Monoallelic variation in DHX9, the gene encoding the DExH-box helicase DHX9, underlies neurodevelopment disorders and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

DExD/H-box RNA helicases (DDX/DHX) are encoded by a large paralogous gene family; in a subset of these human helicase genes, pathogenic variation causes neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) traits and cancer. DHX9 encodes a BRCA1-interacting nuclear helicase regulating transcription, R-loops, and homologous recombination and exhibits the highest mutational constraint of all DDX/DHX paralogs but remains unassociated with disease traits in OMIM. Using exome sequencing and family-based rare-variant analyses, we identified 20 individuals with de novo, ultra-rare, heterozygous missense or loss-of-function (LoF) DHX9 variant alleles. Phenotypes ranged from NDDs to the distal symmetric polyneuropathy axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT2). Quantitative Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) analysis demonstrated genotype-phenotype correlations with LoF variants causing mild NDD phenotypes and nuclear localization signal (NLS) missense variants causing severe NDD. We investigated DHX9 variant-associated cellular phenotypes in human cell lines. Whereas wild-type DHX9 was restricted to the nucleus, NLS missense variants abnormally accumulated in the cytoplasm. Fibroblasts from an individual with an NLS variant also showed abnormal cytoplasmic DHX9 accumulation. CMT2-associated missense variants caused aberrant nucleolar DHX9 accumulation, a phenomenon previously associated with cellular stress. Two NDD-associated variants, p.Gly411Glu and p.Arg761Gln, altered DHX9 ATPase activity. The severe NDD-associated variant p.Arg141Gln did not affect DHX9 localization but instead increased R-loop levels and double-stranded DNA breaks. Dhx9-/- mice exhibited hypoactivity in novel environments, tremor, and sensorineural hearing loss. All together, these results establish DHX9 as a critical regulator of mammalian neurodevelopment and neuronal homeostasis.

Expanded targeted preconception screening panel in Israel: findings and insights.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyse the efficacy and added value of a targeted Israeli expanded carrier screening panel (IL-ECSP), beyond the first-tier test covered by the Israeli Ministry of Health (IMOH) and the second-tier covered by the Health Maintenance Organisations (HMOs). METHODS: A curated variant-based IL-ECSP, tailored to the uniquely diverse Israeli population, was offered at two tertiary hospitals and a major genetics laboratory. The panel includes 1487 variants in 357 autosomal recessive and X-linked genes. RESULTS: We analysed 10 115 Israeli samples during an 18-month period. Of these, 6036 (59.7%) were tested as couples and 4079 (40.3%) were singles. Carriers were most frequently identified with mutations in the following genes: GJB2/GJB6 (1:22 allele frequency), CFTR (1:28), GBA (1:34), TYR (1:39), PAH (1:50), SMN1 (1:52) and HEXA (1:56). Of 3018 couples tested, 753 (25%) had no findings, in 1464 (48.5%) only one partner was a carrier, and in 733 (24.3%) both were carriers of different diseases. We identified 79 (2.6%) at-risk couples, where both partners are carriers of the same autosomal recessive condition, or the female carries an X-linked disease. Importantly, 48.1% of these would not have been detected by ethnically-based screening tests currently provided by the IMOH and HMOs, for example, variants in GBA, TYR, PAH and GJB2/GJB6. CONCLUSION: This is the largest cohort of targeted ECSP testing, tailored to the diverse Israeli population. The IL-ECSP expands the identification of couples at risk and empowers their reproductive choices. We recommend endorsing an expanded targeted panel to the National Genetic Carrier Screening programme.

Community data-driven approach to identify pathogenic founder variants for pan-ethnic carrier screening panels.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recently published new tier-based carrier screening recommendations. While many pan-ethnic genetic disorders are well established, some genes carry pathogenic founder variants (PFVs) that are unique to specific ethnic groups. We aimed to demonstrate a community data-driven approach to creating a pan-ethnic carrier screening panel that meets the ACMG recommendations. METHODS: Exome sequencing data from 3061 Israeli individuals were analyzed. Machine learning determined ancestries. Frequencies of candidate pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants based on ClinVar and Franklin were calculated for each subpopulation based on the Franklin community platform and compared with existing screening panels. Candidate PFVs were manually curated through community members and the literature. RESULTS: The samples were automatically assigned to 13 ancestries. The largest number of samples was classified as Ashkenazi Jewish (n = 1011), followed by Muslim Arabs (n = 613). We detected one tier-2 and seven tier-3 variants that were not included in existing carrier screening panels for Ashkenazi Jewish or Muslim Arab ancestries. Five of these P/LP variants were supported by evidence from the Franklin community. Twenty additional variants were detected that are potentially pathogenic tier-2 or tier-3. CONCLUSIONS: The community data-driven and sharing approaches facilitate generating inclusive and equitable ethnically based carrier screening panels. This approach identified new PFVs missing from currently available panels and highlighted variants that may require reclassification.

Exploring the factors affecting classification and reporting of uncertain prenatal microarray findings, using a "virtual fetus" model-a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Significant discrepancy exists between laboratories in classification and reporting of copy number variants (CNVs). Studies exploring factors affecting prenatal CNV management are rare. Our "virtual fetus" pilot study examines these factors. METHOD: Ten prenatally diagnosed CNVs of uncertain significance (VUS) > 1Mb, encompassing OMIM-morbid genes, inherited from healthy parents, were classified by 15 MD geneticists from laboratory, prenatal, and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) units. Geneticists addressed factors affecting classification, obligation to report, and recommendation for invasive testing or PGT. RESULTS: CNVs were classified likely benign (10.7%), VUS (74.7%), likely pathogenic (8.7%), or pathogenic (6.0%). Classification discrepancy was higher for losses versus gains. Classifying pathogenic/likely pathogenic was more common for losses (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 10.9, 95% CI 1.55-76.9), and geneticists specializing in gynecology (aOR 4.9, 95% CI 1.03-23.3). 84.0% of respondents would report CNVs, depending on classification and family phenotype. Invasive testing in pregnancies was recommended for 29.3% of CNVs, depending on the classification and geneticist's specialization. PGT was recommended for 32.4%, depending on classification, experience years, and family's phenotype (38.0% for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization irrespectively, 26.7% otherwise). CONCLUSION: Factors affecting CNV classification/reporting are mainly dosage, family phenotype, geneticist specialization and experience. Understanding factors from our pilot study may facilitate developing an algorithm for clinical consensus and optimal management.

Monogenic conditions and central nervous system anomalies: A prospective study, systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Determine the incremental diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing (pES) over chromosome microarray (CMA) or G-banding karyotype in fetuses with central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities. METHODS: Data were collected via electronic searches from January 2010 to April 2022 in MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science and EMBASE. The NHS England prenatal exome cohort was also included. Incremental yield was calculated as a pooled value using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included (n = 1583 cases). The incremental yield with pES for any CNS anomaly was 32% [95%CI 27%-36%; I2 = 72%]. Subgroup analysis revealed apparent incremental yields in; (a) isolated CNS anomalies; 27% [95%CI 19%-34%; I2 = 74%]; (b) single CNS anomaly; 16% [95% CI 10%-23%; I2 = 41%]; (c) more than one CNS anomaly; 31% [95% Cl 21%-40%; I2 = 56%]; and (d) the anatomical subtype with the most optimal yield was Type 1 malformation of cortical development, related to abnormal cell proliferation or apoptosis, incorporating microcephalies, megalencephalies and dysplasia; 40% (22%-57%; I2 = 68%). The commonest syndromes in isolated cases were Lissencephaly 3 and X-linked hydrocephalus. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal exome sequencing provides a high incremental diagnostic yield in fetuses with CNS abnormalities with optimal yields in cases with multiple CNS anomalies, particularly those affecting the midline, posterior fossa and cortex.

International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis 2022 debate 3-Fetal genome sequencing should be offered to all pregnant patients.

Prenatal trio exome sequencing (ES) has become integrated into the care for pregnant women when the fetus has structural anomalies. Details regarding optimizing indications for prenatal exome sequencing, its detection rates with different categories of fetal anomalies, and principles of interpretation of pathogenicity of sequence variants are still under investigation. However, there is now growing consensus about its benefits for finding the cause of fetal structural anomalies. What is not established, is whether exome or genome sequencing (GS) has a place in the care of all pregnant women. This report is a summary of the debate on this topic at the 26th International Conference on Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy. Both expert debaters considered the advantages and disadvantages. Advantages include the ability to diagnose serious childhood conditions without a prenatally observable phenotype, which creates the potential of early treatments. Disadvantages include difficulties with variant classification, counseling complexities, healthcare cost, and the burden on healthcare systems and families, in particular with the discovery of adult-onset disorders or variants of uncertain significance. Although both debaters weighed the balance of these conflicting arguments differently, they agreed that more research is needed to further explore the clinical utility and ethical aspects of GS for all pregnant women.

SMARCC1 is a susceptibility gene for congenital hydrocephalus with an autosomal dominant inheritance mode and incomplete penetrance.

A Jewish couple of mixed origin was referred for genetic counseling following termination of pregnancy at 18 weeks of gestation due to severe ventriculomegaly with aqueduct stenosis. Trio exome sequencing revealed a loss-of-function heterozygous variant in the SMARCC1 gene inherited from an unaffected mother. The SMARCC1 gene is associated with embryonic neurodevelopmental processes. Recent studies have linked perturbations of the gene with autosomal dominant congenital hydrocephalus, albeit with reduced penetrance. However, these studies were not referenced in the SMARCC1 OMIM record (*601732) and the gene was not considered, at the time, an OMIM morbid gene. Following our case and appeal, SMARCC1 is now considered a susceptibility gene for hydrocephalus. This allowed us to reclassify the variant as likely pathogenic and empowered the couple to make informed reproductive choices.

Upgrading an intronic TMEM67 variant of unknown significance to likely pathogenic through RNA studies and community data sharing.

FETAL PHENOTYPE: A couple of Ashkenazi Jewish descent was referred for an early anatomy scan at 14 + 2 weeks of gestation following a previous pregnancy termination due to posterior encephalocele and enlarged kidneys. The index pregnancy was also positive for several fetal abnormalities, including enlarged kidneys with cystic dysplasia and abnormal cerebellar morphology highly suggestive of Joubert syndrome. GENETIC DIAGNOSTIC TEST PERFORMED, RESULT, AND INTERPRETATION: Trio exome sequencing revealed compound heterozygosity for variants in the TMEM67 gene: a known pathogenic maternally inherited variant found in trans with a paternal intronic variant of unknown significance. RNA analysis revealed that the intronic variant creates a cryptic acceptor splice site in intron 12, leading to the insertion of 22 bp and causing a frameshift with a premature stop codon. This analysis enabled the reclassification of the intronic variant to likely pathogenic. IMPLICATIONS AND NOVELTY: This information empowered the couple to make informed reproductive choices and opt for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for future pregnancies.

Ethnicity has a multiplex impact upon the risk of a full mutation expansion among female heterozygotes for FMR1 premutation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether ethnicity affects the risk of full mutation expansion among females heterozygous for FMR1 premutation. METHODS: Women who carry the FMR1 premutation alelle of Jewish origin who underwent fragile X prenatal diagnosis between 2011 and 2018 in two medical centers in Israel were included. The heterozygote women and fetuses were analyzed for the number of CGG repeats and AGG interruptions. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-six subjects were included. Parental ethnicity was fully concordant in 592 cases (Jewish, Ashkenazi, and non-Ashkenazi). Ashkenazi compared with non-Ashkenazi heterozygotes have a significantly higher mean number of CGG repeats (68 ± 8.7, 64 ± 6.4 respectively, P = 0.03) and a lower mean number of AGG interruptions (0.89 ± 0.83, 1.60 ± 1.18 respectively, p = 0.0001). Overall, 56/198 (28.2%) fetuses of Ashkenazi heterozygotes had an expansion to a full mutation compared with 6/98 among the non-Ashkenazi (6.1%) (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, in addition to CGG repeats and AGG interruptions (which contributed 68.3% of variance), ethnicity is an independent risk factor for a full mutation expansion (odds ratio [OR] = 2.04, p < 0.001) and accounted for 9% of the variation of a full mutation expansion. CONCLUSION: Apart from significant differences regarding the number of CGG repeats and AGG interruptions between Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi heterozygotes, ethnicity independently affects the risk of a full mutation.

Economic impact of using maternal plasma cell-free DNA testing to guide further workup in recurrent pregnancy loss.

OBJECTIVE: We have previously demonstrated that maternal-plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-testing can detect chromosomal anomalies in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) with 81.8% sensitivity and 90.3% specificity. Here we assess whether this is cost effective in guiding further workup in RPLs. METHOD: A decision-analytic model was developed to compare the cost of various RPL management pathways: (1) current American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) RPL workup; (2) microarray or karyotyping analysis of products of conception (POCs) and RPL workup only for euploid cases; and (3) cfDNA testing and RPL workup only for euploid cases. Sample accessibility, failure rates, and sensitivity were specified for each test. Costs of sample collection, genetic tests, and RPL workup were considered. Analysis outcomes included detection rate of chromosomal anomaly and cost per patient tested. RESULTS: In comparison to existing cytogenetic testing on POCs, cfDNA testing pathway allowed for better sample accessibility with a lower cost per patient. In addition, using cfDNA to guide further workup significantly increases the number of causative fetal chromosome anomalies detected, reducing the number of patients undergoing unnecessary workup resulting in an overall cost savings. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that inclusion of cfDNA testing is a cost-effective approach to guide RPL workup.

Maternal plasma genome-wide cell-free DNA can detect fetal aneuploidy in early and recurrent pregnancy loss and can be used to direct further workup.

STUDY QUESTION: Can maternal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) detect chromosomal anomalies in early pregnancy loss (EPL) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Genome-wide cfDNA testing can serve as an alternative to cytogenetic analysis in products of conception (POCs) in RPLs and can guide further management. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Random chromosomal anomalies are the single most common cause for EPL and RPL. Cytogenetic analysis in POCs may be used to direct management in RPL because the detection of random chromosomal anomalies can eliminate further unwarranted testing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective diagnostic test study from March 2018 to January 2019 of 109 patients experiencing pregnancy loss before 14 weeks gestation at a tertiary-care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Blood samples were drawn for genome-wide cfDNA testing prior to chorionic villous sampling for cytogenetic analysis of POCs with both short-term cultures (STCs) and long-term cultures (LTCs). Final analysis included 86 patients with non-mosaic cytogenetic results in POCs and available cfDNA results. Aneuploidy detection rates by cfDNA testing and POC cytogenetic analysis were compared. The first 50 samples served as the Training Set to establish pregnancy loss-specific log-likelihood ratio (LLR) thresholds using receiver-operator characteristic (ROC)-like analyses. These were then used for the entire cohort. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Seventy-eight samples (71.5%) had results available from both STC and LTC; 12 samples (11%) had a result from STC only, and 7 samples (6.4%) had a result from LTC only. A chromosomal anomaly was detected in 55/86 (64%). The rates of chromosomal anomalies were 61, 72, 73 and 44% in patients undergoing their first, second, third and ≥4th pregnancy losses, respectively. The median cfDNA fetal fraction was 5%. With standard LLR thresholds used for noninvasive prenatal screening, the sensitivity of cfDNA in detecting aneuploidy was 55% (30/55) and with a specificity of 100% (31/31). Using pregnancy loss-specific LLR thresholds, the sensitivity of cfDNA in detecting aneuploidy was 82% (45/55), with a specificity of 90% (28/31). The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 8.46 and 0.20, respectively. Fetal sex was correctly assigned in all cases. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Cases with a false-positive result by cfDNA analysis would not receive the indicated RPL workup. Specificity could be improved by using a fetal fraction (FF) cutoff of 4%, but this would result in exclusion of more than a quarter of cases. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: cfDNA-based testing can serve as an alternative to POC cytogenetic analysis and can guide further RPL management: if cfDNA demonstrates aneuploidy, no further action is taken and if no abnormality is detected, the recommended RPL workup is performed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Cell-free DNA testing was funded by Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA. Y.Y. is a member of Illumina's Clinical Expert Panel and has received travel grants. A.B. has received travel grants from Illumina. All authors have no competing interest to declare.

Oncofertility: insights from IVF specialists-a worldwide web-based survey analysis.

PURPOSE: This research sought to understand IVF-physicians' knowledge of, experience with, and attitudes toward fertility preservation for cancer patients. METHODS: A 35-question, self-report survey request was emailed to IVF providers who were registered on the IVF-Worldwide.com network (3826 clinics). Physicians submitted responses on the IVF-Worldwide.com website. Survey results were reported as a proportion of the responding clinics. RESULTS: Survey responses were completed by 321 (8.4%) globally distributed IVF clinics, representing 299,800 IVF cycles. Of these clinics, 86.6% (278) performed fertility preservation, treating approximately 6300 patients annually. However, 18.4% of the centers reported that patients sought advice independently, without an oncologist's referral. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation was performed by 37.7% of the clinics, yet 52.6% considered the procedure experimental. IVM was performed by 16.5% of responding clinics. A majority (63.6%) of the clinics selected treatment protocols based on each patient's malignancy. Most respondents (76.3%) disagreed that fertility preservation was not yet successful enough to make it an available option. However, 44.2% believed that pregnancy rates following oocyte cryopreservation could not be determined because not enough oocyte cryopreservation patients had completed embryo transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Most clinics performed fertility preservation, tailoring protocols to each patient's disease and condition. Almost 20% of patients sought advice independently, indicating that more effort is needed to encourage oncologists to refer patients. Most survey respondents believed that data was not yet available on either live birth outcomes or the best protocol for each disease. Therefore, long-term study must continue, with the establishment of interim milestones and an outcome-tracking registry.

Parental Origin of the Retained X Chromosome in Monosomy X Miscarriages and Ongoing Pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the distribution of the parental origin of the retained X chromosome in monosomy X, either in miscarriages or in ongoing pregnancies. METHOD: The parental origin of the X chromosome was determined in monosomy X pregnancies, either miscarriages or ongoing pregnancies. Microsatellite marker patterns were compared between maternal and fetal samples by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction. Distributions of maternally and paternally derived X chromosome were assessed in miscarriages and in ongoing pregnancies using two-tailed Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Forty monosomy X pregnancies were included in the study: 26 miscarried at 5-16 weeks, and 14 ongoing pregnancies were diagnosed at 11-20 weeks. The retained X chromosome was maternally derived in 67% of the cases. In miscarriages, maternal and paternal X chromosome were retained in a similar proportion (54% [95% CI: 35-73%] vs. 46% [95% CI: 27-65%]), while in ongoing pregnancies, the maternal rate was 13 times higher (93% [95% CI: 79-100%)] vs. 7% [95% CI: 0-20%]). CONCLUSIONS: The retained X chromosome in individuals with monosomy X should theoretically be maternally derived in 2/3 of the cases. Our study suggests a preferential early miscarriage in pregnancies with a retained paternally derived X chromosome. This may explain the observation that 75-90% of individuals with monosomy X retain the maternal X chromosome.

An evidence-based scoring system for prioritizing mosaic aneuploid embryos following preimplantation genetic screening.

The aim of this study was to devise an evidence-based scoring system for prioritizing mosaic aneuploid embryos for transfer. A retrospective analysis was performed of all sequential cytogenetic and molecular results on chorionic villi samples (n = 72,472) and products of conception (n = 3806) analysed at a single centre. The likelihood that a mosaic aneuploidy detected in chorionic villi samples will involve the fetus, the incidence of clinically significant fetal uniparental disomy in the presence of a mosaic in chorionic villi and the chance of the mosaicism culminating in miscarriage were used to generate a scoring system for prioritizing mosaic aneuploid embryos detected by preimplantation genetic screening. A composite score was obtained for each individual mosaic aneuploidy after assignment of an individual risk score based on the incidence/likelihood of each adverse outcome. A final additional score was assigned to viable full or mosaic aneuploidies with a well-defined phenotype. The higher the composite score the lower the priority for embryo transfer. In conclusion, due to the paucity of prospective studies on the actual transfer of mosaic aneuploid embryos, we suggest using this evidence-based scoring system to provide a useful tool for clinicians, embryologists and patients.

Dilemmas in genetic counseling for low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci detected on prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis is standard of care in fetuses with malformations, detecting clinically significant copy number variants in 5-7% of cases over conventional karyotyping. However, it also detects variants of uncertain significance in 1.6-4.2% of the cases, some of which are low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci. The interpretation of these variants in pregnancy is particularly challenging because the significance is often unclear and the clinical implications may be difficult to predict. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe counseling dilemmas regarding low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci that are detected by prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis. STUDY DESIGN: During the study period (January 2014 to December 2015), 700 prenatal chromosomal microarray analyses were performed. Cases were categorized as "indicated" (n=375) if there were abnormal sonographic findings or suggestive medical history and "patient choice" (n=325) in the presence of a structurally normal fetus with no other particular indication. The laboratory reported on copy number variants ≥400 Kb in size in loci known to be associated with genetic syndromes and ≥1 Mb in other areas of genome. Results were classified as gross aneuploidy, copy number variants, and normal. Copy number variants were categorized according to the American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines: pathogenic, variants of uncertain significance, or benign. Variants of uncertain significance were further subdivided into categories of likely pathogenic, variants of uncertain significance with no subclassification, and likely benign. Statistical analysis was performed with the use of Chi square test and Fisher's exact test to compare intergroup differences in incidence of the different result categories and demographic data. RESULTS: Patient choice cases became more prevalent with time (35.5% in the beginning of the study, compared with 48.4% at the end of the study period). Clinically significant copy number variants were found in 14 of 375 (3.7%) of indicated cases vs only 2 of 325 (0.6%) of patient choice cases (P=.009). All "likely benign" variants consisted of low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci. The incidence thereof was similar between the indicated and patient choice groups (3.7% vs 3.4%; P=.85). In the indicated group, some variants of uncertain significance may have contributed to the abnormal anatomic findings. Conversely, in the patient choice group, the finding of low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci was often unexpected and confounding for prospective parents. CONCLUSION: Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis added clinically significant information in both groups. However, it also detected low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci in approximately 3.5% of the cases. This fact should be conveyed during pretest counseling to allow patients to make informed choices, particularly when chromosomal microarray is to be performed for patient choice.

Improving preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) reliability by selection of sperm donor with the most informative haplotype.

BACKGROUND: The study is aimed to describe a novel strategy that increases the accuracy and reliability of PGD in patients using sperm donation by pre-selecting the donor whose haplotype does not overlap the carrier's one. METHODS: A panel of 4-9 informative polymorphic markers, flanking the mutation in carriers of autosomal dominant/X-linked disorders, was tested in DNA of sperm donors before PGD. Whenever the lengths of donors' repeats overlapped those of the women, additional donors' DNA samples were analyzed. The donor that demonstrated the minimal overlapping with the patient was selected for IVF. RESULTS: In 8 out of 17 carriers the markers of the initially chosen donors overlapped the patients' alleles and 2-8 additional sperm donors for each patient were haplotyped. The selection of additional sperm donors increased the number of informative markers and reduced misdiagnosis risk from 6.00% ± 7.48 to 0.48% ±0.68. The PGD results were confirmed and no misdiagnosis was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that pre-selecting a sperm donor whose haplotype has minimal overlapping with the female's haplotype, is critical for reducing the misdiagnosis risk and ensuring a reliable PGD. This strategy may contribute to prevent the transmission of affected IVF-PGD embryos using a simple and economical procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. DNA testing of donors was approved by the institutional Helsinki committee (registration number 319-08TLV, 2008). The present study was approved by the institutional Helsinki committee (registration number 0385-13TLV, 2013).

Preimplantation genetic screening: results of a worldwide web-based survey.

Our objective was to evaluate and characterize the extent and patterns of worldwide usage of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) among the assisted reproductive technique community. A prospective, web-based questionnaire with questions relating to practices of, and views on, PGS was directed to users and non-users of PGS. A total of 386 IVF units from 70 countries conducting 342,600 IVF cycles annually responded to the survey. A total of 77% of respondents routinely carry out PGS in their clinics for a variety of indications: advanced maternal age (27%), recurrent implantation failure (32%) and recurrent pregnancy loss (31%). Few (6%) offer PGS to all their patients. In most cycles (72%), trophectoderm biopsy is carried out and either array-comparative genomic hybridization (59%) or next-generation sequencing (16%) are used for genetic analysis. Only 30% of respondents regard PGS as clearly evidenced-based, and most (84%) believe that more randomized controlled trials are needed to support the use of PGS. Despite ongoing debate and lack of robust evidence, most respondents support the use of PGS, and believe that it may aid in transferring only euploid embryos, thereby reducing miscarriage rates and multiple pregnancies, increasing live birth rates and reducing the risk of aneuploid pregnancies and births.

Association of aberrant right subclavian artery with abnormal karyotype and microarray results.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of chromosomal aberration (both microscopic and sub-microscopic) in fetuses with an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) detected by ultrasonographic anomaly scan. METHODS: The study included 62 pregnant women whose fetuses were diagnosed with ARSA who were referred for genetic counseling. Of these, 55 patients underwent amniocentesis and 7 declined invasive testing. All 55 amniocentesis samples were tested by standard G-banding and chromosomal microarray, except for 2 samples for which only karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization for 22q11.2 deletions were performed. RESULTS: Of the 55 women who underwent amniocentesis, 5 were detected with trisomy 21 (9.1%), all of whom had additional ultrasound findings. Among the 14 fetuses with ARSA and additional ultrasound findings, the incidence of trisomy 21 was 35.7%. In fetuses with isolated ARSA, no chromosomal aberrations were detected by standard cytogenetic analysis and only one (1.9%) deleterious copy number variants (CNV) was detected by chromosomal microarray. CONCLUSION: Aberrant right subclavian artery with additional ultrasound findings constitute a strong predictor for aneuploidy. However, when ARSA is found in isolation, it confers no increased risk for aneuploidy or pathogenic CNVs. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.