Two-lung ventilation with artificial pneumothorax on cerebral desaturation and early postoperative cognitive outcome: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of two lung ventilation (TLV) with carbon dioxide artificial pneumothorax on cerebral desaturation and postoperative neurocognitive changes in elderly patients undergoing elective minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The first aim of this study was to compare the effect of TLV and one lung ventilation (OLV) on cerebral desaturation. The second aim was to assess changes in early postoperative cognitive outcomes of two ventilation methods. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial enrolled patients 65 and older scheduled for MIE. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to TLV group or OLV group. The primary outcome was the incidence of cerebral desaturation events (CDE). Secondary outcomes were the cumulative area under the curve of desaturation for decreases in regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) values below 20% relative to the baseline value (AUC.20) and the incidence of delayed neurocognitive recovery. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were recruited between November 2019 and August 2020. TLV group had a lower incidence of CDE than OLV group [3 (10.71%) vs. 13 (48.14%), P = 0.002]. TLV group had a lower AUC.20 [0 (0-35.86) % min vs. 0 (0-0) % min, P = 0.007], and the incidence of delayed neurocognitive recovery [2 (7.4%) vs. 11 (40.7%), P = 0.009] than OLV group. Predictors of delayed neurocognitive recovery on postoperative day 7 were age (OR 1.676, 95% CI 1.122 to 2.505, P = 0.006) and AUC.20 (OR 1.059, 95% CI 1.025 to 1.094, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to OLV, TLV had a lower incidence of CDE and delayed neurocognitive recovery in elderly patients undergoing MIE. The method of TLV combined with carbon dioxide artificial pneumothorax may be an option for these elderly patients. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR1900027454).

Comparative study of a modified double-lumen tube ventilation control connector and traditional connector in clinical use: a randomised-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A Y-shaped rotatable connector (YRC) for double-lumen tubes (DLT) is invented and compared with the traditional connector (Y-shaped connector, YC). METHODS: Sixty patients with ASA grade I-III, aged ≥ 18 years, who needed to insert a DLT for thoracic surgery were recruited and assigned into the YRC group (n = 30) and the YC group (n = 30) randomly. The primary endpoints included the inhaled air concentration (Fi) and the exhaled air concentration (Et) of sevoflurane before and after the switch between two-lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation at different times, positioning time, and switching time. The secondary endpoints were the internal gas volume of the two connectors, airway pressure, and the sputum suction time. RESULTS: The Et and Fi of the YRC group and the YC group were significantly different (all p < 0.05) at 5s, 10s, and 30s after the patient switched from two-lung ventilation to one-lung ventilation. The positioning time of the YRC group was less than YC group (89.75 ± 14.28 s vs 107.80 ± 14.96 s, p < 0.05), as well as the switching time (3.60 ± 1.20 s vs 9.05 ± 2.53 s, p < 0.05) and the internal gas volume (17.20 ml vs 24.12 ml). There was no difference in airway pressure and the sputum suction time in two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with YC, YRC was beneficial for maintaining depth of anesthesia, improves efficiency for the switch between one-lung and two-lung ventilation, and shortens the tube positioning time.

Efficacy of artificial pneumothorax under two-lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: One-lung ventilation (OLV) is the standard and widely applied ventilation approach used in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer (VATS-e). To address the disadvantages of OLV with respect to difficulties in intubation and induction, as well as the risk of respiratory complications, two-lung ventilation (TLV) with artificial pneumothorax has been introduced for use in VATS-e. However, no studies have yet compared TLV and OLV with postoperative infection and inflammation in the prone position over time postoperatively. Here, we investigated the efficacy of TLV in patients undergoing VATS-e in the prone position. METHODS: Between April 2010 and December 2016, 119 patients underwent VATS-e under OLV or TLV with carbon dioxide insufflation. Clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative outcomes, including oxygenation and systemic inflammatory responses, were compared between patients who underwent OLV and those who underwent TLV. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics other than pT stage were comparable between groups. The TLV group had shorter thoracic operation time than the OLV group. No patients underwent conversion to open thoracotomy. The PaO2/FiO2 ratios of the TLV group on postoperative day (POD) 5 and on POD7 were significantly higher than those of the OLV group. C-reactive protein levels on POD7 were lower in the TLV group than in the OLV group. There were no significant differences with respect to postoperative complications between the OLV and TLV groups. In the TLV group, the white blood cell count on POD7 was significantly lower than that in the OLV group; body temperature showed a similar trend immediately after surgery and on POD1. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrated that, compared with OLV, TLV in the prone position provides better oxygenation and reduced inflammation in the postoperative course. Accordingly, TLV might be more useful than OLV for ventilation during esophageal cancer surgery.

Efficacy of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic pericardial window creation using two lung ventilation in chronic large pericardial effusions.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that two lung ventilation under general anaesthesia may also be safely performed to create pericardial window with uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. METHOD: The single-centre, retrospective, comparative study was conducted at Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey, comprised data from March 2011 to March 2018 of patients with recurrent and/or with chronic large pericardial effusions unresponsive to medical therapy and/or to pericardiocentesis and who underwent pericardial window creation with uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Group 1 had data of patients in whom pericardial windows were created under general anaesthesia, while group 2 had patients with two lung ventilation. Parameters compared between the groups were gender, age, operation side, operation time amount of drainage, complication, recurrences and survival. Data was analysed using SPSS 19. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 9(45%) were males and 11(55%) were females. Group 1 had 14(70%) patients, while group 2 had 6(30%). The age of patients in group 2 was significantly higher than those in group 1 (p=0.041). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to gender, amount of drainage, operation time and post-operative complications (p>0.05). There was no recurrence or mortality in either of the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pericardial window could be created safely with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under two lung ventilation for patients carrying high risk for one lung ventilation.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic total thymectomy: two-lung ventilation with artificial pneumothorax.

Objectives: Double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLET) and one-lung ventilation (OLV) have been generally accepted as the classic anesthetic method in video-assisted thoracoscopic total thymectomy (VATT). However, there are still some disadvantages of DLET. Two-lung ventilation (TLV) with single-lumen endotracheal tube (SLET) is considered to be an alternative in VATT to avoid these disadvantages. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of TLV in VATT by comparing it with OLV cases.Material and methods: We retrospectively screened 198 patients who received TLV unilateral thoracic incision VATT and 117 patients who received OLV unilateral thoracic incision VATT. Perioperative data were analyzed, including surgical variables, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative complications and hospital stay.Results: No significant differences with regard to operative time (p = .146), postoperative hospital stay (p = .553), complications (p = .254), hemodynamic parameters and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) were found between TLV group and OLV group. However, end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) was higher in TLV group at 15 min (39.95 ± 5.03 vs 38.70 ± 4.57, p = .021) and 30 min (41.91 ± 5.50 vs 38.91 ± 4.51, p < .001) after initiation of the operation.Conclusions: It is safe and feasible to adopt TLV using SLET with CO2 insufflation artificial pneumothorax in unilateral thoracic incision VATT.

Comparison of early postoperative pulmonary complications between two-lung ventilation with artificial pneumothorax and one-lung ventilation with bronchial blockade in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Background: Two-lung ventilation (TLV) with artificial carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumothorax is used during the thoracoscopic phase of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). However, the impact of TLV with artificial pneumothorax on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after MIE is unclear. This study aimed to compare the incidence of early PPCs between TLV with CO2 pneumothorax and one-lung ventilation (OLV) with bronchial blockade in patients undergoing MIE. Methods: Five hundred ninety-three patients with esophageal cancer who underwent elective MIE with two-field lymph node dissection were analyzed. Patients in the TLV group were intubated using a single-lumen endotracheal tube and underwent surgery using TLV with artificial CO2 pneumothorax. Patients in the OLV group underwent surgery using OLV with a bronchial blocker. Patient characteristics and intraoperative and PPC data were collected and analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce confounding bias. Results: The TLV and OLV group comprised 513 and 80 patients, respectively. PSM matched 197 TLV group and 73 OLV group patients. Incidence of pneumonia within the first 3 days of surgery was higher in the TLV group (11.7% vs. 4.1%) but the difference was not significant (P=0.06). The incidence of infiltrates on chest radiography was 36.0% in the TLV group and 28.8% in the OLV group (P=0.26). Incidence of other major PPCs requiring treatment and major non-pulmonary postoperative complications did not significantly differ between the groups. Length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the TLV group (13.0 vs. 11.0 days; P=0.03). Conclusions: Compared with OLV with bronchial blockade, TLV with CO2 pneumothorax did not reduce the incidence of early PPCs after MIE.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax under two-lung ventilation and single-lumen endotracheal tube intubation.

Background: This study investigated the feasibility of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) performed under two-lung ventilation (TLV) and single-lumen endotracheal tube (SLET) intubation in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax. Methods: From January 2016 to December 2019, 344 patients who underwent VATS with spontaneous pneumothorax, whether primary or secondary, were enrolled. The surgery was performed through TLV using SLET intubation or one-lung ventilation (OLV) using double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLET) intubation. Patient data were collected retrospectively from medical records and compared with an emphasis on the time required for anesthesia and surgery. Results: The average anesthesia time was 72.6±17.8 min for TLV and 89.9±24.3 min for OLV (P<0.001). The average operating time was 42.1±16.2 min for TLV and 54.7±23.8 min for OLV (P<0.001). The average time from the onset of anesthesia to incision was 23.6±7.0 min for TLV and 27.6±9.5 min for OLV (P<0.001). There was no case of conversion to OLV using DLET intubation during surgery with TLV using SLET intubation. Removal of the chest tube took 1.6±1.1 days for the TLV group and 2.3±3.6 days for the OLV group (P=0.017). Patients were discharged at 2.7±1.2 days after surgery for the TLV group and 3.2±2.3 days after surgery for the OLV group (P=0.009). Conclusions: TLV using SLET intubation could shorten the time required for anesthesia-related procedures and surgery. In addition, it can be a beneficial surgical and anesthetic option for pneumothorax.

Two-lung ventilation or one-lung ventilation for esophagectomy: maybe the more is better from the evidence of meta-analysis.

One-lung ventilation (OLV) is the most commonly used ventilation strategy during esophagectomy. However, two-lung ventilation (TLV) with artificial pneumothorax has been applied in recent years during esophagectomy. It is unclear whether TLV takes advantages over OLV for esophagectomy. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the effects of TLV and OLV for esophagectomy. We searched relevant studies from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pubmed, and Embase in November 2020. We included studies that compared the effects of TLV with OLV in esophagectomy and provided sufficient perioperative and postoperative data. We extracted data of postoperative outcomes (postoperative pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak, hospital stay) and surgical variables (thoracic phrase time, blood loss, the number of total resected thoracic lymph nodes). We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and the weighted mean differences (WMDs) for continuous data. Six studies with 1725 patients were included in this meta-analysis. TLV was associated with significantly lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications [RR = 0.714; 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.534, 0.956); P = 0.023], shorter hospital stay [WMD = - 0.148; 95% CI = (- 0.246, - 0.051); P = 0.003], less blood loss [WMD = - 0.352; 95% CI = (- 0.528, - 0.176); P < 0.001] and more resected thoracic lymph nodes [WMD = 0.207; 95% CI = (0.003, 0.4120); P = 0.047] than OLV. Moreover, TLV consumed similar time for thoracic phrase [WMD = - 0.289; 95% CI = (- 0.661, 0.083); P = 0.128], and yielded a comparable rate of anastomotic leak [RR = 1.086; 95% CI = (0.842, 1.400); P = 0.525] compared with OLV. TLV with artificial pneumothorax resulted in less trauma than OLV. TLV with artificial pneumothorax is safe and could be a choice of ventilation strategy for esophagectomy.

Two-lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position: a systematic review.

Esophageal cancer surgery is still carrying a high risk of morbidity and mortality. That is why some anesthesia strategies have tried to reduce those postoperative complications. In this systematic review performed in accordance with the PRISMA-S guidelines (PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022310385)), we aimed to investigate the safety and advantages of two-lung ventilation (TLV) over one-lung ventilation (OLV) in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in the prone position. Seven trials, with a total number of 1710 patients (765 patients with TLV versus 945 patients with OLV) were included. Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were similar between TLV and OLV when realised for esophagectomy. Interestingly, we observed no difference in changes in intraoperative respiratory parameters, operative duration, thoraco-conversion rate, number of harvested lymph nodes, postoperative heart rate and respiratory rate between TLV and OLV. TLV brings better results in terms of intraoperative oxygen arterial pressure (PaO2) during the thoracic time, postoperative oxygenation, PaO2 on inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) ratio, duration of thoracic surgery, preoperative time, blood loss, temperature on postoperative day-1, and C-reactive protein dosage. Our study highlighted the safety of TLV for MIE in prone position when compared to OLV. Interestingly, we found better intra and postoperative ventilation parameters. The choice of ventilation modality did not influence clinical outcome after surgery and the quality of oncological resection. Large randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Resection of mediastinal goiter extending to the carina with use of artificial pneumothorax, two-lung ventilation, and thoracoscopy, with the patient in a prone position.

A 67-year-old woman was presented with a mediastinal tumor extending from the left lobe of the thyroid and passing through the posterior trachea, causing displacement of the esophagus to the left side of the patient and then descending into the right side of the mediastinum to below the carina. Surgery was performed under two-lung ventilation with the patient in a prone position; general anesthesia was performed with a single-lumen tube combined with artificial pneumothorax. In thoracoscopic surgery, we were able to confirm and preserve anatomical structures. After detachment of the tumor at the level of the left and right subclavian arteries, the patient was placed supine, a cervical incision was added, and the tumor was extracted. The tumor was diagnosed as a nonmalignant mediastinal goiter (MG). No such surgical report was found in the literature, and one would be useful for this new approach to MG removal.

A comparison between two lung ventilation with CO2 artificial pneumothorax and one lung ventilation during thoracic phase of minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the feasibility and safety of two lung ventilation with artificial pneumothorax in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) through a comparison with conventional one lung ventilation. METHODS: Eleven hundred and sixty-six patients with esophageal cancer, who underwent McKeown MIE in our center from February 2006 to December 2016, were studied retrospectively. Seven hundred and five patients who underwent one lung ventilation with double lumen endotracheal tube (DLET) were assigned to DLET group. Other 461 patients who underwent two lung ventilation with single lumen endotracheal tube (SLET) were assigned to SLET group. Clinical characteristics, surgical variables and complications were compared between two groups. RESULTS: There were comparable patient characteristics in two groups. Surgical variables and complications were discussed between two groups. SLET group seemed to have shorter operative time, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and more harvested recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph nodes than DLET group, which might be attributed to experienced surgeons. However, there were no significant differences of complications between two groups. Intraoperative clinical parameters were further studied. Before intubation and artificial pneumothorax, there were no significant differences between two groups, except diastolic blood pressure (DBP). With the application of artificial pneumothorax, patients in SLET group have obviously higher PO2, PCO2, and PetCO2 value, and slightly lower pH value and blood pressure during thoracic phase. After the thoracic phase, the changes induced by artificial pneumothorax in SLET group were gradually reversed and clinical parameters gradually return to normal level. CONCLUSIONS: Two lung ventilation with artificial pneumothorax is a safe and feasible choice during MIE.

Better perioperative outcomes in thoracoscopic-esophagectomy with two-lung ventilation in semi-prone position.

BACKGROUND: One-lung ventilation (OLV) anesthesia intubation route is often used in patients undergoing thoracoscopic-esophagectomy in semi-prone position. Recently, the two-lung ventilation (TLV) approach becomes popular. However, limited studies have compared the two ventilation approaches in parallel. Here, we report a single-center, retrospective study of comparing TLV and OLV approach in patients undergoing thoracoscopic-esophagectomy in semi-prone position. METHODS: From January 2013 to November 2014, 147 patients were enrolled into the current study and were given thoracoscopic-esophagectomy in semi-prone position either by OLV or TLV. Intraoperative respiratory functional data and perioperative surgical parameters of the two approaches were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 147 patients, 64 patients received OLV and 83 patients received TLV, and all of them were successfully under gone thoracoscopic procedures without conversion to open thoracotomy. There was no incidence of major intraoperative complications or perioperative death. There were no statistically different in postoperative respiratory complications, either. However, TLV approach resulted in better intraoperative respiratory function (PaCO2, PaO2, SaO2), shorter preparation time for anesthesia induction, less blood loss, shorter thoracoscopic operating time and less postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative respiratory complications and quantity of the resected thoracic lymph node showed no difference between the two ventilation approach (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that TLV intubation approach is superior to OLV approach during the thoracoscopic-esophagectomy in semi-prone position. According to this, TLV approach is a technically feasible, convenient and safe anesthesia induction approach for esophageal cancer surgery.

Thoracoscopic resection of bulky thymoma assisted with artificial pneumothorax: A report of 19 consecutive cases.

The aim of the present study was to examine the feasibility and efficacy of thoracoscopic radical resection of large retrosternal thymoma using artificial pneumothorax. A retrospective analysis was performed on 19 patients with bulky thymoma who underwent thoracoscopic resection using artificial pneumothorax by CO2 insufflation. The operations were performed with unilateral or bilateral thoracic incisions via single lumen endotracheal intubation and two-lung ventilation. This approach provided excellent exposure of the thoracic cavity and reliable control of the neuro-vascular structures in the anterior mediastinum, which was of vital importance for the extended resection of malignant thymoma. The operation time was 140.0±51.4 min without conversion to thoracotomy or sternotomy. The pathological diagnosis was confirmed by immunohistochemistry, including 5 cases of thymus lipomyoma, 1 case of thymus hyperplasia, 1 case of thymus cyst, 2 cases of type AB thymoma, 4 cases of type B1 thymoma, 4 cases of type B3 thymoma, and 2 cases of thymic carcinoma. Furthermore, there were no complications such as recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, phrenic nerve injury, pulmonary infection or atelectasis, with a hospital stay of 5.0±3.0 days. In conclusion, the thoracoscopic resection of thymoma using artificial pneumothorax is a preferable approach, that may be considered for patients with bulky retrosternal tumors.