Immunogenicity of Atezolizumab: Influence of Testing Method and Sampling Frequency on Reported Anti-drug Antibody Incidence Rates.

Measurement of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to assess the incidence of ADA in a clinical trial is a critical step in immunogenicity assessment during the development of a protein therapeutic. We developed novel graphical approaches to illustrate clinical trial ADA data for the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab (Tecentriq) that included a systematic analysis of the impact of the timing of ADA sampling and ADA assay drug tolerance on reported ADA incidence. We found that approaches used across the industry for ADA incidence analysis provide a limited view of immunogenicity in oncology studies, where ADA detection may be confounded by both drug dosage and patient attrition. Moreover, these approaches can miss important temporal information about the immune response. Our results demonstrated that the methodology of ADA assessment for the atezolizumab program was specifically designed to capture most ADA responses to ensure accurate reporting of ADA incidence. We further showed that the use of sparse sampling and/or ADA test methods with insufficient drug tolerance may result in a significant underreporting of ADA incidence. We conclude that the comparison of ADA incidence between different drugs can be highly misleading and that a test method with appropriate sensitivity in the presence of the drug and a clinical sampling scheme that is aligned with ADA responses to a drug is required to accurately report ADA incidence.

Real-world experience of CAR T-cell therapy in older patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The emergence of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has changed the treatment landscape for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, real-world experience reporting outcomes among older patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy is limited. We leveraged the 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims database and analyzed outcomes and cost associated with CAR T-cell therapy in 551 older patients (aged ≥65 years) with DLBCL who received CAR T-cell therapy between 2018 and 2020. CAR T-cell therapy was used in third line and beyond in 19% of patients aged 65 to 69 years and 22% among those aged 70 to 74 years, compared with 13% of patients aged ≥75 years. Most patients received CAR T-cell therapy in an inpatient setting (83%), with an average length of stay of 21 days. The median event-free survival (EFS) following CAR T-cell therapy was 7.2 months. Patients aged ≥75 years had significantly shorter EFS compared with patients aged 65 to 69 and 70 to 74 years, with 12-month EFS estimates of 34%, 43%, and 52%, respectively (P = .002). The median overall survival was 17.1 months, and there was no significant difference by age groups. The median total health care cost during the 90-day follow-up was $352 572 and was similar across all age groups. CAR T-cell therapy was associated with favorable effectiveness, but the CAR T-cell therapy use in older patients was low, especially in patients aged ≥75 years, and this age group had a lower rate of EFS, which illustrates the unmet need for more accessible, effective, and tolerable therapy in older patients, especially those aged ≥75 years.

Modeling diverse genetic subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma with a next-generation alveolar type 2 organoid platform.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the most common histological subtype, accounts for 40% of all cases. While existing genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) recapitulate the histological progression and transcriptional evolution of human LUAD, they are time-consuming and technically demanding. In contrast, cell line transplant models are fast and flexible, but these models fail to capture the full spectrum of disease progression. Organoid technologies provide a means to create next-generation cancer models that integrate the most advantageous features of autochthonous and transplant-based systems. However, robust and faithful LUAD organoid platforms are currently lacking. Here, we describe optimized conditions to continuously expand murine alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells, a prominent cell of origin for LUAD, in organoid culture. These organoids display canonical features of AT2 cells, including marker gene expression, the presence of lamellar bodies, and an ability to differentiate into the AT1 lineage. We used this system to develop flexible and versatile immunocompetent organoid-based models of KRAS, BRAF, and ALK mutant LUAD. Notably, organoid-based tumors display extensive burden and complete penetrance and are histopathologically indistinguishable from their autochthonous counterparts. Altogether, this organoid platform is a powerful, versatile new model system to study LUAD.

Matching-adjusted Indirect Comparison of the Efficacy of Loncastuximab Tesirine Versus Treatment in the Chemoimmunotherapy Era for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca) and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) have been assessed in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL), but direct evidence from head-to-head randomized clinical trials is not available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was used to evaluate the efficacy of Lonca versus CIT-era treatment in R/R DLBCL. The analysis used individual patient data from the phase II LOTIS-2 trial of Lonca (NCT03589469) and pooled aggregated data from 2 extension studies of the CORAL trial for CIT. The LOTIS-2 trial included 145 patients who had relapsed or progressed following 2 or more multi-agent systemic treatment regimens; the CORAL extension studies included 203 patients who received 2 prior lines of therapy and 75 patients who relapsed after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. MAIC analyses were performed to adjust for cross-trial differences in inclusion/exclusion criteria and the distribution of observed baseline characteristics. Overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the balanced trial populations. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients in LOTIS-2 were included in the analysis. After matching to the characteristics of 278 patients from the pooled CORAL extension studies, the ORR was significantly higher for Lonca compared with CIT-era treatment (53.4% vs. 40.3%, P < .05). Lonca was also associated with a significantly improved OS compared with CIT-era treatment (median OS 10.8 vs. 6.4 months; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.48, 0.92], P < .05). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that Lonca was associated with significantly improved efficacy compared with CIT-era treatments for R/R DLBCL.

Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Who Received At Least 3 Lines of Therapies.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment landscape for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has recently changed. We examined characteristics and clinical outcomes of DLBCL patients who initiated a third (3L) and fourth (4L) line of therapy during a contemporary time frame. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with DLBCL who received ≥ 3L after January 1, 2014 were selected from the COTA database. Patients were grouped into cohorts by 3L or 4L initiation and further stratified by type of treatment received: chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy (CT/CIT), targeted therapy (TT), chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), or salvage therapy consolidated with hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Patient characteristics, response rates, and overall survival (OS) were examined. RESULTS: Among adult patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) DLBCL, 212 (mean age; 61.8 years; 59.0% male) received their 3L and 127 (mean age: 61.0 years; 61.4% male) their 4L. Among those treated with their 3L and 4L, 55.2% and 50.4%, respectively, received CT/CIT; 26.9% and 34.6% received TT. The complete response rate of 3L patients was 9.4% for CT/CIT, 10.5% for TT, and 60% for CAR-T. Similar findings were seen with 4L patients (CT/CIT: 6.3%; TT: 15.9%; CAR-T: 53.8%). For those who received pharmacological treatment in 3L and 4L, median OS times were 7.7 and 4.4 months, respectively. Median OS times of patients who received cell-based therapies (CAR-T/HCT) were not reached. CONCLUSION: In this study, a majority of r/r DLBCL patients were treated with CT/CIT or TT in 3L and 4L settings and had poor clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for more effective treatments.

Health-Related Quality of Life, Symptoms, and Tolerability of Loncastuximab Tesirine in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Loncastuximab tesirine has shown antitumor activity with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who were relapsed or refractory after ≥2 prior therapies, including activity in patients with high-risk disease characteristics. This analysis examined health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms, and tolerability in patients receiving loncastuximab tesirine for relapsed or refractory DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The single-arm, open-label phase II LOTIS-2 study (ADCT-402-201; NCT03589469) enrolled 145 patients aged ≥18 years. Patients received loncastuximab tesirine as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using EQ-5D and FACT-Lym at baseline, day 1 of each cycle, and the end-of-treatment visit. RESULTS: During the course of treatment, EQ VAS overall health score was improved over time. The adjusted improvement was 0.65 per cycle (95% CI, 0.26-1.04; P = .001), and the adjusted mean change from baseline score was 5.00 (95% CI, 1.75-8.25; P = .003) at cycle 9, day 1. FACT-Lym total scores remained stable during treatment. More patients reported improvement compared to baseline in pain, lumps/swelling, and losing weight for a majority of visits. More than 60% of patients reported being "not at all" or "a little bit" bothered by treatment side effects for all treatment visits. Findings in elderly patients were similar to the population as whole. CONCLUSION: The findings on HRQoL, symptoms, and tolerability further support the clinical use of loncastuximab tesirine for the treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL. FUNDING: This work was funded by ADC Therapeutics SA. Authors affiliated with ADC Therapeutics SA participated in designing the study; in collecting, analyzing, and interpreting the data; in writing the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Characteristics and treatment patterns of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients receiving ≥3 therapy lines in post-CAR-T era.

OBJECTIVE: Several novel treatments have been approved for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) since chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy became available. The objective of this study was to describe characteristics and treatment patterns in patients with R/R DLBCL post-CAR-T approval. METHODS: Adult patients with R/R DLBCL who initiated third-line treatment or later (3 L+) since 18 October 2017 were identified using administrative claims from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus (1 January 2014-31 March 2020). Treatments were categorized as chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy (CT/CIT), targeted therapies, CAR-T and stem cell transplant (SCT). Treatment distribution, treatment duration of CT/CIT and targeted therapies, and initiation of next-line therapy were described for patients receiving 3 L; analyses were repeated for 4 L. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients received 3 L between 18 October 2017 and 31 March 2020. Mean age was 57 years, and 34% were female. CT/CIT (44.9%), targeted therapies (26.9%), CAR-T (17.2%) and SCT (11.0%) were administered in 3 L. The median treatment duration was 2.9 months for CT/CIT and targeted therapies combined. 31% of patients initiated 4 L within a median follow-up of 5.8 months. Among patients who received 4 L (N = 55), targeted therapies were most commonly used (36.4%), and the median treatment duration was 2.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Post-CAR-T approval, the majority of patients were treated with CT/CIT or targeted therapies in 3 L and 4 L, though most of the targeted therapies prescribed are not indicated for DLBCL. Treatment duration was short. A high proportion of patients moved to the next line of therapy (LOT) during a short follow-up period. This study highlights the unmet need for more effective treatments for patients with R/R DLBCL in 3 L+.

Keap1 mutation renders lung adenocarcinomas dependent on Slc33a1.

Approximately 20-30% of human lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) harbor loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in Kelch-like ECH Associated-Protein 1 (KEAP1), which lead to hyperactivation of the nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like 2 (NRF2) antioxidant pathway and correlate with poor prognosis1-3. We previously showed that Keap1 mutation accelerates KRAS-driven LUAD and produces a marked dependency on glutaminolysis4. To extend the investigation of genetic dependencies in the context of Keap1 mutation, we performed a druggable genome CRISPR-Cas9 screen in Keap1-mutant cells. This analysis uncovered a profound Keap1 mutant-specific dependency on solute carrier family 33 member 1 (Slc33a1), an endomembrane-associated protein with roles in autophagy regulation5, as well as a series of functionally-related genes implicated in the unfolded protein response. Targeted genetic and biochemical experiments using mouse and human Keap1-mutant tumor lines, as well as preclinical genetically-engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of LUAD, validate Slc33a1 as a robust Keap1-mutant-specific dependency. Furthermore, unbiased genome-wide CRISPR screening identified additional genes related to Slc33a1 dependency. Overall, our study provides a strong rationale for stratification of patients harboring KEAP1-mutant or NRF2-hyperactivated tumors as likely responders to targeted SLC33A1 inhibition and underscores the value of integrating functional genetic approaches with GEMMs to identify and validate genotype-specific therapeutic targets.

Clinical and economic burden in patients with diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease in a claims database in Japan.

PURPOSE: The effect of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) among young and middle-aged adults can be significant, but no previous study has examined the prognosis and the associated health care cost of the disease in this population. We evaluated the clinical and economic burden of PAD in patients from a large claims database to clarify the effect of the disease on a relatively young working Japanese population. METHODS: Patients aged ≥45 and ≤64 years with first PAD diagnosis between 2005 and 2011 comprised the PAD cohort (n = 362); an age- and sex-matched non-PAD comparison cohort (n = 362) was also identified. Rates of cardiovascular events/interventions, health care utilization, and costs were compared. FINDINGS: The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 52.8 (5.6) years and 40.8% were women. Baseline Charlson comorbidity index was significantly higher in the PAD cohort than in the non-PAD cohort (1.90 [2.19] vs 1.16 [1.99]; P < 0.001). The PAD cohort had significantly higher first-year event rates than did the non-PAD cohort for myocardial infarction (2.2% vs 0.2%; P = 0.019) and ischemic stroke (4.1% vs 0.5%; P = 0.001). Health care utilization was significantly greater for the PAD cohort for all parameters assessed (number of hospitalization, inpatient days, and outpatient visits) in the first year (all, P < 0.001). Total annual costs for health care were significantly higher in the PAD cohort than in the non-PAD cohort in the first year (P < 0.001). Among patients with diabetes, patients with PAD (n = 98) had significantly greater first-year event rates (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, coronary artery bypass surgery, peripheral arterial revascularization, percutaneous coronary intervention, and limb amputation; all, P < 0.001), significantly greater number of clinic visits (P = 0.023), and total cost burden than did patients without PAD (n = 63). IMPLICATIONS: Even in a relatively young working Japanese population, PAD is associated with substantial clinical and economic burden.