RESUMEN
This review aims to encapsulate the current knowledge in extracellular vesicles extracted from amniotic fluid and amniotic fluid derived stem/stromal cells. Amniotic fluid (AF) bathes the developing fetus, providing nutrients and protection from biological and mechanical dangers. In addition to containing a myriad of proteins, immunoglobulins and growth factors, AF is a rich source of extracellular vesicles (EVs). These vesicles originate from cells in the fetoplacental unit. They are biological messengers carrying an active cargo enveloped within the lipid bilayer. EVs in reproduction are known to play key roles in all stages of pregnancy, starting from fertilisation through to parturition. The intriguing biology of AF-derived EVs (AF-EVs) in pregnancy and their untapped potential as biomarkers is currently gaining attention. EV studies in numerous animal and human disease models have raised expectations of their utility as therapeutics. Amniotic fluid stem cell and mesenchymal stromal cell-derived EVs (AFSC-EVs) provide an established supply of laboratory-made EVs. This cell-free mode of therapy is popular as an alternative to stem cell therapy, revealing similar, if not better therapeutic outcomes. Research has demonstrated the successful application of AF-EVs and AFSC-EVs in therapy, harnessing their anti-inflammatory, angiogenic and regenerative properties. This review provides an overview of such studies and discusses concerns in this emerging field of research.
Asunto(s)
Vesículas Extracelulares , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Animales , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Líquido Amniótico , ConocimientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess changes in the monthly numbers of hospital-based abortions and outpatient early medical abortions in Victoria during January 2012 - March 2022, with a particular interest in the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study; time series analysis of Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset (VAED) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: All admitted care episodes in Victoria during 1 January 2012 - 31 March 2022 with medical abortion as the principal diagnosis; all PBS claims for mifepristone-misoprostol (MS-2 Step) during 1 January 2015 (date of listing) - 31 March 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in monthly numbers (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of admissions for hospital-based and outpatient early medical abortions during the pre-pandemic period (January 2012 - March 2020), the first full month of the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020), and the pandemic period (May 2020 - March 2022). RESULTS: The monthly number of hospital-based abortions declined in Victoria during the pre-pandemic period (slope, -2.92 [95% CI, -3.45 to -2.38] per month); the rate of decline was greater during the pandemic period (slope, -5.74 [95% CI, -10.5 to -0.96] per month). The monthly number of outpatient early medical abortions increased during the pre-pandemic period (slope, 5.94 [95% CI, 5.34-6.34] per month); it declined during the first month of the pandemic (slope, -26.4 [95% CI, -70.1 to -17.3] per month), but did not significantly change thereafter. The total monthly number of abortions during the pandemic period did not deviate markedly from the pre-pandemic median value. The pre-pandemic declines in monthly numbers of abortions in major city hospitals, in private hospitals, or at earlier than 14 weeks' gestation intensified during the pandemic period. During January 2015 - March 2020, 14 634 of 103 496 abortions were outpatient medical abortions (14%); during the pandemic period, 11 154 of 33 056 abortions were outpatient medical abortions (33%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of outpatient early medical abortion has steadily increased in Victoria since the PBS listing of mifepristone-misoprostol, which helped ensure access to abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Outpatient medical abortions may eventually outnumber surgical early abortions in Victoria, but they are not always appropriate: hospitals will continue to be essential for comprehensive abortion care.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , COVID-19 , Misoprostol , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Misoprostol/uso terapéutico , Mifepristona , Aborto Legal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Pandemias , Vigilancia de la Población , Hospitales Privados , COVID-19/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence supporting the use of valaciclovir to reduce fetal infection after maternal primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has stimulated interest in routine CMV serological screening in pregnancy. It is important to understand the healthcare consumer perspective of a CMV infection during pregnancy to minimize unintended harms of screening. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Australian women who had a lived experience of CMV infection following serological testing during pregnancy. Participants were recruited via social media and healthcare consumer networks, and purposively selected to capture a range of perinatal outcomes. Interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Twelve participants were interviewed: 6 had a live birth, 4 had terminations of pregnancy, 1 had a neonatal death and 1 was pregnant at the time of interview. Four major categories emerged from the analysis. Women reported a lack of CMV awareness among themselves, their social networks, and among their health care providers. The participants described their experience as "hard" and "stressful". Uncertainty and variability characterized their clinical decision-making process. The pregnancy and postpartum periods were marked by ongoing anxiety about the long-term impacts of CMV. Women supported screening for CMV, decision making and reproductive choice, but acknowledged that routine testing may not be desired by everyone and may increase stress and terminations of pregnancy. Important coping strategies included obtaining support from partners, family, and other families with lived experience of CMV, as well as having access to knowledgeable and sensitive healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: Serological diagnosis of maternal CMV infection during pregnancy can have severe and prolonged psychological impacts on parents, regardless of the pregnancy outcome. Improving healthcare professionals' knowledge and public awareness are essential before widespread serological screening can be responsibly introduced. Healthcare administrators that are considering implementing a prenatal screening program for secondary prevention of fetal CMV infection should pay attention to consumer perspectives to minimize unintended harms to women and their families.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/psicología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Adulto , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/psicología , Ansiedad/psicología , Australia/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been clinically available in Australia on a user-pays basis since 2012. There are numerous providers, with available tests ranging from targeted NIPT (only trisomies 21, 18, and 13 +/- sex chromosome aneuploidy) to genome-wide NIPT. While NIPT is being implemented in the public health care systems of other countries, in Australia, the implementation of NIPT has proceeded without public funding. The aim of this study was to investigate how NIPT has been integrated into antenatal care across Australia and reveal the successes and challenges in its implementation in this context. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was conducted from September to October 2022. Invitations to participate were sent to healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the provision of NIPT in Australia through professional society mailing lists and networks. Participants were asked questions on their knowledge of NIPT, delivery of NIPT, and post-test management of results. RESULTS: A total of 475 HCPs responded, comprising 232 (48.8%) obstetricians, 167 (35.2%) general practitioners, 32 (6.7%) midwives, and 44 (9.3%) genetic specialists. NIPT was most commonly offered as a first-tier test, with most HCPs (n = 279; 60.3%) offering it to patients as a choice between NIPT and combined first-trimester screening. Fifty-three percent (n = 245) of respondents always offered patients a choice between NIPT for the common autosomal trisomies and expanded (including genome-wide) NIPT. This choice was understood as supporting patient autonomy and informed consent. Cost was seen as a major barrier to access to NIPT, for both targeted and expanded tests. Equitable access, increasing time demands on HCPs, and staying up to date with advances were frequently reported as major challenges in delivering NIPT. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate substantial variation in the clinical implementation of NIPT in Australia, including in the offers of expanded screening options. After a decade of clinical use, Australian clinicians still report ongoing challenges in the clinical and equitable provision of NIPT.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas , Humanos , Femenino , Australia , Embarazo , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/métodos , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Adulto , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are no established guidelines for the follow up of infants born after a prenatal diagnosis of a genomic copy number variant (CNV), despite their increased risk of developmental issues. The aims of this study were (i) to determine the perinatal outcomes of fetuses diagnosed with and without a CNV, and (ii) to establish a population-based paediatric cohort for long term developmental follow up. METHODS: An Australian state-wide research database was screened for pregnant individuals who had a prenatal chromosomal microarray (CMA) between 2013-2019 inclusive. Following linkage to laboratory records and clinical referrer details, hospital records were manually reviewed for study eligibility. Eligible participants were mother-child pairs where the pregnancy resulted in a livebirth, the mother was able to provide informed consent in English (did not require a translator) and the mother was the primary caregiver for the child at hospital discharge after birth. Research invitations were sent by registered post at an average of six years after the prenatal diagnostic test. Statistical analysis was performed in Stata17. RESULTS: Of 1832 prenatal records examined, 1364 (74.5%) mother-child pairs were eligible for recruitment into the follow up cohort. Of the 468 ineligible, 282 (60.3%) had 'no live pregnancy outcome' (209 terminations of pregnancy (TOP) and 73 miscarriages, stillbirths, and infant deaths), 157 (33.5%) required a translator, and 29 (6.2%) were excluded for other reasons. TOP rates varied by the type of fetal CNV detected: 49.3% (109/221) for pathogenic CNVs, 18.2% (58/319) for variants of uncertain significance and 3.3% (42/1292) where no clinically significant CNV was reported on CMA. Almost 77% of invitation letters were successfully delivered (1047/1364), and the subsequent participation rate in the follow up cohort was 19.2% (201/1047). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides Australia's first population-based data on perinatal outcomes following prenatal diagnostic testing with CMA. The relatively high rates of pregnancy loss for those with a prenatal diagnosis of a CNV presented a challenge for establishing a paediatric cohort to examine long term outcomes. Recruiting a mother-child cohort via prenatal ascertainment is a complex and resource-intensive process, but an important step in understanding the impact of a CNV diagnosis in pregnancy and beyond. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12620000446965p; Registered on April 6, 2020.
Asunto(s)
Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN , Resultado del Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recién Nacido , Australia , Adulto , Masculino , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications for maternal TORCH (Toxoplasma gondii, rubella, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and herpes simplex virus (HSV)) serology, with a focus on the yield in isolated fetal growth restriction (FGR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of antenatal TORCH testing between January 2014 and December 2018 was carried out at two hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. TORCH testing ordered for pregnancy losses and stillbirth was excluded. RESULTS: Medical records of 718 pregnancies were reviewed, representing 760 fetuses. Isolated FGR was the indication for TORCH screening in 71.2% of pregnancies. Screens ordered for isolated FGR were positive in 7.4% (95% CI 5.5-10.0%). There were 49 positive maternal immunoglobulin M (CMV = 34, Toxoplasma = 15). Two acute maternal infections during pregnancy were diagnosed (CMV = 1, Toxoplasma = 1), with both screens ordered to assess symptomatic maternal illness. There was one neonatal CMV infection, born to a woman with symptomatic primary CMV. No maternal or neonatal rubella or HSV infections were identified. We found a diagnostic yield of TORCH screening for isolated FGR of 0.0% (95% CI 0.00-0.8%). An estimated AUD$64 269.75 was expended on maternal TORCH screens in this study. CONCLUSION: Maternal TORCH testing for isolated FGR is of no diagnostic yield and should be abandoned.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Herpes Simple , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Humanos , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/congénito , Herpes Simple/diagnóstico , Toxoplasmosis/diagnóstico , Australia , Diagnóstico PrenatalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 infection in pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of progression to severe disease, but vaccine uptake by pregnant women is hindered by persistent safety concerns. COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy has been shown to reduce stillbirth, but its relationship with preterm birth is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the rate of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among women giving birth in Melbourne, Australia, and to compare perinatal outcomes by vaccination status. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted after the June 2021 government recommendations for messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. Routinely collected data from all 12 public maternity hospitals in Melbourne were extracted on births at ≥20 weeks' gestation from July 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022. Maternal sociodemographic characteristics were analyzed from the total birth cohort. Perinatal outcomes were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated women for whom weeks 20 to 43 of gestation fell entirely within the 9-month data collection period. The primary outcomes were the rates of stillbirth and preterm birth (spontaneous and iatrogenic) in singleton pregnancies of at least 24 weeks' gestation, after exclusion of congenital anomalies. Secondary perinatal outcomes included the rate of congenital anomalies among infants born at ≥20 weeks' gestation and birthweight ≤third centile and newborn intensive care unit admissions among infants born without congenital anomalies at ≥24 weeks' gestation. We calculated the adjusted odds ratio of perinatal outcomes among vaccinated vs unvaccinated women using inverse propensity score-weighting regression adjustment with multiple covariates; P<.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Births from 32,536 women were analyzed: 17,365 (53.4%) were vaccinated and 15,171 (47.6%) were unvaccinated. Vaccinated women were more likely to be older, nulliparous, nonsmoking, not requiring an interpreter, of higher socioeconomic status, and vaccinated against pertussis and influenza. Vaccination status also varied by region of birth. Vaccinated women had a significantly lower rate of stillbirth compared with unvaccinated women (0.2% vs 0.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.37; P<.001). Vaccination was associated with a significant reduction in total preterm births at <37 weeks (5.1% vs 9.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.71; P<.001), spontaneous preterm birth (2.4% vs 4.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.96; P=.02), and iatrogenic preterm birth (2.7% vs 5.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.65; P<.001). Infants born to vaccinated mothers also had lower rates of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. There was no significant increase in the rate of congenital anomalies or birthweight ≤3rd centile in vaccinated women. Vaccinated women were significantly less likely to have an infant with a major congenital anomaly compared with the unvaccinated group (2.4% vs 3.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.94; P=.02). This finding remained significant even when the analysis was restricted to women vaccinated before 20 weeks' gestation. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was associated with a reduction in stillbirth and preterm birth, and not associated with any adverse impact on fetal growth or development. Vaccine coverage was substantially influenced by known social determinants of health.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Nacimiento Prematuro , Lactante , Embarazo , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Mortinato/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Peso al Nacer , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Resultado del EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the perinatal outcomes of fetuses diagnosed with a pathogenic copy number variant (CNV) or variant of uncertain significance (VUS); and to characterize these variants in terms of testing indication, genomic location, size, and inheritance. METHODS: Retrospective study of singleton pregnancies with a pathogenic CNV or VUS from a single laboratory during 2012-2018. Probabilistic record linkage between the prenatal diagnosis dataset and perinatal outcome data for births from 20 weeks gestation was performed. If no birth record was found, this implied a pregnancy loss <20 weeks. RESULTS: We included 6945 prenatal microarray results; a pathogenic CNV was detected in 230 (3.3%, 95% CI: 2.9%-3.8%) and a VUS in 483 (7.0%, 95% CI: 6.4%-7.6%). Of pregnancies with a pathogenic CNV, 20.0% (95% CI: 15.3%-25.6%) had a live birth, 3.0% (95% CI: 1.5%-6.2%) had a perinatal death (stillbirth or neonatal death), and 77% (95% CI: 71.1%-81.9%) had no birth record. Of those with a VUS, 64.4% (95% CI: 60.0%-68.5%) had a live birth, 1.8% (95% CI: 1.0%-3.5%) had a perinatal death, and no birth record was found for 33.7% (95% CI: 29.7%-38.1%). Most pathogenic CNVs (61.1%) were <7 Mb in size. The most common microdeletion syndromes were DiGeorge, Wolf-Hirschhorn, and Cri-du-chat syndromes. CONCLUSION: This study provides an overview of perinatal outcomes and frequency of recurrent CNVs observed in the prenatal microarray era.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Perinatal , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN , Feto , GenómicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To analyze population-based trends in the prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) since the availability of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). METHODS: Retrospective state-wide data for all prenatal diagnoses performed <25 weeks gestation from 2005 to 2020 in Victoria, Australia. Non-invasive prenatal testing became locally available from 2012. The prenatal diagnosis rates of SCA as proportions of all prenatal diagnostic tests and all births were calculated. Statistical significance was assessed with the χ2 test for trend, with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: 46,518 amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling were performed during the study period, detecting 617 SCAs. There was a significant increase in the rate of prenatal SCAs from 5.8 per 10,000 births in 2005 to 8.7 per 10,000 births in 2020 (p < 0.0001). This increase was predominantly due to 47,XXY cases, 91% of which were ascertained via positive NIPT for this condition in 2020. The prenatal diagnosis rate of 47,XXY significantly increased from 0.8 per 10,000 births in 2005 to 4.3 per 10,000 births in 2020 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Screening for SCAs using NIPT has directly led to an increase in their prenatal diagnosis on a population-wide basis, especially 47,XXY. This has implications for clinician education, genetic counselling, and pediatric services.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de los Cromosomas , Síndrome de Klinefelter , Embarazo , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Amniocentesis , Síndrome de Klinefelter/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Klinefelter/epidemiología , Síndrome de Klinefelter/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vellosidades Coriónicas , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Trastornos de los Cromosomas/diagnóstico , Aberraciones Cromosómicas Sexuales , Muestra de la Vellosidad Coriónica , Victoria/epidemiología , Cromosomas Sexuales , AneuploidiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is the most common congenital infection worldwide. cCMV can lead to severe long-term sequelae, including neurological impairment and developmental delay. We performed a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines containing recommendations concerning serological screening for CMV during pregnancy. METHOD: We performed a search of MEDLINE, Turning Research into Practice (TRIP) database and the grey literature for clinical practice guidelines or consensus statements published in the English language from Jan 2010 to June 2022. The quality of the included guidelines was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Textual synthesis was used to summarise and compare the recommendations on CMV serological screening in pregnancy. RESULTS: Eleven guidelines and two consensus statements were included. None recommended universal serological screening for CMV in pregnant women; five recommended screening for high-risk women (those with frequent contact with young children). The overall quality of the guidelines varied; most were medium or low. CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical practice guidelines do not actively recommend routine serological screening in pregnancy, most did not meet standard processes for development and predated the emerging data on valaciclovir as a potential intervention. Existing recommendations are underpinned by limited, low-level evidence, exposing the lack of robust data in this area of practice. Further high-level evidence and methodologically robust guidelines are needed to guide clinical practice in this rapidly changing field.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Enfermedades Fetales , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Niño , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Preescolar , Citomegalovirus , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/congénito , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Fetales/diagnóstico , Progresión de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Prenatal screening for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) is increasingly available through expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). NIPT for SCAs raises complex ethical issues for clinical providers, prospective parents and future children. This paper discusses the ethical issues that arise around NIPT for SCAs and current guidelines and protocols for management. The first section outlines current practice and the limitations of NIPT for SCAs. It then outlines key guidelines before discussing the ethical issues raised by this use of NIPT. We conclude that while screening for SCAs should be made available for people seeking to use NIPT, its implementation requires careful consideration of what, when and how information is provided to users.
Asunto(s)
Aneuploidia , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Embarazo , Femenino , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Aberraciones Cromosómicas Sexuales , Cromosomas SexualesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Melbourne, Australia, recorded one of the longest and most stringent pandemic lockdowns in 2020, which was associated with an increase in preterm stillbirths among singleton pregnancies. Twin pregnancies may be particularly susceptible to the impacts of pandemic disruptions to maternity care due to their higher background risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies birthing in public maternity hospitals in Melbourne. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were used to compare perinatal outcomes between a pre-pandemic group to women in whom weeks 20+0 to 40+0 of gestation occurred entirely during one of two lockdown-exposure periods: exposure 1 from 22 March 2020 to 21 March 2021 and exposure 2 from 22 March 2021 to 27 March 2022. RESULTS: Total preterm births < 37 weeks were significantly lower in exposure 1 compared with the pre-pandemic period (63.1% vs 68.3%; adjusted risk ratio 0.92 95% CI 0.87-0.98, p = 0.01). This was mainly driven by fewer spontaneous preterm births (18.9% vs 20.3%; adjusted risk ratio 0.95 95% CI 0.90-0.99, p = 0.04). There were also lower rates of preterm birth < 34 weeks (19.9% vs 23.0%, adjusted risk ratio 0.93 95% CI 0.89-0.98 p = 0.01) and total iatrogenic births for fetal compromise (13.4% vs 20.4%; adjusted risk ratio 0.94 95% CI 0.89-0.98, p = 0.01). There were fewer special care nursery admissions (38.5% vs 43.4%; adjusted risk ratio 0.91 95% CI 0.87-0.95, p < 0.001) but no significant changes in stillbirth (1.5% vs 1.6%; adjusted risk ratio 1.00 95% CI 0.99-1.01, p = 0.82). Compared with the pre-pandemic period, there were more preterm births < 28 weeks and neonatal intensive care unit admissions in exposure 2. CONCLUSIONS: Melbourne's first lockdown-exposure period was associated with lower preterm births in twins without significant differences in adverse newborn outcomes. Our findings provide insights into the influences on preterm birth and the optimal timing of delivery for twins.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicios de Salud Materna , Nacimiento Prematuro , Embarazo , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Embarazo Gemelar , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Mortinato/epidemiología , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate human fetal exposure to non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) by analyzing amniotic fluid and umbilical cord blood. STUDY DESIGN: Concentrations of four NNS (acesulfame-potassium [ace-K], saccharin, steviol glucuronide, and sucralose) were measured in amniotic fluid (n = 13) and cord blood samples (n = 15) using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Amniotic fluid samples were obtained for research purposes at the time of term elective cesarean birth or clinically indicated third trimester amnioreduction at Mercy Hospital for Women (Melbourne, Australia). All except four women were in the fasting state. Cord blood samples were obtained from an independent cohort of newborns whose mothers were enrolled in a separate clinical trial at the National Institutes of Health. RESULTS: Ten of 13 amniotic fluid samples contained at least one NNS (ace-K, saccharin, steviol glucuronide, and/or sucralose). Maximum amniotic fluid NNS concentrations of ace-K, saccharin, steviol glucuronide, and sucralose were 78.9, 55.9, 93.5, and 30.6 ng/mL, respectively. Ace-K and saccharin were present in 100% and 80% of the cord blood samples, with maximal concentrations of 6.5 and 2.7 ng/mL, respectively. Sucralose was not detected and steviol glucuronide was not measurable in any of the cord blood samples. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence of human transplacental transmission of NNS. Based on results predominantly obtained from rodent models, we speculate that NNS exposure may adversely influence the offsprings' metabolic health. Well-designed, prospective clinical trials are necessary to understand the impact of NNS intake during pregnancy on human development and long-term health. KEY POINTS: · NNS consumption during pregnancy has increased in recent years.. · Maternal NNS intake during pregnancy is associated with preterm birth and higher infant weight gain in epidemiologic studies.. · In rodents, in utero NNS exposure induces metabolic abnormalities in mothers and their offspring, alters offspring gut microbiota composition, and promotes sweet taste preference in adulthood.. · It is presently unknown whether and to what degree maternal NNS ingestion in humans leads to direct in utero exposure.. · This study provides the first evidence of in utero NNS exposure in humans and highlights the urgent need to investigate clinical consequences of early life NNS exposure on metabolism, weight, taste preference, and general health..
Asunto(s)
Edulcorantes no Nutritivos , Nacimiento Prematuro , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Líquido Amniótico/química , Sangre Fetal/química , Edulcorantes no Nutritivos/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sacarina/análisis , Sacarina/metabolismoRESUMEN
Little is published on cytomegalovirus (CMV) serological screening at the first antenatal visit or the contemporary CMV seroprevalence rates among the Australian pregnant population. We performed a retrospective analysis of public hospital births in a major tertiary centre (n = 840) over a two month period. We found that 13.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.4-16.1%) of women had been screened for CMV at their first antenatal visit with their general practitioner. Of these, 43.0% (95% CI 34.3-52.1%) were CMV seronegative and therefore susceptible to primary infection. Seronegative women were also more likely to have been born in an economically developed country, to live in a socio-economically advantaged postcode and to be nulliparous. The information from this study may help guide future studies of congenital CMV risk reduction strategies.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Médicos Generales , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Citomegalovirus , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Australia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , PartoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Congenital cytomegalovirus infection is the most common perinatal infection and a significant cause of sensorineural hearing loss, cerebral palsy, and neurodevelopmental disability. There is a paucity of human gene expression studies examining the pathophysiology of cytomegalovirus infection. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a whole transcriptomic assessment of amniotic fluid from pregnancies with live fetuses to identify differentially expressed genes and enriched Gene Ontology categories associated with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. STUDY DESIGN: Amniotic fluid supernatant was prospectively collected from pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis for suspected congenital cytomegalovirus infection because of first-trimester maternal primary infection or ultrasound features suggestive of fetal infection. Women who had received therapy to prevent fetal infection were excluded. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection was diagnosed via viral polymerase chain reaction of amniotic fluid; cytomegalovirus-infected fetuses were paired with noninfected controls, matched for gestational age and fetal sex. Paired-end RNA sequencing was performed on amniotic fluid cell-free RNA with the Novaseq 6000 at a depth of 30 million reads per sample. Following quality control and filtering, reads were mapped to the human genome and counts summarized across genes. Differentially expressed genes were identified using 2 approaches: voomWithQualityWeights in conjunction with limma and RUVSeq with edgeR. Genes with a false discovery rate <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Differential exon use was analyzed using DEXSeq. Functional analysis was performed using gene set enrichment analysis and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Manual curation of differentially regulated genes was also performed. RESULTS: Amniotic fluid samples were collected from 50 women; 16 (32%) had congenital cytomegalovirus infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. After excluding 3 samples without matched controls, 13 cytomegalovirus-infected samples collected at 18 to 23 weeks and 13 cytomegalovirus-negative gestation-matched controls were submitted for RNA sequencing and analysis (N=26). Ten of the 13 pregnancies with cytomegalovirus-infected fetuses had amniocentesis because of serologic evidence of maternal primary infection with normal fetal ultrasound, and 3 had amniocentesis because of ultrasound abnormality suggestive of cytomegalovirus infection. Four cytomegalovirus-infected pregnancies ended in termination (n=3) or fetal death (n=1), and 9 resulted in live births. Pregnancy outcomes were available for 11 of the 13 cytomegalovirus-negative controls; all resulted in live births of clinically-well infants. Differential gene expression analysis revealed 309 up-regulated and 32 down-regulated genes in the cytomegalovirus-infected group compared with the cytomegalovirus-negative group. Gene set enrichment analysis showed significant enrichment of multiple Gene Ontology categories involving the innate immune response to viral infection and interferon signaling. Of the 32 significantly down-regulated genes, 8 were known to be involved in neurodevelopment and preferentially expressed by the brain. Six specific cellular restriction factors involved in host defense to cytomegalovirus infection were up-regulated in the cytomegalovirus-infected group. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis predicted the activation of pathways involved in progressive neurologic disease and inflammatory neurologic disease. CONCLUSION: In this next-generation sequencing study, we revealed new insights into the pathophysiology of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. These data on the up-regulation of the intraamniotic innate immune response to cytomegalovirus infection and the dysregulation of neurodevelopmental genes may inform future approaches to developing prognostic markers and assessing fetal responses to in utero therapy.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Líquido Amniótico/metabolismo , Citomegalovirus/genética , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/congénito , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Interferones/genética , Interferones/metabolismo , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/genética , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/metabolismo , RNA-SeqRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a worsening of perinatal outcomes in many regions around the world. Melbourne, Australia, had one of the longest and most stringent lockdowns worldwide in 2020 while recording only rare instances of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the stillbirth and preterm birth rates in women who were exposed or unexposed to lockdown restrictions during pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of perinatal outcomes in Melbourne before and during the COVID-19 lockdown. The lockdown period was defined as the period from March 23, 2020 to March 14, 2021. Routinely-collected maternity data on singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation without congenital anomalies were obtained from all the 12 public hospitals in Melbourne. We defined the lockdown-exposed cohort as those women for whom weeks 20 to 40 of gestation occurred during the lockdown and the unexposed control group as women from the corresponding calendar periods 12 and 24 months before. The main outcome measures were stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction (birthweight < third centile), and iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to compare the odds of stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise, adjusting for multiple covariates. RESULTS: There were 24,817 births in the exposed group and 50,017 births in the control group. There was a significantly higher risk of preterm stillbirth in the exposed group than the control group (0.26% vs 0.18%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.05; P=.015). There was also a significant reduction in the preterm birth of live infants <37 weeks (5.68% vs 6.07%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.99; P=.02), which was largely mediated by a significant reduction in iatrogenic preterm birth (3.01% vs 3.27%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.99; P=.03), including iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise (1.25% vs 1.51%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.93; P=.003). There were also significant reductions in special care nursery admissions during lockdown (11.53% vs 12.51%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.95; P<.0001). There was a trend to fewer spontaneous preterm births <37 weeks in the exposed group of a similar magnitude to that reported in other countries (2.69% vs 2.82%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.05; P=.32). CONCLUSION: Lockdown restrictions in Melbourne, Australia were associated with a significant reduction in iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise and a significant increase in preterm stillbirths. This raises concerns that pandemic conditions in 2020 may have led to a failure to identify and appropriately care for pregnant women at an increased risk of antepartum stillbirth. Further research is required to understand the relationship between these 2 findings and to inform our ongoing responses to the pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Nacimiento Prematuro , Estudios de Cohortes , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Pandemias , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortinato/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The acronym 'TORCH' refers to well-recognised causes of perinatal infections: toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV). A TORCH serology panel is often used to test for maternal primary infection following detection of ultrasound abnormalities in pregnancy. AIM: This review aims to estimate the diagnostic yield of maternal TORCH serology in pregnancy following fetal ultrasound abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary studies published since 2000 that assessed maternal TORCH serology for suspected fetal infection and included information on indications for testing, definition of positive TORCH serology results, and perinatal outcomes were included. RESULTS: Eight studies with a total of 2538 pregnancies were included. The main indications for testing were polyhydramnios, fetal growth restriction and hyperechogenic bowel. There were 26 confirmed cases of congenital CMV, of which 15 had multiple ultrasound abnormalities. There were no cases of congenital toxoplasmosis, rubella or HSV confirmed in any of the eight studies. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical utility of TORCH serology for non-specific ultrasound abnormalities such as isolated fetal growth restriction or isolated polyhydramnios is low. It is time to retire the TORCH acronym and the reflex ordering of 'TORCH' panels, as their continued use obscures, rather than illuminates, appropriate investigation for fetal ultrasound abnormalities.
Asunto(s)
Feto/anomalías , Infecciones/diagnóstico , Serología/normas , Adulto , Femenino , Feto/fisiopatología , Humanos , Infecciones/sangre , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/métodos , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/normas , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/sangre , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Serología/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a survey-based discrete-choice experiment (DCE) to understand the test features that drive women's preferences for prenatal genomic testing, and explore variation across countries. METHODS: Five test attributes were identified as being important for decision-making through a literature review, qualitative interviews and quantitative scoring exercise. Twelve scenarios were constructed in which respondents choose between two invasive tests or no test. Women from eight countries who delivered a baby in the previous 24 months completed a DCE presenting these scenarios. Choices were modeled using conditional logit regression analysis. RESULTS: Surveys from 1239 women (Australia: n = 178; China: n = 179; Denmark: n = 88; Netherlands: n = 177; Singapore: n = 90; Sweden: n = 178; UK: n = 174; USA: n = 175) were analyzed. The key attribute affecting preferences was a test with the highest diagnostic yield (p < 0.01). Women preferred tests with short turnaround times (p < 0.01), and tests reporting variants of uncertain significance (VUS; p < 0.01) and secondary findings (SFs; p < 0.01). Several country-specific differences were identified, including time to get a result, who explains the result, and the return of VUS and SFs. CONCLUSION: Most women want maximum information from prenatal genomic tests, but our findings highlight country-based differences. Global consensus on how to return uncertain results is not necessarily realistic or desirable.
Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Prioridad del Paciente , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas , Genómica , Humanos , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIMS: Children with a congenital upper limb difference (CoULD) are a diverse group who often require multidisciplinary care and long-term support for functional and social impacts. The Australian Hand Difference Register (AHDR) provides a national database of children born with a CoULD and aims to facilitate research and improve health care for affected children. Using data from the first 3 years of its operation, we analysed the demographic and clinical features of participating families, including type of CoULDs and the frequency of pre-natal and syndromic diagnoses. METHODS: Families were recruited from tertiary plastic surgery, orthopaedic and genetics clinics, as well as by self-referral. Hand differences were classified by the consulting physician according to the Oberg-Manske-Tonkin classification system. Primary carers were invited to complete an online questionnaire covering demographic information, pregnancy and newborn outcomes and diagnostic details. RESULTS: Between August 2017 and September 2020, 822 families consented and 320 questionnaires were reviewed. CoULDs were detected pre-natally in 66 (20.6%) and post-natally in 248 children (77.5%); data for 6 (1.9%) children were missing. The most common CoULDs were radial polydactyly, symbrachydactyly with ectodermal elements and radial longitudinal deficiency, hypoplastic thumb. Twenty-seven children (8.4%) had an associated syndrome, 7 diagnosed pre-natally and 19 post-natally; the most common were VACTERL association, Poland anomaly, Holt-Oram and ectrodactyly-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: The AHDR is a valuable resource for understanding the relative frequencies of CoULDs. Participation will assist future research into the diagnostic journeys of children with CoULDs, including risk factors, diagnosis and psychosocial impacts.
Asunto(s)
Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades Superiores , Australia , Niño , Mano , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Pulgar , Extremidad Superior , Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades Superiores/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Prenatal screening for aneuploidy has undergone immense changes over the past two decades. In 2013 cell-free DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) became a new self-funded option primarily for Down syndrome screening, but also other aneuploidies and genetic conditions. The numbers of Medicare item claims for prenatal diagnostic procedures have halved since the introduction of NIPT, while billings for serum screening fell by 40% over the same period, on a background of steady births. Australia is now observing historically low rates of prenatal diagnostic testing. These data provide an informative snapshot of historic changes in prenatal screening and diagnosis, as our sector prepares for the impending impacts of other advances in genomics on maternity care. They also highlight the need to address equity and quality issues that arise when consumers must bear the full costs of improved genomic tests in the absence of Medicare funding.