RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many Gram-negative bacteria other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been implicated in waterborne outbreaks, but standardized laboratory detection methods for these organisms have not been established. AIM: This study aimed to establish laboratory testing methodologies for six waterborne pathogens: Acinetobacter spp., Burkholderia spp., Cupriavidus spp., Delftia acidovorans, Elizabethkingia spp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. METHODS: Water samples were spiked by UK Health Security Agency laboratories and sent to the Glasgow Royal Infirmary laboratory for analysis. Water samples were spiked with either a pure culture of target organism or the target organism in water containing normal background flora, to ensure that the methodology could identify organisms from a mixed culture. Volumes of 100 mL were filtered under negative pressure on to culture media and incubated at 30 °C and 37 °C. The incubation time was 7 days, with plates read on days 2, 5 and 7. Further identification of colonies was undertaken using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). FINDINGS: Optimal recovery of organisms was obtained by culturing water samples on tryptic soy agar, chocolate bacitracin agar and pseudomonas selective agar. The optimal temperature for isolation was 30 °C. The optimal incubation time was 5 days, and MALDI-TOF MS identified all test species reliably. CONCLUSION: The methodology described was able to detect the six tested waterborne pathogens reliably, and can be utilized by laboratories involved in testing water samples during outbreak investigations.
Assuntos
Hospitais , Microbiologia da Água , Humanos , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/normas , Meios de Cultura , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/classificação , Temperatura , Reino Unido , Carga Bacteriana/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Cataract surgery offers significant improvement to quality of life for patients with cataracts. However, there are growing waiting lists and challenges in providing this type of surgery in a timely manner. Feedback from stakeholders had previously indicated infection prevention and control (IPC) as a potential barrier to high-throughput surgery. Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infection Scotland was asked to support the implementation of high-throughput cataract surgery aimed at addressing these challenges. AIM: To develop an IPC pathway to facilitate high-throughput surgery. This would be based on best practice, and would address any barriers identified by stakeholders. METHODS: A short life working group with input from key stakeholders, including clinical teams, was established. A rapid literature review was also undertaken. RESULTS: An agreed patient pathway was developed, with the aim of helping to facilitate high-throughput surgery. Pre-, intra- and postoperative phases were considered. Where literature was unavailable, expert/consensus opinion was utilized. Facilities for high-throughput surgery were also considered, including the Jack and Jill theatre arrangement which lends itself well to this concept. CONCLUSION: Through collaboration with stakeholders, an IPC pathway was developed to facilitate high-throughput cataract surgery and address any potential IPC barriers to implementation. The process and the output described could be utilized to develop similar pathways for other surgeries that lend themselves well to high throughput, improving quality of life for patients and reducing waiting times. This study highlights the importance of establishing surveillance for postoperative endophthalmitis following implementation.