ABSTRACT
AIMS: Sevelamer is a phosphate-binding resin implicated in gastrointestinal (GI) injury. This study aimed to investigate the role of sevelamer in GI injury among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 17 CKD patients (cases) with and 18 CKD patients (comparisons) without sevelamer crystals in specimens. All cases were on sevelamer. Six comparison patients were also taking sevelamer, but crystals were absent in tissue sections. The comparison group was thus subclassified into patients who were and were not taking sevelamer. The frequency of underlying disorders was similar between two groups, including hypertension (cases = 82%; comparisons = 78%) and diabetes mellitus (cases = 53%, comparisons = 50%). The most common presentation was GI bleeding (cases = 41%, comparisons = 33%). Predominant histological patterns were also similar, with ulcers (cases = 42%; comparisons = 39%) and acute ischaemia (cases = 35%; comparisons = 28%) being predominant in both cohorts. Of note, sevelamer was present with amyloidosis and cytomegalovirus in one study case each. Two study patients who continued sevelamer had follow-up biopsies; one showed persistent ulceration and the other appeared normal. Crystals were absent in both. CONCLUSIONS: GI injury in CKD patients in both groups had similar features regardless of presence of sevelamer, suggesting that it adheres to tissue rather than causes injury. The study highlights other histologically identifiable causes of intestinal injury, as well as injuries unassociated with sevelamer in patients undergoing therapy. Therefore, physicians should be cautious in attributing GI injuries to sevelamer to avoid overlooking other causes and unnecessary treatment discontinuation.
Subject(s)
Chelating Agents , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Sevelamer/adverse effects , Chelating Agents/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , BiopsyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Case reports have suggested a causative role between sevelamer use and subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), but no large observational studies have evaluated this association. METHODS: Using the United States Renal Data System database from 2015 to 2019, we examined the association between initiation of sevelamer (vs. non-sevelamer containing phosphate binders) and GIB hospitalization as well as all-cause mortality among individuals on hemodialysis. We emulated a target trial using Cox regression models and inverse probability of treatment weights to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) across outcomes and subgroups. RESULTS: Among 21,354 new users of phosphate binders (11,276 sevelamer and 10,078 non-sevelamer) with baseline lab data (calcium, phosphorus, hemoglobin, and albumin), there were 2,811 GIB hospitalizations and 5,920 deaths after a median follow-up of 1.3 years. Compared with the initiation of non-sevelamer binders, sevelamer was not associated with an increased risk of GIB hospitalization (89 vs. 90 events per 1,000 person-years; IPTW-HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.91-1.06) or all-cause mortality (220 vs. 224 events per 1,000 person-years; IPTW-HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93-1.03). Subgroup analyses (such as diabetes and anti-coagulation use) were generally consistent, and there was no association between sevelamer dose and GIB hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Among patients requiring hemodialysis, sevelamer (vs. non-sevelamer) containing phosphate binders was not associated with increased risk of GIB hospitalization.
Subject(s)
Chelating Agents , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Hospitalization , Renal Dialysis , Sevelamer , Humans , Sevelamer/adverse effects , Sevelamer/therapeutic use , Sevelamer/administration & dosage , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Male , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Aged , Chelating Agents/therapeutic use , Chelating Agents/adverse effects , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Hyperphosphatemia/drug therapyABSTRACT
AIM: Bile acid sequestrants are cholesterol-lowering drugs, which also improve glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes. The mechanism behind the glucose-lowering effect is unknown but has been proposed to be mediated by increased glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion. Here, we investigated the glucose-lowering effects of sevelamer including any contribution from GLP-1 in people with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 15 people with type 2 diabetes on metformin monotherapy underwent two 17-day treatment periods with the bile acid sequestrant sevelamer and placebo, respectively, in a randomized order and with an interposed wash-out period of minimum 6 weeks. On days 15 and 17 of each treatment period, participants underwent experimental days with 4-h liquid meal tests and application of concomitant infusion of exendin(9-39)NH2 or saline. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, sevelamer improved insulin sensitivity (assessed by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance) and beta-cell sensitivity to glucose and lowered fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentrations. In both treatment periods, exendin(9-39)NH2 increased postprandial glucose excursions compared with saline but without absolute or relative difference between the two treatment periods. In contrast, exendin(9-39)NH2 abolished the sevelamer-induced improvement in beta-cell glucose sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The bile acid sequestrant sevelamer improved insulin sensitivity and beta-cell sensitivity to glucose, but using the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39)NH2 we were not able to detect a GLP-1-mediated glucose-lowering effect of sevelamer in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Nevertheless, the sevelamer-induced improvement of beta-cell sensitivity to glucose was shown to be GLP-1-dependent.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Insulin Resistance , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Sevelamer/pharmacology , Sevelamer/therapeutic use , Cross-Over Studies , Blood Glucose , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 , Glucose/therapeutic use , Amines/therapeutic use , Bile Acids and Salts , Insulin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is positively associated with mortality. Ferric citrate is a potent phosphorus binder that lowers serum phosphorus level and improves iron metabolism. We compared its efficacy and safety with active drugs in Chinese CKD patients with hemodialysis. METHODS: Chinese patients undergoing hemodialysis were randomized into two treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio, receiving either ferric citrate or sevelamer carbonate, respectively, for 12 weeks. Serum phosphorus levels, calcium concentration, and iron metabolism parameters were evaluated every 2 weeks. Frequency and severity of adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: 217 (90.4%) patients completed the study with balanced demographic and baseline characteristics between two groups. Ferric citrate decreased the serum phosphorus level to 0.59 ± 0.54 mmol/L, comparable to 0.56 ± 0.62 mmol/L by sevelamer carbonate. There was no significant difference between two groups (p > 0.05) in the proportion of patients with serum phosphorus levels reaching the target range, the response rate to the study drug, and the changes of corrected serum calcium concentrations, and intact-PTH levels at the end of treatment. The change of iron metabolism indicators in the ferric citrate group was significantly higher than those in the sevelamer carbonate group. There are 47 (40.5%) patients in the ferric citrate group, and 26 (21.3%) patients in the sevelamer carbonate group experienced drug-related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs); most were mild and tolerable. Common drug-related TEAEs were gastrointestinal disorders, including diarrhea (12.9 vs. 2.5%), fecal discoloration (14.7 vs. 0%), and constipation (1.7 vs. 7.4%) in ferric citrate and sevelamer carbonate group. CONCLUSION: Ferric citrate capsules have good efficacy and safety in the control of hyperphosphatemia in adult patients with CKD undergoing hemodialysis. Efficacy is not inferior to sevelamer carbonate. The TEAEs were mostly mild and tolerated by the patients.
Subject(s)
Hyperphosphatemia , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Adult , Humans , Hyperphosphatemia/drug therapy , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Sevelamer/adverse effects , Calcium , Chelating Agents/adverse effects , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Ferric Compounds/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Phosphorus , Iron/therapeutic use , ChinaABSTRACT
To describe the association between levels of homocitrulline (HCit) and the degree of albumin carbamylation in a cohort of hemodialyzed patients. Plasma total and protein-bound HCit concentrations in samples from hemodialyzed patients included in NICOREN trial were determined by LC-MS/MS at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment with either sevelamer or nicotinamide. HCit concentrations at all timepoints and in both groups were positively and significantly correlated with the degree of albumin carbamylation. Plasma concentrations of total HCit, protein-bound HCit and carbamylated albumin did not decrease after 24 weeks of treatment with either sevelamer or nicotinamide. The present results demonstrate that plasma total and protein-bound HCit concentrations were closely associated with albumin carbamylation in hemodialyzed patients. Therefore, total and protein-bound HCit concentrations might be valuable biomarkers of the overall intensity of protein carbamylation in this context. Given the less complex and time-consuming analytical methods required, these markers should be favored in future clinical studies of carbamylation reaction.
Subject(s)
Protein Carbamylation , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Humans , Albumins , Biomarkers , Chromatography, Liquid , Niacinamide , SevelamerABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Benefits of phosphate-lowering interventions on clinical outcomes in patients with CKD are unclear; systematic reviews have predominantly involved patients on dialysis. This study aimed to summarize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning benefits and risks of noncalcium-based phosphate-lowering treatment in nondialysis CKD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of RCTs involving noncalcium-based phosphate-lowering therapy compared with placebo, calcium-based binders, or no study medication, in adults with CKD not on dialysis or post-transplant. RCTs had ≥3 months follow-up and outcomes included biomarkers of mineral metabolism, cardiovascular parameters, and adverse events. Outcomes were meta-analyzed using the Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects. Unstandardized mean differences were used as effect sizes for continuous outcomes with common measurement units and Hedge's g standardized mean differences (SMD) otherwise. Odds ratios were used for binary outcomes. Cochrane risk of bias and GRADE assessment determined the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: In total, 20 trials involving 2498 participants (median sample size 120, median follow-up 9 months) were eligible for inclusion. Overall, risk of bias was low. Compared with placebo, noncalcium-based phosphate binders reduced serum phosphate (12 trials, weighted mean difference -0.37; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.15 mg/dl, low certainty evidence) and urinary phosphate excretion (eight trials, SMD -0.61; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.31, low certainty evidence), but resulted in increased constipation (nine trials, log odds ratio [OR] 0.93; 95% CI, 0.02 to 1.83, low certainty evidence) and greater vascular calcification score (three trials, SMD, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.77, very low certainty evidence). Data for effects of phosphate-lowering therapy on cardiovascular events (log OR, 0.51; 95% CI, -0.51 to 1.17) and death were scant. CONCLUSIONS: Noncalcium-based phosphate-lowering therapy reduced serum phosphate and urinary phosphate excretion, but there was an unclear effect on clinical outcomes and intermediate cardiovascular end points. Adequately powered RCTs are required to evaluate benefits and risks of phosphate-lowering therapy on patient-centered outcomes.
Subject(s)
Hyperphosphatemia/prevention & control , Phosphates/metabolism , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Chelating Agents/therapeutic use , Ferric Compounds/therapeutic use , Humans , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Lanthanum/therapeutic use , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/metabolism , Sevelamer/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Sevelamer hydrochloride (SH) and calcium carbonate (CaCO3) are two agents included in the phosphate-binding group which are frequently prescribed in the treatment of patients with hyperphosphatemia. However, there are no satisfactory studies on the genotoxic effects of SH in vitro. This study was conducted to reveal the genotoxic and/or cytotoxic potential of these two drugs in cultured human peripheral lymphocytes. Human peripheral lymphocytes were treated with SH and CaCO3 at sublethal concentrations for 24 or 48 h for micronucleus assay and 1 h in the comet assay. CaCO3 and SH stimulated a slight increase in micronucleus formation however this increase was not significant compared to the control group. According to the findings of the comet test, only one concentration of the SH caused significant DNA damage (2 mg/ml, 48 h) whereas CaCO3 did not cause important DNA breakage. No significant oxidative damage or anti-radical effect caused by test substances was observed on the pure pBR322 plasmid DNA in a cell-free medium. Also, it was found that the drugs were devoid of mutagenic activity in the Ames test, but had a weak cytotoxic effect. Both test substances, particularly SH, significantly reduced the nuclear division index compared to the control group. In conclusion, the cytotoxic effect of SH was evident on the basis of in vitro tests and slightly higher than CaCO3.
Subject(s)
Hyperphosphatemia , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Humans , Sevelamer/pharmacology , Sevelamer/therapeutic use , Hyperphosphatemia/drug therapy , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Calcium Carbonate/therapeutic use , Phosphates/therapeutic use , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/drug therapy , Polyamines/therapeutic use , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , CalciumABSTRACT
This study was designed to examine the relative safety and efficacy of sevelamer in the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in comparison to placebo, calcium carbonate (CC), or lanthanum carbonate (LC). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched for articles published through 18 June 2022. The quality of relevant studies was independently analyzed by two investigators who also extracted data from these manuscripts as per Cochrane Collaboration Handbook 5.3. The safety and efficacy of sevelamer as a treatment for hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients were then examined through a meta-analysis, with the primary patient-level outcomes of interest in this analysis being all-cause mortality and the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects. Vascular calcification score was also examined as an intermediate outcome, while serum biochemical parameters including levels of phosphate (P), calcium (Ca), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), lipids, C-reactive protein (CRP), or fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) were additionally assessed. In total, this meta-analysis incorporated data from 34 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling 2802 patients. Sevelamer was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.28, CI 0.19 - 0.41, very low certainty) and Vessel calcification score (RR -0.58, CI -1.11 to -0.04, low certainty) and induced less hypercalcemia (MD -0.28, CI 0.40 to -0.16, low certainty) and hyperphosphatemia (MD -0.22, CI -0.32 to -0.13, low certainty) when compared with Ca-based binders in CKD5D individuals. No significant differences in gastrointestinal adverse events (GAEs) incidence were observed. These data suggest that sevelamer may represent a beneficial means of protecting CKD patients against death and vessel calcification when used to treat hyperphosphatemia, while we found no clinically important benefits in decreasing gastrointestinal adverse effects.
Subject(s)
Hyperphosphatemia , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Sevelamer/adverse effects , Hyperphosphatemia/drug therapy , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Chelating Agents/adverse effects , Phosphates , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Renal Dialysis/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Hyperphosphatemia is a well-known complication of kidney disease. Phosphate binders are a mainstay treatment, but despite the existence of several phosphate binders, there is no one best approach to manage hyperphosphatemia. Phosphate binders are calcium-based, non-calcium- based, and others. While calcium-based phosphate binders are used frequently, they may cause hypercalcemia. Conversely, lanthanum carbonate and sevelamer were not linked to hypercalcemia but are costlier. The most recently developed class of phosphate binders is the ironbased ferric citrate and sucroferric oxyhydroxide. These have an important role in controlling phosphate levels due to their ability to lower the phosphate while concurrently providing iron sources. This review provides pharmacological profiles of different phosphate binders and their clinical usages, and further elaborates on their place in hyperphosphatemia management.
Subject(s)
Hypercalcemia , Hyperphosphatemia , Humans , Hyperphosphatemia/drug therapy , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Iron/therapeutic use , Hypercalcemia/complications , Hypercalcemia/drug therapy , Sevelamer/therapeutic use , Phosphates/therapeutic use , Calcium/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Decades have witnessed rapid progress of polymeric materials for vascular embolic or chemoembolic applications. Commercially available polymeric embolics range from gelatin foam to synthetic polymers such as poly(vinyl alcohol). Current systems under investigation include tunable, bioresorbable microspheres composed of chitosan or poly(ethylene glycol) derivatives,in situgelling liquid embolics with improved safety profiles, and radiopaque embolics that are trackablein vivo. In this paper, we proposed a concept of 'responsive embolization'. Sevelamer, clinically proved as an inorganic phosphate binder, was ground into nanoparticles. Sevelamer nanoparticle is highly mobile and capable of swelling and aggregating in the presence of endogenous inorganic phosphate, thereby effectively occluding blood flow in the vessel as it was administered as an embolic agent for interventional therapy. Moreover, citrated sevelamer nanoparticles delayed the aggregation, preferable to penetrate deeply into the capillary system. On the rabbit VX2 liver cancer model, both sevelamer particles aggregates occlude the tumor feeding artery, but backflow was found for the pristine one, thereby citrate passivation of sevelamer nanoparticles endows it have potential from 'bench to bedside' as a new type of vascular embolic.
Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic , Nanoparticles , Animals , Microspheres , Phosphates , Polymers , Rabbits , SevelamerABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Constipation is prevalent in patients with kidney failure partly due to the use of medication, such as phosphate binders. We hypothesized that serum levels of gut microbiome-derived uremic toxins (UTOX) may be affected by the choice of phosphate binder putatively through its impact on colonic transit time. We investigated two commonly prescribed phosphate binders, sevelamer carbonate (SEV) and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFO), and their association with gut microbiome-derived UTOX levels in hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: Weekly blood samples were collected from 16 anuric HD participants during the 5-week observational period. All participants were on active phosphate binder monotherapy with either SFO or SEV for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment. Eight UTOX (7 gut microbiome-derived) and tryptophan were quantified using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Serum phosphorus, nutritional, and liver function markers were also measured. For each substance, weekly individual levels, the median concentration per participant, and differences between SFO and SEV groups were reported. Patient-reported bowel movements, by the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS), and pill usage were assessed weekly. RESULTS: The SEV group reported a 3.3-fold higher frequency of BSS stool types 1 and 2 (more likely constipated, p < 0.05), whereas the SFO group reported a 1.5-fold higher frequency of BSS stool types 5-7 (more likely loose stool and diarrhea, not significant). Participants in the SFO group showed a trend toward better adherence to phosphate binder therapy (SFO: 87.6% vs. SEV: 66.6%, not significant). UTOX, serum phosphorus, nutritional and liver function markers, and tryptophan were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the gut microbiome-derived UTOX levels between phosphate binders (SFO vs. SEV), despite SFO therapy resulting in fewer constipated participants. This pilot study may inform study design of future clinical trials and highlights the importance of including factors beyond bowel habits and their association with UTOX levels.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Hyperphosphatemia , Toxins, Biological , Chelating Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Hyperphosphatemia/drug therapy , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Phosphates , Phosphorus , Pilot Projects , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Sevelamer/therapeutic use , Tryptophan/therapeutic use , Uremic ToxinsABSTRACT
Sevelamer, has been shown to have many pleiotropic actions on lipid panel, various inflammatory markers, and blood glucose levels in chronic kidney disease patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare these pleiotropic effects of sevelamer to other phosphate binders used in chronic kidney disease patients. The relevant randomized controlled trials published from 1 January 2001 to 31 November 2019 on the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials published in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar were identified. All the included studies were independently assessed for eligibility and risk of bias. The modified data extraction form of Cochrane was used. This review included 44 studies for qualitative analysis and 28 reports for quantitative analysis. A meta-analysis of three studies (n = 180) showed that glycated haemoglobin had significantly decreased in sevelamer-treated patients (MD: 0.5%; p = <.001). Compared with calcium-based phosphate binders, sevelamer showed a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein (MD: -19.43 mg/dL; p = <.001) and total cholesterol (MD: -19.98 mg/dL; p < .001). A significant increase in high-density lipoprotein (MD: 1.29 mg/dL; p = .05) was also prominent in sevelamer treated patients. However, we were not able to observe a significant change in other biochemical parameters such as TG, CRP, hs-CRP, FGF-23, IL-6 and albumin as, no statistically significant difference was observed.
Subject(s)
Phosphates , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Calcium , Chelating Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Sevelamer/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphatemia is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. It is unknown whether combining two therapies with different mechanisms of action-tenapanor, an inhibitor of paracellular phosphate absorption, and phosphate binders-is safe and effective for the management of hyperphosphatemia in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. METHODS: This double-blind phase 3 trial enrolled 236 patients undergoing maintenance dialysis with hyperphosphatemia (defined in this trial as serum phosphorus 5.5-10 mg/dl inclusive) despite receiving phosphate binder therapy (sevelamer, nonsevelamer, sevelamer plus nonsevelamer, or multiple nonsevelamer binders). These participants were randomly assigned to receive oral tenapanor 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change in serum phosphorus concentration from baseline to week 4. RESULTS: Of the 236 randomized patients, 235 (99.6%) were included in the full analysis set; this included 116 in the tenapanor plus binder group and 119 in the placebo plus binder group. A total of 228 patients (96.6%) completed the 4-week treatment period. In the full analysis set (mean age 54.5 years, 40.9% women), patients treated with tenapanor plus binder achieved a larger mean change in serum phosphorus concentration from baseline to week 4 compared with placebo plus binder (-0.84 versus -0.19 mg/dl, P<0.001). Diarrhea was the most commonly reported adverse event, resulting in study drug discontinuation in four of 119 (3.4%) and two of 116 (1.7%) patients receiving tenapanor plus binder or placebo plus binder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A dual-mechanism treatment using both tenapanor and phosphate binders improved control of hyperphosphatemia in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis compared with phosphate binders alone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: AMPLIFY, NCT03824587.
Subject(s)
Chelating Agents/therapeutic use , Hyperphosphatemia/drug therapy , Isoquinolines/therapeutic use , Renal Dialysis , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Chelating Agents/adverse effects , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Female , Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 , Humans , Hyperphosphatemia/blood , Isoquinolines/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Phosphorus/blood , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Sevelamer/therapeutic use , Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger 3/antagonists & inhibitors , Sulfonamides/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a rapidly rising problem in the 21st century and is a leading cause of chronic liver disease that can lead to end-stage liver diseases, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer. Despite this rising epidemic, no pharmacological treatment has yet been established to treat this disease. The rapidly increasing prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its aggressive form, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), requires novel therapeutic approaches to prevent disease progression. Alterations in microbiome dynamics and dysbiosis play an important role in liver disease and may represent targetable pathways to treat liver disorders. Improving microbiome properties or restoring normal bile acid metabolism may prevent or slow the progression of liver diseases such as NASH. Importantly, aberrant systemic circulation of bile acids can greatly disrupt metabolic homeostasis. Bile acid sequestrants are orally administered polymers that bind bile acids in the intestine, forming nonabsorbable complexes. Bile acid sequestrants interrupt intestinal reabsorption of bile acids, decreasing their circulating levels. We determined that treatment with the bile acid sequestrant sevelamer reversed the liver injury and prevented the progression of NASH, including steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in a Western diet-induced NASH mouse model. Metabolomics and microbiome analysis revealed that this beneficial effect is associated with changes in the microbiota population and bile acid composition, including reversing microbiota complexity in cecum by increasing Lactobacillus and decreased Desulfovibrio The net effect of these changes was improvement in liver function and markers of liver injury and the positive effects of reversal of insulin resistance.
Subject(s)
Bile Acids and Salts/metabolism , Diet, Western , Liver/drug effects , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/pathology , Sevelamer/pharmacology , Animals , Bile Acids and Salts/chemistry , Cecum/microbiology , Chemokine CCL2/genetics , Chemokine CCL2/metabolism , Cholesterol/analysis , Collagen Type I/genetics , Collagen Type I/metabolism , Collagen Type I, alpha 1 Chain , Disease Models, Animal , Feces/chemistry , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Lactobacillus/drug effects , Lipid Metabolism/drug effects , Liver/metabolism , Liver/pathology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/metabolism , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/prevention & control , Sevelamer/chemistry , Sevelamer/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Transforming Growth Factor beta/genetics , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolismABSTRACT
The majority of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving dialysis do not achieve target serum phosphorus concentrations, despite treatment with phosphate binders. Tenapanor is a nonbinder, sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3) inhibitor that reduces paracellular intestinal phosphate absorption. This preclinical study evaluated the effect of tenapanor and varying doses of sevelamer carbonate on urinary phosphorus excretion, a direct reflection of intestinal phosphate absorption. We measured 24-h urinary phosphorus excretion in male rats assigned to groups dosed orally with vehicle or tenapanor (0.3 mg/kg/day) and provided a diet containing varying amounts of sevelamer [0-3% (wt/wt)]. We also evaluated the effect of the addition of tenapanor or vehicle on 24-h urinary phosphorus excretion to rats on a stable dose of sevelamer [1.5% (wt/wt)]. When administered together, tenapanor and sevelamer decreased urinary phosphorus excretion significantly more than either tenapanor or sevelamer alone across all sevelamer dose levels. The Bliss statistical model of independence indicated that the combination was synergistic. A stable sevelamer dose [1.5% (wt/wt)] reduced mean ± SE urinary phosphorus excretion by 42 ± 3% compared with vehicle; together, tenapanor and sevelamer reduced residual urinary phosphorus excretion by an additional 37 ± 6% (P < 0.05). Although both tenapanor and sevelamer reduce intestinal phosphate absorption individually, administration of tenapanor and sevelamer together results in more pronounced reductions in intestinal phosphate absorption than if either agent is administered alone. Further evaluation of combination tenapanor plus phosphate binder treatment in patients receiving dialysis with hyperphosphatemia is warranted.
Subject(s)
Chelating Agents/pharmacology , Intestinal Absorption/drug effects , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Isoquinolines/pharmacology , Kidney/drug effects , Phosphorus/urine , Renal Elimination/drug effects , Sevelamer/pharmacology , Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger 3/antagonists & inhibitors , Sulfonamides/pharmacology , Animals , Drug Synergism , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Kidney/metabolism , Male , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger 3/metabolism , Time FactorsABSTRACT
The treatment of hyperphosphatemia remains challenging in patients receiving hemodialysis. This phase 1b study assessed safety and efficacy of EOS789, a novel pan-inhibitor of phosphate transport (NaPi-2b, PiT-1, PiT-2) on intestinal phosphate absorption in patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis therapy. Two cross-over, randomized order studies of identical design (ten patients each) compared daily EOS789 50 mg to placebo with meals and daily EOS789 100 mg vs EOS789 100 mg plus 1600 mg sevelamer with meals. Patients ate a controlled diet of 900 mg phosphate daily for two weeks and began EOS789 on day four. On day ten, a phosphate absorption testing protocol was performed during the intradialytic period. Intestinal fractional phosphate absorption was determined by kinetic modeling of serum data following oral and intravenous doses of 33Phosphate (33P). The results demonstrated no study drug related serious adverse events. Fractional phosphate absorption was 0.53 (95% confidence interval: 0.39,0.67) for placebo vs. 0.49 (0.35,0.63) for 50 mg EOS789; and 0.40 (0.29,0.50) for 100 mg EOS789 vs. 0.36 (0.26,0.47) for 100 mg EOS789 plus 1600 mg sevelamer (all not significantly different). The fractional phosphate absorption trended lower in six patients who completed both studies with EOS789 100 mg compared with placebo. Thus, in this phase 1b study, EOS789 was safe and well tolerated. Importantly, the use of 33P as a sensitive and direct measure of intestinal phosphate absorption allows specific testing of drug efficacy. The effectiveness of EOS789 needs to be evaluated in future phase 2 and phase 3 studies.
Subject(s)
Hyperphosphatemia , Polyamines , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Hyperphosphatemia/drug therapy , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Phosphates , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Sevelamer/adverse effectsABSTRACT
There is compelling evidence implicating intestinal permeability in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we examined the role of bile acids (BA) in western diet (WD)-induced loss of colonic epithelial barrier (CEB) function in mice with a genetic impairment in intestinal epithelial barrier function, junctional adhesion molecule A knockout mice, F11r-/- . WD-fed knockout mice developed severe NASH, which was associated with increased BA concentration in the cecum and loss of CEB function. Analysis of cecal BA composition revealed selective increases in primary unconjugated BAs in the WD-fed mice, which correlated with increased abundance of microbial taxa linked to BA metabolism. In vitro permeability assays revealed that chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), which was elevated in the cecum of WD-fed mice, increased paracellular permeability, while the BA-binding resin sevelamer hydrochloride protected against CDCA-induced loss of barrier function. Sequestration of intestinal BAs by in vivo delivery of sevelamer to WD-fed knockout mice attenuated colonic mucosal inflammation and improved CEB. Sevelamer also reduced hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, and improved metabolic derangements associated with NASH. Collectively, these findings highlight a hitherto unappreciated role for BAs in WD-induced impairment of the intestinal epithelial barrier in NASH.
Subject(s)
Bile Acids and Salts/metabolism , Colon/metabolism , Diet, Western/adverse effects , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/metabolism , Animals , Caco-2 Cells , Cell Adhesion Molecules/deficiency , Cell Adhesion Molecules/genetics , Colon/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Liver/drug effects , Liver/metabolism , Liver/pathology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/etiology , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/pathology , Permeability , Receptors, Cell Surface/deficiency , Receptors, Cell Surface/genetics , Sevelamer/administration & dosageABSTRACT
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Sevelamer is an insoluble polymer indicated for the management of hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The package inserts for both tablet formulations recommend the tablets be administered whole. Due to whole tablets being sometimes inadvertently crushed and the significantly increased cost of sevelamer packets, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of crushed sevelamer tablets for enteral feeding tube administration. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective chart review was performed. All adult ICU patients prescribed sevelamer carbonate between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2019 were included if they received at least one dose of a sevelamer tablet or packet, whereas they had an enteral feeding tube in place. The primary outcome was the incidence of an obstructed enteral feeding tube or need for replacement, as defined as the number of occurrences over the total numbers of doses administered. The secondary outcome was the change in phosphorus levels from time of sevelamer initiation to discontinuation or patient discharge. RESULTS: A total of 14 obstructions were reported, four in the tablet arm and ten in the packet arm (0.4% tablet arm, 0.5% packet arm; P = .5931). Of these, four (29%) required tube replacement and were followed by sevelamer discontinuation. Two (14%) were documented to be due to increased tube feeds and esomeprazole. Six (43%) cases required tube replacement, but no issues arose upon continuation. Only one of the obstructions resulted in a recurrent tube occlusion. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Sevelamer tablets may be crushed and administered via enteral feeding tubes, provided clear instruction on tablet preparation is included. Oral administration in dysphagic patients requires further evaluation with clear protocols for preparation and administration.
Subject(s)
Chelating Agents/administration & dosage , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Hyperphosphatemia/drug therapy , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Sevelamer/administration & dosage , Chelating Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Routes , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Retrospective Studies , Sevelamer/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of lanthanum carbonate (LC) versus calcium salts, non-LC phosphate binders (PBs), sevelamer, or placebo in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted up to 18 June 2021. Data acquisition and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the serum biochemical parameters, adverse events, and patient-level outcomes of LC, non-LC PBs, and sevelamer for hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed utilizing the I2 statistic and Q-test, and a random effect model was selected to calculate the pooled effect size. RESULTS: A total of 26 randomized, controlled trials and 3 observational studies were included. Compared to the other groups, better control effect of serum phosphorus (RR = 2.68, p < 0.001), reduction in serum phosphorus (95%CI = -1.93, -0.99; p < 0.001), Ca × P (95%CI = -13.89, -2.99; p = 0.002), serum intact parathyroid hormone levels (95%CI = -181.17, -3.96, p = 0.041) were found in LC group. Besides, reduced risk of various adverse effects, such as hypotension, abdominal pain, diarrhea, dyspepsia, and a score of coronary artery calcification were identified with LC in comparison to calcium salt, non-LC PBs, or placebo group. Significantly lower risk in mortality with LC treatment vs. non-LC PBs was observed, while no significant difference was identified between LC and calcium salt groups. CONCLUSION: LC might be an alternative treatment for hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD considering its comprehensive curative effect.
Subject(s)
Hyperphosphatemia/drug therapy , Lanthanum/therapeutic use , Phosphates/blood , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Sevelamer/therapeutic use , Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder/drug therapy , Humans , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Lanthanum/adverse effects , Observational Studies as Topic , Parathyroid Hormone/blood , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Phosphate binders are commonly used in the treatment of patients with hyperphosphatemia. While phosphate binders are used to lower phosphate, the effects of specific phosphate binder types on vitamin D metabolism are unknown. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the Phosphate Normalization Trial in which patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease were randomized to receive either placebo, sevelamer carbonate, lanthanum carbonate or calcium acetate for 9 months. We evaluated changes in serum concentrations of vitamin D metabolites including 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [24,25(OH)2D3], 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3], the ratio of 24,25(OH)2D3 to 25-hydroxyvitamin D [the vitamin D metabolite ratio (VMR)] and the ratio of serum 1,25(OH)2D to 25-hydroxyvitamin D. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, randomization to the calcium acetate arm was associated with a 0.6 ng/mL (95% CI 0.2, 1) and 13.5 pg/ng (95% CI 5.5, 21.5) increase in 24,25(OH)2D and VMR, respectively, and a 5.2 pg/mL (95% CI 1.1, 9.4) reduction in 1,25(OH)2D. Randomization to sevelamer carbonate was associated with a 0.5 ng/mL (95% CI -0.9, -0.1) and 11.8 pg/ng (95% CI -20, -3.5) reduction in 24,25(OH)2D3 and VMR, respectively. There was no association of the sevelamer arm with the change in 1,25(OH)2D3, and randomization to lanthanum carbonate was not associated with a change in any of the vitamin D metabolites. CONCLUSION: Administration of different phosphate binders to patients with moderate to severe CKD results in unique changes in vitamin D metabolism.