Randomized controlled trial of nasogastric tube use after esophagectomy: study protocol for the kinetic trial.

Esophagectomy is a complex and complication laden procedure. Despite centralization, variations in perioparative strategies reflect a paucity of evidence regarding optimal routines. The use of nasogastric (NG) tubes post esophagectomy is typically associated with significant discomfort for the patients. We hypothesize that immediate postoperative removal of the NG tube is non-inferior to current routines. All Nordic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer centers were invited to participate in this open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT). Inclusion criteria include resection for locally advanced esophageal cancer with gastric tube reconstruction. A pretrial survey was undertaken and was the foundation for a consensus process resulting in the Kinetic trial, an RCT allocating patients to either no use of a NG tube (intervention) or 5 days of postoperative NG tube use (control) with anastomotic leakage as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include pulmonary complications, overall complications, length of stay, health related quality of life. A sample size of 450 patients is planned (Kinetic trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39935085). Thirteen Nordic centers with a combined catchment area of 17 million inhabitants have entered the trial and ethical approval was granted in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. All centers routinely use NG tube and all but one center use total or hybrid minimally invasive-surgical approach. Inclusion began in January 2022 and the first annual safety board assessment has deemed the trial safe and recommended continuation. We have launched the first adequately powered multi-center pragmatic controlled randomized clinical trial regarding NG tube use after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction.

Accuracy of FAST in detecting intraabdominal bleeding in major trauma with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is a tool to rapidly detect intraabdominal and intrapericardial fluid with point-of-care ultrasound. Previous studies have questioned the role of FAST in patients with pelvic fractures. The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy of FAST to detect clinically significant intraabdominal hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fractures. METHODS: We included all consecutive patients with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures treated our Level 1 trauma center from 2009-2020. We registered patient and fracture characteristics, FAST investigations and CT descriptions, explorative laparotomy findings, and transfusion needs. We compared FAST to CT and laparotomy findings, and calculated true positive and negative findings, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: We included 389 patients. FAST had a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 98%, a PPV of 84%, and a NPV of 96% for clinically significant intraabdominal bleeding. Patients with retroperitoneal hematomas were at increased risk for laparotomy both because of True-negative FAST and False-positive FAST. CONCLUSION: FAST is accurate to identify clinically significant intraabdominal blood in patients with severe pelvic fractures and should be a standard asset in these patients. Retroperitoneal hematomas challenge the FAST interpretation and thus the decision making when applying FAST in patients with pelvic fractures.

Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging-based diagnosis of severe mesenteric traction syndrome: Hemodynamics and prostacyclin - A prospective cohort study.

BRIEF ABSTRACT: Today, the diagnosis and grading of mesenteric traction syndrome relies on a subjective assessment of facial flushing. However, this method has several limitations. In this study, Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging and a predefined cut-off value are assessed and validated for the objective identification of severe mesenteric traction syndrome. BACKGROUND: Severe mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. The diagnosis is based on an assessment of the developed facial flushing. Today this is performed subjectively, as no objective method exists. One possible objective method is Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI), which has been used to show significantly higher facial skin blood flow in patients developing severe MTS. Using these data, a cut-off value has been identified. This study aimed to validate our predefined LSCI cut-off value for identifying severe MTS. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed on patients planned for open esophagectomy or pancreatic surgery from March 2021 to April 2022. All patients underwent continuous measurement of forehead skin blood flow using LSCI during the first hour of surgery. Using the predefined cut-off value, the severity of MTS was graded. In addition, blood samples for prostacyclin (PGI2) analysis and hemodynamics were collected at predefined time points to validate the cut-off value. MAIN RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in the study. Using our predefined LSCI cut-off value, 21 (35 %) patients were identified as developing severe MTS. These patients were found to have higher concentrations of 6-Keto-PGFaα (p = 0.002), lower SVR (p < 0.001), lower MAP (p = 0.004), and higher CO (p < 0.001) 15 min into surgery, as compared with patients not developing severe MTS. CONCLUSION: This study validated our LSCI cut-off value for the objective identification of severe MTS patients as this group developed increased concentrations of PGI2 and more pronounced hemodynamic alterations compared with patients not developing severe MTS.

Intraoperative near-infrared lymphography with indocyanine green may aid lymph node dissection during robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adequate lymphadenectomy during gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer resection is essential, because lymph node (LN) metastasis correlates with increased recurrence risk. Fluorescence lymphography with indocyanine green (ICG) has been used for LN mapping in several surgical specialties; however, reports on GEJ cancer are lacking. Therefore, we investigated whether intraoperative ICG lymphography could facilitate LN harvest during robot-assisted resection of GEJ cancer. METHODS: Patients scheduled for robot-assisted resection of GEJ cancer were included, and outcomes were compared with historical controls. After intraoperative endoscopic submucosal ICG injection, standard D1 + LN dissection was performed under white light. Then, near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging was activated, and each LN dissection area was re-examined. Any tissue within the D1 + field exhibiting distinctly increased ICG fluorescence compared with background tissue was dissected and sent for pathology review. RESULTS: We included 70 patients between June 2020 and October 2021. Three cases were aborted due to disseminated disease, and two were converted to open resection and excluded from the analysis. Additional tissue was dissected after NIR review in 34 of 65 (52%) patients. We dissected 43 fluorescent tissue samples, and after pathology review, 30 were confirmed LNs; none were metastatic. The median number of LNs harvested per patient (34, interquartile range [IQR] = 26-44) was not significantly different from that harvested from historical controls (32, IQR = 24-45; p = 0.92), nor were there any differences between these two groups in the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, or comprehensive complication scores (p = 0.12, p = 0.46, and p = 0.41, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative NIR lymphography with ICG may aid LN detection during robot-assisted resection of GEJ cancer without increasing surgical risk. Although NIR lymphography may facilitate LN dissection, none of the LN removed after the NIR review was metastatic. Hence, it remains uncertain whether NIR lymphography will improve oncological outcomes.

Colonoscope retraction technique and predicting adenoma detection rate: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The success of preventing colorectal cancer relies on the expertise of the colonoscopists. Studies suggest that the retraction technique is a powerful indicator of expertise in distinguishing endoscopists with various adenoma detection rates (ADRs). We aimed to develop a retraction technique score and explore the correlation between endoscopists' retraction technique and their ADRs. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter study, 8 colonoscopist nurses and physicians with various ADRs were included. Data from patients admitted for a colonoscopy, as part of the Danish nationwide screening program, were gathered directly from the Olympus ScopeGuide system (UPD-3; Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan) providing XYZ-coordinates from the coils along the length of the colonoscope. Motor skill measures were developed based on tip retraction, retraction efficiency, and retraction distance. The principal component analysis was used to study the association among the 3 measures and the historical ADR to create a combined score, the colonoscopy retraction score (CoRS). RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-three recordings were analyzed. We demonstrated a significant and strong correlation between CoRS and ADR (.90, P < .01). Conversely, withdrawal time did not correlate significantly with ADR (.33, P = .42). In procedures without polypectomies or biopsy sampling, a significant and strong correlation was found between CoRS and ADR (.88, P < .01) and between withdrawal time and ADR (.75, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a novel, real-time computerized and unbiased assessment tool for colonoscopy withdrawal. CoRS strongly correlated with ADR with and without therapeutic interventions during withdrawal and could be used to ensure quality instead of minimal withdrawal time. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03587935.).

Quantitative fluorescence angiography aids novice and experienced surgeons in performing intestinal resection in well-perfused tissue.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) after gastrointestinal resection is a devastating complication with huge consequences for the patient. As AL is associated with poor blood supply, tools for objective assessment of perfusion are in high demand. Indocyanine green angiography (ICG-FA) and quantitative analysis of ICG-FA (q-ICG) seem promising. This study aimed to investigate whether ICG-FA and q-ICG could improve perfusion assessment performed by surgeons of different experience levels. METHODS: Thirteen small bowel segments with a varying degree of devascularization, including two healthy sham segments, were constructed in a porcine model. We recruited students, residents, and surgeons to perform perfusion assessment of the segments in white light (WL), with ICG-FA, and after q-ICG, all blinded to the degree of devascularization. RESULTS: Forty-five participants fulfilled the study (18 novices, 12 intermediates, and 15 experienced). ICG and q-ICG helped the novices correctly detect the healthy bowel segments to experienced surgeons' level. ICG and q-ICG also helped novice surgeons to perform safer resections in healthy tissue compared with normal WL. The relative risk (RR) of leaving ischemic tissue in WL and ICG compared with q-ICG, even for experienced surgeons was substantial, intermediates (RR = 8.9, CI95% [4.0;20] and RR = 6.2, CI95% [2.7;14.1]), and experienced (RR = 4.7, CI95% [2.6;8.7] and RR = 4.0, CI95% [2.1;7.5]). CONCLUSION: Q-ICG seems to guide surgeons, regardless of experience level, to safely perform resection in healthy tissue, compared with standard WL. Future research should focus on this novel tool's clinical impact.

Association between bacterial growth in chest tube and anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection: prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine whether collagenase producing bacteria could be detected, in fluid collected from chest tubes, before clinical presentation of anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection. METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-center study of patients who underwent resection of the gastroesophageal junction. All patients had a chest tube placed in the pleural cavity perioperatively. Drain fluid was collected and cultured from the first post-operative day and at time of routine removal of the drain (days 3-5). RESULTS: From January 2018 to July 2019, a total of 84 patients were included in the study. Twenty (36%) patients experienced severe complications with a Clavien-Dindo score of 3b-5. Eleven (13%) patients were diagnosed with anastomotic leakage which occurred after 8 days (mean, range 2-13). Twenty patients (24%) had drain samples with significant growth of microbes. Among the 11 patients with anastomotic leakage, we found 2 with microbe growth at POD 2 and POD 4, the remaining 9 samples were negative (p = 0.638). Thirty-day mortality rate was zero. CONCLUSION: Cultured fluid from the pleural cavity of asymptomatic patients following esophageal resection did not indicate a significant association with anastomotic leakage.

Evaluation of the systemic inflammatory response, endothelial cell dysfunction, and postoperative morbidity in patients, receiving perioperative corticosteroid, developing severe mesenteric traction syndrome - an exploratory study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a severe mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) leads to increased surgical stress, endothelial dysfunction, and postoperative morbidity in a cohort in which all patients received a single dose of methylprednisolone. INTRODUCTION: Preoperatively administered corticosteroids lower the incidence of severe MTS and may also attenuate surgical stress and endothelial damage associated with the development of severe MTS, ultimately lowering the postoperative morbidity. METHODS: This exploratory study analyzed prospectively collected data from 45 patients all receiving 125 mg methylprednisolone. No control group was included. The severity of MTS was graded intraoperatively, and postoperative morbidity was assessed blinded. Blood samples for plasma prostacyclin (PGI2), IL6 and endothelial damage (Syndecan-1, sVEGRF1 and sThrombomodulin) biomarkers were obtained at predefined time points. RESULTS: Patients undergoing either open liver surgery (n = 23) or Whipple's procedure (n = 22) were included. No differences were found in postoperative morbidity between patients developing and not developing severe MTS. Surgery led to significantly increased plasma levels of biomarkers indicative of surgical stress and endothelial damage. Further, patients developing severe MTS had increased levels of PGI2 (p = 0.05) and lower systemic vascular resistance (p < 0.05) 15 min into surgery. However, when comparing the biomarkers of surgical stress, endothelial damage no differences between patients with and without severe MTS were identified. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study found that surgery was associated with a pro-inflammatory response and damage to the endothelium. However, no differences were found between patients developing severe MTS and patients developing moderate/no MTS in biomarkers of surgical stress, endothelial damage, or postoperative morbidity. Corticosteroids may therefore attenuate the endothelial damage in patients developing severe MTS. However, as this was an exploratory study, these findings must be confirmed in future randomized controlled studies.

Time to maximum indocyanine green fluorescence of gastric sentinel lymph nodes and feasibility of combined indocyanine green/sodium fluorescein gastric lymphography.

PURPOSE: Indocyanine green (ICG) and sodium fluorescein (SF) are fluorescent dyes used for sentinel lymph node mapping. In oncological gastric surgery, ICG lymphography has increased the number of resected lymph nodes. However, the optimal time to administer ICG is unclear, and both preoperative and intraoperative injections have been practised. As dye spillage will diminish lymphogram visibility, a second dye with different excitation and emission spectra may present a clinical alternative. We measured the time until maximum ICG fluorescence of gastric sentinel lymph nodes and investigated the feasibility of combined lymphography with two fluorescent dyes: ICG and SF. METHODS: Ten Danish Landrace/Yorkshire pigs were used in this study. After completion of the laparoscopic setup, ICG and then SF were endoscopically injected into the gastric submucosa. Lymphograms for both dyes were recorded, and the time until maximum ICG sentinel lymph node fluorescence was determined. RESULTS: The mean time until maximum ICG fluorescence of gastric sentinel lymph nodes was 50 s (± 12.5), and the fluorescent signal then remained stable until the end of the recorded period (45 min). A lymphogram showing both ICG and SF was acquired for eight of the ten pigs. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the short time until maximum ICG fluorescence of sentinel lymph nodes, intraoperative injections could be a sufficient alternative to preoperative injections for oncological gastric surgery. Combined ICG and SF lymphography was feasible and resulted in clear lymphograms with no interference between the two dyes. The ability to use multiple dyes during a surgical procedure offers the exciting prospect of simultaneously assessing perfusion and performing fluorescence lymphography.

Severe mesenteric traction syndrome is associated with increased systemic inflammatory response, endothelial dysfunction, and major postoperative morbidity.

This study aimed to determine if mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) triggers increased systemic inflammation and endothelial cell dysfunction. Patients developing severe MTS had pronounced early IL6 elevations followed by endothelial cell damage. Furthermore, these processes were associated with increased postoperative morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) leads to increased systemic inflammation and dysfunction of the glycocalyx and endothelial cell and whether this correlates with the degree of postoperative morbidity. INTRODUCTION: Severe MTS is associated with increased postoperative morbidity following major gastrointestinal surgery, but the pathophysiological mechanism has not been previously explored. Systemic inflammatory response and impaired glycocalyx and endothelial cells may be responsible for the development of symptoms. METHODS: The study analyzed prospectively collected data from two cohorts (n = 67). The severity of the MTS response was graded intraoperatively and blood samples for PGI2, catecholamines, IL6, and endothelial biomarkers obtained at predefined time points. RESULTS: Patients undergoing either esophagectomy (n = 45) or gastrectomy (n = 22) were included. Surgery led to significantly increased plasma concentrations of all biomarkers. Yet, patients who developed severe MTS had higher baseline epinephrine levels (p < 0.05) and higher levels of PGI2 (p < 0.05), Syndecan-1 (p < 0.001), and sVEGFR1 (p < 0.001). Peak values of IL6, Syndecan-1, sVEGFR1, and sTM all correlated to peak PGI2. Lastly, patients with high postoperative morbidity had higher baseline epinephrine (p = 0.009) and developed higher plasma IL6 (p = 0.007) and sTM (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The development of severe MTS during upper gastrointestinal surgery is associated with preoperative elevated plasma epinephrine and further a more pronounced proinflammatory response and damage to the vascular endothelium. The increased postoperative morbidity seen in patients with severe MTS may thus, in part, be explained by an inherent susceptibility towards an inappropriate secretion of PGI2, which leads to an increased surgical stress response and endothelial damage. These findings must be confirmed in a new prospective cohort.

Feasibility and usability of real-time intraoperative quantitative fluorescent-guided perfusion assessment during resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage after resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer is a dangerous complication, and leakage rates have remained stable for decades. Perfusion is crucial for anastomotic healing, but traditional perfusion assessment is limited in a minimally invasive environment. New methods as indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) have proven promising, but quantitative analysis has been challenging. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and usability of real-time intraoperative quantitative fluorescence angiography (q-ICG) with a touchscreen tablet. METHODS: A software for q-ICG was previously developed and validated. Ten patients underwent perfusion assessment in white light (WL), with ICG-FA, and with q-ICG during Ivor-Lewis esophageal resection. The usability of the tablet-based software was tested with the System Usability Scale (SUS®). Furthermore, we investigated the differences in perfusion assessment as the distance from the conduit margin to a surgeon selected point of sufficient perfusion for anastomosis using the different modalities. RESULTS: Q-ICG was successful in all patients, with an excellent median SUS® of 82.5 (77.5-93.8). Significant differences in distances from the conduit margin to points of sufficient perfusion selected by the surgeons were found: ICG: WL = 14.1 mm (p = 0.048), q-ICG: WL = 32.08 mm (p < 0.001), and q-ICG: ICG = 17.95 mm (p = 0.002). Furthermore, significant differences of perfusion were found between the points, when q-ICG was performed retrospectively in the surgeon selected areas (p = 0.008-0.013). CONCLUSION: Real-time intraoperative touchscreen-based q-ICG was feasible with excellent usability, and differences in sufficient perfusion points selected by the surgeons between modalities were found. Further studies should focus on clinical relevance and determine cutoff values associated with anastomotic leakage.

Development of a severe mesenteric traction syndrome during major abdominal surgery is associated with increased postoperative morbidity: Secondary data analysis on prospective cohorts.

PURPOSE: MTS is elicited during open abdominal surgery and is characterized by facial flushing, hypotension, and tachycardia in response to the release of prostacyclin (PGI2) to plasma. MTS seems to affect postoperative morbidity, but data from larger cohorts are lacking. We aimed to determine the impact of severe mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) on postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing open upper gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: The study was a secondary analysis of data from three cohorts (n = 137). The patients were graded for severity of MTS intraoperatively, and hemodynamic variables and blood samples for plasma 6-keto-PGF1α, a stable metabolite of PGI2, were obtained at defined time points. Postoperative morbidity was evaluated by the comprehensive complication index (CCI) and the Dindo-Clavien classification (DC). RESULTS: Patients undergoing either esophagectomy (n = 70), gastrectomy (n = 22), liver- (n = 23), or pancreatic resection (n = 22) were included. Severe MTS was significantly associated with increased postoperative morbidity, i.e., CCI ≥ 26.2 (OR 3.06 [95% CI 1.1-6.6]; p = 0.03) and risk of severe complications, i.e., DC ≥3b (OR 3.1 [95% CI 1.2-8.2]; p = 0.023). Furthermore, patients with severe MTS had increased length of stay (OR 10.1 [95% CI 1.9-54.3]; p = 0.007) and were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (OR = 7.3 [95% CI 1.3-41.9]; p = 0.027), but there was no difference in 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Occurrence of severe MTS during upper gastrointestinal surgery is associated with increased postoperative morbidity as indicated by an increased rate of severe complications, length of stay, and admission to the ICU. It remains to be determined whether inhibition of MTS enhances postoperative recovery.

Laser speckle contrast imaging and quantitative fluorescence angiography for perfusion assessment.

PURPOSE: Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is an established technique for assessment of intestinal perfusion during gastrointestinal surgery, whereas quantitative ICG-FA (q-ICG) and laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) are relatively unproven. The study aimed to investigate whether the techniques could be applied interchangeably for perfusion assessment. METHODS: Nineteen pigs underwent laparotomy, two minor resections of the small bowel, and anastomoses. Additionally, seven pigs had parts of their stomach and small intestine de-vascularized. Data was also collected from an in vivo model (inferior caval vein measurements in two additional pigs) and an ex vivo flow model, allowing for standardization of experimental flow, distance, and angulation. Q-ICG and LSCI were performed, so that regions of interest were matched between the two modalities in the analyses, ensuring coverage of the same tissue. RESULTS: The overall correlation of q-ICG and LSCI evaluated in the porcine model was modest (rho = 0.45, p < 0.001), but high in tissue with low perfusion (rho = 0.74, p < 0.001). Flux values obtained by LSCI from the ex vivo flow model revealed a decreasing flux with linearly increasing distance as well as angulation to the model. The Q-ICG perfusion values obtained varied slightly with increasing distance as well as angulation to the model. CONCLUSIONS: Q-ICG and LSCI cannot be used interchangeably but may supplement each other. LSCI is profoundly affected by angulation and distance. In comparison, q-ICG is minimally affected by changing experimental conditions and is more readily applicable in minimally invasive surgery.

Computerized feedback during colonoscopy training leads to improved performance: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Simulation-based training in colonoscopy is increasingly replacing the traditional apprenticeship method to avoid patient-related risk. Mentoring during simulation is necessary to provide feedback and to motivate, but expert supervisors are a scarce resource. We aimed to determine whether computerized feedback in simulated colonoscopy would improve performance, optimize time spent practicing, and optimize the pattern of training. METHODS: Forty-four participants were recruited and randomized to either a feedback group (FG) or a control group (CG). Participants were allowed 2 hours of self-practice during which they could practice as they saw fit on 2 different cases: 1 easy and 1 difficult. The CG practiced without feedback, but the participants in the FG were given a score of progression every time they reached the cecum. All participants were tested on a different case after end of training. The primary outcome was the progression score in the final case, and secondary outcomes were time spent practicing and the training pattern. RESULTS: Regression analysis adjusting for sex was done because of an uneven sex distribution between groups (P = .026) and significantly higher performance scores by men (37.6, standard deviation [SD] 25.9) compared with women (19.7, SD 18.7); P = .012. The FG outperformed the CG in the final case, FG scoring 14.4 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-27.6) more than the CG; P = .033, and they spent more time practicing, FG practicing 25.8 minutes (95% CI, 11.6-39.9) more than the CG; P = .001. The FG practiced more on the easy case and reached the cecum 3.2 times more (95% CI, 2-4.5) during practice (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings of this study revealed that an automatic, computerized score of progression during simulated colonoscopy motivates the novices to improve performance, optimizes time spent practicing, and optimizes their pattern of training. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03248453.).

Methods for certification in colonoscopy - a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Reliable, valid, and feasible assessment tools are essential to ensure competence in colonoscopy. This study aims to provide an overview of the existing assessment methods and the validity evidence that supports them. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in October 2016. Pubmed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for studies evaluating assessment methods to ensure competency in colonoscopy. Outcome variables were described and evidence of validity was explored using a contemporary framework. RESULTS: Twenty-five observational studies were included in the systematic review. Most studies were based on small sample sizes. The studies were categorized after outcome measures into five groups: Clinical process related outcome metrics (n = 2), direct observational colonoscopy assessment (n = 8), simulator based metrics (n = 11), automatic computerized metrics (n = 2), and self-assessment (n = 1). Validity score varied among the studies and only five studies presented sufficient evidence to recommend the tool for clinical assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The objectives vary throughout the presented tools. Some tools are global tools where others focus on procedural technical skill assessment or even part-task skills. There is a tendency in the most recent studies towards more specific assessment of technical skills. The majority of assessment methods lack sufficient validity evidence.

An automatic measure of progression during colonoscopy correlates to patient experienced pain.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy screening and surveillance programs depend on patient's tolerable experience, which is associated with competence of the endoscopist. The Colonoscopy Progression Score (CoPS) is an automated tool based on recording of the Magnetic Scope Imager (MEI) picture in order to track progression. CoPS deliver a numeric score and a graphic map. A high score expresses a rapid and smooth progression. Aims of study were to explore the correlation between CoPS and patient experienced pain and to identity locations associated with pain. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients listed for colonoscopy were included and asked to reply to pain by pressing a rubber ball. The signal was recorded simultaneous to CoPS. Patients evaluated the experience on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). CoPS and recorded pain events were used to create a pain sensitive CoPS-map (S-CoPS map). RESULTS: A total of 58 complete recordings were used for evaluation. We demonstrated a moderate correlation between CoPS and patient experienced pain, Pearson's r = -0.47 (p < .001). A low CoPS was associated with a painful colonoscopy and a high CoPS excluded severe pain. Sensitivity and specificity was 0.79 and 0.60 and AUC was 0.61 Passage of the sigmoid colon, right and left flexures were associated with pain for 51%, 33% and 25% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: A moderate correlation between CoPS and patient experienced pain suggest that CoPS measure inserting skills but might also be a measure of a gentle performance. The graphic S-CoPS-map can be used to point-out painful passages and aid planning of future colonoscopies.

Quantitative perfusion assessment of intestinal anastomoses in pigs treated with glucagon-like peptide 2.

PURPOSE: Despite exhaustive research and improvement of techniques, anastomotic leakage remains a frequent complication in gastrointestinal surgery. As leakage is associated with poor perfusion, reliable objective methods to assess anastomotic perfusion are highly demanded. In addition, such methods enable evaluation of interventions that may improve anastomotic perfusion. Glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) is an enteroendocrine hormone that regulates mid-gut perfusion. In the present study, we aimed to explore if quantitative perfusion assessment with indocyanine green (q-ICG) could detect an increase in porcine anastomotic perfusion after treatment with GLP-2. METHODS: Nineteen pigs had two small bowel resections followed by anastomosis. Blinded to all investigators, animals were randomized to receive GLP-2 or placebo. Anastomotic perfusion was assessed at baseline, 30 min after injection of GLP-2/placebo, and after 5 days of treatment. Anastomotic strength and healing were evaluated by bursting pressure and histology. RESULTS: Q-ICG detected a significantly higher increase in anastomotic perfusion (p < 0.05) in animals treated with GLP-2, compared with placebo. No significant differences in anastomotic strength or healing were found. CONCLUSIONS: Q-ICG is a promising tool for perfusion assessment in gastrointestinal surgery and opens new opportunities in research of factors that may influence anastomotic healing, but further research is warranted to evaluate the effects of GLP-2 on anastomotic healing.

Evaluation of the surgical apgar score in patients undergoing Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: The Surgical Apgar Score is a simple outcome score based on intraoperative parameters. The scoring system is recently validated in patients undergoing esophagectomy but without comparable results. This study evaluated the ability of the original and modified Surgical Apgar Scores to predict major complications in a patient population undergoing Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 234 patients who successfully underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen from November 23, 2011 till November 23, 2014. Major complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher within 30 days after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess factors associated with major complications. Receiver operating characteristics were performed for determination of the predictive value of the Surgical Apgar Score scoring systems. RESULTS: There were 64 (27.4%) patients with at least one major complication and 4 (1.7%) deaths. The original and modified versions of the Surgical Apgar Score were not associated with major complications and the scoring systems showed no significant predictive value when receiver operating characteristics were performed. CONCLUSIONS: The original or modified versions of the Surgical Apgar Score could possibly be useful in some subgroups of esophagectomy patients, but should not be considered to have a general predictive value. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:186-191. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Combining different methods improves assessment of competence in colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a reliable method of assessing competence in colonoscopy based on multiple sources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physicians with varying degrees of experience in colonoscopy performed two colonoscopies each in a standardized simulated environment. Their performances were assessed under direct observation by an expert rater and by automatic computerized analysis of operator movements and scope movements, respectively. Reliability (Cronbach's alpha) for subjective assessment, time to cecum, analysis of operator movement and analysis of scope movements were calculated. Composite score calculations were used to explore different combinations of the measures. RESULTS: Twenty physicians were included in the study. The reliability (Cronbach's alpha) were 0.92, 0.57, 0.87 and 0.55 for the subjective score assessed under direct observation, time to cecum, distance between operator's hands and colonoscopy progression score, respectively. Equal weight (=25%) to all four methods resulted in a reliability of 0.91 and optimal weighting of the methods (55%, 10%, 25% and 10%, respectively) resulted in a maximum reliability of 0.95. CONCLUSION: Combining subjective expert ratings with automated objective assessments results in a less biased and more reliable assessment of competence in colonoscopy.