RESUMO
This study examined the role of health facilities on testing for Hepatitis B virus in a policy context where screening is only available at a cost. We fitted multivariate multinomial logistic regression models to cross-sectional data (nâ¯=â¯1374) collected from Upper West Region of Ghana. The analysis showed that approximately 28% of respondents reported ever testing for HBV. Although source of healthcare influenced HBV testing, traders (RRRâ¯=â¯0.29, pâ¯≤â¯0.001) and farmers (RRRâ¯=â¯0.34, pâ¯≤â¯0.01) were significantly less likely to test voluntarily. Wealth generally predicted voluntary testing, although less so for mandatory testing. The findings highlight the need for free HBV services targeting the very poor, especially those who use community-level health facilities as their primary source of care.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/economia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Vírus da Hepatite B/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite Crônica/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pobreza , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Feminino , Gana , Hepatite Crônica/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection has emerged as a global public health issue. Although it often causes an acute and self-limiting infection with low mortality rates in the western world, it bears a high risk of developing chronic hepatitis in immunocompromised patients with substantial mortality rates. Organ transplant recipients who receive immunosuppressive medication to prevent rejection are thought to be the main population at risk for chronic hepatitis E. Therefore, there is an urgent need to properly evaluate the clinical impact of HEV in these patients. This article aims to review the prevalence, infection course, and management of HEV infection after solid organ transplantation by performing a comprehensive literature review. In addition, an in-depth emphasis of this clinical issue and a discussion of future development are also presented.
Assuntos
Hepatite E/epidemiologia , Hepatite E/terapia , Hepatite Crônica/epidemiologia , Hepatite Crônica/terapia , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , PrevalênciaRESUMO
To determine the extent to which Taiwanese patients use alternative medicine, we interviewed 500 consecutive patients with chronic liver and gastrointestinal disorders at an outpatient-service. Forty-two patients were excluded due to incomplete data. The percentages of patients with chronic liver (102/269, 37.9%) and gastrointestinal (74/189, 39.2%) diseases using alternative medicine were not significantly different (p = 0.70). The patients who used alternative medicine were not statistically different in gender (p = 0.37), age (p = 0.59), education level (p = 0.83), family income (p = 0.90), or occupation (p = 0.72). Only 36% (64/176) of patients informed their doctors of their use of alternative medicine. The kinds of alternative medicine used by the 176 patients included: Chinese/herbal medicine, 169 (96%); acupuncture, 31 (18%); nutritional supplements, 22 (13%); chiropractic, 17 (10%); scratching, 14 (8%); Qigong, 13 (7%); cupping, 13 (7%); and incense ash, 3 (2%). Sixty-six percent (111/169) of patients used Chinese/herbal medicine in addition to Western allopathic medicine. Only 11% (19/169) of them believed that Chinese/herbal medicine had side effects. Our study indicates the use of alternative medicine occurs across all demographic groups in one-third of patients with chronic liver and gastrointestinal diseases at a major general hospital in Taipei. We suggest that the doctors question all patients for history of alternative therapy use.
Assuntos
Terapias Complementares/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastroenteropatias/terapia , Hepatite Crônica/terapia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Doença Crônica , Terapias Complementares/economia , Coleta de Dados , Educação , Feminino , Medicina Herbária/economia , Humanos , Renda , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocupações , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Taiwan/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: alpha-Interferon is widely accepted for treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis B, but its use remains limited in children, partly because of questions regarding its cost effectiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of alpha-interferon for children with chronic active hepatitis B. METHODS: We estimated the cost per year of life saved by alpha-interferon therapy for three cohorts of patients with chronic active hepatitis B treated at 2, 12, or 25 years of age. We assumed that only patients with active viral replication would be treated and that alpha-interferon would prevent cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in a portion of the population treated. We calculated costs per year of life saved. Medical costs and years of life saved were discounted at 5% per year. RESULTS: With a 30% response rate to alpha-interferon, there was a net savings in both money and lives in the children's group with a minimal cost per year of life saved for adolescents ($510) and adults ($934). Years of life saved per person were greater for children (1.0) than adults (0.5). With a 6% response rate, estimated costs per year of life saved for children ($5,700) were one-fourth of those of adults ($22,100). CONCLUSIONS: alpha-interferon therapy for patients with chronic active hepatitis B is cost effective. alpha-Interferon is more cost effective in toddlers than adults because of the smaller dose required and the greater increase in life expectancy of children.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Hepatite B/terapia , Hepatite Crônica/terapia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The goal of treating chronic hepatitis C with alfa interferon is to eradicate HCV infection. The actual influence of this treatment on the development of cirrhosis is unknown. Moreover, the poor results and the high cost of this treatment have caused a public health problem. Three strategies were evaluated by decision analysis: no treatment (S1), treatment of chronic active hepatitis only (S2), treatment of all chronic hepatitis (S3). For each strategy, we estimated the probability of the occurrence of the following events based on data in the literature: presence of chronic active hepatitis, chronic persistent hepatitis or cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis; discontinuation of interferon because of adverse events; biological response to treatment; incidence of cirrhosis 8 years after diagnosis without treatment or in case of response to treatment. RESULTS: The risk of cirrhosis was 28.5% with S1, 25.4% with S2, and 25.2% with S3, 8 years after diagnosis. If HCV infection was detected early before cirrhosis, the number of cases of cirrhosis occurring in an 8 year-followup period would be 45,600 with S1, 40,640 with S2, and 40,320 with S3 and the cost of S2 and S3 would be 1.23 10(9) French Francs (FF), and 2.57 10(9) FF, respectively. The mean cost to prevent one case of cirrhosis would vary from 248,000 FF with S2 to 487,000 FF with S3. CONCLUSION: This decision analysis study suggests that the S3 strategy is not suitable for a population of HCV infected patients, because of its low efficiency and high cost.
Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite Crônica/complicações , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Cirrose Hepática/etiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hepatite C/economia , Hepatite C/patologia , Hepatite C/terapia , Hepatite Crônica/economia , Hepatite Crônica/patologia , Hepatite Crônica/terapia , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/economia , Cirrose Hepática/patologia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Chronic active hepatitis C is an important public health issue because of its prevalence, evolution, and overall cost. Treatment by recombinant alpha-interferon is both expensive and exacting and its effectiveness is limited. We report the results of a cost-effectiveness analysis of alpha-interferon treatment in patients with chronic active hepatitis C. METHODS: Direct medical costs of caring for patients with chronic active hepatitis C and its complications, based on treatment or no treatment, were assessed with retrospective data collected from the files of 137 hospital patients. Seventy-seven patients were treated with alpha-interferon between 1988 and 1994. The overall costs of caring for chronic active hepatitis C patients, without treatment or with alpha-interferon treatment (3 millions units three times a week) for 6 months (strategy A), 12 months (strategy B), or 12 months but discontinuing treatment when there was no response (strategy C), was reported and compared to the respective effectiveness of each. RESULTS: With an actualization rate of 5%, the real overall cost of caring for a chronic active hepatitis C patient was 143290 FF. Considering the contraindication rate (15%), the treatment acceptance (85%), the response rate to treatment (50%), and the prolonged response rate (25 to 30%), treating patients with strategy A induced a real overall cost of caring to 140731 FF to avoid 0.11 cases of cirrhosis, to 150277 FF to avoid 0.13 cases of cirrhosis with strategy B, and to 136947 FF to avoid 0.13 cases of cirrhosis with strategy C. CONCLUSION: Alpha-interferon treatment in patients with chronic active hepatitis C provides a long-term saving compared to cases which receive no treatment. Strategy C was the most cost-effective, inducing the reduction of both the number of cases of cirrhosis and the cost of care.