Effects of Manual Therapy on Parkinson's Gait: A Systematic Review.

Manual therapy (MT) is commonly used in rehabilitation to deal with motor impairments in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, is MT an efficient method to improve gait in PD? To answer the question, a systematic review of clinical controlled trials was conducted. Estimates of effect sizes (reported as standard mean difference (SMD)) with their respective 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were reported for each outcome when sufficient data were available. If data were lacking, p values were reported. The PEDro scale was used for the quality assessment. Three studies were included in the review. MT improved Dynamic Gait Index (SMD = 1.47; 95% CI: 0.62, 2.32; PEDro score: 5/10, moderate level of evidence). MT also improved gait performances in terms of stride length, velocity of arm movements, linear velocities of the shoulder and the hip (p < 0.05; PEDro score: 2/10, limited level of evidence). There was no significant difference between groups after MT for any joint's range of motion during gait (p > 0.05; PEDro score: 6/10, moderate level of evidence). There is no strong level of evidence supporting the beneficial effect of MT to improve gait in PD. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to understand the impact of MT on gait in PD.

Modified dynamic gait index and limits of stability in myotonic dystrophy type 1.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the performance of balance and walking tests in relation to self-reported fall history in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). METHODS: Twenty-two (13 male) participants with DM1 completed, a 6-month fall history questionnaire, the modified Dynamic Gait Index (mDGI), limits of stability (LoS) testing, and 10-m walking tests. RESULTS: Mean (SD) falls in 6 months was 3.7 (3.1), and 19 (86%) participants reported at least 1 fall. Significant differences in mDGI scores (P = 0.006) and 10-m fast walking gait velocity (P = 0.02) were found between those who had been classified as "fallers" and those who had been classified as "nonfallers." Significant correlations were found between mDGI scores and 10-m walking time. DISCUSSION: Falls are common in DM1, and the mDGI may have potential to distinguish fallers from nonfallers, whereas the LoS failed to detect such impairment. Future studies should further explore use of the mDGI in DM1. Muscle Nerve 58: 694-699, 2018.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of three scales for measuring balance in patients with chronic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Various outcome measures are used for the assessment of balance and mobility in patients with stroke. The purpose of the present study was to examine test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) for measuring balance in patients with chronic stroke. METHODS: Fifty-six patients (39 male and 17 female) with chronic stroke participated in this study. A senior physical therapist assessed the test-retest reliability and validity of three scales, including the DGI, TUG, and BBS over two testing sessions. In addition, the third assessment of each scale was taken at the time of discharge to determine the responsiveness of the three outcome measures. RESULTS: The reliability of the TUG (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1] = 0.98), DGI (ICC2,1 = 0.98) and BBS (ICC2,1 = 0.99) were excellent. The standard error of measurement (SEM) of the TUG, DGI, and BBS were 1.16, 0.71, and 0.98, respectively. The minimal detectable change (MDC) of the TUG, DGI, and BBS were 3.2, 1.9, and 2.7, respectively. There was a significant correlation found between the DGI and BBS (first reading [r] = 0.75; second reading [r] = 0.77), TUG and BBS (first reading [r] = -.52; second reading [r] = -.53), and the TUG and DGI (first reading [r] = 0.45; second reading [r] = 0.48), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The test-retest reliability of the TUG, BBS, and DGI was excellent. The DGI demonstrated slightly better responsiveness than TUG and BBS. However, the small sample size of this study limits the validity of the results.

[Functional assessment of patients with vertigo and dizziness in occupational medicine]. / Badanie czynnosciowe osób z zawrotami glowy i zaburzeniami równowagi dla potrzeb medycyny pracy.

BACKGROUND: Balance assessment relies on symptoms, clinical examination and functional assessment and their verification in objective tests. Our study was aimed at calculating the assessment compatibility between questionnaires, functional scales and objective vestibular and balance examinations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of 131 patients (including 101 women; mean age: 59±14 years) of the audiology outpatient clinic was examined. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, phobic vertigo and central dizziness were the most common diseases observed in the study group. Patients' symptoms were tested using the questionnaire on Cawthworne-Cooksey exercises (CC), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Duke Anxiety-Depression Scale. Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), the Tinetti test, Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA) were used for the functional balance assessment. Objective evaluation included: videonystagmography caloric test and static posturography. RESULTS: The study results revealed statistically significant but moderate compatibility between functional tests BBS, DGI, TUG, DVA and caloric results (Kendall's W = 0.29) and higher for posturography (W = 0.33). The agreement between questionnaires and objective tests were very low (W = 0.08-0.11).The positive predictive values of BBS were 42% for caloric and 62% for posturography tests, of DGI - 46% and 57%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of functional tests (BBS, DGI, TUG, DVA) revealed statistically significant correlations with objective balance tests but low predictive values did not allow to use these tests in vestibular damage screening. Only half of the patients with functional disturbances revealed abnormal caloric or posturography tests. The qualification to work based on objective tests ignore functional state of the worker, which may influence the ability to work. Med Pr 2018;69(2):179-189.

Reliability and validity of the Arabic Dynamic Gait Index in people poststroke.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) is a valid and reliable measure of gait, balance, and fall risk. The purpose of this study was to translate the DGI into Arabic and evaluate the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the DGI (A-DGI) in patients with stroke. METHODS: The DGI was translated into Arabic according to the World Health Organization forward/backward translation protocol for translating assessment tools. It was then administered to a convenience sample of patients with stroke. The inter-and intrarater reliability as well as convergent and discriminant validity of the A-DGI were examined. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with stroke (mean [SD] age, 64 [12] years; 33 male) were enrolled in the study. The A-DGI score reflected high agreement for both interrater (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]3,1 = .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .97-.99) and intrarater (ICC1,1 = .97; 95% CI, .95-.98) reliability and correlated moderately but significantly with the Glasgow Coma Scale (rho = .39, P = .01), Beck Depression Inventory (rho = -.50, P < .01), and Stroke Impact Scale-16 version 3.0 domains. The A-DGI discriminated between subjects who were at risk of fall and those who were not (U = .00, P < .01), younger and older adults (U = 195, P = .03), side of hemiplegia (U = 218, P = .04), and mild and moderate (U = 105.5, P = .02) as well as mild and severe stroke severity (U = 30, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The A-DGI reflected high reliability and validity in the stroke population. The availability of a reliable and valid A-DGI facilitates its use among therapists from Arabic origins, which will enrich the rehabilitation process in their clinical practice.

Self-assessed Dynamic Gait Index correlates with physical therapist assessed Dynamic Gait Index in people with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) is a clinical measure of walking ability comprised of eight walking tasks. In people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) the DGI has demonstrated validity, reliability, and ability to identify fallers. A self-assessed version of the DGI that demonstrates concurrent validity with the original DGI in people with MS would be valuable for remote assessment of walking ability. We therefore developed a questionnaire-based self-assessed version of the DGI (sDGI) that asks participants to self-rate their predicted ability to perform the eight DGI walking tasks. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and internal consistency of the sDGI in people with MS who had self-reported gait impairment. METHODS: We enrolled 53 ambulatory people with MS with self-reported gait impairment. Participants completed the sDGI, the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12), the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), and self-reported their number of falls in the past 3 months. Then, up to 4 weeks later, they completed the DGI by in-person evaluation by a physical therapist (PT). We calculated the internal consistency of the sDGI and concordance between the sDGI and DGI. To determine if cognition impacted concordance, we calculated concordance in the cognitively impaired and non-impaired groups and also tested the difference between groups. We also calculated correlation between the sDGI and the DGI and the MSWS-12. The ability of the sDGI and the DGI to identify fallers was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: 51 participants completed the study. They had a mean age of 60.9 (SD 11.5) years, median PDDS of 4.0 (interquartile range 3, 5), 32 % used walking aids, 25 % were cognitively impaired, and 62 % were female. The sDGI was internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha 0.85, 95 % CI 0.76, 0.90) but was not concordant (CCC = 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.28-0.60) with the DGI. Concordance between the sDGI and DGI was not different for cognitively intact versus cognitively impaired individuals. The sDGI was moderately correlated with the DGI (R = 0.64, p < 0.01) and strongly correlated with the MSWS-12 (R = -0.71, p < 0.01). Neither the sDGI nor the DGI identified fallers in this sample. CONCLUSION: The moderate to strong correlation among the sDGI, DGI and MSWS-12 supports the validity of the sDGI as a measure of walking ability in people with MS. However, because there is poor concordance between the sDGI and the DGI performed in clinic by a PT in both cognitively intact and cognitively impaired participants, the sDGI should not be used as a substitute for the DGI. The sDGI could be used as a screening tool because most participants underestimated their walking performance compared to assessment by a PT so the sDGI would be unlikely to miss poor walking ability. As neither the sDGI nor the DGI identified fallers in this sample, our results do not support using these tools to identify fallers in people with MS and self-reported gait impairment.

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Modified Dynamic Gait Index in the Elderly.

The modified Dynamic Gait Index (mDGI) is one of the valid instruments used in the evaluation of gait disorders. This study aimed to translate the mDGI into Turkish and evaluate the evidence for its reliability and validity for use in an elderly population. For test-retest reliability, the mDGI was administered twice, and for inter-rater reliability, the mDGI was administered alone on the same day by two raters. Concurrent validity of the mDGI was assessed using Pearson's correlation analysis between the Turkish version of the mDGI score and the Timed Up and Go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and 10-m Walk Test (10-MWT), respectively. The internal consistency of the mDGI was found to be excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97) and test-retest (ICC = 0.95; 95% Cl (0.84-0.95)) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.95; 95% Cl (0.85-0.95)) were excellent. A negative, moderate correlation was found between mDGI and TUG (r = -0.73, p < .0001), and a positive, moderate correlation with BBS (r = 0.71, p < .0001) and 10-MWT (r = 0.72, p < .0001). The Turkish version of the mDGI was found to be a valid and reliable assessment instrument for gait and balance in the elderly.

Intrarater and interrater reliability of the dynamic gait index in post stroke patients with eye movement disorders.

BACKGROUND: The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) is a useful tool that has been evaluated for its reliability in patients with vestibular disorders, elderly people and, in chronic stroke population. Present study was aimed to evaluate the intrarater and interrater reliability of the DGI to measure dynamic balance and gait performance in stroke patients with eye movement disorders. METHODS: A sample of 30 stroke patients suffering from eye movement disorders were recruited. Two Physical therapists assessed the intrarater and interrater reliability of the DGI in two testing sessions three days apart. In the later session, two raters assessed the patients' performance simultaneously on the DGI. The reliability was calculated using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC2, 1). Standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC95) at 95% confidence interval were also calculated. A significance level was set at p-value <0.05. RESULTS: The (ICC2, 1) for intrarater and interrater reliability of total DGI scores was 0.86 and 0.91 respectively. While (ICC2, 1) for intrarater and interrater reliability of individual items ranged from 0.73 to 0.91 to 0.73-0.93, respectively. The (SEM) and (MDC95) for intrarater reliability of total DGI scores were 0.76 and 2.10, respectively. Corresponding values for interrater reliability were 0.62 and 1.71, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The DGI is a reliable tool for evaluating the dynamic balance and gait performance in stroke patients with eye movement disorders. This tool showed good to excellent intrarater and interrater reliability of total DGI scores and moderate to good intrarater and interrater reliability of individual items of the DGI.

Prevalence of bilateral vestibulopathy among older adults above 65 years on the indication of vestibular impairment and the association with Dynamic Gait Index and Dizziness Handicap Inventory.

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) and evaluate the association with, and concurrent validity of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) in diagnosing BV based on video head impulse test (vHIT) among older adults ≥65 years referred to a geriatric falls clinic on suspicion of vestibular impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The vHIT was applied as a reference standard of BV to estimate diagnostic parameters for optimal cut-off scores of DGI and DHI applied separately and in combination. RESULTS: Two-hundred medical records were reviewed (70% women, mean age 79.4 years). The prevalence of BV was 9%. DGI was weakly associated with BV: Odds Ratio (OR) 1.15 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01; 1.31), with a 93% sensitivity and 47% specificity of a cut-off score of 16. The total score of DHI showed no association with BV: OR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98; 1.04). The concurrent validity for BV and DGI and/or DHI were found to be inadequate. CONCLUSIONS: A prevalence of 9% underlines the relevance for assessment of BV. Only a weak association between DGI and/or DHI and BV was found. Thus, vHIT remains the preferred test for detecting BV in geriatric fall assessments.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONBilateral vestibulopathy (BV) has numerous negative consequences for older adults and the prevalence is high among older adults referred to a geriatric falls clinic on suspicion of vestibular impairment.The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) are not valid alternatives to the Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) when assessing BV among geriatric outpatients.

Translingual neural stimulation affects resting-state functional connectivity in mild-moderate traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can lead to movement and balance deficits. In addition to physical therapy, brain-based neurorehabilitation efforts have begun to show promise in improving these deficits. The present study investigated the effectiveness of translingual neural stimulation (TLNS) on patients with mild-to-moderate TBI (mmTBI) and related brain connectivity using a resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) approach. METHODS: Resting-state images with 5-min on GE750 3T scanner were acquired from nine participants with mmTBI. Paired t-test was used for calculating changes in RSFC and behavioral scores before and after the TLNS intervention. The balance and movement performances related to mmTBI were evaluated by Sensory Organization Test (SOT) and Dynamic Gait Index (DGI). RESULTS: Compared to pre-TLNS intervention, significant behavioral changes in SOT and DGI were observed. The analysis revealed increased RSFC between the left postcentral gyrus and left inferior parietal lobule and left Brodmann Area 40, as well as the increased RSFC between the right culmen and right declive, indicating changes due to TLNS treatment. However, there were no correlations between the sensory/somatomotor (or visual or cerebellar) network and SOT/DGI behavioral performance. CONCLUSIONS: Although the limited sample size may have led to lack of significant correlations with functional assessments, these results provide preliminary evidence that TLNS in conjunction with physical therapy can induce brain plasticity in TBI patients with balance and movement deficits.

Is the dynamic gait index a useful outcome to measure balance and ambulation in patients with cerebellar ataxia?

BACKGROUND: Ataxia can adversely affect balance and gait and increase the incidence of falls, which puts individuals at greater risk for injury. Thus, interventions focused on balance and gait are integral in rehabilitation training. In order to determine if rehabilitation interventions are effective, we need an outcome measure to detect change. To our knowledge, no activity level outcome measures have been established for balance and gait in cerebellar ataxia. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study is to determine the reliability and validity of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) for ataxia. DESIGN: Twenty adult participants (23-84 years) with ataxia were evaluated to assess construct validity, inter-rater reliability, and same day test-retest reliability of the DGI. METHODS: Participants completed ataxia-specific impairment level outcome measures, as well as the DGI. In addition to the in-person rater, three additional physical therapists scored video recordings of DGI test and retests. Construct validity was assessed via Spearman's rank order correlation coefficient (Spearman's rho) between the impairment measures (Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), International Cooperative of Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) and the DGI. Reliability was assessed by Spearman's rho and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ICC (2,1). RESULTS: In terms of construct validity, we found significant correlations between the activity level DGI and impairment level outcome measures (-0.81 for SARA; -0.88 with ICARS). The interrater reliability of the DGI applied to participants with ataxia was high (Spearman rho: range 0.71-0.98; ICC (2,1) 0.98) as was test-retest reliability (Spearman rho: 0.95; ICC (2,1) 0.98). CONCLUSION: We showed that the DGI is a reliable and valid outcome measure to be used in the clinic for individuals with cerebellar ataxia. The DGI had excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability for raters with varying years of clinical experience. Therefore, the DGI can be a useful clinical outcome measure for assessing balance and ambulation for individuals with cerebellar ataxia.

Reliability, internal consistency, and concurrent validity of a modified version of the dynamic gait index in people with vestibular disorders.

BACKGROUND: People with vestibular disorders often have abnormalities in gait and balance. The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) is a relatively effective clinical gait measure that has been validated for use in patients with vestibular disorders. The modified version of the DGI (M-DGI) is based on the original DGI. RESEARCH QUESTION: The objective of this study was to refine and test the clinical application of the M-DGI, and to investigate whether it is an effective indicator of dynamic gait in patients with vestibular disorders. METHODS: A reliability and validity study. All raters reviewed the instructions and scoring criteria for each M-DGI item prior to the initial test. The raters simultaneously scored two M-DGI tasks for the 75 subjects, and the two tasks were completed with an interval of two hours in-between. Reliability of total M-DGI scores was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1). Internal consistency of the M-DGI was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Concurrent validity of the M-DGI with Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG) was assessed using Spearman's rank order correlation coefficient. RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Interrater and intrarater reliability of the total M-DGI scores were reflected by ICCs of 0.99 and 0.97. Internal consistency of the M-DGI score was 0.9975. Spearman's rank order correlation coefficient of the M-DGI score with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and the Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG) was 0.72 and 0.65, respectively.The M-DGI demonstrates acceptable reliability, internal consistency, and concurrent validity for use as a clinical gait measurement for patients with vestibular disorders.

Validity and reliability of the Dynamic Gait Index in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) is a performance-based tool can be applied in a short time and evaluates dynamic balance and gait ability. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the DGI valid and reliable for assessing gait and balance disorders in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP)? METHODS: Sixteen children with hemiplegic CP (5 females, 11 males; mean age 10y 3mo, SD 2y 7mo; range 6-14y; Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I [n = 9], II [n = 7]) and 16 age-matched typically developing (TD) (8 females, 8 males; mean age 9y 9mo, SD 2y 6mo; range 6-14y) participated. The relationship between the DGI, Four-Square Step Test (FSST), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (PBS) was analyzed. To determine the test-retest reliability, the DGI was performed twice and; for the inter-rater reliability, only DGI was reapplied by a different rater on the same day. Internal consistency was obtained by Cronbach-α value. Validity was tested by Spearman correlation coefficient and reliability was calculated by Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between hemiplegic CP and TD and between the children with GMFCS level I and II in the comparison of results of the DGI and other tests. All items on the DGI had appropriate internal consistency (Cronbach-α = 0.969). The test-retest (ICC = 0.970 CI(0.915- 0.990)) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.983 CI(0.882- 0.998)) reliabilities were found to be excellent. A negative, moderate correlation between FSST and DGI (rs = -0.673, p = 0.004); a positive, high correlation between PBS (rs = 0.724, p = 0.002) and DGI and a negative, high correlation between TUG and DGI (rs = -0.828, p < 0.001) was detected. SIGNIfiCANCE: DGI with features such as its feasibility in a short time, being simple but distinctive and not requiring heavy equipment is a valid and reliable method in children with hemiplegic CP.

Identification of Latent Classes of Motor Performance in a Heterogenous Population of Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To determine classes of motor performance based on community deployable motor impairment and functional tests in a heterogeneous adult population. DESIGN: Sixteen tests of limb-specific and whole-body measures of motor impairment and function were obtained. Linear regression analysis was used to dichotomize performance on each test as falling within or outside the age- and sex-predicted values. Latent class analysis was used to determine 3 classes of motor performance. The chi-square test of association and the Fisher exact test were used for categorical variables, and analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for continuous variables to evaluate the relationship between demographic characteristics and latent classes. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=118; 50 men) participated in the study. Quota sampling was used to recruit individuals who self-identified as healthy (n=44) or currently living with a preexisting chronic health condition, including arthritis (n=19), multiple sclerosis (n=18), Parkinson disease (n=17), stroke (n=18), or low functioning (n=2). INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Latent classes of motor performance. RESULTS: Across the entire sample, 3 latent classes of motor performance were determined that clustered individuals with motor performance falling: (1) within predicted values on most of the tests (expected class), (2) outside predicted values on some of the tests (moderate class), and (3) outside predicted values on most of the tests (severe class).The ability to distinguish between the respective classes based on the percent chance of falling outside predicted values was achieved using the following community deployable motor performance tests: 10-meter walk test (22%, 80%, and 100%), 6-minute walk test (14.5%, 37.5%, and 100%), grooved pegboard test (23%, 38%, and 100%), and modified physical performance test (3%, 54%, and 96%). CONCLUSIONS: In this heterogeneous group of adults, we found 3 distinct classes of motor performance, with the sample clustering into an expected test score group, a moderate test score deficiency group, and a severed test score deficiency group. Based on the motor performance tests, we established that community deployable, easily administered testing could accurately predict the established clusters of motor performance.

First report of the efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation in improving function in patients with Neurofibromatosis type 2: an observational cohort study in a clinical setting.

PURPOSE: Patients with Neurofibromatosis type 2 often experience debilitating neuro-otological problems which affect their mobility and balance. This study examined the efficacy of a personalised program of vestibular rehabilitation for patients with Neurofibromatosis type 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational cohort study analysing routinely collected data for 21 patients in a highly specialised Neurofibromatosis type 2 service. Vestibular rehabilitation comprised an initial one-hour assessment followed by a patient-specific exercise program reviewed in person and by email consultations. Patients were subsequently followed-up at 9 months. The vestibular rehabilitation efficacy was assessed using the Dynamic Gait Index score. RESULTS: Nineteen of 21 patients were assessed as impaired and at risk of falls pre-rehabilitation (Dynamic Gait Index <19/24), of which 79% showed clinical improvement post-rehabilitation. There was a significant improvement in the Dynamic Gait Index scores pre-rehabilitation to post-rehabilitation (p < 0.001) and outcomes were subsequently maintained at the 9-month follow-up assessment. Whilst the pre-rehabilitation Dynamic Gait Index scores of patients with more severe genotype were lower compared to other patients, the beneficial effect of vestibular rehabilitation was similar amongst genetic severity groups. CONCLUSIONS: Personalised vestibular rehabilitation significantly improves function in Neurofibromatosis type 2, sustaining benefits for 9 months, irrespective of patients' age or genetic severity. Implications for rehabilitation Patients with Neurofibromatosis type 2 experience debilitating neuro-otological problems which affect their mobility and balance. A patient-tailored program of vestibular rehabilitation was offered in a highly specialised clinic for six months with a follow-up assessment at 9 months post-treatment. All patients improved from baseline, with 79% of them achieving clinically significant improvement in function and with statistically significant benefits sustained for 9 months. The beneficial effect of vestibular rehabilitation was similar for all patients, regardless of age or genetic severity, suggesting vestibular rehabilitation could be incorporated in routine clinical care in Neurofibromatosis type 2 clinics internationally.

Differentiation of Patients with Balance Insufficiency (Vestibular Hypofunction) versus Normal Subjects Using a Low-Cost Small Wireless Wearable Gait Sensor.

Balance disorders present a significant healthcare burden due to the potential for hospitalization or complications for the patient, especially among the elderly population when considering intangible losses such as quality of life, morbidities, and mortalities. This work is a continuation of our earlier works where we now examine feature extraction methodology on Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) tests and machine learning classifiers to differentiate patients with balance problems versus normal subjects on an expanded cohort of 60 patients. All data was obtained using our custom designed low-cost wireless gait analysis sensor (WGAS) containing a basic inertial measurement unit (IMU) worn by each subject during the DGI tests. The raw gait data is wirelessly transmitted from the WGAS for real-time gait data collection and analysis. Here we demonstrate predictive classifiers that achieve high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in distinguishing abnormal from normal gaits. These results show that gait data collected from our very low-cost wearable wireless gait sensor can effectively differentiate patients with balance disorders from normal subjects in real-time using various classifiers. Our ultimate goal is to be able to use a remote sensor such as the WGAS to accurately stratify an individual's risk for falls.

Translingual Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Symptoms Due to Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of high- and low-frequency noninvasive translingual neurostimulation (TLNS) plus targeted physical therapy (PT) for treating chronic balance and gait deficits due to mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury (mmTBI). DESIGN: Participants were randomized 1:1 in a 26-week double-blind phase 1/2 study (NCT02158494) with 3 consecutive treatment stages: in-clinic, at-home, and no treatment. Arms were high-frequency pulse (HFP) and low-frequency pulse (LFP) TLNS. SETTING: TLNS plus PT training was initiated in-clinic and then continued at home. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=44; 18-65y) from across the United States were randomized into the HFP and LFP (each plus PT) arms. Forty-three participants (28 women, 15 men) completed at least 1 stage of the study. Enrollment requirements included an mmTBI ≥1 year prior to screening, balance disorder due to mmTBI, a plateau in recovery with current PT, and a Sensory Organization Test (SOT) score ≥16 points below normal. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received TLNS (HFP or LFP) plus PT for a total of 14 weeks (2 in-clinic and 12 at home), twice daily, followed by 12 weeks without treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was change in SOT composite score from baseline to week 14. Secondary variables (eg, Dynamic Gait Index [DGI], 6-minute walk test [6MWT]) were also collected. RESULTS: Both arms had a significant (P<.0001) improvement in SOT scores from baseline at weeks 2, 5, 14 (primary endpoint), and 26. DGI scores had significant improvement (P<.001-.01) from baseline at the same test points; 6MWT evaluations after 2 weeks were significant. The SOT, DGI, and 6MWT scores did not significantly differ between arms at any test point. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Both the HFP+PT and LFP+PT groups had significantly improved balance scores, and outcomes were sustained for 12 weeks after discontinuing TLNS treatment. Results between arms did not significantly differ from each other. Whether the 2 dosages are equally effective or whether improvements are because of provision of PT cannot be conclusively established at this time.

POWER training in chronic stroke individuals: differences between responders and nonresponders.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity muscle weakness is a primary contributor to post-stroke dysfunction. Resistance training is an effective treatment for hemiparetic weakness and improves walking performance. Post-stroke subject characteristics that do or do not improve walking speed following resistance training are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper was to describe baseline characteristics, as well as responses to training, associated with achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in walking speed (≥0.16 m/s) following Post-stroke Optimization of Walking Using Explosive Resistance (POWER) training. METHODS: Seventeen participants completed 24 sessions of POWER training, which included intensive progressive leg presses, jump training, calf raises, sit-to-stands, step-ups, and over ground fast walking. Outcomes included SSWS, FCWS, DGI, FMA-LE, 6-MWT, paretic knee power, non-paretic knee power, and paretic step ratio. RESULTS: Specific to those who reached MCID in SSWS (e.g. "responders"), significant improvements in SSWS, FCWS, 6-MWT, paretic knee power, and non-paretic knee power was realized. Paretic knee power and non-paretic knee power significantly improved in those who did not achieve MCID for gait speed (e.g. "non-responders"). CONCLUSION: The potential for POWER training to enhance general locomotor function was confirmed. Baseline paretic knee strength/power may be an important factor in how an individual responds to this style of training. The lack of change within the non-responders emphasizes the contribution of factors other than lower extremity muscle power improvement to locomotor dysfunction.

Correlations between measures of dynamic balance in individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis.

Mediolateral balance control during walking is a challenging task in post-stroke hemiparetic individuals. To detect and treat dynamic balance disorders, it is important to assess balance using reliable methods. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), margin-of-stability (MoS), and peak-to-peak range of angular-momentum (H) are some of the most commonly used measures to assess dynamic balance and fall risk in clinical and laboratory settings. However, it is not clear if these measures lead to similar conclusions. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess dynamic balance in post-stroke hemiparetic individuals using BBS, DGI, MoS and the range of H and determine if these measure are correlated. BBS and DGI were collected from 19 individuals post-stroke. Additionally, kinematic and kinetic data were collected while the same individuals walked at their self-selected speed. MoS and the range of H were calculated in the mediolateral direction for each participant. Correlation analyses revealed moderate associations between all measures. Overall, a higher range of angular-momentum was associated with a higher MoS, wider step width and lower BBS and DGI scores, indicating poor balance control. Further, only the MoS from the paretic foot placement, but not the nonparetic foot, correlated with the other balance measures. Although moderate correlations existed between all the balance measures, these findings do not necessarily advocate the use of a single measure as each test may assess different constructs of dynamic balance. These findings have important implications for the use and interpretation of dynamic balance assessments.

Rethinking the neurological examination II: dynamic balance assessment / Repensando o exame neurológico II: avaliação do equilíbrio dinâmico

The authors propose that the neurological exam needs reevaluation with respect to the dynamic balance test (walking). Validated tests such as: preferred and maximum gait speed, dynamic gait index, five-times-sit-to-stand test, timed up & go cognitive and manual, should be part of the neurological examination routine. In the neurological exam of older patients, these same bedside tests bring the plus of evaluation the risk of occasional falling.

Os autores propõem que o exame neurológico tradicional seja reavaliado no que diz respeito ao exame do equilíbrio dinâmico (marcha). Testes validados tais como: velocidade da marcha - preferencial e máxima; índice dinâmico da marcha, teste senta-levanta cinco vezes e o tempo levanta-e-anda cognitivo e manual, deveriam fazer parte do exame neurológico de rotina. Na avaliação neurológica dos pacientes idosos, esses mesmos testes à beira do leito trazem benefício adicional ao aferir o risco de queda ocasional.