Learning curve of laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility and learning curve of laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy was assessed. METHODS: Donors who underwent right hepatectomy performed by a single surgeon were reviewed. Comparisons between open and laparoscopy regarding operative outcomes, including number of bile duct openings in the graft, were performed using propensity score matching. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2018, 103 and 96 donors underwent laparoscopic and open living donor right hepatectomy respectively, of whom 64 donors from each group were matched. Mean(s.d.) duration of operation (252·2(41·9) versus 304·4(66·5) min; P < 0·001) and median duration of hospital stay (8 versus 10 days; P = 0·002) were shorter in the laparoscopy group. There was no difference in complication rates of donors (P = 0·298) or recipients (P = 0·394) between the two groups. Total time for laparoscopy decreased linearly (R2 = 0·407, ß = -0·914, P = 0·001), with the decrease starting after approximately 50 procedures when cases were divided into four quartiles (2nd versus 3rd quartile, P = 0·001; 3rd versus 4th quartile, P = 0·023). Although grafts with bile duct openings were more abundant in the laparoscopy group (P = 0·022), no difference was found in the last two quartiles (P = 0·207). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy is feasible and an experience of approximately 50 cases may surpass the learning curve.

ANTECEDENTES: Se evaluó la viabilidad y la curva de aprendizaje de la hepatectomía derecha de donante vivo MÉTODOS: Se llevó a cabo una revisión de los donantes sometidos a hepatectomía derecha por un único cirujano. Las comparaciones entre el abordaje abierto y laparoscópico con respecto a los resultados operatorios, incluyendo el número of aberturas de los conductos biliares en el injerto se realizó utilizando un análisis de emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión. RESULTADOS: Desde 2014 a 2018, 96 y 103 donantes fueron sometidos a hepatectomía derecho de donante vivo por cirugía abierta y laparoscópica, respectivamente, de los cuales 64 donantes fueron emparejados para ambos grupos. La media del tiempo operatorio (304,3 ± 66,5 versus 252,2 ± 41,9 minutos, P < 0,001) y la mediana de la estancia hospitalaria fueron más cortas en el grupo de cirugía laparoscópica (10 versus 8 días, P = 0,002). No hubo diferencias entre ambos grupos en las tasas de complicaciones de los donantes (P = 0,298) o receptores (P = 0,394). El tiempo total de la laparoscopia disminuyó linealmente (R2= 0,407, ß = -0,914, P = 0,001) y esta disminución comenzó a partir aproximadamente de los 50 casos realizados cuando los casos fueron divididos en cuatro cuartiles (segundo a tercero y tercero a cuarto, P = 0,001 y P = 0,023, respectivamente). Aunque los injertos con aperturas de los conductos biliares fueron más numerosos en el grupo laparoscópico (P = 0,022), no se hallaron diferencias en los dos últimos cuartiles (P = 0,207). CONCLUSIÓN: La hepatectomía derecha de donante vivo por vía laparoscópica es viable, y una experiencia de aproximadamente 50 casos, puede superar la curva de aprendizaje.

Predictors of incisional hernia in adult liver transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: Incisional hernia is a complication following abdominal operation. Patients undergoing liver transplantation have a high risk of developing incisional hernia because of immunosuppression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate incisional hernia after liver transplantation and to identify risk factors for hernia formation in those patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1044 adult patients with more than 2 years of follow-up in patients who underwent liver transplantation from January 2000 to December 2015. RESULTS: Incisional hernia was identified in 79 patients with more than 2 years of follow-up. The overall incisional hernia rate was 7.6%. The mean age and body mass index (BMI) of the patients with incisional hernia were 55 ± 9 years and 25.3 ± 3.7 kg/m2, respectively. No significant differences in gender, diagnosis, diabetes, Child-Pugh score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, donor type, hepatorenal syndrome, varix bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, ventilator use, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), or bile leakage were found between patients who did and did not develop incisional hernia. Patients with acute rejection before hernia development were more to have herniated patients hernia (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Age greater than 55 years and high BMI were significant risk factors. We identified risk factors for the development of incisional hernia. Based on these risk factors, attention should be paid to incisional hernia in older and obese patients.

Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy versus laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in posterior segments: Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:: This study was designed to analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy compared to laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma located in the posterior segments. MATERIAL AND METHODS:: The study included patients who underwent either laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy or laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma located in segment 6 or 7 from January 2009 to December 2016 at Samsung Medical Center. After 1:1 propensity score matching, patient baseline characteristics and operative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Disease-free survival and overall survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier log-rank test. RESULTS:: Among 61 patients with laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy and 37 patients with laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, 30 patients from each group were analyzed after propensity score matching. After matching, baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar including tumor size (3.4 ± 1.2 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 3.7 ± 2.1 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.483); differences were significant before matching (3.1 ± 1.3 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 4.3 ± 2.7 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.035). No significant differences were observed in operative and postoperative data except for free margin size (1.04 ± 0.71 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 2.95 ± 1.75 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P < 0.001). Disease-free survival (5-year survival: 38.0% in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 47.0% in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.510) and overall survival (5-year survival: 92.7% in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 89.6% in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.593) did not differ between the groups based on Kaplan-Meier log-rank test. CONCLUSION:: For hepatocellular carcinoma in the posterior segments, laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy was feasible compared to laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Weaning of Veno-venous Bypass in Liver Transplantation: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Veno-venous bypass (VVB) has been used in liver transplantation (LT) to minimize hemodynamic instability during caval anastomosis of anhepatic phase. With the introduction of the piggyback (PB) technique, which is a caval-sparing technique, the use of VVB progressively decreased over the world. The aim of this study was to introduce our experience using VVB with the focus on its weaning process. METHODS: A total of 300 consecutive LT cases from May 1996 to November 2003 were examined. Except for pediatric LT, 242 LT cases were investigated to evaluate the trends in VVB use, surgical technique, the amount of transfusion requirements, and durations of operation and anhepatic phase. RESULTS: For the early 100 LT cases, VVB was used in 97.5% of recipients, especially in all the recipients of deceased donor LT (DDLT). Then, the frequency of VVB use was decreased, and VVB was not used after the 268th recipient. In DDLT, the PB technique was first introduced in the 58th recipient and became a routine procedure of the DDLT since the 191th recipient. Living donor LT was increased, and the amount of transfusion requirement, duration of operation, and duration of anhepatic phase was reduced over time. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing experience and sophisticated surgical and anesthetic techniques were important factors responsible for the weaning of VVB. The advancement of the PB technique used in living donor LT might be a main factor of its weaning.

Early Vs Late Liver Retransplantation: Different Characteristics and Prognostic Factors.

BACKGROUND: East Asia is a known endemic area for hepatitis B, and living donor liver transplantation is mainly performed. Liver retransplantation (ReLT) is expected to become an increasing problem because of a shortage of organs. This study aimed to compare early and late ReLT with consideration of specific circumstances and disease background of East Asians. METHODS: Between October 1996 and January 2015, 51 patients underwent ReLT; we performed a retrospective analysis of data obtained from medical records of the patients. Clinical characteristics, indication, causes of death, survival rate, and prognostic factors were investigated. RESULT: The survival rate for early ReLT (n = 18) was 51.5% and that for late ReLT (n = 33) was 50.1% at 1 year postoperatively. Continuous venovenous hemodialysis and the use of mechanical ventilators were more frequent, and pre-retransplant intensive care unit stay and prothrombin time was longer in early ReLT than in late ReLT. Operation time was longer and the amount of intraoperative blood loss was greater in late ReLT than in early ReLT. Multivariate analysis showed that a higher C-reactive protein level increased mortality in early ReLT (P = .045), whereas a higher total bilirubin level increased the risk of death in late ReLT (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Patients with early ReLT are likely to be sicker pre-retransplantation and require adequate treatment of the pretransplant infectious disease. On the other hand, late ReLT is likely to be technically more difficult and should be decided before the total bilirubin level increases substantially.

A multi-institutional analysis of intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: Does age matter?

BACKGROUND: Single-session intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) minimizes treatment demands associated with traditional whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) but outcomes on local disease control and morbidity among the elderly is limited. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective registry was established from 19 centers utilizing IORT from 2007 to 2013. Patient, tumor, and treatment variables were analyzed for ages <70 and ≥70. RESULTS: We evaluated 686 patients (<70 = 424; ≥70 = 262) who were margin and lymph node negative. Patients <70 were more likely to have longer operative time, oncoplastic closure, higher rates of IORT used as planned boost, and receive chemotherapy and post-operative WBRT. Wound complication rates were low and not significantly different between age groups. Median follow-up was 1.06 (range 0.51-1.9) years for < 70 and 1.01 (range 0.5-1.68) years for ≥ 70. There were 5 (0.73%) breast recurrences (4 in <70 and 1 ≥ 70, p = 0.65) and no axillary recurrences during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IORT was associated with a low rate of wound complication and local recurrence on short-term follow-up in this cohort.

Case-matched comparison of ABO-incompatible and ABO-compatible living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has a high success rate. There are few detailed comparisons regarding biliary complications, infective complications and patient survival between ABO-compatible (ABO-C) and ABO-I LDLT. The aim was to compare the outcomes of ABO-I LDLT with those of ABO-C LDLT using the matched-pairs method. METHODS: Patients who underwent ABO-I LDLT procedures between 2010 and 2013 were studied. They were matched for significant variables with patients who had ABO-C LDLT (1:2 matching). RESULTS: Forty-seven ABO-I LDLT procedures were included. Ninety-four patients who had ABO-C LDLT were selected as a comparator group. The incidence of cytomegalovirus, bacterial and fungal infections during the first 3 months was similar after ABO-I LDLT and ABO-C LDLT (85 versus 76 per cent, 28 versus 37 per cent, and 13 versus 20 per cent, respectively). Antibody-mediated rejection occurred after two procedures within 2 weeks of transplantation, but liver function improved with plasma exchange in both patients. There were no differences in the rate of acute rejection and biliary complications between ABO-I and ABO-C groups (P = 0.478 and P = 0.511 respectively). Three patients who had ABO-I LDLT developed diffuse intrahepatic biliary complications and progressed to graft failure. The 1-, 2- and 3-year patient survival rates after ABO-I LDLT and ABO-C LDLT were 89 versus 87 per cent, 85 versus 83 per cent, and 85 versus 79 per cent, respectively. CONCLUSION: The short-term outcomes of ABO-I LDLT were comparable to those of ABO-C LDLT in this study. ABO-I LDLT is an effective and safe transplant option with the potential to expand the pool of live donors.

Single-Center Experience of Consecutive 522 Cases of Hepatic Artery Anastomosis in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to clarify risk factors and outcome of hepatic arterial complication after living-donor liver transplantations (LDLT). METHODS: From 2004 to 2010, 522 consecutive LDLTs were performed. We used univariate and multivariate analysis to identify the risk factor on a retrospective basis, and then analysis was performed for adult cases. Hepatic arterial complication included thrombosis, stenosis, and pseudoaneurysm. RESULTS: The arterial complication rate was 4.79% (25 cases). Each complication was 9 thromboses, 14 stenoses, and 2 pseudoaneurysms. Preoperative hemoglobin was significantly associated with thrombosis (P = .021), and arterial size with stenosis (P = .037). We could not find any association between arterial complications and biliary stricture. However, the outcome of biliary stricture treatment was associated with arterial stenosis. Of 9 cases with thrombosis, 7 patients underwent rearterialization and 2 were treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Of 14 stenosis cases, 2 patients were treated with the use of balloon dilatation, 10 patients were observed under LMWH, and 2 patients underwent retransplantation. In cases of pseudoaneurysm, 1 patient underwent revision of the aneurysm and the other was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, preoperative low hemoglobin level was a risk factor for thrombosis and artery size a risk factor for stenosis.

Influence of hepatitis B virus reactivation on the recurrence of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection in patients with low viral load.

It is unclear whether the reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) influences the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection in patients with chronic hepatitis B. The aim of this study was to identify the influence of HBV reactivation on the recurrence of hepatitis B-related HCC after curative resection in patients with low viral load (HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL). We retrospectively analysed a total of 130 patients who underwent curative resection for HBV-related early stage HCC (single nodule; <5 cm/two or three nodules; <3 cm) with pre-operative HBV DNA levels <2000 IU/mL with serial HBV DNA tests. The predictive factors including HBV reactivation for the recurrence of HBV-related HCC after curative resection were investigated. Fifty-three patients (41%) had HBV reactivation after resection among 130 patients. HBV reactivation was observed in 22 of 53 patients with undetectable baseline HBV DNA and in 31 of 77 patients with detectable baseline HBV DNA. Cumulative recurrence rates after resection at 1, 2 and 3 years were 17.0%, 23.3% and 31.4%, respectively. The multivariable analysis demonstrated that the risk factors for the recurrence were the presence of microvascular invasion (hazard ratio (HR) 2.62, P = 0.003), multinodularity (HR 4.61, P = 0.005), HBV reactivation after resection (HR 2.03, P = 0.032) and HBeAg positivity (HR 2.06, P = 0.044). HBV reactivation after curative resection is associated with the recurrence of HBV-related HCC in patients with low viral load.

Expanded criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the few effective treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our aim in this study was to evaluate the risk factors for HCC recurrence and propose new criteria for LT based on pretransplantation findings. One hundred eighty patients who underwent LT for HCC between 2002 and 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Outcome measures included maximal tumor size and number of tumors revealed by radiological studies before transplantation, demographics, and tumor recurrence. Maximal tumor size >6 cm, >7 tumors, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels >1000 ng/mL were identified as independent prognostic factors of HCC recurrence in univariate and multivariate analysis. Disease-free survival rate in patients with a maximal tumor size ≤6 cm, ≤7 tumors, and/or AFP levels ≤1000 ng/mL at 1, 3, and 5 years was 97.9%, 91.5%, and 90.0%, respectively, but the 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rate of patients who had a maximal tumor size >6 cm, >7 tumors, and/or AFP levels >1000 ng/mL was 61.9%, 47.6%, and 47.6%, respectively (P < .001). In conclusion, LT can improve the survival of patients with advanced HCC if they have a maximal tumor size ≤6 cm, tumor number ≤7, and/or AFP levels ≤1000 ng/mL.

Change of hepatitis B virus DNA and covalently closed circular DNA status in liver graft after liver transplantation.

Recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) occurs despite prophylaxis, and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is thought to play a role owing to its resistance to prophylactic agents used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes of HBV DNA and cccDNA within the liver graft during liver transplantation (LT). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and probes were designed to measure total HBV DNA (tDNA) and cccDNA by real-time PCR. One hundred fifty samples from 70 patients who underwent LT for HBV were used for analysis. A 1st biopsy was taken from the donor before donor hepatectomy (Bx1), a 2nd from the recipient after reperfusion (Bx2), and a 3rd (Bx3) during follow-up after LT in 18 patients. Both tDNA and cccDNA after reperfusion were detected more frequently in pre-LT HBeAg(+) and high-HBV DNA titer recipients. However, the type and duration of antiviral agents and presence of mutation before LT did not influence the presence of tDNA or cccDNA in Bx2. tDNA positivity within the graft decreased from 41.4% to 22.2% during follow-up, but cccDNA did not (4.3% in Bx2 and 5.6% in Bx3). Although HBV recurrence was not related to pre-LT recipient HBeAg or HBV DNA titer, the presence of tDNA after reperfusion had strong correlation. The presence of tDNA within the graft is influenced by pre-LT viral replicative status, and although its presence decreases with prophylaxis, it is strongly correlated with recurrence. cccDNA does not have a role in predicting recurrence but is preserved within the graft despite prophylaxis.

Prediction of biliary complications after living-donor liver transplantation based on serum cytokine profile.

Biliary tract complications are the main concern associated with living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Many laboratory parameters have been studied for the early detection of post-LDLT complications, including various cytokines. To explore immunologic activation status and its clinical significance, the cytokine secretion patterns of LDLT patients who developed biliary complications were analyzed. Serum samples from LDLT recipients were collected 1 day before and 3, 7, 14, and 30 days after transplantation. Each sample was tested for interleukin (IL) 2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, interferon-α, and tumor necrosis factor α with the use of multiplex bead flow cytometry. Fifteen patients without any complications and 6 patients with biliary complications showed differential serum cytokine profiles. The biliary complication group (4 biliary stricture and 2 biliary obstruction patients) displayed significantly increased concentrations of IL-2 and IL-12 on post-transplantation days 3 and 7 and of IL-4 on post-transplantation day 7. Profiling cytokine secretion in the serum of patients in the first month of LDLT may be helpful for the prediction and diagnosis of biliary complications within 1 year.

Monitoring and treatment for BK virus after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The BK nephropathy (BKN) shows a 10% prevalence among cases of kidney transplantation (KT). We assessed the incidence of BK replication in KT recipients as well as our updated screening strategy and the impact of interventions on BK virus infections. METHODS: Since September 2007, our screening protocol for BK virus included examination of urine cytology or BK virus DNA real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection on postoperative days 1, 5, 9, 16, 24, 36, 48 weeks up to 1 year. IR present, we tested urine BK virus DNA PCR quantitation. We applied the updated screening protocol from August 2010. It urine BK DNA PCR quantification was above 10(7) copies/mL, we checked regularly blood the BK virus DNA PCR quantification. In addition, if the blood BK virus DNA load was above 10(4) copies/mL and the serum creatinine elevated, we was performed an allograft biopsy. Between September 2007 and December 2011, the 58 recipients who showed BK viremia were enrolled in the present study in 2 groups according to the period of screening protocol (era I, era II). RESULTS: The time between kidney transplantation and BK viremia detection of era II was shorter than that of era I (16 vs 29 weeks; P = .001). Viremia clearance rate at 6 months in era II was significant higher than that of era I (82% vs 36.8%; P = .001) as well as at 12 months (100% vs 61.1%, P < .001) after intervention. Interestingly, viremia clearance at 12 months after intervention was 100% in era II. CONCLUSION: An updated screening protocol for BK virus allowed early detection and accurate diagnosis of BKN. Early detection of BK virus infection enabled early intervention and improved viral clearance rate.

Presence of vesicoureteral reflux in the graft kidney does not adversely affect long-term graft outcome in kidney transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: We studied the incidence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in the graft kidney and its effect on the occurrence of urinary tract infection (UTI) and long-term graft function. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 64 adult kidney transplant recipients based upon voiding cystourethrography at 12 months post-transplantation. Patients underwent analysis of survival, incidence of UTIs beyond 1 year, and graft function. RESULTS: Thirty-seven male and 27 female patients in the study populations showed a mean age 42 years. VUR in the transplanted kidney at 12 months post-transplant occurred among 78.1% (50/64) of subjects: grade I (n = 6), grade II (n = 30), or grade III (n = 14) reflux. Patients followed for a median 61 months (range 44-74s) showed 11 cases of UTIs in 9 subjects. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics or incidence of, UTIs according to the presence or severity of VUR (P = .81) or the Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate values at 12, 36, 48, or 60 months post-transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: VUR present in 78.1% of patients after kidney transplantation affected neither graft functions or graft survival. The incidence of UTI did not differ according to the presence of VUR.

Liver transplantation in lymphoma patients with hepatitis B virus reactivation.

BACKGROUND: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (AoCLF) occurs in lymphoma patients because of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. We aimed to identify characteristics of patients who underwent liver transplantation (OLT) because of AoCLF that occurred due to HBV reactivation in the setting of lymphoma and to compare these patients with AoCLF patients who did not have lymphoma. METHODS: Twenty patients underwent OLT due to AoCLF between February 2009 and June 2011. Among these patients, five were diagnosed with lymphoma before OLT and assigned to group 1. The remaining patients (n = 15) were assigned to group 2. RESULTS: Hospitalization after transplantation in group 2 was longer than in group 1 (P = .014). However, there were no differences in other variables between the two groups. The overall survival rate of group 1 was lower than that of group 2, but there was no difference between the two groups (P = .134). With the exception of one patient, the median time from complete remission to liver transplantation in group 1 was 4.5 months (range, 1-15) in group 1. Lymphoma recurrence occurred in one patient 8 months after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that OLT is a feasible and effective approach in AoCLF due to HBV reactivation in select lymphoma patients.

Comparison of the incidence of de novo malignancy in liver or kidney transplant recipients: analysis of 2673 consecutive cases in a single center.

PURPOSE: An increased incidence of de novo malignancy (dM) is an established complication among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients compared with the general population. The aims of this study were to describe the incidence and cumulative risk for development of dM among our transplanted population, depending on various clinical and pathologic variables. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and pathologic data of SOT recipients performed from February 1995 to December 2010. RESULTS: Among 2673 consecutive SOT recipients, the dM that developed in 66 (2.5%) patients included, 16 (0.6%; 24.2% of overall dM) lymphoid dM and 50 (1.9%; 75.8% of overall dM) nonlymphoid dM. Cumulative incidence of dM in liver was significantly higher than that in kidney transplant recipients. A significantly higher cumulative incidence of dM was observed among living donor versus deceased donor SOT. Although the more frequent development of lymphoid dM was observed during the first year posttransplantation, the cumulative risk of nonlymphoid dM increased year by year, reaching a substantially higher incidence than that of lymphoid dM beyond 5 years after SOT. Comparing the various immunosuppressive regimens, the cumulative incidence was greater among the group with basiliximab induction. However, the hazard of occurrence was unaffected by whether tacrolimus or cyclosporine was used for maintenance immunosuppression. The increased risk of dM was not dependent on recipient age or gender. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated distinctive cumulative incidences of dM in different clinical and pathologic settings.

Comparison between resection and transplantation in combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of choice for combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is surgical resection. However, the efficacy of liver transplantation is not clear. We compared the surgical outcome of hepatic resection and liver transplantation for cHCC-CC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1995 to 2012, 89 patients were diagnosed with cHCC-CC after hepatic resection and 8 patients diagnosed with cHCC-CC after liver transplantation. We excluded 21 patients who were American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Stage III or IV and lost to follow-up. The outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The poor prognostic factors in cHCC-CC patients who underwent hepatectomy were large tumor size (>5 cm), small safety margin (<2 cm), and low preoperative albumin level. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the hepatectomy group (n = 68) and the liver transplant group (n = 8) was not statistically different (5-year DFS: 26.2% vs 37.5%, P = .333; 5-year OS: 42.1% vs 50%, P = .591). In the small tumor subgroup (tumor size <5 cm), the DFS and OS between the 2 surgical procedures was not different, and in the adequate resection margin subgroup (safety margin >2 cm), survival was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In well-selected cases with small tumor size and with preserved liver function, liver resection should be considered when complete resection is possible.

Optimal device and method for transportation of isolated porcine islet.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the optimal method for transportation of isolated porcine islets from an isolation facility to a transplant hospital or research center in terms of temperature, oxygen supply, and shaking effect. METHODS: Commercially available insulator boxes with thermoregulators exposed for 5 hours under two external temperatures (4°C and 37°C) were monitored using HOBO temperature loggers. To find the optimal transport device, we compared islet counts, viability, quality, and function in conical tubes, gas-permeable bags (GPB) and gas-permeable flasks (GPF) after 1, 3 and 5 hours. To evaluate the effects of shaking on islets, we also analyzed the difference between a control and a shaking group in each device with time. RESULTS: Commercially available Styrofoam insulators with thermoregulators maintained the internal temperature near the target. Islet recovery rate for GPF, which was higher than other devices, was maintained, while those decreased with time for conical tube and GPB containers adenosine diphosphate/adenosine triphosphate (ADP/ATP) ratio for GPF was lower than other devices, albeit not significantly fluoroscein acrimide/propidium iodide (AO/PI) ratio for GPF was higher than other devices after 5 hours. Glucose stimulated index was not different among the devices. In comparison with the control group, shaking yielded comparable islet survival, viability and function. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the use of commercially available insulator boxes with thermoregulators maintained internal temperature close to the target value and that GPF was more favorable for islet oxygenation during transportation. This study also suggested negligible impact of shaking on isolated porcine islets during transportation.

Jejunal artery can be a useful option for arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation when the suitable arterial inflow is absent.

Successful arterial reconstruction is essential for liver transplantation. In the case of inadequate arterial inflow, an arterial conduit from the aorta using artery graft or re-establishment of arterial flow through other arteries such as the splenic artery, gastroepiploic, or sigmoid artery is considered. Herein we report our experience of 27 cases of hepatic artery reconstruction using alternative methods. The most common cause of hepatic artery reconstruction requiring alternative methods was intimal dissection for which we usually used the gastroepiploic artery. Many patients had a previous operation or transarterial chemoembolization history. Among these cases, hepatic artery reconstruction using the jejunal artery was performed for 2 cases of living donor liver transplantation due to the absence of suitable alternatives. These patients have been followed up with patent hepatic arterial flow until now. Thus, the jejunal artery can be a useful option for arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation when suitable arterial inflow is absent.

Can immune function assay predict infection or recovery?

BACKGROUND: Recently, the ImmuKnow assay (Cylex Inc., Columbia, Md) has been reported to be a global immune monitoring tool for organ transplants recipients. We assessed whether immunKnow ATP values predicted infectious syndromes. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 71 kidney transplant patients between September 2008 and May 2011. lmmuKnow assay monitoring was performed at one dav before as well as 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, and 52 weeks after the operation. ImmuKnow assay values were compared as well as BK viral infection pre-infection(PI), at first detection of infectious syndrome (DI), 4 weeks there after (4W), 8 weeks there after (8W) and 12 weeks there after (12W) and pre-recovery (PR), recovery (R) times. RESULTS: Serial ImmuKnow assays showed significant differences over time and BK viral infectious state (P = .026). Interestingly, PI was significantly lower than DI and PR but PR significant greater than PI, 8W and 12W. However, we did not observe an adequate or absolute cutoff value of ImmuKnow by ROC curve: 377 ng/mL ImmuKnow showed 0.471 of AUC and 57.1% and 56.2%, of sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal evaluation and adjustment of the value of ImmuKnow assay seemed to be a favorable modality to monitor infectious syndromes especially those involving BK virus.