The German version of the Nottingham Clavicle Score is a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate patients with clavicle and acromioclavicular pathologies.

PURPOSE: The Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS) is a patient-reported outcome measure developed to evaluate treatment results of clavicle, acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joint pathologies. Valid, reliable and user-friendly translations of outcome measure instruments are needed to allow comparisons of international results. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to translate and adapt the NCS into German and evaluate the psychometric properties of the German version. METHODS: The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the NCS were completed using a 'translation-back translation" method and the final version was administered to 105 German-speaking patients. The psychometric properties of this version (NCS-G) were evaluated in terms of feasibility, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. RESULTS: No major differences occurred between the NCS translations into German and back into English, and no content- or linguistic-related difficulties were reported. The Cronbach's alpha for the NCS-G was 0.885, showing optimal internal consistency. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.907 (95% CI 0.844-0.945), with a standard error of measurement of 5.59 points and a minimal detectable change of 15.50 points. The NCS-G showed moderate to strong correlation with all other investigated scales (Spearman correlation coefficient: qDASH: ρ = - 0.751; OSS: ρ = 0.728; Imatani Score: ρ = 0.646; CMS: ρ = 0.621; VAS: ρ = - 0.709). Good sensitivity to change was confirmed by an effect size of 1.17 (95% CI 0.89-1.47) and a standardized response mean of 1.23 (95% CI 0.98-1.45). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that NCS-G is reliable, valid, reproducible and well accepted by patients, showing analogous psychometric properties to the original English version. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Physiotherapy as part of primary health care, Italy.

Objective: To describe the Family and Community Physiotherapist model, which aims to incorporate rehabilitation services within primary health care in Tuscany, Italy. Methods: The Department of Health Professions of the Central Tuscany local health authority designed the model during 2020-2021. We describe the four phases of the organizational case study implementation of the model, namely: (i) analysis of the political and organizational framework, as well as determination of changing health-care needs; (ii) model co-design and training of multiprofessional health-care workers (local general practitioners, physiatrists and geriatricians); (iii) delivery and surveillance of rehabilitation services; and (iv) evaluation. Findings: During the initial roll-out of the project in April-December 2021, general practitioners referred 165 patients with a mean age of 83.7 years (standard deviation: 11.1) to the Family and Community Physiotherapist. Interventions were mainly activated for patients with comorbidities (64/165; 38.8%), followed by those with long-term immobilization issues (36/165; 21.8%). The most commonly provided intervention was counselling, contributing to the achievement of objectives for 127 patients (77.0%). A full rehabilitation path was proposed for only 10 patients (6.1%). No additional costs were incurred by the health authority during the implementation of the model. Conclusion: Our model facilitated the provision of rehabilitative care in the community, preventing the exacerbation of chronic conditions and meeting the population health needs in non-hospital environments. The model overcame the typical lack of integration within health-care services with flexibility, promoting care proximity solutions to cope with health challenges such as an ageing population and the coronavirus disease.

Reporting of "usual care" as the control group in randomized clinical trials of physiotherapy interventions for multiple sclerosis is poor: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the description of interventions defined as "usual care" in control groups with those provided in experimental groups in physiotherapy randomized clinical trials for multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search and study selection from five databases from their inception to February 2021. Randomized clinical trials aimed to physiotherapy multiple sclerosis treatment and providing "usual care" in the control group were included. Intervention reporting was assessed using the TIDieR checklist. Word and reference counts for each group were extracted. The methodological quality was assessed by the PEDro scale. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included. The TIDieR total scores, word, and reference count were statistically higher in the experimental group, when compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The TIDieR total score is not correlated with PEDro score, word, publication year, or reference counts. CONCLUSION: Control treatments identified as "usual care" are underdescribed when compared to experimental treatments, affecting the validity, generalizability, and interpretability of results.

Reliability of the six-minute walk test in individuals with stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The six-minute walking test (6MWT) is a simple and widely used measure of functional capacity. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize findings on reliability of 6MWT in subjects who have had a stroke. METHODS: Two independent investigators conducted an extensive search in multidisciplinary electronic databases from inception to August 2019, and selected complete original studies on the reliability of the 6MWT used to assess individuals with stroke. Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated methodological quality. Outcome for meta-analysis was reliability, measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). In addition, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 241 potentially relevant articles screened, 6 met inclusion criteria and 5 of them were included in meta-analysis. Combined correlation coefficient of .98 (confidence interval .98-.99) was found for test-retest reliability. Only one study investigated inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. SEM and MDC values were rarely reported. CONCLUSIONS: The 6MWT has high test-retest reliability, when used to assess individuals with stroke. Other types of reliability and SEM and MDC need further investigations in populations with a stroke.

Barriers to evidence-based practice implementation in physiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To review and meta-analyse the evidence about the prevalence of barriers to evidence-based practice (EBP) reported in physiotherapy. METHODS: Two independent investigators conducted an extensive electronic search in EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL databases from their inception to July 2020 and included the retrieved articles if they investigated barriers to EBP among physiotherapy professionals. Subsequently, they extracted data and assessed the methodological quality using a scale described in a similar previous study. The outcome for meta-analysis was frequency of each reported barrier. Sub-analyses were performed grouping studies based on countries where surveys were performed, classified as either developed or developing countries. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles were included in the systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Risk of bias assessment of included studies showed a median score: 4 points (interquartile range: 3-4). The findings of meta-analysis revealed that lack of time was the most frequently reported barrier (53.0% [95% confidence interval, 95%CI, 44.0-62.0]), followed by language (36.0% [95%CI 16.0-62.0]), lack of access (34.0% [95%CI 23.0.27]) and lack of statistical skills (31.0% [95%CI 20.0-44.0]). Lack of skills and lack of generalizability were declared as barriers by 27.0% [95%CI 18.0-38.0] and 23.0% [95%CI 15.0-33.0] of responders, respectively. Lack of support and lack of interest are less frequent, with 16.0% [95%CI 11.0-24.0] and 9.0% [95%CI 6.0-15.0] of responses, respectively. Barriers reported in investigations performed in developed countries were less frequent when compared to those performed in developing countries. CONCLUSION: Organizational issues and methodological skills seem key issues to allow the implementation of EBP, suggesting the need to adopt or enhance organizational and training strategies to facilitate the implementation of the EBP. Quantitative synthesis showed high heterogeneity for all analyses, and therefore, pooled data should be interpreted with caution.

Open Access Physical Therapy Journals: Do Predatory Journals Publish Lower-Quality Randomized Controlled Trials?

OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in predatory and nonpredatory journals in the field of physical therapy. DATA SOURCES: From a list of 18 journals included either on Beall's list (n=9) or in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) (n=9), 2 independent assessors extracted all the RCTs published between 2014 and 2017. When journals published more than 40 RCTs, a sample of 40 trials was randomly extracted, preserving the proportions among years. Indexing in PubMed, country of journal publication, and dates of submission or acceptance were also recorded for each journal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) scale and duration of the peer review. RESULTS: Four hundred ten RCTs were included. The mean PEDro score of articles published in non-Beall, DOAJ journals was higher than those published in Beall journals (mean score ± SD, 5.8±1.7 vs 4.5±1.5; P<.001), with the differences increasing when the indexing in PubMed was also considered (6.5±1.5 vs 4.4±1.5; P<.001). The peer review duration was significantly longer in non-Beall than in Beall journals (mean duration [d] ± SD, 145.2±92.9 vs 45.4±38.8; P<.001) and in journals indexed in PubMed than in nonindexed journals (136.6±100.7 vs 60.4±55.7; P<.001). Indexing in PubMed was the strongest independent variable associated with the PEDro score (adjusted R2=0.182), but noninclusion on Beall's list explained an additional, albeit small, portion of the PEDro score variance (cumulative adjusted R2=0.214). CONCLUSIONS: Potentially predatory journals publish lower-quality trials and have a shorter peer review process than non-Beall journals included in the DOAJ database.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Italian version of the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score.

PURPOSE: The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) is self-reported outcome measurement developed to evaluate shoulder instability taking into account also adaptive strategies. Valid, reliable, reproducible, and user-friendly translations of outcome measure instruments are needed to allow comparisons of international study results. METHODS: The Italian translation and cultural adaptation of the OSIS were completed using a "translation-back translation" method and the final version was administered to a sample of 25 consecutive Italian-speaking patients. The psychometric properties of this adaptation were evaluated in terms of feasibility, reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. RESULTS: No major differences occurred between the OSIS translations into Italian and back into English, and no content- or linguistic-related difficulties were reported. The Cronbach's alpha for the total OSIS was 0.897. Intraclass correlation coefficient value for inter-rater reliability was 0.805, while for intra-rater reliability was 0.586. Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the OSIS and the Rowe score was 0.548 (p = 0.005) and between OSIS-I and SF-12 was 0.488 (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of the OSIS is a reliable, valid, and reproducible outcome measure for clinical evaluation of patients affected by shoulder instability, which remains simple and user-friendly as the original version. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective cohort study, Level II. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The availability of a validated translation of the OSIS will help surgeon to share their data on shoulder instability diagnostic and treatment in a more reproducible and comparable fashion.

Reliability of the 36-item version of the Token Test in patients with poststroke aphasia.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the 36-item version of the Token Test. METHODS: Twenty-four people following stroke with mild disorder of language comprehension were assessed by two speech therapists at a distance of 2  days apart. RESULTS: The test showed excellent and good inter-rater reliability, while some parts had lower coefficients. CONCLUSION: This version of the Token Test can be used to assess mild disorder of oral language comprehension. However, further clearer instructions for administration and scoring may improve the test reliability.

The Italian version of the Functional Behavior Profile: reliability in a population of persons with multiple sclerosis.

The aims of this study were to translate and investigate the interrater, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the functional behavior profile (FBP) in an Italian population with multiple sclerosis. The Italian version of the FBP (FBP-I) was developed and the reliability of the final questionnaire was measured. A sample of 22 persons with clinically diagnosed multiple sclerosis was independently assessed by two raters. Interrater and test-retest reliability of the subscores and of the total score of the FBP-I were good to excellent. The internal consistency of the FBP-I was high. The FBP-I showed good psychometric properties and it can be used to assess functional status in Italian-speaking patients with multiple sclerosis.

Randomized controlled trial quality in pediatric physical therapy.

The aim of this study is to describe the reported quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric physical therapy (PPT) and changes with time. All RCTs sourced from PEDro database and scored using the PEDro scale were included. RCTs were classified as high- or low quality both with the original cut-off of 6 and a modified cut-off of 5. The relationship between PEDro scores and year of publication was also investigated. One thousand three hundred sixty-seven articles were analyzed. According to the PEDro scale original and modified cut-off, 29% and 56% of the articles were classified as high-quality studies, respectively. The number of RCTs and the average PEDro score increased between 1962 and 2012. However, since some items of the scale could be more frequently satisfied, a further improvement of the quality of RCTs in PPT is recommended.

Prevalence of burnout among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Work-related burnout is a significant concern amongst healthcare professionals, including physiotherapists. It can negatively impact on both staff well-being and the quality of care delivered to patients. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of burnout among physiotherapists. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and PsycINFO, from inception to February 1st, 2022. STUDY SELECTION OR ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting burnout prevalence among physiotherapists. DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS: Prevalence of burnout. Sub-analyses were performed grouping studies based on countries where surveys were conducted, classified as developed or developing countries. The risk of bias was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: 32 studies were included in the systematic review and 31 in the meta-analysis, enrolling a total of 5984 physiotherapists from 17 countries. Pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) of burnout was 8% (4-15). Prevalence figures for Maslach Burnout Inventory dimensions were: (i) emotional exhaustion, 27% (21-34) (ii) depersonalization, 23% (15-32) (iii) low personal accomplishment, 25% (15-40). Both overall and single components prevalence was higher, although not significantly, in studies from developing than in developed countries. LIMITATIONS: Tools used to assess burnout and cut-off scores chosen to identify the burnout prevalence differed across studies. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Prevalence of burnout reported by physiotherapists appears high worldwide, in particular in developing countries, and compares with that reported by nurses and physicians. Substantial heterogeneity in the prevalence of burnout, in its definition and assessment methods across studies, and limited quality of most studies precludes drawing definitive conclusions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42022307876 CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

Treatment approaches for pusher behaviour: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Some individuals with hemiplegia show a postural disorder called pusher behavior. Various underlying theoretical mechanisms have been proposed, thus leading to various treatment approaches. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review is to identify and analyze the available evidence on the treatment approaches for pusher behavior. METHODS: Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search for original studies reporting on treatments for pusher behavior. Studies were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and PEDro from their inception to December 2020. Treatment approaches were grouped in homogeneous areas based on the supposed underlying mechanism. To assess the reporting of the interventions, the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) was used. RESULTS: Thirty-one papers describing 45 interventions were included in the review. Most of the studies were case reports (i.e. including 1 person) (n = 16), followed by randomized controlled trials (n = 5), single subject design trials (n = 5), non-randomized controlled trials (n = 3), and case series (i.e. including more than 1 person) (n = 2). Treatment approaches were grouped into five categories: visual feedback, somatosensory cues, visual-somatosensory integration, brain stimulation, and other nonspecific treatments. The median number of TIDIeR items reported was 7 (range 4 to 10). CONCLUSION: Pusher behavior is still little-known. Five main categories of treatment approaches based on the alleged etiological underlying mechanisms have been identified. Most of studies are case reports; controlled trials should be further conducted. Intervention reporting should be improved to allow treatment replication in larger trials.

Physical functioning and health-related quality of life after COVID-19: a long-term perspective case series.

The purpose of our study was to monitor the long-term changes in physical functioning and health-related quality of life in individuals who received outpatient rehabilitation after COVID-19. Individuals referred to outpatient rehabilitation for post-COVID-19 physical therapy were assessed before the treatment, at the end of the treatment, and 2 and 6 months after the end of the treatment. The physical functioning was assessed by Barthel Index, Timed Up and Go test, Short Physical Performance Battery test (SPPB), Patient-Specific Functioning Scale (PSFS), and EuroQOL 5D-3L. Friedman's test was utilized to assess changes in the assessments. The proportions of individuals showing variation in performance equal to or greater than the absolute minimal detectable change (MDC) value of the SPPB and PSFS were calculated. Forty-four cases were monitored for 7.3-15.6 months. At baseline, they showed substantial independence in activities of daily living, moderate mobility limitations, and below-average health-related quality of life. Their status significantly improved over time (Friedman's test P = 0.002 to <0.001); post hoc analysis confirmed the improvement of mobility and health-related quality of life at 6-month follow-up relative to the baseline. After accounting for MDC values, 55% meaningfully improved on SPPB and 45% on PSFS, although some worsened (11 and 5%, respectively) and the remaining showed no meaningful change. Despite good independence in activities of daily living and perceived health, individuals surviving the COVID-19 may not have fully recovered their premorbid functioning status seven to 15 months after the infection.

Cross-cultural adaptation and test-retest reliability of the Italian version of the Pediatric Balance Scale in children with typical and atypical development.

BACKGROUND: Balance disorders in children are complex and disabling. The pediatric balance scale assesses functional balance in the contest of everyday tasks. It is recommended for balance assessment in children. The cross-cultural validation of an assessment instrument allows to assess individuals in the appropriate cultural context. We designed our study with the aim of translating and cross-cultural adapting the Pediatric Balance Scale into Italian, and investigating the reliability of the translated version. METHODS: Two forward translation of the Pediatric Balance Scale were conducted. Two blind backward translations were subsequently performed. A multidisciplinary group compared the content of the translations with those of the original Pediatric Balance Scale. Ambiguities and discrepancies were amended. To assess conceptual equivalence of the translation, we conducted cognitive debriefing involving physiotherapists, parents, and children. Suggestions for rewording were sought and considered for eventual modification. The Italian Pediatric Balance Scale was administered to 18 children with typical development (age 4.7-7.9 years, female 61.1%, scores 51-56), and to 18 children with atypical development (age 4.9-15.0 years, female 44.4%, scores 38-56). Test-retest reliability (i.e., intrarater and interrater reliability, and agreement between raters) of the scale was assessed by mean of single-rating, absolute-agreement, two-way mixed effects model intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC3,1) and the Bland-Altman method. The standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change were subsequently computed. RESULTS: The forward and backward translations showed no substantial differences in content; wording discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The multidisciplinary group proposed some minor changes. Twenty-three physiotherapists, 36 parents, and 36 children participated in cognitive interviewing and further changes were made. Perfect agreement was observed in test-retest reliability assessment of the Italian pediatric balance scale in children with typical development. High reliability (intrarater: ICC3,1 0.998, 95% CI 0.994 to 0.999; interrater: ICC3,1 0.994, 95% CI 0.984 to 0.998) and agreement among raters (Bland-Altman plots: 89%, 95% CI 67% to 97%, of the data within the 95% CI limits of the bias estimate) were found assessing children with atypical development. Very small standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change values were observed (intrarater: 0.212 and 0.588; interrater: 0.368 and 1.019). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides a translated and cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Pediatric Balance Scale. The full cross-cultural validity of the tool requires further steps to complete the psychometric testing.

Implementation of community physiotherapy in primary care: one-year results of an on-call physiotherapy service.

BACKGROUND: Primary health care systems have a key role in meeting health needs of community, including function. The aim of this paper is to describe the population involved in the Community Physiotherapist project and their health outcomes over a one-year period. METHODS: The Community Physiotherapist is an on-call service which requires a request by general practitioners or medical specialists. Reason for prescription, waiting time for service delivery, diagnostic categories, provided intervention, number of interventions and outcomes were recorded for everyone included in the project. Possible differences in characteristics between individuals referred by medical specialists and general practitioners were also investigated. RESULTS: From January to December 2022, 409 individuals were referred to the Community Physiotherapist pathway. Functional goals were achieved in 79.5% of interventions, without reported adverse events. In most cases physiotherapists provided counselling or caregiver training and 3.3% of individuals needed a full rehabilitation program. The groups of individuals referred by the two types of prescribers showed no significant differences, apart, as expected, from their median age. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the Community Physiotherapist model within the primary care setting allows to provide appropriate, effective and safe interventions. Sharing the project among all the health professionals helped to support its appropriateness and effectiveness. Results also indicate that a new organizational model, such as the Community Physiotherapist, will take a long time to be implemented.

Reliability of the PEDro scale: comparison between trials published in predatory and non-predatory journals.

BACKGROUND: Lack of effective peer-review process of predatory journals, resulting in more ambiguity in reporting, language and incomplete descriptions of processes might have an impact on the reliability of PEDro scale. The aim of this investigation was to compare the reliability of the PEDro scale when evaluating the methodological quality of RCTs published in predatory (PJs) and non-predatory (NPJs) journals, to more confidently select interventions appropriate for application to practice. METHODS: A selected sample of RCTs was independently rated by two raters randomly selected among 11 physical therapists. Reliability of each item of the PEDro scale and the total PEDro score were assessed by Cohen's kappa statistic and percent of agreement and by Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), respectively. The Chi-square test was used to compare the rate of agreement between PJs and NPJs. RESULTS: A total number of 298 RCTs were assessed (119 published in NPJs). Cronbach's alphas were .704 and .845 for trials published in PJs and NPJs, respectively. Kappa values for individual scale items ranged from .14 to .73 for PJs and from .09 to .70 for NPJs. The ICC was .537 (95% CI .425-.634) and .729 (95% CI .632-.803), and SEM was 1.055 and 0.957 for PJs and NPJs, respectively. Inter-rater reliability in discriminating between studies of moderate to high and low quality was higher for NPJs (k = .57) than for PJs (k = .28). CONCLUSIONS: Interrater reliability of PEDro score of RCTs published in PJs is lower than that of trials published in NPJs, likely also due to ambiguous language and incomplete reporting. This might make the detection of risk of bias more difficult when selecting interventions appropriate for application to practice or producing secondary literature.

The burden of words in shoulder pain: A case report of a water polo player.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Shoulder pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems of the world's population. In particular, in water polo athletes, the frequency of injuries or pain to this joint is very high. The incidence of psychosocial factors in musculoskeletal pain is well recognized, even if they seem to be more present in chronic pain, rather than in acute pain. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was a semi-professional water polo player with acute shoulder pain which occurred during a game. At first, the pain was very mild, but it progressively got worse after the visit to the casualty department where, even in the absence of any confirmed structural lesions, the patient is ordered to refrain from any active movements. The patient became worried, so his anxiety levels increased which worsened his symptoms. The physiotherapist opted for a "hands-off/hands-on approach". OUTCOMES: Significative improvements were observed in all the considered outcome measures, the patient obtained complete recovery in a very short period of time and then he was able to return to his sport. DISCUSSIONS: Psychosocial factors such as anxiety, fear and catastrophizing can modulate pain responses in a subject without structural problems. Thus, counseling and education in pain science can be an effective therapeutic method, especially with conditions of acute, as well as chronic, pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Effectiveness of robot-assisted arm therapy in stroke rehabilitation: An overview of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted arm therapy (RAT) has been used mainly in stroke rehabilitation in the last 20 years with rising expectations and growing evidence summarized in systematic reviews (SRs). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to provide an overview of SRs about the effectiveness, within the ICF domains, and safety of RAT in the rehabilitation of adult with stroke compared to other treatments. METHODS: The search strategy was conducted using search strings adapted explicitly for each database. A screening base on title and abstract was realized to find all the potentially relevant studies. The methodological quality of the included SRs was assessed using AMSTAR-2. A pre-determined standardized form was used to realize the data extraction. RESULTS: 18 SRs were included in this overview. Generally, positive effects from the RAT were found for motor function and muscle strength, whereas there is no agreement for muscle tone effects. No effect was found for pain, and only a SR reported the positive impact of RAT in daily living activity. CONCLUSION: RAT can be considered a valuable option to increase motor function and muscle strength after stroke. However, the poor quality of most of the included SRs could limit the certainty around the results.

Effects of robotic upper limb treatment after stroke on cognitive patterns: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Robotic therapy (RT) has been internationally recognized for the motor rehabilitation of the upper limb. Although it seems that RT can stimulate and promote neuroplasticity, the effectiveness of robotics in restoring cognitive deficits has been considered only in a few recent studies. OBJECTIVE: To verify whether, in the current state of the literature, cognitive measures are used as inclusion or exclusion criteria and/or outcomes measures in robotic upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies eligible were identified through PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science from inception to March 2021. RESULTS: Eighty-one studies were considered in this systematic review. Seventy-three studies have at least a cognitive inclusion or exclusion criteria, while only seven studies assessed cognitive outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite the high presence of cognitive instruments used for inclusion/exclusion criteria their heterogeneity did not allow the identification of a guideline for the evaluation of patients in different stroke stages. Therefore, although the heterogeneity and the low percentage of studies that included cognitive outcomes, seemed that the latter were positively influenced by RT in post-stroke rehabilitation. Future larger RCTs are needed to outline which cognitive scales are most suitable and their cut-off, as well as what cognitive outcome measures to use in the various stages of post-stroke rehabilitation.

The subjective visual vertical in patients with pusher behaviour: a pilot study with a psychophysical approach.

Pusher behaviour (PB) reflects some misrepresentation of verticality. However, its neural mechanisms are still unclear. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the perception of the subjective visual vertical in patients with PB using an orientation discrimination task relying on a psychophysical forced-choice procedure. A sample of eight patients with post-stroke hemiplegia, three of whom with (PB+ group) and five without (PB- group) a clear PB, and 10 matched healthy subjects, was selected. All participants were assessed with an orientation discrimination task based on the objective Two-Alternatives Forced Choice (2AFC) procedure, in which observers are forced to report whether an oriented stimulus that was tilted off-vertical by a varying amount (but never vertical) was tilted clockwise or counterclockwise from vertical. Participants' ability in detecting the visual vertical was estimated by calculation of bias and threshold, which represent deviations of the subjective vertical from the physical vertical and the sensitivity to orientation offsets away from vertical, respectively. While there were no significant differences between groups in terms of bias, statistical analysis showed a significantly higher threshold in the PB+ group compared to both PB- and control groups. Results suggest that vertical misrepresentation might be due to the presence, in patients with PB, of a lower signal-to-noise ratio in coding systems. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.