[CAR-T cells gene therapy medicines: Regulatory status and pharmaceutical circuits in Europe and France]. / Les médicaments de thérapie génique CAR-T cells : statuts réglementaires et circuits pharmaceutiques en Europe et en France.

CAR-T cells belong to a new class of biological medicines, referred to as Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs). Despite the cellular component, according to the regulatory definition, CAR-T cells are gene therapy medicines, a sub-category of ATMPs, since their therapeutic effect is the result of their genetic modification. The specificity and the complexity of these innovative drugs have required a complete reorganization of the hospital and pharmaceutical circuits, from the cell collection to the drug administration to the patient. Indeed, increased interaction and collaboration between different healthcare professionals is essential in order to guarantee the quality and safety of these innovative medicines.

Market access of gene therapies across Europe, USA, and Canada: challenges, trends, and solutions.

This review can inform gene therapy developers on challenges that can be encountered when seeking market access. Moreover, it provides an overview of trends among challenges and potential solutions.

Exploring Solutions to Foster ATMP Development and Access to Patients in Europe.

There are several critical factors that have influenced the (un)success rate of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) over the first ten years since the EU Regulation 1394/2007 entered into force. This article provides an overview of the current regulatory scenario and outlines the outstanding challenges to be faced in order to further promote research and development of ATMPs and the issues to be considered in the perspective of a possible legislative reform.

Cell and gene therapy manufacturing capabilities in Australia and New Zealand.

Cell and gene therapy products are rapidly being integrated into mainstream medicine. Developing global capability will facilitate broad access to these novel therapeutics. An initial step toward achieving this goal is to understand cell and gene therapy manufacturing capability in each region. We conducted an academic survey in 2018 to assess cell and gene therapy manufacturing capacity in Australia and New Zealand. We examined the following: the number and types of cell therapy manufacturing facilities; the number of projects, parallel processes and clinical trials; the types of products; and the manufacturing and quality staffing levels. It was found that Australia and New Zealand provide diverse facilities for cell therapy manufacturing, infrastructure and capability. Further investment and development will enable both countries to make important decisions to meet the growing need for cell and gene therapy and regenerative medicine in the region.

Why Include the Public in Genome Editing Governance Deliberation?

With the birth of genetically engineered twins in November 2018, international debate about human genome editing governance has moved from an emphasis on mutual engagement among multiple stakeholders to a self-regulatory model enacted through high-level expert groups with little or no public input. This article reconstructs this paradigm shift and suggests that inclusive public deliberation should still have a role in public decision making about genome editing.

Bioanalysis of adeno-associated virus gene therapy therapeutics: regulatory expectations.

The number of gene therapy (GTx) modality therapies in development has grown significantly in the last few years. Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based delivery approach has become most prevalent among other virus-based GTx vectors. Several regulatory guidelines provide the industry with general considerations related to AAV GTx development including discussion and recommendations related to highly diverse bioanalytical support of the AAV-based therapeutics. This includes assessment of pre- and post-treatment immunity, evaluation of post-treatment viral shedding and infectivity, as well as detection of transgene protein expression. An overview of the current regulatory recommendations as found in currently active and published draft US FDA and EMA guidance or guideline documents is presented herein.

LeRoy Walters's Legacy of Bioethics in Genetics and Biotechnology Policy.

LeRoy Walters was at the center of public debate about emerging biological technologies, even as "biotechnology" began to take root. He chaired advisory panels on human gene therapy, the human genome project, and patenting DNA for the congressional Office of Technology Assessment. He chaired the subcommittee on Human Gene Therapy for NIH's Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. He was also a regular advisor to Congress, the executive branch, and academics concerned about policy governing emerging biotechnologies. In large part due to Prof. Walters, the Kennedy Institute of Ethics was one of the primary sources of talent in bioethics, including staff who populated policy and science agencies dealing with reproductive and genetic technologies, such as NIH and OTA. His legacy lies not only in his writings, but in those people, documents, and discussions that guided biotechnology policy in the United States for three decades.

The Effectiveness and Value of Patisiran and Inotersen for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

DISCLOSURES: Funding for this summary was contributed by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Blue Shield of California, and California Health Care Foundation to the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), an independent organization that evaluates the evidence on the value of health care interventions. ICER's annual policy summit is supported by dues from Aetna, AHIP, Anthem, Blue Shield of California, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Cambia Health Solutions, United Healthcare, Kaiser Permanente, Premera Blue Cross, AstraZeneca, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, National Pharmaceutical Council, Prime Therapeutics, Sanofi, Spark Therapeutics, Health Care Service Corporation, Editas, Alnylam, Regeneron, Mallinkrodt, Biogen, HealthPartners, and Novartis. Mickle, Dreitlein, and Pearson are ICER employees. Lasser, Cipriano, and Hoch have nothing to disclose.

TTR Gene Silencers for Hereditary ATTR Amyloidosis: More than ICER Recognized.

DISCLOSURES: No funding support was received for the writing of this commentary. The author ser ves as a consultant for Akcea Therapeutics, Alnylam Phar maceuticals, Corino Therapeutics, Intellia Therapeutics, and Ionis Pharmaceuticals.

Gene Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: An Emerging Treatment Option for a Devastating Disease.

BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disease that, in most cases, involves homozygous deletion of the SMN1 gene. This causes a deficiency in survival motor neuron (SMN) protein, which plays a critical role in motor neuron development. SMA has a range of phenotype expression resulting in variable age of symptom onset, maximum motor strength achieved, and survival. Without intervention, infants with a more severe form of the disease (type 1 SMA) die before 2 years of age. Although it is rare, SMA is the most common fatal inherited disease of infancy, and until recently, treatment was primarily supportive. In 2016, a new agent, nusinersen, was approved by the FDA. Other treatments are in development, including a gene therapy, AVXS-101. These treatments are not only improving the lives of patients with SMA and their families, they are changing the disease phenotype. They have the greatest benefit when given early in the disease course. OBJECTIVES: To discuss current knowledge about SMA, provide clinical evidence for available and emerging treatment options, and present approaches for adding new therapies to hospital/health system formularies to ensure timely access to newly approved therapies for SMA. SUMMARY: Advances in clinical care have significantly extended the lives of individuals with SMA, and research into the genetic mechanisms leading to disease have revealed strategies for intervention that target the underlying cause of SMA. Nusinersen is now on the market, and other treatment options, such as AVXS-101, may soon be approved. This article provides an overview of SMA and the genetic mechanisms leading to SMN deficiency, then describes how new and emerging treatments work to overcome this deficiency and prevent associated nerve damage and disability. In addition, we discuss steps for incorporating AVXS-101 into hospital/health system formularies, along with barriers and concerns that may delay access, based in part on lessons learned with nusinersen.

A decade of marketing approval of gene and cell-based therapies in the United States, European Union and Japan: An evaluation of regulatory decision-making.

There is a widely held expectation of clinical advance with the development of gene and cell-based therapies (GCTs). Yet, establishing benefits and risks is highly uncertain. We examine differences in decision-making for GCT approval between jurisdictions by comparing regulatory assessment procedures in the United States (US), European Union (EU) and Japan. A cohort of 18 assessment procedures was analyzed by comparing product characteristics, evidentiary and non-evidentiary factors considered for approval and post-marketing risk management. Product characteristics are very heterogeneous and only three products are marketed in multiple jurisdictions. Almost half of all approved GCTs received an orphan designation. Overall, confirmatory evidence or indications of clinical benefit were evident in US and EU applications, whereas in Japan approval was solely granted based on non-confirmatory evidence. Due to scientific uncertainties and safety risks, substantial post-marketing risk management activities were requested in the EU and Japan. EU and Japanese authorities often took unmet medical needs into consideration in decision-making for approval. These observations underline the effects of implemented legislation in these two jurisdictions that facilitate an adaptive approach to licensing. In the US, the recent assessments of two chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) products are suggestive of a trend toward a more permissive approach for GCT approval under recent reforms, in contrast to a more binary decision-making approach for previous approvals. It indicates that all three regulatory agencies are currently willing to take risks by approving GCTs with scientific uncertainties and safety risks, urging them to pay accurate attention to post-marketing risk management.

Centralised versus decentralised manufacturing and the delivery of healthcare products: A United Kingdom exemplar.

BACKGROUND: The cell and gene therapy (CGT) field is at a critical juncture. Clinical successes have underpinned the requirement for developing manufacturing capacity suited to patient-specific therapies that can satisfy the eventual demand post-launch. Decentralised or 'redistributed' manufacturing divides manufacturing capacity across geographic regions, promising local, responsive manufacturing, customised to the end user, and is an attractive solution to overcome challenges facing the CGT manufacturing chain. METHODS: A study was undertaken building on previous, so far unpublished, semi-structured interviews with key opinion leaders in advanced therapy research, manufacturing and clinical practice. The qualitative findings were applied to construct a cost of goods model that permitted the cost impact of regional siting to be combined with variable and fixed costs of manufacture of a mesenchymal stromal cell product. RESULTS: Using the United Kingdom as an exemplar, cost disparities between regions were examined. Per patient dose costs of ~£1,800 per 75,000,000 cells were observed. Financial savings from situating the facility outside of London allow 25-41 additional staff or 24-35 extra manufacturing vessels to be employed. Decentralised quality control to mitigate site-to-site variation was examined. Partial decentralisation of quality control was observed to be financially possible and an attractive option for facilitating release 'at risk'. DISCUSSION: There are important challenges that obstruct the easy adoption of decentralised manufacturing that have the potential to undermine the market success of otherwise promising products. By using the United Kingdom as an exemplar, the modelled data provide a framework to inform similar regional policy considerations across other global territories.

Cell and gene therapies at the forefront of innovative medical care: Implications for South Africa.

The fields of cell and gene therapy are moving rapidly towards providing innovative cures for incurable diseases. A current and highly topical example is immunotherapies involving T-cells that express chimeric antigen receptors (CAR T-cells), which have shown promise in the treatment of leukaemia and lymphoma. These new medicines are indicative of the changes we can anticipate in the practice of medicine in the near future. Despite their promise, they pose challenges for introduction into the healthcare sector in South Africa (SA), including: (i) that they are technologically demanding and their manufacture is resource intensive; (ii) that the regulatory system is underdeveloped and likely to be challenged by ethical, legal and social requirements that accompany these new therapies; and (iii) that costs are likely to be prohibitive, at least initially, and before economies of scale take effect. Investment should be made into finding novel and innovative ways to introduce these therapies into SA sooner rather than later to ensure that SA patients are not excluded from these exciting new opportunities.