Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 63(3): 281-6, 2001 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11246912

RESUMO

The survival of Helicobacter pylori (NCTC 11638) in various semiprocessed and fresh, ready-to-eat foods, and one raw chicken was studied at 4 degrees C and under aerobic conditions by experimentally inoculating these with 10(4) CFU. Cells were concentrated by two centrifugation cycles followed by plating onto selective blood agar medium made from Wilkins-Chalgren agar supplemented with 5% whole horse blood, and 30 mg/l colistin methanesulfonate, 100 mg/l cycloheximide, 30 mg/l nalidixic acid, 30 mg/l trimethoprim, and 10 mg/l vancomycin. H. pylori was recovered from spiked pasteurized milk and tofu samples up to 5 days and from spiked leaf lettuce and raw chicken up to 2 days. H. pylori could not be recovered from yogurt after any length of storage time. H. pylori is unlikely to grow in foods; however, it may survive in low acid-high moisture environments under refrigeration and pose a possible risk for transmission of infection via foods.


Assuntos
Manipulação de Alimentos/métodos , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Helicobacter pylori/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Animais , Bovinos , Galinhas/microbiologia , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Laticínios/microbiologia , Feminino , Infecções por Helicobacter/prevenção & controle , Temperatura , Fatores de Tempo , Verduras/microbiologia
2.
J Food Prot ; 66(2): 304-10, 2003 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12597493

RESUMO

Detecting the use of genetically modified feeds in milk has become important, because the voluntary labeling of milk and dairy products as "GMO free" or as "organically grown" prohibits the employment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The aim of this work was to investigate whether a DNA transfer from foodstuffs like soya and maize was analytically detectable in cow's milk after digestion and transportation via the bloodstream of dairy cows and, thus, whether milk could report for the employment of transgene feeds. Blood, milk, urine, and feces of dairy cows were examined, and foreign DNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction by specifically amplifying a 226-bp fragment of the maize invertase gene and a 118-bp fragment of the soya lectin gene. An intravenous application of purified plant DNA showed a fast elimination of marker DNA in blood or its reduction below the detection limit. With feeding experiments, it could be demonstrated that a specific DNA transfer from feeds into milk was not detectable. Therefore, foreign DNA in milk cannot serve as an indicator for the employment of transgene feeds unless milk is directly contaminated with feed components or airborne feed particles.


Assuntos
Bovinos/metabolismo , DNA de Plantas/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Leite/química , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/metabolismo , Ração Animal , Animais , Bovinos/fisiologia , Fezes/química , Feminino , Análise de Alimentos , Amplificação de Genes , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Glycine max/genética , Urinálise/veterinária , Zea mays/genética
3.
Food Addit Contam ; 22(2): 104-12, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15823999

RESUMO

The results of an inter-laboratory study with five commercially available peanut ELISA test kits to detect and quantify peanut residues in two food matrices (biscuit and dark chocolate) at four different concentrations (0-10 mg peanut kg(-1) matrix corresponding to about 0-2.5 mg peanut protein kg(-1) matrix) are reported. In general the five ELISA test kits evaluated could detect peanut protein in the two food matrices. In three cases, the study challenged the test kits beyond their intended use for quantification below the manufacturers' defined cut-off limits. Generally, all five ELISA test kits performed well in the concentration range 5-10 mg kg(-1) rather than in the low concentration range (2.0 or 2.5 mg kg(-1)). The variation in the found recoveries of peanut between the different test kits had a spread of 44-191% across all concentrations. The quantification characteristics between test kits differed significantly at the very low mg kg(-1) level. Two test kits performed well even at concentrations below 5 mg kg(-1) with reproducibilities of 27-36% for biscuits and 45-57% for chocolate.


Assuntos
Arachis/química , Cacau/química , Doces/análise , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Proteínas de Plantas/análise , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/etiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
4.
Food Addit Contam ; 21(1): 1-31, 2004 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14744677

RESUMO

Food allergies represent an important health problem in industrialized countries. Undeclared allergens as contaminants in food products pose a major risk for sensitized persons. A proposal to amend the European Food Labelling Directive requires that all ingredients intentionally added to food products will have to be included on the label. Reliable detection and quantification methods for food allergens are necessary to ensure compliance with food labelling and to improve consumer protection. Methods available so far are based on protein or DNA detection. This review presents an up-to-date picture of the characteristics of the major food allergens and collects published methods for the determination of food allergens or the presence of potentially allergenic constituents in food products. A summary of the current availability of commercial allergen detection kits is given. One part of the paper describes various methods that have been generally employed in the detection of allergens in food; their advantages and drawbacks are discussed in brief. The main part of this review, however, focuses on specific food allergens and appropriate methods for their detection in food products. Special emphasis is given to allergenic foods explicitly mentioned in the Amendment to the European Food Labelling Directive that pose a potential risk for allergic individuals, namely celery, cereals containing gluten (including wheat, rye and barley) crustaceans, eggs, fish, peanuts, soybeans, milk and dairy products, mustard, tree-nuts, sesame seeds, and sulphite at concentrations of at least 10 mg kg(-1). Sulphites, however, are not discussed.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/análise , Análise de Alimentos/métodos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Grão Comestível/imunologia , Ovos/análise , Eletroforese/métodos , Produtos Pesqueiros/análise , Rotulagem de Alimentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Liberação de Histamina/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoensaio/métodos , Nozes/imunologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos
5.
Food Addit Contam ; 20(9): 797-803, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-13129774

RESUMO

Undeclared peanut allergens as contaminants in foodstuffs represent a major health problem for sensitized persons. Various immunochemical techniques are employed to detect and quantify peanut allergens. There is an urgent need to compare and standardize those test systems to enable comparable allergen analyses of foodstuffs, comparable studies, and consequent and consistent measures against the presence of hidden peanut allergens. The present study compared commercially available peanut ELISA kits with human sera-based immunoassay techniques (dot blotting and Western blotting), enabling semiquantitative and quantitative detection, and identification of peanut contaminants in foodstuffs. Additionally, the effect of conventional roasting conditions on the detection and quantification of peanut with the selected methods was investigated.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/análise , Arachis/imunologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Western Blotting/métodos , Análise de Alimentos/métodos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/prevenção & controle , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA