Assessment of the possible inhibitory effect of carrageenan in human papillomavirus DNA testing by polymerase chain reaction amplification.

We assessed carrageenan's potential to inhibit human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA extraction and amplification in vaginal swab samples collected in a trial, assessing the efficacy of a carrageenan-based gel against HPV infections. Experiment #1 consisted of adding gel (carrageenan-containing or placebo) to swabs and comparing HPV DNA detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to unmanipulated samples collected from the same participants. For Experiments #2 and #3, we tested vaginal samples for inhibition by addition of an internal control and amplification by real-time PCR. Experiment #4 investigated carrageenan's interference with the extraction process by assessing HPV45 detectability in undiluted and diluted HPV45 positive samples (n = 3) with carrageenan versus no gel. In Experiment #1, there was a loss of HPV positivity with the addition of carrageenan (n = 9), but none with placebo gel (n = 5). In Experiments #2 and #3, the absence of the amplified product was observed in samples from the carrageenan arm: 3.3% (1/30) and 0.5% (1/199) of samples. In Experiment #4, HPV45 was not detected in undiluted carrageenan-containing samples, but after 1/50 dilution, the same HPV45 copy number was detected. Carrageenan does not affect the DNA extraction process, and inhibition of HPV DNA amplification by carrageenan occurs infrequently.

Evaluation of the intraoperative human papillomavirus test as a marker of early cure at 12 months after electrosurgical excision procedure in women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the intraoperative human papillomavirus (IOP-HPV) test has the same prognostic value as the HPV test performed at 6 months after treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) to predict treatment failure. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Barcelona, Spain. POPULATION: A cohort of 216 women diagnosed with HSIL and treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). METHODS: After LEEP, an HPV test was performed using the Hybrid Capture 2 system. If this was positive, genotyping was performed with the CLART HPV2 technique. The IOP-HPV test was compared with HPV test at 6 months and with surgical margins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Treatment failure. RESULTS: Recurrence rate of HSIL was 6%. There was a strong association between a positive IOP-HPV test, a positive 6-month HPV test, positive HPV 16 genotype, positive surgical margins and HSIL recurrence. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the IOP-HPV test were 85.7, 80.8,24.0 and 98.8% and of the HPV test at 6 months were 76.9, 75.8, 17.2 and 98.0%. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative HPV test accurately predicts treatment failure in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3. This new approach may allow early identification of patients with recurrent disease, which will not delay the treatment. Genotyping could be useful in detecting high-risk patients. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: IOP-HPV test accurately predicts treatment failure in women with CIN 2/3.

HrHPV testing vs liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and older: a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence supports high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) testing as the primary cervical cancer screening tool. However, benefits and harms should be carefully considered before replacing liquid-based cytology. In women age 50 and older, we evaluated how a commercially available DNA amplification HPV test compares with routine liquid-based cytology. METHODS: This prospective study included 4043 patients who had a cervical sample analyzed from September 2011 to September 2012. Patients were followed between 64 and 76 months (median: 70 months). Samples were analyzed using both liquid-based cytology and the Cobas 4800 HPV DNA test. We calculated the diagnostic efficacy of liquid-based cytology and HPV, with or without the opposite test as triage, using cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+/CIN3+) as reference. RESULTS: The patients had a median age of 58 years, (range; 50-90). At baseline, HPV prevalence was 8.0%: a total of 3.7% of patients had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (ASCUS+). Positive test results were 1.9% for liquid-based cytology with HPV triage and 3.0% for HPV with liquid-based cytology triage. The cumulative incidence of CIN3+ was 1.0% (40/4043). Sensitivities for CIN3+ were: liquid-based cytology 47.5% (31.5%-63.9%); liquid-based cytology with HPV triage 45.0% (29.3%-61.5%); HPV 90.0% (76.3%-97.2%); and HPV with liquid-based cytology triage 67.5% (50.9%-81.4%). Corresponding specificities were: liquid-based cytology 96.6% (96.0%-97.2%); liquid-based cytology with HPV triage 98.5% (98.0%-98.8%); HPV 92.8% (92.0%-93.6%); and HPV with liquid-based cytology triage 97.7% (97.2%-98.1%). At baseline, HPV testing overlooked five cases of gynecological cancer other than cervical cancer. Five cervical cancers were detected, two had been overlooked at baseline by liquid-based cytology and two by HPV testing CONCLUSION: HPV screening using DNA amplification is a promising alternative to liquid-based cytology in women age 50 and older, but evaluation of alternative triage methods is warranted. The risk of overlooking cancers needs consideration when replacing liquid-based cytology with HPV testing as a method for primary screening.

Consistency evaluation of Liferiver, Yaneng, Darui, and the Cobas 4800 test for high-risk human papillomavirus screening.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, several high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) tests have been developed. The assay capabilities need to be systematically reviewed. Here, we compared the clinical sample performance of three novel HR-HPV assays (Liferiver, Yaneng, and Darui) based on different platforms with the widely adopted cobas4800 test. METHODS: A total of 346 cervical swabs from women who were screened for cervical cancer were analyzed for the presence of 14 HR-HPV genotypes. The distinction between the four assays was investigated by the genotyping and direct sequencing. RESULTS: The positive rates of the four assays ranged from 61.56% to 64.16%. The overall concordance was 88.15%. The Yaneng assays displayed the best sensitivity (100%) and specificity (98.43%). The sensitivity (98.17%) and specificity (98.43%) of the Darui assay were superior to those of the cobas4800 test (97.72% and 93.70%, respectively). The Liferiver assay displayed comparable sensitivity with the cobas4800 test (95.89% and 97.72%, respectively). The specificity of the cobas4800 was lower than that of the Liferiver assay (93.70% vs. 97.64%). CONCLUSIONS: The three novel HR-HPV assays displayed good agreement with the cobas4800 test. The analytical performance of all four fulfilled the requirements of sensitivity and specificity for HR-HPV detection.

HPV-mRNA and HPV-DNA detection in samples taken up to seven years before severe dysplasia of cervix uteri.

Randomized clinical trials using human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing have found increased protection against cervical cancer and HPV-based screening is globally recommended for women ≥30 years of age. HPV-mRNA is a promising alternative target for cervical screening tests, but assessing equivalence requires longitudinal evaluation over at least the length of a screening interval. Our aim is to analyze the longitudinal sensitivity of HPV-mRNA and HPV-DNA in cervical samples taken up to 7 years before severe cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN3+). From a population-based cohort of 95,023 women in Sweden, cervical samples were frozen at -80°C between May 2007 and January 2012. Registry linkages identified that 1,204 of these women had CIN3+ 4 months to 7 years after enrolment. Baseline samples were analyzed for HPV-mRNA (Aptima, Hologic) and for HPV-DNA (Cobas 4800, Roche) and results from both tests obtained for 1,172 women. For both women <30 and ≥ 30 years, HPV-mRNA had similar sensitivity for CIN3+ as HPV-DNA (p = 0.0217 and p = 0.0123 in noninferiority testing for at least 90% relative sensitivity, respectively). Among women ≥30 years, the longitudinal sensitivities for CIN3+ occurring 5-7 years later were comparable [76.3% (95% CI: 65.8%-84.3%) and 82.5% (95% CI: 72.6%-89.4%)] as were the longitudinal negative predictive values for absence of CIN3+ [99.97% (95% CI: 99.95-99.98) and 99.98% (95% CI: 99.96-99.99)], for the HPV-mRNA and HPV-DNA test. In conclusion, HPV-mRNA testing has similar longitudinal sensitivity as HPV-DNA, implying that HPV-mRNA testing can safely be used for cervical screening.

Analytical performance evaluation of the HPV OncoCheck assay for detection of high-risk HPV infection in liquid-based cervical samples.

Recent studies have demonstrated low specificity (false positive) of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing for the screening and diagnosis of cervical samples. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of the HPV OncoCheck assay, which is an HPV E6/E7 mRNA-based assay, for the detection of 16 high-risk (HR)-HPVs including HPV 16 and HPV 18 genotypes in cervical samples using multiplex reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR. In the present study, the analytical performance of the assay was evaluated using 16 HPV single strand DNAs. Clinical evaluation was performed using 319 Thinprep® liquid-based cytology samples obtained from women with cervical diseases, and the HPV OncoCheck assay results were compared with those of cytological diagnosis and sequence analysis. All 16 types of HPVs were detected with a minimum detection sensitivity of 100 copies per reaction and high specificity was observed. The sensitivity and specificity of the HPV OncoCheck assay for detecting high-grade lesions were 94.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.875-0.975; p < .0001) and 95.4% (95% CI, 0.868-0.989; p < .0001), and sequence analysis were 99.4% (95% CI, 0.965-0.999; p < .0001), and 98% (95% CI, 0.939-0.996; p < .0001), respectively. Moreover, the agreement between the HPV OncoCheck assay and sequence analysis for the detection of HR-HPV was 98.8% (κ = 0.98, 95% CI 0.967-0.996; p < .0001). The results of this study showed high agreement and specificity with cytological diagnoses and sequence analysis. Future studies with histological follow- up are needed to determine whether use of the HPV OncoCheck assay in cervical screening may aid detection of the most significant cervical disease while reducing false-positive results.

Investigation of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) in antrochoanal polyps.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESES: This study aimed to investigate the presence of HPV (HPV types 11 and 16) and EBV in antrochoanal polyps and to contribute to the current literature in this regard. STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study. METHODS: A total of 100 patients (including 43 patients undergoing surgery for antrochoanal polyp, 27 patients undergoing surgery for nasal polyp, and 30 patients undergoing surgery for hypertrophic inferior turbinate) were included in this study. DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples with the aid of the Bioneer's AccuPrep Genomic DNA Extraction Kit. In the obtained genomic DNAs, while the detection of HPV DNA was performed using the nested-PCR method, the detection of HPV types 11/16 and EBV DNA was performed using the RT-PCR method. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients with antrochoanal polyp was 26.7 ±â€¯15.4 years (range 7-70). There were 20 (46.5%) women and 23 (53.5%) men in the antrochoanal polyp group. HPV DNA was positively detected using the nested-PCR method in 14 (32.6%) of the patients with antrochoanal polyp and in 3 (11.1%) of the patients with nasal polyp. HPV DNA was not detected in the hypertrophic inferior turbinate group (control group). There was a statistically significant difference between all groups in terms of HPV DNA positivity. In the antrochoanal polyp group, 2 patients had HPV 11 positivity and 12 patients had HPV 16 positivity. In the nasal polyp group, 1 patient had HPV 11 positivity and 2 patients had HPV 16 positivity. EBV DNA was positively detected in 16 (37.2%) of the patients with antrochoanal polyp, in 11 (40.7%) of the patients with nasal polyp and in 8 (26.7%) of the patients with hypertrophic inferior turbinate, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of EBV DNA positivity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there is a need for further studies investigating the presence of viruses in antrochoanal polyps.

[Relationship between cervical lesions and the type-specific viral load of high risk HPV reflected by the Ct value of Cobas 4800 HPV system].

Objective: To explore the relationship between cervical lesions and high risk HPV (HR-HPV) viral load reflected by the cycle threshold (Ct) values of Cobas 4800 HPV (Cobas 4800) system. Methods: From August 2016 to September 2017, 7 000 women from Shenzhen, were recruited for cervical cancer screening with Cobas 4800 system and cytology co-test. Colposcope biopsies were performed on women who were positive of HPV 16, 18, and positive of HPV types other than 16,18 with cytology [≥ atypical squamous cell of undetermined signification (ASCUS)], or HPV negative but abnormal of cytology [≥ low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)]. The Ct values of HPV 16, 18 and all combined other types coming from Cobas 4800 system were used as an indicator of viral load to analyze the relationship between type-specific HPV load and the cervical lesions. Results: (1) Among the 7 000 screening women, 370 cases were positive for cervical cancer screening, 325 of them underwent colposcope biopsies, and coloposcopy referred rate was 87.8% (325/370). Among 325 women undergoing cervical biopsy, pathological diagnosis was 119 cases of normal cervical cervix, 151 cases of LSIL, and 55 cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and above (HSIL(+); including 53 cases of HSIL, 1 case of cervical adenocarcinoma, and 1 case of cervical squamous cell carcinoma). (2) The Ct value of HPV 16 was inversely correlated with the upgrading of the lesions (r=-0.617, P=0.000), and significant different among normal cervix,LSIL and HSIL(+) (35.4±4.5 vs 31.0±6.0 vs 26.5±4.0; F=25.537, P=0.000). There was no correlation between Ct value of HPV 18 and cervical lesions (r=-0.021, P=0.902). The Ct value of other 12 HPV types was statistically difference among normal normal cervix, HSIL(+) and cervicitis (33.0±5.3 vs 29.9±7.2 vs 29.8±5.8; F=5.087, P=0.007). Among them, LSIL and HSIL(+) were significantly lower than normal cervix (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between LSIL and HSIL(+) (P>0.05). Conclusion: The Ct value of HPV 16 detecting in Cobas 4800 system as an indicator of virus load obviously correlates with different grades of cervical lesions, therefore could be a reference of cervical lesion existence and an indicator of lesion prognosis.

Randomised study shows that repeated self-sampling and HPV test has more than two-fold higher detection rate of women with CIN2+ histology than Pap smear cytology.

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.85.

Validation of a Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Cervical Screening Test That Provides Expanded HPV Typing.

As cervical cancer screening shifts from cytology to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, a major question is the clinical value of identifying individual HPV types. We aimed to validate Onclarity (Becton Dickinson Diagnostics, Sparks, MD), a nine-channel HPV test recently approved by the FDA, by assessing (i) the association of Onclarity types/channels with precancer/cancer; (ii) HPV type/channel agreement between the results of Onclarity and cobas (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA), another FDA-approved test; and (iii) Onclarity typing for all types/channels compared to typing results from a research assay (linear array [LA]; Roche). We compared Onclarity to histopathology, cobas, and LA. We tested a stratified random sample (n = 9,701) of discarded routine clinical specimens that had tested positive by Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2; Qiagen, Germantown, MD). A subset had already been tested by cobas and LA (n = 1,965). Cervical histopathology was ascertained from electronic health records. Hierarchical Onclarity channels showed a significant linear association with histological severity. Onclarity and cobas had excellent agreement on partial typing of HPV16, HPV18, and the other 12 types as a pool (sample-weighted kappa value of 0.83); cobas was slightly more sensitive for HPV18 and slightly less sensitive for the pooled high-risk types. Typing by Onclarity showed excellent agreement with types and groups of types identified by LA (kappa values from 0.80 for HPV39/68/35 to 0.97 for HPV16). Onclarity typing results corresponded well to histopathology and to an already validated HPV DNA test and could provide additional clinical typing if such discrimination is determined to be clinically desirable.

Detecting and typing target DNA with a novel CRISPR-typing PCR (ctPCR) technique.

This study develops a new method for detecting and typing the interested DNAs based on CRISPR, which was named as ctPCR3.0, representing CRISPR- or Cas9/sgRNA-typing PCR, version 3.0. This technique detects target DNA in just one homogeneous step: quantitative PCR (qPCR) amplifying the Cas9/sgRNA-cleaved DNA samples. By directly adding Cas9 and sgRNA into the qPCR reaction and giving an additional isothermal incubation before qPCR program, the target DNA can be homogeneously detected in as few as 2 h. Without opening the detecting tube in the whole detection process, ctPCR3.0 can be used to detect target DNA as the traditional qPCR detection. The technique was fully verified by detecting the cloned HPV L1 genes of 10 high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes. The technique also successfully detected the L1 and E6-E7 genes of two highest-risk HPVs, HPV16 and HPV18, in the genomic DNA of two HPV-positive cervical carcinoma cells, HeLa and SiHa. Finally, the ctPCR3.0 method was validated by successfully detecting HPVs in many clinical samples. By performing these detections, this study thus provides a new CRISPR-based DNA detection and typing platform and a ready-to-use HPV clinical detection technique. The platform has wide application in clinical diagnosis.

Clinical validation of REALQUALITY RQ-HPV Screen according to the international guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for cervical screening.

BACKGROUND: According to international guidelines, HPV DNA tests represent a valid alternative to Pap Test for primary cervical cancer screening, provided that they guarantee balanced clinical sensitivity and specificity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe lesions. The aim of this study was to assess whether REALQUALITY RQ-HPV Screen, a new assay based on real time PCR that targets the E6-E7 region of 14 high-risk human papillomaviruses, meets the criteria for primary cervical cancer screening. METHODS: As required by guidelines, a non-inferiority test was conducted to compare the clinical performance of the test under evaluation with that of a clinically validated reference test (Hybrid Capture 2, HC2). The reproducibility of the device was assessed as well. The clinical samples used to test the hypothesis of non-inferiority and to asses reproducibility comprised 910 and 536 cervical specimens respectively. All specimens were originating from a population-based screening cohort. RESULTS: The study demonstrates that both the clinical sensitivity and specificity of REALQUALITY RQ-HPV Screen are non-inferior to those of HC2. In addition, an adequate intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility has been reached by the test. CONCLUSIONS: REALQUALITY RQ-HPV Screen fulfils all the requirements of the international guidelines and can be considered clinically validated for primary cervical cancer screening purposes.

Factors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) test acceptability in primary screening for cervical cancer: A mixed methods research synthesis.

Primary screening for cervical cancer is transitioning from the longstanding Pap smear towards implementation of an HPV-DNA test, which is more sensitive than Pap cytology in detecting high-risk lesions and offers greater protection against invasive cervical carcinomas. Based on these results, many countries are recommending and implementing HPV testing-based screening programs. Understanding what factors (e.g., knowledge, attitudes) will impact on HPV test acceptability by women is crucial for ensuring adequate public health practices to optimize cervical screening uptake. We used mixed methods research synthesis to provide a categorization of the relevant factors related to HPV primary screening for cervical cancer and describe their influence on women's acceptability of HPV testing. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Health and Web of Science for journal articles between January 1, 1980 and October 31, 2017 and retained 22 empirical articles. Our results show that while most factors associated with HPV test acceptability are included in the Health Belief Model and/or Theory of Planned Behavior (e.g., attitudes, knowledge), other important factors are not encompassed by these theoretical frameworks (e.g., health behaviors, negative emotional reactions related to HPV testing). The direction of influence of psychosocial factors on HPV test acceptability was synthesized based on 14 quantitative studies as: facilitators (e.g., high perceived HPV test benefits), barriers (e.g., negative attitudes towards increased screening intervals), contradictory evidence (e.g., sexual history) and no impact (e.g., high perceived severity of HPV infection). Further population-based studies are needed to confirm the impact of these factors on HPV-based screening acceptability.

Socio-economic variations in anticipated adverse reactions to testing HPV positive: Implications for the introduction of primary HPV-based cervical screening.

Some cervical cancer screening programmes are replacing cytology with human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing as the primary screening test. Concerns have been previously raised around the potential psychosocial impact of testing positive for HPV. We analysed socio-economic variations in anticipated adverse reactions to testing positive for HPV in women of screening age in the general population. A questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 5553 women aged 20-64 in 2010, selected through primary care in Ireland. This included questions on: socio-economics; HPV knowledge; and women's anticipated adverse psychosocial responses to testing HPV positive (shame, anxiety, stigma and worry). Multivariable linear regression was used to identify socio-economic factors significantly associated with each anticipated adverse reaction. The response rate was 62% (n = 3470). In multivariate analyses, having only attained primary level education were significantly associated with higher mean scores for all four adverse outcomes. Religion was significantly associated with all four adverse outcomes. Age was associated with anxiety and worry; younger women (<30 years) had the highest mean scores. Being married/cohabiting was significantly associated with significantly lower shame and worry scores. Not working was significantly associated with higher mean anxiety and worry scores. Our large population-based survey found significant socio-economic variations in anticipated adverse reactions to testing HPV positive. In order to minimise possible negative impacts on screening uptake and alleviate potential adverse psychological effects of HPV-based screening on women, screening programmes may need to develop specific messages around HPV infection and HPV screening that target certain subgroups of women.

Good concordance of HPV detection between cervico-vaginal self-samples and general practitioner-collected samples using the Cobas 4800 HPV DNA test.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing self-samples and clinician-collected samples for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection using clinically validated PCR-based HPV DNA assays are limited. We measured the concordance of HPV detection between home-based self-sampling and general practitioner (GP) sampling using the Cobas 4800 HPV DNA test and studied women's accept of home-based self-sampling. METHODS: Paired GP-collected samples and cervico-vaginal self-samples were obtained from 213 women aged 30-59 years diagnosed with ASC-US within the cervical cancer screening program. After undergoing cervical cytology at their GP, the women collected a self-sample with the Evalyn Brush at home and completed a questionnaire. Both samples were HPV-tested using the Cobas 4800 test. Histology results were available for those who tested HPV positive in GP-collected samples. RESULTS: We observed good concordance for HPV detection between self-samples and GP-collected samples (κ: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58-0.81). No underlying CIN2+ cases were missed by self-sampling. Women evaluated that self-sampling was easy (97.2%, 95% CI: 93.9-98.9%) and comfortable (94.8%, 95% CI: 90.9-97.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Home-based self-sampling using the Evalyn Brush and the Cobas 4800 test is an applicable and reliable alternative to GP-sampling.

Digital diffraction analysis enables low-cost molecular diagnostics on a smartphone.

The widespread distribution of smartphones, with their integrated sensors and communication capabilities, makes them an ideal platform for point-of-care (POC) diagnosis, especially in resource-limited settings. Molecular diagnostics, however, have been difficult to implement in smartphones. We herein report a diffraction-based approach that enables molecular and cellular diagnostics. The D3 (digital diffraction diagnosis) system uses microbeads to generate unique diffraction patterns which can be acquired by smartphones and processed by a remote server. We applied the D3 platform to screen for precancerous or cancerous cells in cervical specimens and to detect human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA. The D3 assay generated readouts within 45 min and showed excellent agreement with gold-standard pathology or HPV testing, respectively. This approach could have favorable global health applications where medical access is limited or when pathology bottlenecks challenge prompt diagnostic readouts.

An automated quantitative DNA image cytometry system detects abnormal cells in cervical cytology with high sensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of an automated DNA-image-cytometry system as a tool to detect cervical carcinoma. METHODS: Of 384 liquid-based cervical cytology samples with available biopsy follow-up were analyzed by both the Imager System and a high-risk HPV test (Cobas). RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of Imager System for detecting biopsy proven high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN]2-3) and carcinoma were 89.58% and 56.25%, respectively, compared to 97.22% and 23.33% of HPV test but additional HPV 16/18 genotyping increased the specificity to 69.58%. The sensitivity and specificity of the Imager System for predicting HSIL+ (CIN2-3+) lesions among atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance samples were 80.00% and 70.53%, respectively, compared to 100% and 11.58% of HPV test whilst the HPV 16/18 genotyping increased the specificity to 77.89%. Among atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude HSIL, the sensitivity and specificity of Imager System for predicting HSIL+ (CIN2-3+) lesions upon follow up were 82.86% and 33.33%%, respectively, compared to 97.14% and 4.76% of HPV test and the HPV 16/18 genotyping increased the specificity to 19.05%. Among low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cases, the sensitivity and specificity of the Imager System for predicting HSIL+ (CIN2-3+) lesions were 66.67% and 35.71%%, respectively, compared to 66.67% and 29.76% of HPV test while HPV 16/18 genotyping increased the specificity to 79.76%. The overall results of imager and high-risk HPV test agreed in 69.43% (268) of all samples. CONCLUSIONS: The automated imager system and HPV 16/18 genotyping can enhance the specificity of detecting HSIL+ (CIN2-3+) lesions.

The Clinical Significance of HPV Type in Women with Recurrent Cytological Atypia.

BACKGROUND: The human papillomavirus (HPV) test has proven to be efficient in triaging women with abnormal Pap findings in women with low cytological atypia, but there is no data about the accuracy for large loop excision of transformation zone in cases of recurrent atypia. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical correlation between results of HPV typing and conization histology in women who had recurrent abnormal Pap test results with no colposcopy findings. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study included 138 women enrolled in the Maccabi Healthcare Services who had consecutive atypical Pap test results for 2 years in which no abnormal colposcopic findings were detected. These women had an HPV typing and then conization. RESULTS: Among the total study population (n=138), 71.7% had negative histology, 19.6% had ≤ cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (≤ CIN1), and 8.7% had CIN2+. With regard to HPV typing, 34.8% were negative and 65.2% were positive. Of those testing positive, 34.4% were positive for HPV 16 or 18. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of HPV typing for women were 89.7%, 44.4%, 38.9%, and 91.7%, respectively, and for HPV 16 or 18: 71.4%, 67.7%, 32.3%, and 100.0%, respectively. After stratification by cytological grades, for women with high-grade cervical cytology, the sensitivity and negative predictive values of the HPV typing were higher than among low-grade cervical cytology, while specificity and positive predictive values were lower. CONCLUSIONS: HPV typing is a useful tool for the management of patients with persistently abnormal Pap test results.

[Application of isothermal HPV DNA amplification test in cervical cancer screening].

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of isothermal human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA amplification test as a primary screening test in the early detection of cervical cancer. Methods: From June to August 2016, 2, 774 women aged 30-64 years old from Inner Mongolia were recruited for cervical cancer screening. HPV DNA was detected by Isomega and cobas4800. INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra was served as a reference method for the cases whose results were inconsistent by using these two methods. Histological diagnosis was considered as a gold standard to estimate the effectiveness and accuracy of Isomega and cobas4800 for detecting CIN2 or greater. Results: The concordance of Isomega and cobas4800 was 94.84% (Kappa=0.82) for high risk HPV (HR-HPV), 99.68% (Kappa=0.95) for HPV16, 99.78% (Kappa=0.91) for HPV18 and 94.34% (Kappa=0.76) for other HR-HPV types. The concordances of Isomega and the reference were 99.71% (Kappa=0.96), 99.86% (Kappa=0.94) and 96.76% (Kappa=0.87) for HPV16, 18 and other HR-HPV, respectively, while the concordances of cobas4800 and the reference were 99.82% (Kappa=0.97), 99.86% (Kappa=0.94) and 97.51% (Kappa=0.90), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of Isomega for detecting CIN2+ (including CIN2, CIN3 and squamous cell carcinoma) were 87.76% and 82.94%, respectively, while those of cobas4800 were 89.80% and 85.06%, respectively. Conclusions: The concordances of Isomega and cobas4800 is confident. These two methods can accurately detect the HPV16 and 18 genotyping, and have good sensitivity and specificity for clinical diagnosis and population screening of cervical cancer.

Pre-vaccination prevalence of high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) in women from Kosovo and their related sociodemographic characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: Kosovo's current health care system does not support organized nationwide cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs. To date, no reliable data are available on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Kosovo, or on high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) prevalence and HPV type distribution. Our aim is to determinate the pre-vaccination prevalence and distribution of HR-HPVs and to assesses the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and increased risk of HPV infection in women from Kosovo. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Detection of HR-HPV DNA in cytologically evaluated cervical smears was performed using a clinically validated Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test, Roche Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test, HPV52 type-specific real-time PCR and an in-house GP5+/GP6+/68 PCR. RESULTS: The crude overall prevalence of any of the HR-HPVs was estimated at 13.1% (26/199; 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.1-18.5%), with HPV16 being the most common type (7/26, 26.9%), followed by HPV31 and HPV51, each detected in 4/26 (15.4%) cervical specimens, HPV18, detected in 3/26 (11.5%) specimens, HPV52 and HPV66, each detected in 2/26 (7.7%) specimens, and HPV33, HPV45, HPV56, and HPV58, each detected in a single (3.9%) specimen. Women over 40 (OR = 0.36), older than 18 at sexual debut (odds ratio (OR) = 0.28), those that had delivered at least one child (OR = 0.32), and those that had a history of pregnancy termination (OR = 0.39) were at lower risk for HPV infection. CONCLUSION: Because more than 70% of cervical precancerous lesions could have been prevented in Kosovo using nationwide HPV-based cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination, it is of outmost importance to implement both programs in the national health care system as soon as possible.