Validation of an Argentine version of Lupus Quality of Life questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To determine reproducibility and validity of an Argentine version of the Lupus Quality of Life questionnaire (LupusQoL) and to determine cut-off values in the questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-seven systemic lupus erythematosus patients (American College of Rheumatology 1982/1997) were assessed from April 2014 to July 2014. Demographic and socioeconomic variables were collected, as well as SELENA/SLEDAI, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index Score, comorbidities and treatment data. Patients completed LupusQoL-Argentine version and European Quality of Life Questionnaire (EuroQoL-5D). Internal consistency and reliability were examined. Convergent validity with EuroQoL-5D was assessed through analysis of latent classes, which established homogeneous categories from the responses of each domain of LupusQoL and for the total. RESULTS: Out of 147 patients, 93.2% were female, mean age 36.4 ± 11.1 years, mean disease duration 2.7 ± 9 years, mean SELENA/SLEDAI 2.7 ± 3 points. The cut-off point that defined good or bad quality of life was 0.739 for EuroQoL 5D and 63 for LupusQoL. Cut-off values for each LupusQoL domain were also defined, creating two classes in each of them. There was moderate to high concordance to classify quality of life (Kappa = 0.74, 95% confidence interval = 0.54, 0.95). CONCLUSION: The Argentine version of LupusQoL is a valid, reliable and reproducible instrument to assess quality of life. In this study, cut-off points that allow the classification of patients regarding whether they have good or bad quality of life are established for the first time.

Concordancia de los nuevos criterios ACR/EULAR y los ACR 1980 para la clasificación de la esclerosis sistémica / Concordance of the new ACR/EULAR criteria and the ACR 1980 for the classification of systemic sclerosis

Objetivo: Evaluar cumplimiento, y así mismo concordancia y discordancia de los criterios de clasificación de Esclerosis Sistémica (ES) ACR/EULAR 2013 y ACR 1980 en pacientes con diagnóstico clínico de la enfermedad. Método: Se incluyeron 169 pacientes con diagnóstico de Esclerosis Sistémica. Resultados: El 72,2 por ciento cumplía los criterios ACR 1980, y el 99,4 por ciento (168 pacientes) cumplía los criterios ACR/EULAR 2013. La concordancia absoluta de toda la muestra fue 72,7 por ciento, para el subtipo limitado 35,2 por ciento, y 100 por ciento el difuso. Se subanalizaron los pacientes con limitada que sólo cumplían criterios ACR/EULAR 2013, y se comparó con el resto de las limitadas. Los primeros presentaron en forma estadísticamente significativa menor esclerodactilia distal a MCF, menor presencia de úlceras digitales y pitting scars, menor afectación intersticial pulmonar, y mayor daño microvascular en la capilaroscopia. Conclusión: Los nuevos criterios de clasificación de Esclerosis Sistémica serían más adecuados para detectar esclerodermias limitadas, siendo dicho hallazgo estadísticamente significativo.

Objective: To evaluate the performance, and likewise concordance and discordance of the classification criteria of Systemic Sclerosis ACR/EULAR 2013 and ACR 1980 in a group of patients with clinical diagnosis of SSc. Methods: We enrolled 169 patients with diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis. Results: 72.2 percent met the 1980 ACR criteria, and 99.4 percent met the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria. The absolute agreement of the entire sample was 72.7 percent, 35.2 percent for the limited subtype, and 100 percent for the diffuse. Those patients with limited subtype who only met the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria were compared with the rest of limited patients. The first group had statistically significantly lower sclerodactyly distal to MCF, lower presence of digital ulcers and pitting scars, less interstitial lung involvement, and greater abnormal nail fold capillaries. Conclusion: The new classification criteria for systemic sclerosis seem to be more suitable for detecting limited scleroderma. In the present study, statistically significant discrepancy was found in the limited subtype.