High-pitch CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with ultra-low contrast medium volume for the detection of pulmonary embolism: a comparison with standard CTPA.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and image quality of high-pitch CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with reduced iodine volume in normal weight patients. METHODS: In total, 81 normal weight patients undergoing CTPA for suspected pulmonary arterial embolism were retrospectively included: 41 in high-pitch mode with 20 mL of contrast medium (CM); and 40 with normal pitch and 50 mL of CM. Subjective image quality was assessed and rated on a 3-point scale. For objective image quality, attenuation and noise values were measured in all pulmonary arteries from the trunk to segmental level. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Radiation dose estimations were recorded. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in patient and scan demographics between high-pitch and standard CTPA. Subjective image quality was rated good to excellent in over 90% of all exams with no significant group differences (p = 0.32). Median contrast opacification was lower in high-pitch CTPA (283.18 [216.06-368.67] HU, 386.81 [320.57-526.12] HU; p = 0.0001). CNR reached a minimum of eight in all segmented arteries, but was lower in high-pitch CTPA (8.79 [5.82-12.42], 11.01 [9.19-17.90]; p = 0.005). Median effective dose of high-pitch CTPA was lower (1.04 [0.72-1.27] mSv/mGy·cm; 1.49 [1.07-2.05] mSv/mGy·cm; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: High-pitch CTPA using ultra-low contrast volume (20 mL) rendered diagnostic images for the detection of pulmonary arterial embolism in most instances. Compared to standard CTPA, the high-pitch CTPA exams with drastically reduced contrast medium volume had also concomitantly reduced radiation exposure. However, objective image quality of high-pitch CTPA was worse, though likely still within acceptable limits for confident diagnosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides valuable insights on the performance of a high-pitch dual-source CTPA protocol, offering potential benefits in reducing contrast medium and radiation dose while maintaining sufficient image quality for accurate diagnosis in patients suspected of pulmonary embolism. KEY POINTS: • High-pitch CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with ultra-low volume of contrast medium and reduced radiation dose renders diagnostic examinations with comparable subjective image quality to standard CTPA in most patients. • Objective image quality of high-pitch CTPA is reduced compared to standard CTPA, but contrast opacification and contrast-to-noise ratio remain above diagnostic thresholds. • Challenges of high-pitch CTPA may potentially be encountered in patients with severe heart failure or when performing a Valsalva maneuver during the examination.

Interrater Variability of ML-Based CT-FFR in Patients without Obstructive CAD before TAVR: Influence of Image Quality, Coronary Artery Calcifications, and Location of Measurement.

Objectives: CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) can improve the specificity of coronary CT-angiography (cCTA) for ruling out relevant coronary artery disease (CAD) prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, little is known about the reproducibility of CT-FFR and the influence of diffuse coronary artery calcifications or segment location. The objective was to assess the reliability of machine-learning (ML)-based CT-FFR prior to TAVR in patients without obstructive CAD and to assess the influence of image quality, coronary artery calcium score (CAC), and the location of measurement within the coronary tree. Methods: Patients assessed for TAVR, without obstructive CAD on cCTA were evaluated with ML-based CT-FFR by two observers with differing experience. Differences in absolute values and categorization into hemodynamically relevant CAD (CT-FFR ≤ 0.80) were compared. Results in regard to CAD were also compared against invasive coronary angiography. The influence of segment location, image quality, and CAC was evaluated. Results: Of the screened patients, 109/388 patients did not have obstructive CAD on cCTA and were included. The median (interquartile range) difference of CT-FFR values was -0.005 (-0.09 to 0.04) (p = 0.47). Differences were smaller with high values. Recategorizations were more frequent in distal segments. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR between both observers was comparable (proximal: Δ0.2%; distal: Δ0.5%) but was lower in distal segments (proximal: 98.9%/99.1%; distal: 81.1%/81.6%). Image quality and CAC had no clinically relevant influence on CT-FFR. Conclusions: ML-based CT-FFR evaluation of proximal segments was more reliable. Distal segments with CT-FFR values close to the given threshold were prone to recategorization, even if absolute differences between observers were minimal and independent of image quality or CAC.