Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Allergy ; 78(6): 1441-1458, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36802268

RESUMO

The role of nutrition is increasingly recognized in the management of chronic immune diseases. However, the role of an immune-supportive diet as adjuvant therapy in the management of allergic disease has not been similarly explored. This review assesses the existing evidence for a relationship between nutrition, immune function, and allergic disease from a clinical perspective. In addition, the authors propose an immune-supportive diet to enhance dietary interventions and complementing other therapeutic options for allergic disease from early life to adulthood. A narrative review of the literature was conducted, to determine the evidence of the relationship between nutrition and immune function, overall health, epithelial barrier function, and gut microbiome, particularly in relation to allergy. Studies on food supplements were excluded. The evidence was assessed and utilized to develop a sustainable immune-supportive diet to complement other therapies in allergic disease. The proposed diet consists of a highly diverse range of fresh, whole, and minimally processed plant-based and fermented foods supplemented with moderate amounts of nuts, omega-3-rich foods and animal-based products in proportional amounts of the EAT-Lancet diet, such as (fatty) fish, (fermented) milk products which may be full-fat and eggs, lean meat or poultry, which may be free-range or organic.


Assuntos
Dieta , Hipersensibilidade , Animais , Hipersensibilidade/terapia , Carne , Suplementos Nutricionais , Ovos
2.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 34(9): e14019, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37747742

RESUMO

Following a diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy, to secure the best outcome, the patient should receive individualized advice tailored to their specific needs, which considers the type and presentation of the food involved, level of exclusion required, risk of cross-contamination and any variance required for age, ethnicity, financial issues, and lifestyle. Issues such as food labels "may contain" statements, and variation in the threshold of reaction and impact of cofactors should also be considered. Most important is the need to ensure that the diagnosis is robust, especially given the nutritional, psychological, and socioeconomic issues that can affect an individual with a diagnosis of food allergy. Unnecessary exclusion of one or more foods that have not triggered allergic reactions, especially in individuals with allergic comorbidities, can result in severe IgE-mediated reactions on re-exposure. Given that food allergies may change over time, the diagnosis should be reviewed, to determine whether resolution is likely, or new-food triggers are reported. Regular assessment is vital, especially during childhood, to ensure reintroduction occurs at an appropriate time, thus enabling increased diversity of the diet and improvement in the quality of life. For some, an IgE-mediated food allergy may necessitate the life-long exclusion of foods, and for others, a food habitually eaten suddenly triggers an allergic reaction in adult life. People of all ages, ethnicities, and socioeconomic backgrounds deserve individual advice on the management of their food allergy to support a healthy diet and improve quality of life.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Alimentos , Etnicidade , Imunoglobulina E
3.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 127(1): 28-35, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33757808

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy with potential risk of malnutrition related to the early onset of disease, frequent avoidance of cow's milk, and the possibility of multiple food triggers. This publication is aimed at providing an evidence-based, practical approach to the dietary management of FPIES. DATA SOURCES: This is a narrative review summarizing information from national and international guidelines, retrospective studies, population studies, review articles, case reports, and case series to evaluate for nutritional risk and develop guidance for risk reduction in children with FPIES. STUDY SELECTIONS: We have included retrospective clinical cohort studies, population-based studies, case reports, and case studies. We did not exclude any studies identified owing to the small number of studies addressing the nutritional management of individuals with FPIES. RESULTS: Children with FPIES are at risk of malnutrition owing to suboptimal oral intake, limited food choices, and knowledge deficits related to feeding. In particular, children with 3 or more FPIES triggers seem to be at increased risk for poor weight gain and developing food aversion. Caregivers of children with FPIES also report a high degree of psychosocial burden. CONCLUSION: Appropriate dietary management entails the following 3 essential components: supporting normal growth and development, avoidance of allergens, and advancement of complementary foods. Education to avoid the trigger food and assisting caregivers in creating an individualized, well-designed complementary feeding plan to meet the infant's nutritional needs for optimal growth and development are essential management strategies.


Assuntos
Proteínas Alimentares/efeitos adversos , Suplementos Nutricionais , Enterocolite/dietoterapia , Comportamento Alimentar , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/dietoterapia , Alérgenos/imunologia , Animais , Cuidadores/psicologia , Gatos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Enterocolite/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Lactente , Leite/imunologia , Síndrome , Aumento de Peso
4.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 68(1): 50-55, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30074576

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: No formal comparative effectiveness studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) treatment choice on long-term growth in pediatric patients. Long-term studies of inhaled corticoid steroids in asthma, however, suggest possible effects on linear growth. The aim of this study was to compare longitudinal, anthropometric growth in children with EoE according to treatment approach. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of anthropometric growth (height and body mass index [BMI] z scores) in pediatric (<18 years of age) patients newly diagnosed with EoE across 5 clinical sites between 2005 and 2014. We compared differences in growth according to treatment approach over a 12-month period. Modification by sex and age was examined and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess robustness of results given study assumptions. RESULTS: In the 409 patients identified, the mean age and proportion male differed by treatment (P =  < 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively). Baseline growth measures were associated with slight impairment of height at diagnosis (median baseline height z score of -0.1 [interquartile range -0.9, 0.8]). In general, treatment approach was not associated with any significant increase or decrease in expected growth over a 12-month period. Subtle decrease in linear growth was observed with treatment using a combined elemental and topical steroid (Δ height z score [adjusted]: -0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.08, -0.01). Differences in linear growth differed by sex (P for interaction <0.01). For elemental formula in combination with topical steroids, only girls exhibited a significant decline in linear growth (Δ height z score [adjusted]: -0.24; 95% CI: -0.32, -0.17). A slight reduction in BMI was observed for patients treated with a combination of elemental diet and dietary elimination (Δ BMI z score [adjusted]: -0.07; 95% CI: -0.13, -0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of EoE, in general, is not associated with major anthropometric growth changes in most pediatric patients. Slight linear growth impairment was observed for topical steroid treatment, and sex differences in growth by treatment approach were observed. Future prospective studies should evaluate the effect of treatment on optimal growth and development and over a longer period of follow-up.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Estatura/efeitos dos fármacos , Peso Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Esofagite Eosinofílica/tratamento farmacológico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/fisiopatologia , Administração Tópica , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Antropometria , Criança , Desenvolvimento Infantil/efeitos dos fármacos , Pré-Escolar , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Dig Dis Sci ; 64(6): 1401-1408, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30927211

RESUMO

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated disease triggered by food antigens for which dietary elimination treatment can induce and sustain histologic remission. Our review aims to describe the state of the art regarding dietary treatment of EoE, highlighting a number of areas of controversy related to dietary therapy in EoE, including novel modalities for determining food triggers, making the empiric dietary elimination process more efficient, issues of cross-contamination and "dosing" of how much food to avoid or add back, costs and effects on quality of life, long-term efficacy, and the risk of developing immediate IgE-type reactions after initial dietary elimination. Elemental formulas, empiric elimination diets, and targeted allergy test-directed elimination diets are well-described treatments for EoE. Although elemental diets are most efficacious, their clinical use is limited by cost and the palatability of an exclusively liquid diet. While empiric elimination is less effective than elemental formula-based diets, they are more easily implemented and often sustainable. Since the comparative effectiveness of elimination diets with proton-pump inhibitors and swallowed topical steroids remains unknown, there are multiple areas to address with future research.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Esofagite Eosinofílica/dietoterapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/dietoterapia , Alérgenos/imunologia , Animais , Reações Cruzadas , Esofagite Eosinofílica/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
South Med J ; 111(6): 328-332, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29863219

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Differences in the initial management of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) by practice setting have not been well characterized. We aimed to characterize these differences for sites in the Carolinas EoE Collaborative (CEoEC), a multicenter network of academic and community practices. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of pediatric EoE patients at five CEoEC sites: University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospital, Charlotte Asthma and Allergy Specialists, Greenville Health Systems, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, and the Medical University of South Carolina Hospital. Cases of EoE were defined by consensus guidelines. Data were extracted from electronic medical records. We tested for differences among sites and used a multinomial model (polytomous regression) to assess associations between treatment and site, adjusting on patient factors. RESULTS: We identified 464 children with EoE across the CEoEC sites. The median age was highest at Wake Forest (11.4 years), the median eosinophil count was highest at UNC (69 eos/hpf), and UNC had the most male patients (82%). UNC used topical steroids for initial treatment in 86% of cases, compared with <1% in Greenville (P < 0.01). Greenville used dietary elimination more frequently than UNC (81% vs 2%, P < 0.01). Differences in treatment approach held after adjusting for potential baseline confounders. There was no significant association between patient factors and initial treatment approach. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in EoE patient factors and treatment approaches were identified across CEoEC sites and were not explained by patient or practice factors. This suggests that institutional or provider preferences drive initial treatment approaches, and that more data are needed to drive best practice decisions.


Assuntos
Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos de Pesquisa/tendências , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Esofagite Eosinofílica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , South Carolina/epidemiologia
8.
Dysphagia ; 31(6): 765-770, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27503565

RESUMO

The six-food elimination diet (SFED), where dairy, wheat, eggs, soy, nuts, and seafood are avoided, is an effective treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Patient-related costs of this approach, however, are unknown. We aimed to assess the cost of and ease of shopping for an SFED compared to an unrestricted diet. A dietitian with expertise in EoE generated menus meeting dietary requirements for a week's worth of meals for the SFED and an unrestricted diet. We compared prices and the number of missing items for both diets at standard and specialty grocery stores. The average weekly price of the SFED at a standard supermarket was $92.54 compared to $79.84 for an unrestricted diet (p = 0.0001). A patient shopping at a standard grocery store needed a higher proportion of items from a second store compared to an unrestricted diet (32 vs. 3 %, p = 0.0001). The prices of the SFED and unrestricted diet using a specialty supermarket were comparable ($106.47 vs. $105.96, p = 0.81), as was the percentage of items requiring a trip to a second store (6 vs. 2 % items, p = 0.03). Shopping at a specialty grocery store increased weekly grocery costs by $13.93 (p = 0.04) for the SFED and $26.12 (p = 0.03) for the unrestricted diet. In conclusion, for patients shopping at standard grocery stores, the cost of an SFED is higher, and an SFED requires more items from a second store. These differences disappear at specialty grocery stores, but costs were significantly higher. This cost and logistical burden can inform patients when selecting dietary therapy.


Assuntos
Dieta/economia , Esofagite Eosinofílica/dietoterapia , Alimentos/economia , Comércio , Custos e Análise de Custo/estatística & dados numéricos , Dieta/métodos , Esofagite Eosinofílica/economia , Humanos , Estados Unidos
9.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 41(2): 233-270, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33863482

RESUMO

Worldwide food allergy prevalence is increasing, especially in children. Food allergy management strategies include appropriate avoidance measures and identifying suitable alternatives for a nutritionally sound diet. Individualized dietary intervention begins teaching label reading, which differs among countries or regions. Dietary intervention must result in a nutritionally sound plan including alternatives to support optimal growth and development. Inappropriate or incomplete dietary advice may increase the risk of adverse reactions, growth faltering, and nutrient deficiencies. Evidence indicates input from a registered dietitian improves nutritional outcomes. Nutritional input plays a critical role managing nutritional disorders related to food allergy.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Alérgenos , Criança , Dieta , Alimentos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Humanos
10.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 5(2): 312-324.e29, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28283156

RESUMO

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic/immune-antigen-mediated disease characterized clinically by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and histologically by eosinophil-predominant inflammation. Dietary elimination therapy has been shown to be an effective, drug-free prescription for the treatment of EoE. A range of different dietary elimination therapies have been used. Regardless of the elimination diet chosen, dietary therapy requires in-depth nutrition assessment and management. Elimination diets are not without risk and may impact nutritional status, eating pleasure, and overall quality of life. With adequate guidance, dietary therapy can be effective and nutritionally balanced, and the adverse impact on lifestyle can be minimized. This work group report addresses the potential challenges of implementing an elimination diet for the management of EoE and provides instructions and tools for physicians, dietitians, and other allied health professionals to help guide them in planning elimination diets for both children and adults.


Assuntos
Dieta , Esofagite Eosinofílica/dietoterapia , Alimentos Formulados , Adulto , Animais , Criança , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA