Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Allergy ; 74(7): 1317-1326, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30589088

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis (AR) may increase the risk of developing or worsening asthma, whereas treatment of AR with subcutaneously or sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) may slow this progression. METHODS: In a retrospective real-world analysis, prescription fulfilment data were gathered from French retail pharmacies between 1 March 2012 and 31 December 2016. Using linear regression analyses, patients having received at least two prescriptions of grass pollen SLIT tablets over at least 2 successive years were compared with control patients having received symptomatic medications only. RESULTS: A total of 1099 SLIT patients and 27 475 control patients were included in the main analysis. With regard to symptomatic AR medication dispensing, we observed a 50% decrease in the pre-index/follow-up ratio in the SLIT group, a 30% increase in the control group without age matching (P < 0.0001 vs SLIT) and a 20% increase in the control group with age matching (P < 0.0001 vs SLIT). During the follow-up, 11 (1.8%) and 782 (5.3%) patients initiated asthma treatment in the SLIT and control groups, respectively. The relative risk of medication dispensing for new asthma was lower in the SLIT group (by 62.5% [29.1%-80.1%] without age matching (P = 0.0025) and by 63.7% [31.5%-80.7%] with age matching; P = 0.0018). SLIT was also associated with slower progression of asthma medication dispensing during the follow-up period, relative to the control group (regression coefficient: -0.58 [-0.74 to 0.42] without age matching (P < 0.0001) and -0.61 [-0.76 to -0.46] with age matching; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Prescription of grass pollen SLIT tablets reduced the dispensing of AR and asthma medications in real life.


Assuntos
Alérgenos , Asma/epidemiologia , Pólen , Rinite Alérgica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/imunologia , Asma/imunologia , Asma/terapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Pólen/imunologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rinite Alérgica/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica/terapia , Comprimidos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 57(9): 437-444, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31232279

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Antipsychotics exhibit different profiles of efficacy and safety in patients with schizophrenia. It has recently been reported that the risk of rehospitalization was the lowest with paliperidone palmitate (PP), a long-acting injectable (LAI), when compared with other LAIs (of zuclopenthixol, perphenazine, and olanzapine). We aimed to investigate whether treating patients with PP was also associated with improved real-life treatment persistence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of the LAI antipsychotics (LAIAs) dispensed in French retail pharmacies. Treatment persistence was defined as the non-discontinuation of LAIAs for ≥ 5 months after LAIA initiation (and was also analyzed by Kaplan-Meier persistence curves). RESULTS: A total of 4,492 patients were included in the study. The persistence rate was significantly greater for LAI-PP (64.5%) than for either LAI haloperidol decanoate (HD) or LAI risperidone microspheres (R) (46.4% and 35.4%, respectively). Multivariate Cox analyses illustrated that LAIA initiation with HD or R significantly increased the risk of discontinuation when compared with PP. CONCLUSION: PP demonstrated a significantly higher persistence rate than HD or R. Moreover, LAIA initiation with HD or R significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation relative to PP. Further comparative studies are required to comprehensively determine whether PP has a better efficacy and/or safety profile than other LAIs.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/farmacocinética , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Preparações de Ação Retardada , França , Haloperidol/análogos & derivados , Haloperidol/farmacocinética , Humanos , Injeções , Palmitato de Paliperidona/farmacocinética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risperidona/farmacocinética
3.
Dermatology ; 228(4): 344-9, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24662194

RESUMO

The frequency of associated comorbidity and the cost of treatments in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) followed up in primary care settings are poorly known. We carried out a retrospective cohort study on a longitudinal electronic medical records database of patients consulting a panel of general practitioners in France. All subjects with AD diagnosed during the first year of life were selected and matched with infants without the disease according to sex (1,163 vs. 1,163). Subjects were followed up for 9 years. Associated diseases, drug consumptions and available medical costs were detailed. Comparisons between subjects and controls were carried out. Subjects with AD had more comorbidities than others, especially in respiratory and ophthalmic system organs. The number of prescribed treatments in the field of skin diseases as well as overall medical costs (general practitioner consultations and prescribed drugs) were higher among atopic subjects, but differences were attenuated with age.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Oftalmopatias/epidemiologia , Medicina Geral/economia , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Dermatite Atópica/economia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Emolientes/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Seguimentos , França/epidemiologia , Medicina Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Doenças Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esteroides/uso terapêutico
4.
Ann Endocrinol (Paris) ; 82(2): 99-106, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33417963

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Different countries have their own systems for evaluating new medicines, and they make decisions as to when and how each new medicine is adopted. PURPOSE: To compare the rate of uptake of new diabetes medicines (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors [DPP-4Is], glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [GLP1-RAs], and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors [SGLT2Is]) in the five most populated European countries. METHODS: The monthly volume of sales of antidiabetic drugs was extracted for each country from the IQVIA™ MIDAS® database for the period 2007 to 2016 and the defined daily doses (DDDs) were calculated. For each new drug, market shares were expressed as a percentage of the total market of non-insulin antidiabetic agents. RESULTS: Sharp differences were observed between the countries. Overall, the highest and fastest rates of uptake were seen for Germany and Spain, compared to lower rates for the UK and Italy. This was especially marked for DPP-4Is, where the market share reached over 30% of non-insulin antidiabetic drugs in Germany and Spain, compared to around 10% in the UK and Italy. In France, there was an initial rapid uptake, which stabilized at around 20% after three years. Rates of uptake were lower for the other drugs, with the GLP1-RAs reaching a market share of 2.5-4.5% in Germany, Spain and France, compared to less than 2.5% in the UK and Italy. The SGLT2Is reached a market share of 5-8% in Spain and Germany, compared to less than 4% in the UK and Italy, and they were not launched at all in France in March 2020. CONCLUSION: The differences in the uptake of new antidiabetic drugs may reflect different methods for assessing and introducing new medicines, as well as cultural factors. The uptake of the new medicines would appear to be more cautious in the UK and Italy, perhaps due to concerns about cost-effectiveness, whereas in Germany and Spain, and possibly also France, a new medicine's potential benefits may be prioritized.


Assuntos
Comércio , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Comportamento do Consumidor/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , França , Alemanha , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/provisão & distribuição , Itália , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/economia , Espanha , Reino Unido
5.
J Med Econ ; 20(9): 974-981, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28682153

RESUMO

AIMS: Data highlighting the cost drivers for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients in terms of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment and monitoring are lacking in France. This study aimed to evaluate the real-life daily cost of VKA treatment in 2013, in French patients suffering from NVAF. METHODS: This longitudinal observational study was performed using the EGB (Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires) database, a random sample of the French national insurance (NHI) database, which covers 80% of the population. All adult patients whose first NVAF anticoagulant treatment in 2013 was a VKA were analyzed. Costs were calculated for the duration of follow-up and then divided by the number of days of therapy. The analysis was performed both from the French NHI perspective (amount reimbursed by the NHI) and from a collective perspective. RESULTS: In this study, 3,254 NVAF patients treated with VKA in 2013 were included, and this sample comprised 52.6% males. The mean daily cost of VKA treatment was €1.13 (±1.18) according to the collective perspective (89.4% of this cost was associated to INR measurement) and €1.05 (±1.16) according to the NHI perspective. LIMITATIONS: As diagnoses associated with procedures are not available in the EGB database, proxies were used, and an algorithm was created to define the AF population. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis is the first to consider an exhaustive spectrum of the costs of VKA treatment in France using EGB data. VKA medication requires exhaustive follow-up, and, thus, associated costs are important. The results of the present study confirmed this close follow-up for VKA patients, making the cost of treatment by VKA nearly 10-times more expensive than the cost of medication itself.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/economia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inibidores , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Coeficiente Internacional Normatizado , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Honorários por Prescrição de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
Adv Ther ; 33(7): 1180-98, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27230988

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients with gout have numerous comorbidities. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence rates of renal and cardiovascular morbidities in trial-aligned patients with established gout in Germany (DE), the United Kingdom (UK), the United States (US), and France (FR). METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study used retrospective data from IMS Disease Analyzer™ (DE, FR), Clinical Practice Research Datalink-Hospital Episode Statistics (UK), and IMS' PharMetrics Plus database linked with outpatient laboratory results (US). Included patients were ≥18 years at index date (January 1, 2010; all dates +1 year for FR), with continuous enrollment during the pre-index year, had "prevalent established gout" determined by data in the pre-index year, and ≥1 documented visit after index date; additional inclusion/exclusion criteria were aligned with recent gout clinical trials. Look-back for comorbidity prevalence extended to January 1, 2003 (US: January 1, 2009). Follow-up for incidence extended from index date to at most March 26, 2013 (FR: May 31, 2014). Events of interest were identified by diagnostic codes and/or laboratory data. RESULTS: The trial-aligned cohorts included 35,118 (DE), 24,607 (UK), 121,591 (US), and 17,338 (FR) patients. Among renal conditions, baseline diagnosis of chronic kidney disease/renal failure was most prevalent in the UK followed by DE; abnormal serum creatinine was most prevalent in the UK. Hypertension was the most prevalent cardiovascular diagnosis in all countries, followed by ischemic heart disease (IHD) and myocardial infarction. Incidence rates (per 100 patient-years) for new/worsening renal impairment ranged from 1.67 (DE) to 4.34 (US) and for nephrolithiasis diagnosis from 0.31 (FR) to 3.79 (US). The incidence rates for hypertension diagnosis were highest among cardiovascular-related events, ranging from 3.23 (UK) to 20.27 (US), followed by IHD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with established gout such as those included in gout trials have a high burden of established morbidity and new diagnoses of morbid events. Consideration of comorbidities, which greatly exacerbate disease burden, is important in gout management. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Gota/epidemiologia , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Gota/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos
7.
Rheumatol Ther ; 3(1): 53-75, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27747520

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to assess disease control, health resource utilization (HRU), and healthcare costs, and their predictors in gout patients across the USA, UK, Germany, and France. METHODS: Data were extracted from the PharMetrics Plus (USA), Clinical Practice Research Datalink-Hospital Episode Statistics (UK), and Disease Analyzer databases (Germany and France) for adult gout patients over a 3-year period: 2009-2011 (all dates +1 year for France). Patients had "prevalent established gout" (i.e., were treated with urate-lowering therapy [ULT] or eligible for ULT based on American College of Rheumatology guidelines) in the preindex panel-year, with January 1 of the second study year as the study index date. Assessments of disease control (uncontrolled gout definition: ≥1 serum urate (sUA) elevation or ≥2 flares; analysis limited to the subpopulation with sUA) data, HRU, and costs were in the second post-index panel-year, while potential predictors (demographics and gout treatment characteristics) were identified in the first post-index panel-year. RESULTS: Treatment rates were high (>70% with chronic urate-lowering treatment in all countries but France), while between 31.3% (France) and 62.9% (USA) of patients remained uncontrolled. Predictors of control included female gender and high adherence. In Germany, the UK, and France, lack of disease control predicted increased gout-attributed costs and increased HRU, both gout-attributed (also in the USA) and non-gout-attributed. CONCLUSION: Gout management remains suboptimal, as many patients remain uncontrolled despite using urate-lowering treatment. Effective and convenient treatment options are needed to improve disease control and minimize additional HRU and costs. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA