed to further assess and optimize this new care paradigm.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics , Critical Pathways/economics , Feasibility Studies , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Humans , Length of Stay , Medicaid/economics , Medicare/economics , Patient Education as Topic/economics , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Patient Readmission/economics , Patient Satisfaction , Patient Selection , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Program Evaluation , Treatment Outcome , United States
17.
Cancer ; 124(21): 4121-4129, 2018 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30359468

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that fecal immunochemical test (FIT) mailing programs are effective for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The objectives of the current study were to assess the magnitude of uptake that could be achieved with a mailed FIT program in a federally qualified health center and whether such a program can be implemented at a reasonable cost to support sustainability. METHODS: The Washington State Department of Health's partner HealthPoint implemented a direct-mail FIT program at 9 medical clinics, along with a follow-up reminder letter and automated telephone calls to those not up-to-date with recommended screening. Supplemental outreach events at selected medical clinics and a 50th birthday card screening reminder program also were implemented. The authors collected and analyzed process, effectiveness, and cost measures and conducted a systematic assessment of the short-term cost effectiveness of the interventions. RESULTS: Overall, 5178 FIT kits were mailed with 4009 follow-up reminder letters, and 8454 automated reminder telephone calls were made over 12 months. In total, 1607 FIT kits were returned within 3 months of the end of the implementation period: an overall return rate of 31% for the mailed FIT program. The average total intervention cost per FIT kit returned was $39.81, and the intervention implementation cost per kit returned was $18.76. CONCLUSIONS: The mailed FIT intervention improved CRC screening uptake among HealthPoint's patient population. This intervention was implemented for less than $40 per individual successfully screened. The findings and lessons learned can assist other clinics that serve disadvantaged populations to increase their CRC screening adherence.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Health Promotion , Mass Screening , Accreditation/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Feces , Federal Government , Female , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Health Plan Implementation/standards , Health Promotion/economics , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Health Promotion/standards , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Mass Screening/standards , Middle Aged , Occult Blood , Postal Service , Program Evaluation , Washington/epidemiology
18.
Cancer ; 124(21): 4154-4162, 2018 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30359464

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multicomponent, evidence-based interventions are viewed increasingly as essential for increasing the use of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to meet national targets. Multicomponent interventions involve complex care pathways and interactions across multiple levels, including the individual, health system, and community. METHODS: The authors developed a framework and identified metrics and data elements to evaluate the implementation processes, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of multicomponent interventions used in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program. RESULTS: Process measures to evaluate the implementation of interventions to increase community and patient demand for CRC screening, increase patient access, and increase provider delivery of services are presented. In addition, performance measures are identified to assess implementation processes along the continuum of care for screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Series of intermediate and long-term outcome and cost measures also are presented to evaluate the impact of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the effectiveness of multicomponent, evidence-based interventions and identifying successful approaches that can be replicated in other settings are essential to increase screening and reduce CRC burden. The use of common framework, data elements, and evaluation methods will allow the performance of comparative assessments of the interventions implemented across CRCCP sites to identify best practices for increasing colorectal screening, particularly among underserved populations, to reduce disparities in CRC incidence and mortality.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Evidence-Based Practice , Mass Screening , Program Evaluation/methods , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Evidence-Based Practice/economics , Evidence-Based Practice/methods , Evidence-Based Practice/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Practice/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Health Plan Implementation/standards , Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data , Health Promotion/economics , Health Promotion/methods , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Health Promotion/standards , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Mass Screening/standards , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Models, Econometric , National Health Programs/economics , National Health Programs/organization & administration , National Health Programs/standards
19.
Cancer ; 124(18): 3733-3741, 2018 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30320429

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) endorses routine screening for genetic risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer as a component of primary health care. Implementation of this recommendation may prove challenging, especially in clinics serving disadvantaged communities. METHODS: The authors tested the feasibility of implementing the USPSTF mandate at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) to identify women who were eligible for genetic counseling (GC). A 12-month usual-care phase was followed by a 12-month intervention phase, during which time cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) was systematically performed for all women aged 25 to 69 years who presented for an annual examination. Women who were eligible for GC were recruited to participate in the study. RESULTS: After initiating CGRA, 112 women who were eligible for GC consented to study participation, and 56% of them received a referral for GC from their primary care physician. A subgroup of 50 participants were seen by the same primary care physician during both the usual-care and intervention phases. None of these patients was referred for GC during usual care, compared with 64% after the initiation of CGRA (P < .001). Only 16% of referred participants attended a GC session. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing USPSTF recommendations for CGRA as a standard component of primary health care in FQHCs is feasible and improves referral of minority women for GC, but more work is needed to understand the beliefs and barriers that prevent many underserved women from accessing cancer genetic services.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Genetic Testing , Health Plan Implementation , Physicians, Primary Care/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Chicago/epidemiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Financing, Government , Genetic Counseling/economics , Genetic Counseling/organization & administration , Genetic Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Genetic Testing/economics , Genetic Testing/methods , Genetic Testing/statistics & numerical data , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Physicians, Primary Care/economics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Health Services/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Program Evaluation , Referral and Consultation/economics , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Risk Assessment , United States/epidemiology
20.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 73(11): 3181-3188, 2018 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30085088

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT). A registered nurse (RN)-managed multidisciplinary team OPAT model was implemented at our hospital. We evaluated the impact of the new OPAT model on readmissions during OPAT and other core OPAT processes. Methods: All potential OPAT cases from 1 November 2013 to 31 June 2017 discharged from the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center were followed up in a retrospective cohort study. Relevant clinical and patient characteristics were collected for the first OPAT course per patient. The primary outcome was all-cause readmission to any facility part of the Johns Hopkins Health System within 30 days of OPAT discharge. Proportions of OPAT patients readmitted before and after the implementation of the new OPAT model were compared. A log-binomial regression was used to compare the risk of readmission, adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, site of OPAT care, opioid dependence and OPAT treatment duration. Results: Five hundred and seventeen OPAT patients were included in the analysis; 51.1% were discharged after the implementation of the new OPAT model. Readmission rates decreased from 20.2% to 13.3% following the RN-managed OPAT programme (P = 0.04). The results of the adjusted model indicated that nurse management was associated with a 39% reduction in the risk of readmission (adjusted relative risk 0.61; 95% CI 0.41-0.91; P = 0.01). Our financial evaluation estimated that the reduction in readmissions achieved by the RN-managed model saved the hospital $649 416 over 15 months. Conclusions: The RN-managed OPAT programme was associated with a significant reduction in readmissions.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cost Savings , Infusions, Parenteral/economics , Nurses , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Baltimore , Case-Control Studies , Female , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infusions, Parenteral/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission/economics , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL