Surgical treatment for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To retrospectively analyze efficacy of single structure internal fixation and double structure internal fixation in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fracture, and analyze their indications.@*METHODS@#From June 2015 to December 2020, 21 patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and femoral neck fracture were treated, including 14 males and 7 females, aged 23 to 69 years old with an average of(38.1±12.9) years old. According to different femoral shaft fracture sites, some patients were fixed with cephalomedullary implant for both femoral neck and the femoral shaft(single structure, InterTan or PFNA Ⅱ), some patients were fixed with cannulated screws for the femoral neck and a retrograde locking nail for the femoral shaft (dual structure), and postoperative function and complications were recorded during follow-up. In 10 cases of single-structure fixation, the femoral necks were all basicervical fractures, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the proximal isthmus;11 cases were double-structure fixation, 9 cases in 11 were basal type of femoral neck, 2 cases in 11 were neck type, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the isthmus and the distal isthmus.@*RESULTS@#All patients were followed up for 12 to 27 months. No femoral head necrosis, deformity, delay or nonunion occurred in the patients with single-structure fixation, and no delayed union or nonunion occurred in femoral shaft fractures;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with single-structure fixation was 91.8±4.1, with 8 cases were excellent and 2 cases were good. The fractures of patients with dual-structure fixation achieved good union without femoral head necrosis, except 1 case of femoral shaft fracture had delayed union;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with dual-structure fixation was 92.4±5.9, 7 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 1 case was fair.@*CONCLUSION@#Good reduction and fixation is the key to the treatment of such fractures. Both the single-structure fixation and the dual-structure fixation are good methods, and it should be selected according to the locations of femoral shaft and femoral neck fractures. Single-structure fixation is a good choice for femoral shaft fractures located at the proximal isthmus and basal femoral neck fractures. For isthmus and distal femoral shaft fractures combined with ipsilateral femoral neck fractures, dual-structure fixation is recommended.

Factors affecting the outcome of surgical treatment for intertrochanteric fractures / 中华创伤杂志

Objective:To investigate the factors affecting the outcome of surgical treatment for femoral intertrochanteric fractures.Methods:A retrospective case series study was conducted for 424 patients with intertrochanteric fractures admitted to four hospitals in Shanghai from January 2014 to December 2016. There were 200 males and 224 females, aged 45-98 years [(77.8±10.5)years]. Normal union was observed in 326 patients (normal union group), and abnormal union was founded in 98 patients including nonunion in 2 patients (abnormal union group). Data were recorded including the age, gender, injury side, AO classification, Evans-Jesen classification, thickness of femoral lateral wall, medial support, tip-apex distance, and screw position within the femoral head. Fracture healing was assessed. Univariate analysis was conducted to examine differences of the above factors between two groups, and Logistic regression was used to screen the main factors affecting fracture union. At the latest follow-up, the hip joint function was estimated according to the Oxford score system.Results:All patients were followed up for 1-3 years [(2.2±0.3)years]. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between two groups regarding the AO classification, Evans-Jesen classification, medial support, tip-apex distance, and screw position within the femoral head ( P<0.05). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the simple fracture ( OR=1.030), medial support ( OR=0.395), tip-apex distance ≤25 mm ( OR=0.266) and inferior screw position ( OR=0.986) were significantly related to fracture union. The hip function in normal union group was (42.6±4.5)points, better than (35.4±3.2)points in abnormal union group ( P<0.05). Conclusion:The stability of intertrochanteric fracture is the most important factor for fracture union. The medial support, tip-apex distance ≤25 mm and inferior screw position are helpful to promote fracture healing and recovery of hip joint function.

Inhibitory effect of recombinant adenovirus-mediated mouse endostatin on pulmonary metastasis of osteosarcoma cell line MG-63 in nude mice / 中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志

Objective:To construct an adenovirus-mediated mouse endostatin vector (Ad-mEndo) and to observe its inhibitory effect on the pulmonary metastasis of osteosarcoma in nude mice, so as to discuss the relationship between ES expression and the pulmonary metastasis of osteosarcoma. Methods: Recombinant adenovirus plasmid pDC315-mEndo was constructed and used to prepare recombinant Ad-mEndo. Osteosarcoma MG-63 cells were subcutaneously injected into the right fore limbs to establish nude mouse model of osteosarcoma; and the models were randomly divided into 3 groups: Ad-mEndo group, Ad-EGFP group and PBS group; animals receiving no transplantation served as blank control. The corresponding agents were injected (20 ?l per time) for a consecutive of 5 times on a weekly basis. The tumor volumes, histopathological characteristics were observed; ELISA was employed to examine the serum ES level. Animals were sacrificed 7 weeks later and the pulmonary metastasis was observed. Results: Sixteen days later,the tumor volume was (1.53?0.05)cm3 in Ad-EGFP group, (1.56?0.07)cm3 in the PBS group, and (0.91?0.03)cm3 in the Ad-mEndo group, with the tumor inhibitory rate being 40.7% in the last group. The serum ES level in the Ad-mEndo group was significantly higher than that of the other groups (P