I-125 eye-plaque seed economics: To re-use or to not re-use? A single institutional cost savings analysis of re-using I-125 radioactive seeds for eye-Plaque brachytherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Iodine-125 (I-125) seeds, commonly used in low-dose rate brachytherapy for ocular malignancies, are often discarded after a single use. This study examines the potential cost savings at an institution with high ocular melanoma referrals, by re-using I-125 seeds for eye-plaque brachytherapy. METHODS: In this single-institutional retrospective analysis, data was collected from I-125 seed orders from 8/2019 through 10/2022. Information including number of seeds ordered per lot, number of plaques built per lot, and number of seeds used per lot were collected. Cost per lot of seed was assumed to be the current cost from the most recent lot of 35 seeds. RESULTS: During the study, 72 I-125 seed lots were ordered bi-weekly, with a median of 35 seeds per lot (Range: 15-35). Each seed was used on average 2.26 times prior to being discarded. The average duration of each seed lot used was 62.2 days (Range: 21-126). Each seed lot contributed to the construction of an average of 8.4 eye plaques (Range: 2-20). With seed recycling, 2,475 seeds were used to construct 608 eye-plaques. Without re-using practice this would require 5,694 seeds. This resulted in a percentage cost savings of 56.5%, with a total seed cost reduction of $344,884, or $559 per eye-plaque on average. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate cost savings relative to re-using I-125 seeds for eye plaques. The data demonstrates how an institution can decrease costs associated with I-125 radiation seeds used for eye-plaque brachytherapy by re-using them.

A practical method of estimating medium-heterogeneity corrected dose without a Monte Carlo calculation in ocular brachytherapy using 125I COMS plaques.

PURPOSE: To provide a practical method of estimating medium-heterogeneity corrected dose without a Monte Carlo (MC) calculation in ocular brachytherapy using 125I Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) plaques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using egs_brachy, MC simulations (1) under task group-43 assumptions with fully loaded seed configurations in water (HOMO) and (2) with effects of plaque backing, insert and inter-seed interactions (HETERO) were performed for seven 125I COMS plaques (10 mm-22 mm in diameter), and homogeneous dose (DHOMO) and heterogeneous dose (DHETERO) for central-axis and off-axis points were determined. For DHOMO, 85 Gy was normalized to a depth of 5 mm. Central-axis heterogeneity correction factors (HCFs) from a depth of 0 mm (inner sclera) to 22 mm (opposite retina) were derived from a ratio of DHETERO to DHOMO. Off-axis HCFs for optic disc/macula and lens as a function of distance from optic disc/macula (DT/MT) for various basal dimensions of tumor (BD/BM) were derived from DHETERO/DHOMO. RESULTS: Central-axis HCF varied with a dose reduction of 10.3-19.8% by heterogeneity. Off-axis HCF for optic disc/macula varied significantly depending on DT/MT and BD/BM with a dose reduction of 11.3-38.3%. Off-axis HCF for lens had a dependence on MT and BM with its variation of 11.0-19.0%. A clinical example of using HCFs to estimate DHETERO was presented. CONCLUSIONS: The practical method of using depth-dependent central-axis HCF and DT/MT- and BD/BM-dependent off-axis HCF provided in this study will facilitate a heterogeneous dose estimate for 125I COMS plaques without MC calculations.

Generation and comparison of 3D dosimetric reference datasets for COMS eye plaque brachytherapy using model-based dose calculations.

PURPOSE: A joint Working Group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the Australasian Brachytherapy Group (ABG) was created to aid in the transition from the AAPM TG-43 dose calculation formalism, the current standard, to model-based dose calculations. This work establishes the first test cases for low-energy photon-emitting brachytherapy using model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs). ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS: Five test cases are developed: (1) a single model 6711 125 I brachytherapy seed in water, 13 seeds (2) individually and (3) in combination in water, (4) the full Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) 16 mm eye plaque in water, and (5) the full plaque in a realistic eye phantom. Calculations are done with four Monte Carlo (MC) codes and a research version of a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). For all test cases, local agreement of MC codes was within ∼2.5% and global agreement was ∼2% (4% for test case 5). MC agreement was within expected uncertainties. Local agreement of TPS with MC was within 5% for test case 1 and ∼20% for test cases 4 and 5, and global agreement was within 0.4% for test case 1 and 10% for test cases 4 and 5. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: Dose distributions for each set of MC and TPS calculations are available online (https://doi.org/10.52519/00005) along with input files and all other information necessary to repeat the calculations. POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: These data can be used to support commissioning of MBDCAs for low-energy brachytherapy as recommended by TGs 186 and 221 and AAPM Report 372. This work additionally lays out a sample framework for the development of test cases that can be extended to other applications beyond eye plaque brachytherapy.

Monte Carlo investigation of dose distribution of uniformly and non-uniformly loaded standard and notched eye plaques.

To investigate the effect of using non-uniform loading and notched plaques on dose distribution for eye plaques. Using EGSnrc Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, we investigate eye plaque dose distributions in water and in an anatomically representative eye phantom. Simulations were performed in accordance with TG43 formalism and compared against full MC simulations which account for inter-seed and inhomogeneity effects. For standard plaque configurations, uniformly and non-uniformly loaded plaque dose distributions in water showed virtually no difference between each other. For standard plaque, the MC calculated dose distribution in planes parallel to the plaque is narrower than the TG43 calculation due to attenuation at the periphery of the plaque by the modulay. MC calculated the dose behind the plaque is fully attenuated. Similar results were found for the notched plaque, with asymmetric attenuation along the plane of the notch. Cumulative dose volume histograms showed significant reductions in the calculated MC doses for both tumor and eye structures, compared to TG43 calculations. The effect was most pronounced for the notch plaque where the MC dose to the optic nerve was greatly attenuated by the modulay surrounding the optic nerve compared to the TG43. Thus, a reduction of optic nerve D95% from 14 to 0.2 Gy was observed, when comparing the TG43 calculation to the MC result. The tumor D95% reduced from 89.2 to 79.95 Gy for TG43 and MC calculations, respectively. TG43 calculations overestimate the absolute dose and the lateral dose distribution of both standard and notched eye plaques, leading to the dose overestimation for the target and organs at risk. The dose matching along the central axis for the non-uniformly loaded plaques to that of uniformly loaded ones was found to be sufficient for providing comparable coverage and can be clinically used in eye-cancer-busy centers.

Hydrogen nanobubbles: A novel approach toward radio-sensitization agents.

BACKGROUND: Ocular melanoma is a rare kind of eye malignancy that threatens the patient's eyesight. Radiotherapy and surgical removal are the most commonly used therapeutic modalities, and nanomedicine has lately entered this field. Brachytherapy using Ruthenium-106 (106 Ru) ophthalmic plaques has been used for decades to treat ocular melanoma, with the applicator placed on the patient's eyes until the prescribed dose reaches the tumor apex. PURPOSE: To investigate the efficiency of hydrogen nanobubbles (H2 -NBs) employment during intraocular melanoma brachytherapy using a 106 Ru electron emitter plaque. METHODS: The Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and experimental investigation using a 3D-designed phantom and thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD) were employed. Various concentrations of H2 -NBs with a diameter of 100 nm were simulated inside tumor tissue. The results were presented as deposited energy and dose enhancement factor (DEF). An equivalent Resin phantom of the human eyeball was made using AutoCAD and 3D-Printer technologies. The glass-bead TLDs dosimeter were employed and placed inside the phantom. RESULTS: Using a 1% concentration of H2 -NBs, a DEF of 93% and 98% were achieved at the tumor apex of 10 mm from the experimental setup and MC simulation, respectively. For simulated concentrations of 0.1%, 0.3%, 0.5%, 1%, and 4% H2 -NBs, a maximum dose enhancement of 154%, 174%, 188%, 200%, and 300% were achieved, respectively, and a dose reduction was seen at about 3 mm from the plaque surface. CONCLUSION: H2 -NBs can be used as an absorbed dose enhancer in 106 Ru eye brachytherapy because of their unique physical characteristics. Reducing plaque implantation time on the patient's eye, reducing sclera absorbed dose, and decreasing the risk of patients' healthy organs irradiation are reported as some of the potential benefits of using H2-NBs.

Design and characterization of an aperture system and spot configuration for ocular treatments with a gantry-based spot scanning proton beam.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Proton therapy is a key modality used in the treatment of ocular melanoma. Traditionally ocular sites are treated using a dedicated eyeline with a passively scattered proton beam and a brass aperture. This work aims to design and characterize a beam-collimating aperture to treat ocular targets with a gantry-based spot scanning proton beam. METHODS: A plastic aperture system that slides into the gantry nozzle of a spot scanning proton beam was designed and constructed. It consists of an intermediate scraper layer to attenuate stray protons and a 3D-printed patient-specific aperture positioned 5.7 cm from the surface of the eye. The aperture system was modeled in TOPAS and Monte Carlo simulations were validated with film measurements. Two different spot configurations were investigated for treatment planning and characterized based on lateral penumbra, central axis (CAX) dose and relative efficiency. Alignment and leakage were investigated through experimental film measurements. Range was verified using a multi-layer ionization chamber. Reference dose measurements were made with a PinPoint 3D ion chamber. Neutron dose was evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: Aperture alignment with radiation isocenter was determined to be within 0.31 mm at a gantry angle of 0°. A single-spot configuration with a 10 mm diameter aperture yielded film-measured lateral penumbras of 1 mm to 1.25 mm, depending on depth in the spread-out Bragg peak. TOPAS simulations found that a single spot configuration results in a flat dose distribution for a 10 mm diameter aperture and provides a CAX dose of less than 106% for apertures less than 14 mm in diameter. For larger targets, adding four corner spots to fill in the dose distribution is beneficial. Trade-offs between lateral penumbra, CAX dose and relative efficiency were characterized for different spot configurations and can be used for future clinical decision-making. The aperture was experimentally determined to not affect proton beam range, and no concerning leakage radiation or neutron dose was identified. Reference dose measurements with a PinPoint ion chamber were within 2.1% of Monte Carlo calculated doses. CONCLUSION: The aperture system developed in this work provides a method of treating ocular sites on a gantry-based spot scanning proton system. Additional work to develop compatible gaze tracking and gating infrastructure is ongoing.

Radio-luminescent imaging for rapid, high-resolution eye plaque loading verification.

BACKGROUND: Eye plaque brachytherapy is currently an optimal therapy for intraocular cancers. Due to the lack of an effective and practical technique to measure the seed radioactivity distribution, current quality assurance (QA) practice according to the American Association of Physicists in Medicine TG129 only stipulates that the plaque assembly be visually inspected. Consequently, uniform seed activity is routinely adopted to avoid possible loading mistakes of differential seed loading. However, modulated dose delivery, which represents a general trend in radiotherapy to provide more personalized treatment for a given tumor and patient, requires differential activities in the loaded seeds. PURPOSE: In this study, a fast and low-cost radio-luminescent imaging and dose calculating system to verify the seed activity distribution for differential loading was developed. METHODS: A proof-of-concept system consisting of a thin scintillator sheet coupled to a camera/lens system was constructed. A seed-loaded plaque can be placed directly on the scintillator surface with the radioactive seeds facing the scintillator. The camera system collects the radioluminescent signal generated by the scintillator on its opposite side. The predicted dose distribution in the scintillator's sensitive layer was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation with the planned plaque loading pattern of I-125 seeds. Quantitative comparisons of the distribution of relative measured signal intensity and that of the relative predicted dose in the sensitive layer were performed by gamma analysis, similar to intensity-modulated radiation therapy QA. RESULTS: Data analyses showed high gamma (3%/0.3 mm, global, 20% threshold) passing rates for correct seed loadings and low passing rates with distinguished high gamma value area for incorrect loadings, indicating that possible errors may be detected. The measurement and analysis only required a few extra minutes, significantly shorter than the time to assay the extra verification seeds the physicist already must perform as recommended by TG129. CONCLUSIONS: Radio-luminescent QA can be used to facilitate and assure the implementation of intensity-modulated, customized plaque loading.

Treatment of ocular tumors through a novel applicator on a conventional proton pencil beam scanning beamline.

Treatment of ocular tumors on dedicated scattering-based proton therapy systems is standard afforded due to sharp lateral and distal penumbras. However, most newer proton therapy centers provide pencil beam scanning treatments. In this paper, we present a pencil beam scanning (PBS)-based ocular treatment solution. The design, commissioning, and validation of an applicator mount for a conventional PBS snout to allow for ocular treatments are given. In contrast to scattering techniques, PBS-based ocular therapy allows for inverse planning, providing planners with additional flexibility to shape the radiation field, potentially sparing healthy tissues. PBS enables the use of commercial Monte Carlo algorithms resulting in accurate dose calculations in the presence of heterogeneities and fiducials. The validation consisted of small field dosimetry measurements of point doses, depth doses, and lateral profiles relevant to ocular therapy. A comparison of beam properties achieved through the applicator against published literature is presented. We successfully showed the feasibility of PBS-based ocular treatments.

Design and optimizing a novel ocular plaque brachytherapy with dual-core of 103Pd and 106Ru.

In recent decades, eye plaques of brachytherapy have been extensively used as primary treatment as well as a complementary treatment for ocular cancer. The purpose of this study is the development of the eye plaque brachytherapy throughout a new design of eye plaque by combining the COMS plaque and the CCB BEBIG plaque loaded by IRA1-103Pd and 106Ru, respectively. A new dual-core plaque with a diameter of 20 mm was designed in the way that the BEBIG plaque with a diameter of 20 mm loaded by 106Ru plate is attached to the COMS plaque with a diameter of 20 mm loaded by 24 of IRA1-103Pd seeds. Dose calculations for the new plaque were performed by using the MCNP5 code. Dose calculations of dual-core plaque including 103Pd seeds (gamma) and 106Ru plate (beta) were separately done for the sake of MCNP constraints in gamma and beta particle transfer simultaneously. The new dual-core plaque delivers a much higher dose rate to the tumor compared with every single plaque, while the dose rate reached to healthy tissues is slightly higher than each plaque separately. Of course, this is acceptable because the treatment time reduces and subsequently the error in radiation therapy reduces.

Intensity modulated high dose rate ocular brachytherapy using Se-75.

PURPOSE: We propose an alternative to LDR brachytherapy for the treatment of ocular melanomas by coupling intensity modulation, through the use of a gold shielded ring applicator, with a middle energy HDR brachytherapy source, Se-75. In this study, we computationally test this proposed design using MCNP6. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An array of discrete Se-75 sources is formed into a ring configuration within a gold shielded applicator, which collimates the beam to a conical shape. Varying this angle of collimation allows for the prescription dose to be delivered to the apex of various sized targets. Simulations in MCNP6 were performed to calculate the dosimetric output of the Se-75 ring source for various sized applicators, collimators, and target sizes. RESULTS: The prescription dose was delivered to a range of target apex depths 3.5-8 mm in the eye covering targets 10-15 mm in diameter by using various sized applicators and collimators. For a 16 mm applicator with a collimator opening that delivers the prescription dose to a depth of 5 mm in the eye, the maximum percent dose rate to critical structures was 30.5% to the cornea, 35.7% to the posterior lens, 33.3% to the iris, 20.1% to the optic nerve, 278.0% to the sclera, and 267.3% to the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: When using Se-75 in combination with the proposed gold shielded ring applicator, dose distributions are appropriate for ocular brachytherapy. The use of a collimator allows for the dose to more easily conform to the tumor volume. This method also reduces treatment time and cost, and it eliminates hand dose to the surgeon through the use of a remote afterloader device.

Surface dose rate variations in planar and curved geometries of 106Ru/106Rh plaque sources for ocular tumors.

PURPOSE: Investigation of surface dose rate variation with respect to the source configuration of 106Ru/106Rh eye plaque. To explore an alternate way to determine activity of brachytherapy plaques. METHODS: The surface dose rates of 106Ru/106Rh plaque developed indigenously were measured by extrapolation chamber. To rule out possibility of any error in the activity distribution and quantity, same source was used in two different configurations namely planar and curved. EBT3 Gafchromic film was used for determination of uniformity in activity. Monte Carlo-based Codes EGSnrc and FLUKA were used to calculate dose rate in tissue, percentage depth dose and for determination of activity. Parameters and correction factors were estimated using simulations. RESULTS: The measured reference absorbed dose rates for planar and curved 106Ru/106Rh eye plaques are found to be 589 ± 29 mGy/h and 560 ± 28 mGy/h, respectively. The difference in the reference absorbed dose rate of curved eye plaque is about ~5% as compared to planar configuration. The FLUKA-calculated dose values are almost independent of cavity length of the extrapolation chamber for both eye plaques. The FLUKA-based dose rates per µCi 106Ru/106Rh are about 17.28 ± 0.08 mGy/h and 16.48 ± 0.06 mGy/h, respectively for planar and curved eye plaques which match well with the measurements. The calculated activities for planar and curved eye plaques are 34.08 µCi and 33.98 µCi, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Surface dose rates for a prototype 106Ru/106Rh eye plaque with different configurations were estimated using simulations and measured experimentally. An alternate way to determine activity of beta-gamma brachytherapy plaque has been proposed.

A Monte Carlo dose calculation system for ophthalmic brachytherapy based on a realistic eye model.

PURPOSE: There is a growing trend towards the adoption of model-based calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) for brachytherapy dose calculations which can properly handle media and source/applicator heterogeneities. However, most of dose calculations in ocular plaque therapy are based on homogeneous water media and standard in-silico ocular phantoms, ignoring non-water equivalency of the anatomic tissues and heterogeneities in applicators and patient anatomy. In this work, we introduce EyeMC, a Monte Carlo (MC) model-based calculation algorithm for ophthalmic plaque brachytherapy using realistic and adaptable patient-specific eye geometries and materials. METHODS: We used the MC code PENELOPE in EyeMC to model Bebig IsoSeed I25.S16 seeds in COMS plaques and 106 Ru/106 Rh applicators that are coupled onto a customizable eye model with realistic geometry and composition. To significantly reduce calculation times, we integrated EyeMC with CloudMC, a cloud computing platform for radiation therapy calculations. EyeMC is equipped with an evaluation module that allows the generation of isodose distributions, dose-volume histograms, and comparisons with Plaque Simulator three-dimensional dose distribution. We selected a sample of patients treated with 125 I and 106 Ru isotopes in our institution, covering a variety of different type of plaques, tumor sizes, and locations. Results from EyeMC were compared to the original plan calculated by the TPS Plaque Simulation, studying the influence of heterogeneous media composition as well. RESULTS: EyeMC calculations for Ru plaques agreed well with manufacturer's reference data and data of MC simulations from Hermida et al. (2013). Significant deviations, up to 20%, were only found in lateral profiles for notched plaques. As expected, media composition significantly affected estimated doses to different eye structures, especially in the 125 I cases evaluated. Dose to sclera and lens were found to be about 12% lower when considering real media, while average dose to tumor was 9% higher. 106 Ru cases presented a 1%-3% dose reduction in all structures using real media for calculation, except for the lens, which showed an average dose 7.6% lower than water-based calculations. Comparisons with Plaque Simulator calculations showed large differences in dose to critical structures for 106 Ru notched plaques. 125 I cases presented significant and systematic dose deviations when using the default calculation parameters from Plaque Simulator version 5.3.8., which were corrected when using calculation parameters from a custom physics model for carrier-attenuation and air-interface correction functions. CONCLUSIONS: EyeMC is a MC calculation system for ophthalmic brachytherapy based on a realistic and customizable eye-tumor model which includes the main eye structures with their real composition. Integrating this tool into a cloud computing environment allows to perform high-precision MC calculations of ocular plaque treatments in short times. The observed variability in eye anatomy among the selected cases justifies the use of patient-specific models.

Dose characteristics of Au-198 eye brachytherapy applicator: A Monte Carlo study.

PURPOSE: The use of ocular plaques is a promising treatment option for eye melanoma brachytherapy. Although several studies have been done on various ocular plaques, little is known about the dose characterization of 198Au plaque. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The full mathematical model of the eye phantom, tumor, 106Ru/106Rh CCA, and 198Au plaque were simulated using the Monte Carlo MCNPX code. The dose distribution was measured in the plaque's central axis direction, and a dose profile was also measured at a distance of 2.5 mm from the plaque surface. RESULTS: The findings showed that 198Au plaque has superior dosimetric characteristics than CCA plaque for tumors with a thickness of greater than 3.5 mm, while CCA plaque is better for tumors with a thickness of less than 3.5 mm. The dose to the sclera and choroid is higher in the case of CCA plaque, while the dose to the organs at risk (lens and optic nerve) is greater in the case of 198Au applicator. In the case of 198Au plaque, however, the dose to sensitive organs was within their permissible dose range. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of medium and large tumors, 198Au plaque is more successful than CCA plaque. It can produce a much more homogeneous lateral dose profile in the target. In the treatment of dome-shaped tumors, 198Au plaque may be more successful than CCA plaque. As a result, the tumor's shape influences the plaque type selection.

On the importance of quality assurance (QA) for COMS eye plaque Silastic inserts: A guide to measurement methods, typical variations, and an example of how QA intercepted a manufacturing aberration.

PURPOSE: Eye plaques are widely used for ocular melanoma and provide an effective alternative to enucleation with adequate tumor control. A COMS plaque utilizes a Silastic insert for precise positioning of the radioactive seeds with respect to the scleral surface of the eye; however, due to manufacturing variability, the insert may unintentionally increase or decrease the distance between the sources and tumor. The purpose of this work is to provide guidance in measuring and identifying outliers in Silastic inserts. The importance of regular quality assurance (QA) is illustrated in an experience where a systematic problem was detected and the manufacturer's 22-mm mold was corrected. METHODS: A detailed description of the molds and manufacturing process used to produce Silastic inserts is provided, including photographs of the process steps. The variability in Silastic insert production was evaluated by measuring the thickness of 124 Silastic inserts. An estimate of how the observed Silastic thickness discrepancies impact the dose to the tumor and critical eye structures was performed using homogeneous dose calculations. A standard QA protocol was developed to guide the clinical user. RESULTS: Thickness of the measured Silastic inserts ranged from 1.22 to 2.67 mm, demonstrating variation from the 2.25 mm standard. Six of the 22-mm inserts were outliers (Δthickness >3 standard deviations) and were excluded from the statistics. The outliers were investigated with the help of the manufacturer, who discovered that a systematic error was accidentally introduced into the 22-mm mold. CONCLUSIONS: Due to manufacturing errors or variability, the Silastic inserts used in COMS eye plaques may be thicker or thinner than the design standard. Such variations may impact tumor control or increase the risk of normal tissue side effects. A standardized QA program is recommended to detect variations and communicate unusual findings to the manufacturer.

Update of the CLRP eye plaque brachytherapy database for photon-emitting sources.

PURPOSE: To update and extend the Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics (CLRP) Eye Plaque (EP) dosimetry database for low-energy photon-emitting brachytherapy sources using egs_brachy, an open-source EGSnrc application. The previous database, CLRP_EPv1, contained datasets for the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) plaques (10-22 mm diameter) with 103 Pd or 125 I seeds (BrachyDose-computed, 2008). The new database, CLRP_EPv2, consists of newly calculated three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions for 17 plaques [eight COMS, five Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG, and four others representative of models used worldwide] for 103 Pd, 125 I, and 131 Cs seeds. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS: Plaque models are developed with egs_brachy, based on published/manufacturer dimensions and material data. The BEBIG plaques (modeled for the first time) are identical in dimensions to COMS plaques but differ in elemental composition and/or density. Previously benchmarked seed models are used. Eye plaques and seeds are simulated at the center of full-scatter water phantoms, scoring in (0.05 cm)3 voxels spanning the eye for scenarios: (a) "HOMO": simulated TG43 conditions; (b) "HETERO": eye plaques and seeds fully modeled; (c) "HETsi" (BEBIG only): one seed is active at a time with other seed geometries present but not emitting photons (inactive); summation over all i seeds in a plaque then yields "HETsum" (includes interseed effects). For validation, doses are compared to those from CLRP_EPv1 and published data. DATA FORMAT AND ACCESS: Data are available at https://physics.carleton.ca/clrp/eye_plaque_v2, http://doi.org/10.22215/clrp/EPv2. The data consist of 3D dose distributions (text-based EGSnrc "3ddose" file format) and graphical presentations of the comparisons to previously published data. POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: The CLRP_EPv2 database provides accurate reference 3D dose distributions to advance ocular brachytherapy dose evaluations. The fully-benchmarked eye plaque models will be freely distributed with egs_brachy, supporting adoption of model-based dose evaluations as recommended by TG-129, TG-186, and TG-221.

EyeDose: An open-source tool for using published Monte Carlo results to estimate the radiation dose delivered to the tumor and critical ocular structures for 125I Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study eye plaques.

PURPOSE: Radiation side effects and visual outcome for uveal melanoma patients managed with plaque radiotherapy are dependent on the radiation dose administered to the tumor and nearby healthy tissues. We have developed an open-source software tool, EyeDose, to simplify and standardize tumor and critical structure dose reporting for Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study eye plaques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: EyeDose is a MATLAB-based program that calculates point dose and volume dose metrics for standard models of the tumor and critical ocular structures. It uses published three-dimensional dose distributions for eye plaques, calculated with Monte Carlo methods, which are oriented with respect to the eye using the tumor's position on a fundus diagram. A standard model for the ocular structures was created using published measurements and patient CT scans. EyeDose reports radiation statistics for the fovea, optic disc, lens, lacrimal gland, retina, and tumor. The dosimetric margin for implant placement uncertainty is also calculated. RESULTS: EyeDose calculations were validated against previously published Monte Carlo results for eight different tumor positions, including the dose to the fovea, optic disc, lacrimal gland, lens, and along the central axis. EyeDose accepts a spreadsheet input for rapidly processing large retrospective patient data sets, with an average run time of <40 s per patient. EyeDose is published as an open-source tool for easy adaptation at different institutions. CONCLUSIONS: EyeDose calculates radiation statistics for Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study eye plaque patients with Monte Carlo accuracy and without a treatment planning system. EyeDose streamlines data collection for large retrospective studies and can also be used prospectively to assess plaque applicability.

Optic disc dose reduction in ocular brachytherapy using 125 I notched COMS plaques: A simulation study based on current clinical practice.

PURPOSE: Although notched Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) plaques have been widely used, optic disc dose reduction by notched COMS plaques has not been discussed in the literature. Therefore, this study investigated optic disc dose reduction in ocular brachytherapy using 125 I notched COMS plaques in comparison with optic disc dose for 125 I standard COMS plaques. METHODS: For this simulation study, an in-house brachytherapy dose calculation program was developed using MATLAB software by incorporating the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group-43 Update (AAPM TG-43U1) dosimetry formalism with a line source approximation in a homogeneous water medium and COMS seed coordinates in the AAPM TG 129. Using this program, optic disc doses for standard COMS plaques (from 12 to 22 mm in diameter in 2 mm increments) and notched COMS plaques with one seed removed (Case #1, from 12 to 22 mm) and with two seeds removed (Case #2, from 14 to 22 mm) were calculated as a function of tumor margin-to-optic disc distance (DT) for various tumor basal dimensions (BDs) for prescription depths from 1 to 10 mm in 1 mm intervals. A dose of 85 Gy for an irradiation time of 168 h was prescribed to each prescription depth. Then absolute and relative optic disc dose reduction by notched COMS plaques (Cases #1 and #2) was calculated for all prescription depths. RESULTS: Optic disc dose reduction by notched COMS plaques (Cases #1 and #2) had five unique trends related to maximum optic disc dose reduction and corresponding optimal DT for each BD in each plaque. It increased with increasing prescription depth. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented in this study would enable the clinician to choose an adequate plaque type among standard and notched 125 I COMS plaques and a prescription depth to minimize optic disc dose.

Estimates of relative beta radiation doses on central and lateral axes of ruthenium/rhodium COB-type plaque used in eye brachytherapy.

The 106Ru/106Rh COB-type plaque has a cut-out section that makes it suitable to be used in eye brachytherapy to treat tumours close to the optical nerve. Nevertheless, this asymmetry makes measurements and calculations of dose rates around this kind of beta applicator more difficult to perform. In this work we present a analytical and numerical method to evaluate the relative dose rates along the central axis of the COB-type plaque and a comparison is made with a result found in literature obtained by means of Monte Carlo simulation.

Delivered dose changes in COMS plaque-based ocular brachytherapy arising from vitrectomy with silicone oil replacement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine dosimetric effects of performing concurrent I-125 Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study plaque brachytherapy and vitrectomy with replacement using silicone oil, previously shown to be a means of shielding uninvolved parts of the eye. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Monte Carlo simulations using MCNP6 were performed to compare the dosimetry with all eye materials assigned as water, and for the vitreous (excluding the tumor), composed of polydimethylsiloxane oil for three generic, one large tumor, and two patient geometry scenarios. Dose was scored at the tumor apex, along the sclera, and within a 3D grid encompassing the eye. The assessed patient cases included vitrectomies to treat intraocular pathologies; not to enhance attenuation/shielding. RESULTS: The doses along the sclera and for the entire eye were decreased when the silicone oil replaced the vitreal fluid, with a maximum decrease at the opposite sclera of 63%. Yet, absolute changes in dose to critical structures were often small and likely not clinically significant. The dose at the tumor apex was decreased by 3.1-9.4%. Dose was also decreased at the edges of the tumor because of decreased backscatter at the tumor-oil interface. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent silicone vitrectomy was found to reduce total radiation dose to the eye. Based on current radiation retinopathy predictive models, the evaluation of the absolute doses revealed only a subset of patients in which a clinically significant difference in outcomes is expected. Furthermore, the presence of the silicone oil decreased dose to the tumor edges, indicating that the tumor could be underdosed if the oil is unaccounted for.

Investigation of gold nanoparticle effects in brachytherapy by an electron emitter ophthalmic plaque.

Background: During decades, all improvements and developments in radiation therapy technologies have been focused on its main goal: maximize the dose in the tumor and minimize it in surrounding normal tissues. Recently, scientists have some approaches to nanoparticles, especially gold nanoparticles (GNPs), for dose localization. Purpose: Herein, the effect of GNPs in combination with electron brachytherapy in a model of eye tumor has been investigated. Materials and methods: Monte Carlo simulation was utilized and a complete anatomical model of the eye, a tumor with 5 mm thick, and a type of Ruthenium-106 beta emitter ophthalmic plaque were simulated. Simulation results have been validated by a Plexiglas eye phantom and film dosimetry, experimentally. Results: The results showed using GNPs causes the dose amplification in 2 mm from the plaque surface which the higher concentration has the higher enhancement. At more distances, Dose Enhancement Factors (DEFs) have the negative amounts, so that total delivered dose to the tumor has decreased with increasing of Au concentrations and the dose of organ at risk like sclera has increased. Conclusion: Therefore, using of GNPs along with a 106Ru/106Rh ocular plaque, as an electron emitter source, is a good choice only for superficial lesions, and it is not recommended for deeper tumors due to the parameters of radiation treatment and delivered dose to the tissues.