Reduction and fixation of high-energy proximal tibiofibular joint dislocations: a technical trick.

We present our technique for screw stabilization and our clinical experience treating a series of patients presenting with proximal tibiofibular joint fracture-dislocations.

The effect of proximal tibiofibular joint dislocation on knee mechanics: reduction and fixation matters.

PURPOSE: Proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) dislocations are under-investigated injuries. There is scant basic science or clinical evidence to direct management. The purpose of this study was twofold; first to investigate the pathomechanics of PTFJ dislocation on knee mechanics. The second purpose was to evaluate knee mechanics following reduction and fixation. METHODS: Six cadaveric legs were tested on a mechanical platform. A 5 Nm external rotation force was applied to each knee and the external rotation and fibular translation was measured for several study conditions at 0°, 30°, and 90° of flexion. Conditions included: the native state, transection of the posterior PTFJ ligament, transection of the anterior and posterior ligaments, screw fixation, and suspensory fixation. Screw fixation was performed using a single quadricortical 3.5 mm screw. Suspensory fixation was performed using an Arthrex TightRope device RESULTS: Transection of the anterior and posterior ligaments increased external rotation by 4.3°, 5.9°, and 5.6°, at 0°, 30°, and 90° (p ≤ 0.001), respectively. Screw and suspensory fixation returned external rotation to a near native state with mild overconstraint. Complete transection of anterior and posterior ligaments resulted in pathologic anterior fibular translation of 1.51 mm (p = 0.001), 1 mm, (p = 0.02) and 0.44 mm (p = 0.69) for 0°, 30°, 90° of knee flexion. Screw and suspensory fixation restored native translation at all points with a small degree of overconstraint. CONCLUSION: Disruption of the PTFJ causes pathologic external rotation and anterior fibular translation. Fixation restores near native motion with minor overconstraint. Surgeons should consider reduction and fixation of PTFJ injuries to restore native knee mechanics.

Bridge Plate Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures: Defining Deficient Radiographic Callus Formation and Its Associations.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether deficient early callus formation can be defined objectively based on the association with an eventual nonunion and specific patient, injury, and treatment factors. METHODS: Final healing outcomes were documented for 160 distal femur fractures treated with locked bridge plate fixation. Radiographic callus was measured on postoperative radiographs until union or nonunion had been declared by the treating surgeon. Deficient callus was defined at 6 and 12 weeks based on associations with eventual nonunion through receiver-operator characteristic analysis. A previously described computational model estimated fracture site motion based on the construct used. Univariable and multivariable analyses then examined the association of patient, injury, and treatment factors with deficient callus formation. RESULTS: There were 26 nonunions. The medial callus area at 6 weeks <24.8 mm 2 was associated with nonunion (12 of 39, 30.8%) versus (12 of 109, 11.0%), P = 0.010. This association strengthened at 12 weeks with medial callus area <44.2 mm 2 more closely associated with nonunion (13 of 28, 46.4%) versus (11 of 120, 9.2%), P <0.001. Multivariable logistic regression analysis found limited initial longitudinal motion (OR 2.713 (1.12-6.60), P = 0.028)) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.362 (1.11-1.67), P = 0.003) were independently associated with deficient callus at 12 weeks. Open fracture, mechanism of injury, smoking, diabetes, plate material, bridge span, and shear were not significantly associated with deficient callus. CONCLUSION: Deficient callus at 6 and 12 weeks is associated with eventual nonunion, and such assessments may aid future research into distal femur fracture healing. Deficient callus formation was independently associated with limited initial longitudinal fracture site motion derived through computational modeling of the surgical construct but not more routinely discussed parameters such as plate material and bridge span. Given this, improved methods of in vivo assessment of fracture site motion are necessary to further our ability to optimize the mechanical environment for healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What happens at the L5/S1 facet joint when implants are placed across the sacroiliac joint?

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the posterior pelvic ring are often stabilized with fixation across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). However, the compensatory changes at the neighboring L5/S1 facet joint are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the compensatory change in pelvic kinematics and contact forces at the L5/S1 facet joint after fixation across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) using a cadaveric model. METHODS: Five fresh-frozen cadaveric pelvis specimens were dissected to remove non-structural soft tissue. Retroreflective markers were fixed to the L5 body, S1 body and bilateral anterior superior iliac spines to represent the motion of L5, S1 and the ileum, respectively. Pressure sensors were inserted in both L5/S1 facet joints. Testing was performed using a robotic system that applied load to mimic ambulation. Testing was performed prior to SIJ fixation, after unilateral SIJ fixation and bilateral fixation. RESULTS: Contact force at the L5/S1 facet joint significantly increased by 55% from 48.4 N to 75.2 N following unilateral fixation (p = 0.0161) and increased by 100% to 96.9 N after bilateral fixation (p = 0.0038). Unilateral SIJ fixation increased flexion of the ilium relative to L5 from 1.2° to 2.0° (p = 0.01) and increased axial rotation of L5 relative to S1 from 0.7° to 1.6° (p = 0.001). Bilateral fixation increased flexion of the ilium relative to L5 to 2.0° from 1.2° prior to fixation (p = 0.001), increased axial rotation of L5 relative to S1 to 1.2° from 0.7° prior to fixation (p = 0.002) and increased flexion of L5 relative to S1 to 2.4° from 1.5° prior to fixation (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The L5/S1 facet joint experiences compensatory increased motion under increased contact force after unilateral and bilateral SIJ fixation, possibly predisposing it to adjacent segment arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, cadaveric study.

Triceps Surae Lengthening in Foot and Ankle Trauma: A Survey of OTA and AOFAS Members.

Background: The prevalence, indications, and preferred methods for gastrocnemius recession and tendo-Achilles lengthening-grouped as triceps surae lengthening (TSL) procedures-in foot and ankle trauma are supported by a scarcity of clinical evidence. We hypothesize that injury, practice environment, and training heritage are significantly associated with probability of performing adjunctive TSL in the operative management of foot and ankle trauma. Methods: A survey was distributed to members of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Participants rated how likely they would be to perform TSL at initial management, definitive fixation, and after weightbearing in the presence and absence of a positive Silfverskiöld test in 10 clinical scenarios of closed foot and ankle trauma. Results: A total of 258 surgeons with median 14 years' experience responded. Eighty-five percent reported foot and ankle fellowship training, 24% reported traumatology fellowship training, 13% both, and 4% no fellowship. Ninety-nine percent reported performing TSL with a median 25 TSL procedures per year, 72% open gastrocnemius recession, and 17% percutaneous tendo-Achilles lengthening). Across all scenarios, we observed low overall 8% probability with fair agreement (κ = 0.246) of performing TSL (range, 1% at initial management of an unstable Weber B bimalleolar ankle fracture with negative contralateral Silfverskiöld test to 29% at definitive fixation of tongue-type calcaneus fracture with positive contralateral Silfverskiöld test). Silfverskiöld testing significantly influenced TSL probability at all time points. University of Washington training (ß = 1.5, P = .007) but not trauma vs foot fellowship training, years in practice, academic practice, urban setting, or facility trauma designation were significantly associated with likelihood of performing TSL. Conclusion: Orthopaedic traumatology and foot and ankle surgeons report similar indications, methods, and low perceived propensity to use TSL in the management of foot and ankle trauma. We found that graduates of 1 fellowship training site were more likely to perform TSL in the setting of acute trauma potentially indicating the need for better scientific data to support this practice. Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic.

Does a Medial Malleolar Osteotomy or Posteromedial Approach Provide Greater Surgical Visualization for the Treatment of Talar Body Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of talar body fractures is influenced by soft-tissue condition and fracture pattern. Two common surgical approaches for the treatment of talar body fractures are the medial malleolar osteotomy (MMO) and the posteromedial approach (PMA). The purpose of this study was to compare the observable talar body surface area with the MMO and the PMA. We hypothesized that visualization following a PMA improves with distraction and distraction with a gastrocnemius recession. METHODS: Five pairs of cadaver limbs were used. Each pair of specimens underwent both approaches to act as an internal control. The laterality of the PMA was determined by randomization, and the MMO was performed on the contralateral ankle. The PMA was performed to visualize the talus, and the talar surface area was recorded using a handheld 3D surface scanner. A distractor was then placed across the joint, and the surface area was remeasured. Finally, a gastrocnemius recession was performed, and the measured surface area under the distraction was recorded. The MMO was performed in standard fashion using fluoroscopy, and the observable talar surface area was recorded. Scans were performed twice for each approach, and the surface areas were averaged. The talus was excised and scanned after each approach in order to compare the visualized surface area with the total surface area of the native talus. RESULTS: The MMO and the PMA exposed a mean of 11.2 and 6.7 cm2, respectively, of the talar surface. Visualization with the PMA was improved with distraction, revealing 8.3 cm2 of the talus (p = 0.01 when compared with an isolated PMA). A PMA with distraction and gastrocnemius recession exposed 9.9 cm2 of the talar dome and body. There was no significant difference in exposure between the MMO and the PMA with distraction and gastrocnemius recession (p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The MMO and the PMA both afford excellent visualization for reduction and fixation of talar body fractures. Visualization using the PMA is improved with distraction and distraction with a gastrocnemius recession. The results of this study may assist surgeons in selecting the optimal approach for surgical repair of talar body fractures.

Open Reduction of Closed Pediatric Tibial Shaft Fractures Treated With Intramedullary Stabilization Does Not Increase Risk of Postoperative Complications.

OBJECTIVE: To compare union and complication rates in pediatric patients presenting with tibial shaft fractures treated with closed or open reduction before intramedullary stabilization. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Multiple pediatric trauma centers. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients presenting with tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary stabilization. INTERVENTION: Intramedullary stabilization after closed or open reduction (percutaneous and open approach). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Union rates, infection rate (superficial and deep), and unplanned return to the operating room (OR). RESULTS: One hundred sixty-six patients were included in this study. One hundred thirty-six patients presented with closed fractures, and 30 patients presented with open tibial shaft fractures. Thirty-seven of the 136 patients (27%) with closed fractures had their fracture specifically opened during surgical fixation. There was no statistical difference in radiographic union at 6 months between fractures electively opened and those treated with closed reduction alone 97% versus 98% (P = 0.9). No patient who underwent an open reduction developed infections or wound-healing concerns, whereas 2 of the 99 (2%) patients treated closed had superficial surgical site infections requiring additional treatment (P = 0.999). There was no difference in unplanned return to OR between those who underwent open reduction at the time of intramedullary stabilization (P = 0.568). CONCLUSION: Performing an open reduction in a closed pediatric tibial shaft fracture before intramedullary fixation does not increase the risk of surgical site infections or wound issues, delayed union, or unplanned return to the OR. An open reduction of a closed tibial shaft fracture for purposes of improving a reduction before intramedullary stabilization may be a safe and effective clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.