Remibrutinib demonstrates favorable safety profile and sustained efficacy in chronic spontaneous urticaria over 52 weeks.

BACKGROUND: Remibrutinib (LOU064), an oral, highly selective Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, offers fast disease control in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) who remain symptomatic despite treatment with second-generation H1 antihistamines. It is currently in phase 3 development for CSU. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of remibrutinib in patients with CSU inadequately controlled with H1 antihistamines. METHODS: In this phase 2b extension study, patients who completed the core study and had a weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) ≥16 at the beginning of the extension study received remibrutinib 100 mg twice daily for 52 weeks. The primary objective was to assess long-term safety and tolerability. Key efficacy end points included change from baseline in UAS7 and proportion of patients with complete response to treatment (UAS7 = 0) and well-controlled disease (UAS7 ≤6) at week 4 and over 52 weeks. RESULTS: Overall, 84.3% (194/230) of patients entered the treatment period and received ≥1 doses of remibrutinib. The overall safety profile of remibrutinib was comparable between the extension and core studies. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate and considered unrelated to remibrutinib by investigators. The 3 most common treatment-emergent adverse events by system organ class were infections (30.9%), skin and subcutaneous tissue (26.8%), and gastrointestinal disorders (16.5%). At week 4 and 52, mean ± SD change from baseline in UAS7 was -17.6 ± 13.40 and -21.8 ± 10.70; UAS7 = 0 (as observed) was achieved in 28.2% and 55.8% and UAS7 ≤6 (as observed) was achieved in 52.7% and 68.0% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Remibrutinib demonstrated a consistent favorable safety profile with fast and sustained efficacy for up to 52 weeks in patients with CSU.

Ixekizumab-induced urticaria is associated with the short duration of remission in psoriasis by activation of mast cells.

BACKGROUND: Mast cell degranulation plays a pivotal role in urticaria and is also an early histologic characteristic of psoriasis. However, whether the activation of mast cells contributes to psoriasis recurrence after discontinuation of interleukin (IL)-17A blockers remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of mast cells in ixekizumab treatment-associated urticaria (ITAUR) and assess the effect of urticaria eruption on psoriasis relapse. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on biopsies of patients who experienced psoriasis relapse after discontinuation of ixekizumab. Transcriptomic and histopathologic features were assessed. Patterns were compared between patients with ITAUR and nonurticaria (NUR) as well as psoriasis-like mice with mast cell activation or inactivation. RESULTS: Patients with ITAUR experienced early relapse compared with NUR group after treatment withdrawal. Transcriptomic and histopathologic analyses revealed that patients with ITAUR had an elevated proportion of mast cells in resolved skin. Especially, the proportion of IL-17A+ mast cells was inversely correlated with the duration of remission. LIMITATIONS: The mechanism of mast cell activation in ITAUR has not been precisely elucidated. CONCLUSION: Ixekizumab treatment increases IL-17A+ mast cells in lesions of ITAUR, which is associated with early psoriasis relapse after ixekizumab withdrawal.

A genome-wide association study of chronic spontaneous urticaria risk and heterogeneity.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a dermatologic condition characterized by spontaneous, pruritic hives and/or angioedema that persists for 6 weeks or longer with no identifiable trigger. Antihistamines and second-line therapies such as omalizumab are effective for some CSU patients, but others remain symptomatic, with significant impact on quality of life. This variable response to treatment and autoantibody levels across patients highlight clinically heterogeneous subgroups. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to highlight pathways involved in CSU by investigating the genetics of CSU risk and subgroups. METHODS: We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 679 CSU patients and 4446 controls and a GWAS of chronic urticaria (CU)-index, which measures IgG autoantibodies levels, by comparing 447 CU index-low to 183 CU index-high patients. We also tested whether polygenic scores for autoimmune-related disorders were associated with CSU risk and CU index. RESULTS: We identified 2 loci significantly associated with disease risk. The strongest association mapped to position 56 of HLA-DQA1 (P = 1.69 × 10-9), where the arginine residue was associated with increased risk (odds ratio = 1.64). The second association signal colocalized with expression-quantitative trait loci for ITPKB in whole blood (Pcolocalization = .997). The arginine residue at position 56 of HLA-DQA1 was also associated with increased risk of CU index-high (P = 6.15 × 10-5, odds ratio = 1.86), while the ITKPB association was not (P = .64). Polygenic scores for 3 autoimmune-related disorders (hypothyroidism, type 1 diabetes, and vitiligo) were associated with CSU risk and CU index (P < 2.34 × 10-3, odds ratio > 1.72). CONCLUSION: A GWAS of CSU identified 2 genome-wide significant loci, highlighting the shared genetics between CU index and autoimmune disorders.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in children with iron deficiency anemia.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency is the primary cause of anemia in children. Intravenous (IV) iron formulations circumvent malabsorption and rapidly restore hemoglobin. METHODS: This Phase 2, non-randomized, multicenter study characterized the safety profile and determined appropriate dosing of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in children with iron deficiency anemia. Patients aged 1-17 years with hemoglobin <11 g/dL and transferrin saturation <20% received single IV doses of undiluted FCM 7.5 mg/kg (n = 16) or 15 mg/kg (n = 19). RESULTS: The most common drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event was urticaria (in three recipients of FCM 15 mg/kg). Systemic exposure to iron increased in a dose-proportional manner with approximate doubling of mean baseline-corrected maximum serum iron concentration (157 µg/mL with FCM 7.5 mg/kg; and 310 µg/mL with FCM 15 mg/kg) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (1901 and 4851 h·µg/mL, respectively). Baseline hemoglobin was 9.2 and 9.5 g/dL in the FCM 7.5 and 15 mg/kg groups, respectively, with mean maximum changes in hemoglobin of 2.2 and 3.0 g/dL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, FCM was well tolerated by pediatric patients. Improvements in hemoglobin were greater with the higher dose, supporting use of the FCM 15 mg/kg dose in pediatric patients (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02410213). IMPACT: This study provided information on the pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose for treatment of iron deficiency anemia in children and adolescents. In children aged 1-17 years with iron deficiency anemia, single intravenous doses of ferric carboxymaltose 7.5 or 15 mg/kg increased systemic exposure to iron in a dose-proportional manner, with clinically meaningful increases in hemoglobin. The most common drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event was urticaria. The findings suggest that iron deficiency anemia in children can be corrected with a single intravenous dose of ferric carboxymaltose and support use of a 15 mg/kg dose.

Evidence-based use of antihistamines for treatment of allergic conditions.

Available since the 1940s, H1 antihistamines are mainstay treatments for allergic conditions such as allergic rhinitis and urticaria. They function as inverse agonists that bind to the H1 receptor to inhibit histamine-induced inflammation. The older, first-generation drugs are no longer recommended for patient use because of their well-documented negative adverse effect profile. Evidence has been accumulating to support a newer generation of H1 antihistamines in oral and intranasal formulations, including in combination with intranasal corticosteroids. The literature is replete with large meta-analyses and systematic reviews establishing the safety and efficacy of second-generation H1 antihistamines in adult and pediatric allergic rhinitis populations, including combination nasal spray agents (eg, MP29-02 or MP-AzeFlu). Although intraclass differences do exist, patient preference, access, and costs should be the priority. Robust data on the regular, not as needed use of H1 antihistamines for urticaria have been published, including in the management of children and pregnant or lactating women. In addition, H1 antihistamines can be used in other related allergic conditions, such as the secondary symptoms of anaphylaxis, to provide patients with greater comfort, including in allergic asthma, depending on the individual.

Safety and outcomes of "at-home self-provocation tests" in patients with mild nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced urticaria/angioedema.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity is common; however, many patients do not receive an accurate diagnosis and are using unnecessary alternative drugs or have medication restrictions. OBJECTIVE: To establish a protocol for provocation tests that can be performed safely and effectively at home to give patients an accurate diagnosis, whereas also delabeling NSAID hypersensitivity. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 147 patients with NSAID hypersensitivity. All patients had NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema with less than 10% body surface area skin involvement. One specialist developed the protocol through history taking and chart review. If NSAID hypersensitivity was confirmed, an oral provocation test was performed to confirm the safe alternative medications (group A). If it was undetermined, an oral provocation test was performed to confirm the diagnosis and alternative medications (group B). All oral provocation tests were performed by patients in their homes according to the protocol. RESULTS: Approximately 26% of group A patients had urticaria or angioedema symptoms with alternative drugs, whereas the remaining 74% was safe. In group B, 34% of the patients were diagnosed with having NSAID hypersensitivity. However, 61% did not respond to the culprit drug; therefore, NSAID hypersensitivity had been misdiagnosed. During this at-home self-provocation test, no severe hypersensitivity reactions occurred. CONCLUSION: Many patients originally suspected of having NSAID hypersensitivity were confirmed to have been misdiagnosed. We successfully conducted an effective and safe at-home self-provocation test.

Injection Site Reaction to Various Insulins as Type III Allergy With Urticarial Vasculitis in a Patient With Type I Diabetes Mellitus.

ABSTRACT: Injection site reactions are defined as skin reactions at the injection site to drugs administered subcutaneously. Pathophysiologically, these reactions are based on different immunological mechanisms. We report the case of a 49-year-old patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus (first diagnosis in 1994 at the age of 23 years). Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using an insulin pump has been used for many years. The patient presented to the department of dermatology with progressive symptoms in the area of the insulin injection sites on the lower abdomen, accompanied by pain, burning, erythema, tenderness, and the formation of subcutaneous nodules. Previous attempts to use different insulins and to change the injection sites did not improve his symptoms. Furthermore, the symptoms appeared within hours after the insulin pump was attached, so that the injection site has to be changed as soon as every 48 hours. No anaphylactic shock was reported at any time. Multiple histological specimens were obtained from an older lesion on the abdomen as well as from test sites after standard allergological tests (prick and intradermal tests) of various insulins. Histologically, these biopsies showed the image of an extensive deep-reaching small vessel vasculitis with the aspect of an urticarial vasculitis and confirmed the diagnosis of an injection-site reaction that can be characterized as a type III hypersensitivity reaction.

Omalizumab treatment in combination with any other biologics: Is it really a safe duo?

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a mast cell-mediated disease, which is sometimes associated with various inflammatory disorders. Omalizumab is a commonly used biological agent, which is a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody against human immunoglobulin E. However, there are only few reports about the combination of omalizumab for CSU with any other biologics for accompanying inflammatory diseases in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patients whose treatment of omalizumab for CSU were combined with any other biologics for associated inflammatory disorders and to describe whether these combinations might have any safety concerns. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with CSU treated with omalizumab concurrently using another biological agent for their other dermatological conditions. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients, 19 women and 12 men, were evaluated. The mean age was 45.13 years. The median duration of omalizumab was 11 months. Biological agents which patients were treated other than omalizumab were as follows: adalimumab biosimilar (n = 3), ustekinumab (n = 4), secukinumab (n = 17) and ixekizumab (n = 7). The median duration of concurrent use of omalizumab and other biologics was 8 months. None of the drug combinations was stopped because of side effects. CONCLUSION: This observational study demonstrated that omalizumab treatment for CSU in combination with any other biological agents for dermatological disorders appeared to be well tolerated without any major safety concerns.

Occupational asthma, rhinitis and contact urticaria from greenhouse work.

BACKGROUND: The current knowledge about occupational allergic diseases among greenhouse workers is scant. AIMS: To describe greenhouse workers' occupational allergic diseases. METHODS: We identified 28 greenhouse workers with occupational allergic diseases in 2002-2020 by conducting a systematic search in the patient register of the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health. All the patients worked in tomato- or cucumber-growing greenhouses and showed immunoglobulin-E-mediated sensitization to occupational agents. Specific inhalation challenges or workplace peak expiratory flow monitoring confirmed occupational asthma (OA), nasal allergen challenges confirmed occupational rhinitis (OR) and open skin tests confirmed occupational contact urticaria (OCU). RESULTS: Most patients had more than one occupational disease and were sensitized to several workplace agents. Tomato plants were the most common cause of occupational diseases and induced 22 allergic diseases in 14 patients. Cucumber plants caused occupational diseases in 10 patients (3 OA, 7 OR and 6 OCU). The pest control mite Amblyseius swirskii and a mixture of parasitic wasps Encarsia formosa and Eretmocerus eremicus both induced two OA cases. Three patients had an occupational disease caused by storage mites and three others had a work-related systemic reaction to a bumblebee sting. CONCLUSIONS: The greenhouse workers typically suffered from several occupational allergic diseases and were sensitized to cultivated plants, various pest control organisms and storage mites. All these can cause OA and OR, but in this study, OCU was only induced by cultivation plants. Cucumber plant is a novel cause of OA and OR, and A. swirskii is a novel cause of OA.

Distinct transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles characterize NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema patients undergoing aspirin desensitization.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the mechanisms of aspirin desensitization in patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced urticaria/angioedema (NIUA). OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize the transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles of patients with NIUA undergoing aspirin desensitization. METHODS: PBMCs and plasma were separated from the blood of patients with NIUA undergoing aspirin desensitization for coronary artery disease and NSAID-tolerant controls. RNA was isolated from PBMCs and subjected to messenger RNA (mRNA)- and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA)-sequencing. Plasma samples were analyzed using LC-MS/MS for metabolite shifts using a semitargeted metabolomics panel. RESULTS: Eleven patients with NIUA and 10 healthy controls were recruited. The mRNA gene profiles of predesensitization versus postdesensitization and healthy control versus postdesensitization did not differ significantly. However, we identified 739 mRNAs and 888 lncRNAs as differentially expressed from preaspirin desensitization patients and controls. A 12-mRNA gene signature was trained using a machine learning algorithm to distinguish between controls, postdose, and predose samples. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis identified 5 canonical pathways that were significantly enriched in preaspirin desensitization samples. IL-22 was the most upregulated pathway. To investigate the potential regulatory roles of the differentially expressed lncRNA on the mRNAs, 9 lncRNAs and 12 mRNAs showed significantly correlated expression patterns in the IL-22 pathway. To validate the transcriptomics data, IL-22 was measured in the plasma samples of the subjects using ELISA. IL-22 was significantly higher in preaspirin desensitization patients compared with controls. In parallel, metabolomic analysis revealed stark differences in plasma profiles of preaspirin desensitization patients and healthy controls. In particular, 2-hydroxybenzoic acid (salicylic acid) was significantly lower in preaspirin desensitization patients compared with healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to combine both transcriptomic and metabolomic approaches in patients with NIUA, which contributes to a deeper understanding about the pathogenesis of NIUA and may potentially pave the way toward a molecular diagnosis of NSAID hypersensitivity.

An open-label, proof-of-concept study of lirentelimab for antihistamine-resistant chronic spontaneous and inducible urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria (CU) is a debilitating mast cell-driven disease, often refractory to standard therapy (ie, antihistamines). Lirentelimab, an anti-sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin 8 mAb, selectively inhibits mast cells and depletes eosinophils. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine safety and efficacy of lirentelimab in patients with CU. METHODS: This phase 2a study enrolled patients with CU refractory to up to 4-fold H1-antihistamine doses. Patients received 6 monthly intravenous doses of lirentelimab (0.3, 1, and up to 3 mg/kg). Primary efficacy end point was change in Urticaria Control Test score at week 22. Urticaria Activity Score weekly average (UAS7) was assessed in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), and Cholinergic UAS7 was used for patients with cholinergic urticaria (CholU). RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were enrolled in 4 cohorts (n = 13 omalizumab-naive CSU, n = 11 omalizumab-refractory CSU, n = 11 CholU, n = 10 symptomatic dermographism). Urticaria Control Test scores increased with lirentelimab across cohorts, with mean changes at week 22 of 11.1 ± 4.1, 4.8 ± 7.0, 6.5 ± 6.2, and 3.4 ± 4.1 and complete response rates (Urticaria Control Test score ≥ 12) of 92%, 36%, 82%, and 40%, respectively. In omalizumab-naive and omalizumab-refractory patients with CSU, disease activity decreased at week 22 (mean UAS7 change, -73% and -47%, respectively), with UAS7 response rates (≥50% reduction) of 77% and 45%, respectively. In patients with symptomatic dermographism, 50% (5 of 10) and 40% (4 of 10) had complete itch and hive resolution by FricTest, respectively, and 100% (7 of 7) evaluable patients with CholU had negative responses to Pulse-Controlled Ergometry exercise test. Most common adverse events included infusion-related reactions (43%; all mild/moderate and transient), nasopharyngitis (21%), and headache (19%). No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Lirentelimab demonstrated activity across 3 forms of antihistamine-refractory CU.

Incidence of urticaria, angioedema, and type I hypersensitivity reactions associated with fibrinolytic agents in Thailand using the database of the health product vigilance center.

BACKGROUND: Besides hemorrhage, allergic reactions have also been observed in several clinical trials of fibrinolytic agents. These reactions might negatively affect patient outcomes, especially life-threatening type I hypersensitivity reactions such as anaphylaxis. However, there are limited data on the incidence of these reactions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of study was to analyze the incidence of urticaria, angioedema, and type I hypersensitivity reactions from fibrinolytic agents for various indications. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from the Thai Vigibase database was conducted. All reports of adverse drug reactions from fibrinolytic agents from 1984 to 2017 were identified using the World Health Organization adverse reaction terminology. The proportion of each suspected adverse drug reaction and the cumulative incidence were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 284 reports were identified in the Thai Vigibase database. The overall incidence of urticaria, angioedema, and type I hypersensitivity reactions for the streptokinase group was 52.64/10,000 persons, with individual incidence rates of 9.64/10,000 persons for urticaria, 8.90/10,000 persons for angioedema, and 34.11/10,000 persons for type I hypersensitivity reactions. In the alteplase group, the overall incidence for all suspected reactions was 18.90/10,000 persons, with individual incidence rates of 3.29/10,000 persons for urticaria, 5.75/10,000 persons for angioedema, and 9.86/10,000 persons for type I hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Type I hypersensitivity reactions were the most common allergic reactions from fibrinolytic agents. It is necessary to take these reactions into consideration when using fibrinolytic therapy.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of omalizumab in Japanese patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: A post-marketing surveillance study.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients has been established, but real-world long-term data remain scarce, especially in Japan. METHODS: 52-week, open-label, single-arm, observational study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of first-time omalizumab in Japanese CSU patients responding inadequately to conventional therapies. RESULTS: Overall, 235 of 280 patients completed the study. Most patients were aged ≥ 18 and < 65 years; adolescents (≥ 12 and ≤ 18 years) accounted for 9.6% of the total population. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) duration of CSU at baseline was 1.6 ± 3.1 years; 46.1% of patients had had CSU for < 6 months. At baseline, the mean ± SD of Urticaria Control Test (UCT) score, Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were 5.1 ± 3.2, 25.2 ± 11.9, and 8.4 ± 5.9, respectively. The mean ± SD duration of the observation period was 330.3 ± 86.2 days. Relapse was reported in 65 patients, 51, 9, and 5 of whom required retreatment with omalizumab 1, 2, and ≥ 3 times, respectively. The incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was reported in 11.8%, 1.4%, and 3.9% of patients, respectively. The most common AEs were urticaria (1.8%) and eczema (1.1%). No adolescents experienced ADRs. A cumulative of 92.8% of patients responded in the Physician's Global Impression of Change, with 81.3%, 75.0%, and 95.1% of patients achieving UCT ≥ 12, UAS7 ≤ 6, and DLQI ≤ 5 up to Week 52, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the safety and effectiveness of omalizumab in CSU patients who responded inadequately to conventional therapies in real-world clinical practice in Japan.

Case series of chronic spontaneous urticaria following COVID-19 vaccines: an unusual skin manifestation.

BACKGROUND: Urticaria following the COVID-19 vaccine was rarely reported and had a short self-limited resolution. However, there has been relatively little literature published on CSU induced by COVID-19 vaccines. PURPOSE: We describe a case series of patients who experienced CSU after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. METHODS: A retrospective case series of 10 patients referred to the Department of Clinical Pharmacology of the University of Monastir (January 2021-January 2022) and included for evaluation of urticaria after COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: The median age was 31 years and patients were mostly female. Atopy was presented in 3 patients and urticaria was accompanied by angioedema in 6 patients. The median time interval between vaccination and the onset of urticaria was 28.5 h. The offended dose was the first one in 8 patients. The resolution of the eruption was observed at least 2 months later, despite the regular use of a full dose of antihistamine in nine patients. Polynuclear leucocytosis was identified in 5 patients. Anti-TPOAb was positive in one patient after receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine. Total serum IgE was elevated in 4 patients. Skin tests for the suspected vaccine as well as the vaccine excipient were negative. CONCLUSION: We add to the medical literature ten new cases of chronic spontaneous urticarial reactions following COVID-19 vaccines uncontrolled with high-dose first-generation H1 antihistamines.

Comparison between chronic spontaneous urticaria and chronic induced urticaria on the efficacy of omalizumab treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of refractory-to-antihistamines chronic induced urticaria (CIndU) in comparison with that of refractory-to-antihistamines chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). We retrieved interventional studies and observational studies on omalizumab efficacy to CIndU patients and efficacy comparison between CSU and CIndU both refractory to H1-antihistamines in electronic databases (accessed till May 2022). The odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated with a random-effect model in this meta-analysis. The majority of patients with different CIndU subtypes gained complete or partial response and good safety after omalizumab treatment. A total of five studies with 355 CSU patients and 103 CIndU patients were included for the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of CSU and CIndU (OR -0.83, 95% CI [0.84, 2.21], P > 0.05). Based on the validity of omalizumab in the treatment of various CIndU subtypes and non-differential efficacy between CSU and CIndU, it is reasonable to list omalizumab as a third-line treatment of refractory CIndU.

New markers to predict the response to omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Omalizumab has high treatment efficacy in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) who do not respond to high doses of antihistamines. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were described as novel inflammatory and prognostic biomarkers. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of SII and SIRI in patients with CSU who receive omalizumab therapy. A total of 124 patients with severe urticaria who had an urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS-7) ≥28 were included in the study. UAS-7, C-reactive protein (CRP), SII, and SIRI values ​​were recorded before and after omalizumab treatment. Patients with UAS-7 ≤6 at week 12 and/or week 24 of omalizumab treatment were considered responders. Three months after omalizumab treatment, significant decreases were observed in SII, SIRI, CRP, and UAS-7 compared to pre-treatment values ​​(p = 0.003, p < 0.001, p = 0.006, and p < 0.001, respectively). At the third and sixth months of treatment, baseline SII and SIRI levels of the omalizumab responder group were significantly higher than the non-responder group (p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in baseline CRP and UAS-7 levels between responders and non-responders (p Ëƒ 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, only pre-treatment SII (OR: 1.002, 95% CI: 1.000-1.004, p = 0.036) and SIRI (OR: 4.334, 95% CI: 1.751-10.726, p = 0.002) values were independently associated with response to omalizumab at 3 months in multivariate regression analysis. SII and SIRI could be effectively used to predict the response to omalizumab therapy. More comprehensive studies are needed to validate and elaborate on this relationship.

Clinical and laboratory parameters associated with treatment response to third-line therapies in chronic refractory urticaria: A real world study from northern India.

Current guidelines recommend omalizumab and cyclosporine for management of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refractory to anti-histamines. Identification of clinico-epidemiological characteristics predictive of treatment response with both modalities which will aid therapy selection. Clinical records of CSU patients receiving omalizumab and cyclosporine from May 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with a minimum follow-up duration of 4 months were included in the analysis. Treatment response was defined as >90% recorded reduction in Urticaria Activity Score-7 (UAS7) as compared to baseline 4 months after treatment initiation. Records of 1364 CSU patients were reviewed. A total of 56 patients who received omalizumab and 132 patients who received cyclosporine fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Treatment response was observed in 46 out of 56 (82.1%) patients in the omalizumab cohort and 106 out of 132 (80.3%) patients in the cyclosporine cohort (P = 0.76). Factors significantly associated with response to omalizumab included high baseline serum IgE levels (P = 0.028), lesser disease duration (P = 0.001), and absence of prior immunosuppressant use (P = 0.024). Factors predictive of cyclosporine response included high baseline UAS7 (P = 0.048), low baseline IgE levels (P = 0.047), and normal baseline D-dimer levels (P = 0.027). Concomitant inducible urticaria, atopy, and angioedema were associated with non-response in both groups (P ≤ 0.05). Incidence of adverse events was slightly higher in cyclosporine group (28.7%) as compared to omalizumab group (19.5%, P = 0.19). This study highlights several clinical parameters and laboratory markers that may be utilized to predict treatment response and aid in prognostication of patients with CSU.

Analysis of clinical factors as possible predictors of response to omalizumab and relapse after treatment discontinuation in chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Omalizumab is a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody which is effective in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), although clinical response appears to be variable in the real-life setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the response of CSU to omalizumab and disease relapse are associated with individual and/or clinical characteristics of patients. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical records of 124 patients treated with omalizumab for moderate to severe CSU refractory to antihistamines. Disease activity was assessed using the urticaria activity score over the last 7 days (UAS7). After 24 weeks of treatment, 91% of patients showed complete remission (UAS7 = 0) or good control (UAS7 < 7) of CSU. Omalizumab was re-administered in 45 patients because of recurrence of moderate to severe symptoms at week 8 after treatment discontinuation or later, and clinical results achieved with retreatment were similar to those observed in the first course. Among the parameters included in our analysis (age and sex of patients, documented history of atopy or autoimmune thyroid disease, CSU duration and baseline severity, concurrent angioedema, and association with chronic inducible urticaria), none was associated with response to omalizumab in our study population. Similarly, these parameters did not significantly differ between patients who experienced CSU relapse and those without relapse. Predictors of response to omalizumab treatment in CSU patients are still unclear, and further studies are needed to evaluate the presence of baseline factors that can influence treatment outcome.

Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in Chinese patients with anti-histamine refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterized by the spontaneous development of wheals, itching, and/or angioedema, for ≥6 weeks. In China, non-sedating H1-antihistamines (H1AH) are the recommended first-line treatment, with escalation up to 4× the standard dose in symptomatic patients to achieve control. Treatment options for Chinese patients who remain symptomatic on H1AH treatment are limited. This 20-week randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study investigated the efficacy and safety of omalizumab as an add-on therapy for the treatment of patients with CSU who remained symptomatic despite H1AH treatment in China. Adult patients (N = 418) diagnosed with refractory CSU for ≥6 months were randomized (2:2:1) to receive omalizumab 300 mg (OMA300), omalizumab 150 mg (OMA150) or placebo, subcutaneously, every 4 weeks. Primary outcome was change from baseline to week 12 in weekly itch severity score (ISS7). Safety was assessed by rates of adverse events (AEs). Demographic and disease characteristics at baseline were comparable across treatment groups. At week 12, statistically significant greater decreases from baseline were observed in ISS7 with OMA300 (least square mean difference [LSM]: -4.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.70, -2.77; p < 0.001) and OMA150 (LSM: -3.79; 95% CI: -5.24, -2.33; p < 0.001) versus placebo. Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs over 20 weeks was slightly higher with OMA300 (71.3%) compared to OMA150 and placebo groups (64.7% and 63.9%, respectively). The incidences of serious AEs were balanced between groups. This study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in Chinese adult patients with CSU who remained symptomatic despite H1AH therapy.

Efficacy and safety of ebastine dose escalation in chronic urticaria: A prospective study.

The second-generation antihistamines at licensed doses are first-line treatment in urticaria and up-dosing is recommended as second-line treatment. To assess the efficacy and safety of escalated doses of ebastine in patients with chronic urticaria (CU), we designed this study. Recruited patients with CU were treated with increasing doses of ebstine. Treatment started at the daily dose of 10 mg. The symptom is assessed weekly, and if there is no significant improvement, the dose is increased from 10 mg to 20 mg, and if still no significant improvement, up to 40 mg. Pruritus, number, diameter, duration and frequency of wheals, and adverse reactions were assessed. One hundred and forty (76.50%) patients achieved marked effect with ebastine 10 mg/day, 27 (14.75%) patients with ebastine 20 mg/day and 13 (7.10%) patients with ebastine 40 mg/day, while 3(1.64%) patients did not get marked effect. There was no significant difference of effect between factitious urticaria, CSU, cholinergic urticaria and CSU with factitious urticaria in different dose (all p > 0.05). Common adverse reactions of ebstine treatment, included dry mouth, somnolence, tiredness and headache, were mild or moderate. There was no significant difference between the degree score of dry mouth with different doses of ebastine, and the same to somnolence, tiredness and headache (all p > 0.05). Doses escalation of ebastine should be effective in treatment of factitious urticaria, CSU and cholinergic urticaria with poorly treated by standard of double doses. Increasing ebastine dose did not increase the incidence of adverse reactions.