ABSTRACT
A doença arterial coronariana (DAC) é umas das doenças cardiovasculares que mais mata no Brasil e no mundo. É uma doença multifatorial, associada a fatores de risco modificáveis. Além dos tratamentos convencionais, é recomendado que pacientes com DAC também incluam modificações no estilo de vida e programas de reabilitação cardiovascular com ênfase no exercício físico (RCEE) em seu tratamento. Sabidamente, o exercício físico regular somado às mudanças no estilo de vida contribui para a diminuição do avanço da doença aterosclerótica e da mortalidade dos pacientes com DAC. Além disso, o exercício físico tem impacto benéfico na capacidade funcional e qualidade de vida. Um programa de RCEE é uma estratégia eficaz, segura e com excelente razão de custo-benefício para o tratamento da DAC. Contudo, mesmo sendo uma terapia recomendada pelos principais órgãos de saúde, no Brasil as políticas públicas de saúde são extremamente escassas e a quantidade de centros especializados que oferecem a RCEE também é baixa. Problemas de adesão, participação e motivação são evidentes quando os programas são avaliados. Esta revisão mostra os principais estudos que, ao longo das últimas décadas, deram base para as recomendações da RCEE e faz uma análise crítica do cenário atual, deixando claro que novas estratégias de atuação e monitoramento devem ser exploradas e incentivadas para que os programas de RCEE sejam incluídos efetivamente no tratamento dos pacientes com DAC
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the most lethal cardiovascular diseases both in Brazil and worldwide. It is a multifactorial disease associated with modifiable risk factors. In addition to conventional treatments, it is recommended that patients with CAD also include lifestyle changes and exercise-based cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) programs in their treatment. It is well known that regular physical exercise combined with lifestyle changes contributes to a reduction in the progression of atherosclerosis and in mortality in patients with CAD. Moreover, physical exercise has a beneficial impact on functional capacity and quality of life. A CR program is an effective, safe strategy for the treatment of CAD with an excellent cost-benefit ratio. However, even though it is a therapy recommended by the main health agencies, public health policies in Brazil are extremely scarce and the number of specialized centers that offer CR is low. Problems of adherence, participation, and motivation are evident when these programs are evaluated. This review looks at the main studies that have been the basis for the recommendations of CR over last decades and critically analyzes the current scenario, making it clear that new strategies for action and monitoring should be explored and encouraged such that CR programs will be included effectively in the treatment of patients with CAD
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Coronary Artery Disease , Exercise , Cardiac Rehabilitation/methods , Quality of Life , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Chronic Disease/mortality , Risk Factors , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Heart RateABSTRACT
Abstract Aim: This study tested the hypothesis that: 1- the exercise training would improve the heart rate recovery (HRR) decline after maximal exercise test in hypertensive patients and; 2- the exercise training would normalize HRR decline when compared to normotensive individuals. Methods: Sixteen hypertensive patients were consecutively allocated into two groups: Exercise-trained (n = 9, 47±2 years) and untrained (n = 7, 42±3 years). An exercise-trained normotensive group (n = 11, 41±2 years) was also studied. Heart rate was evaluated by electrocardiogram. The autonomic function was evaluated based on heart rate changes on the first and the second min of recovery after the maximal exercise test. Exercise training consisted of three 60-minute exercise sessions/week for 4 months. Results: In hypertensive patients, exercise training significantly increased the HRR decline in the first (-19±2 vs. -34±3 bpm, P = 0.001) and second (-33±3 vs. -49±2 bpm, P = 0.006) minutes after the maximal exercise test. In addition, after exercise training, the initial differences in the HRR decline after exercise between hypertensive patients and normotensive individuals were no longer observed (first minute: -34±3 vs. -29±3 bpm, P = 0.52, and second minute: -49±2 vs. -47±4 bpm, P = 0.99). Conclusion: Hypertension causes a delay in HRR after the maximal exercise test yet the exercise training normalizes HRR during the post-exercise period in hypertensive patients.