Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
J. appl. oral sci ; J. appl. oral sci;20(3): 357-361, May-June 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-643734

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Lingual orthodontics is becoming more popular in dental practice. The purpose of the present investigation was to compare plaque formation on teeth bonded with the same bracket onto buccal or lingual surface, with non-bonded control teeth, via an in vivo growth experiment over a 30-day period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with split-mouth design was set up enrolling 20 dental students. Within each subject sites with buccal and lingual brackets and control sites were followed. Clinical periodontal parameters (periodontal pocket depth: PPD; bleeding on probing: BOP) were recorded at baseline and on days 1, 7 and 30. Microbiological samples were taken from the brackets and the teeth on days 1, 7 and 30 to detect colony-forming units (CFU). Total CFU, streptococci CFU and anaerobe CFU were measured. RESULTS: No significant differences (P>0.05) were found between buccal and lingual brackets in terms of clinical periodontal parameters and microbiological values. Conclusion: Bracket position does not have significant impact on bacterial load and on periodontal parameters.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Dental Plaque/microbiology , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Orthodontic Brackets/microbiology , Periodontium/microbiology , Bacteria, Anaerobic/growth & development , Colony Count, Microbial , Dental Bonding , Surface Properties , Streptococcus/growth & development , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL