A twenty-year review of clinical liver transplantation / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective To review the development of adult and pediatric liver transplantation in Tianjin First Center Hospital, and to enhance academic exchanges, improve technological innovation, and jointly promote the progress and maturity in the field of liver transplantation. Methods The development of liver transplantation in Tianjin First Center Hospital was analyzed. The clinical data of adult and pediatric liver transplantation from September 1998 to September 2018 were collected. The important events and technological innovation achievements of liver transplantation during the 20 years were summarized. Results The first clinical liver transplantation was attempted in Tianjin First Central Hospital in April 1980. The first long-term survival adult liver transplantation in China was completed in 1994 (11 years survival after the operation). The specialized team of liver transplantation was formally established in September 1998. The 20-year clinical exploration and progress reflected the characteristics of era changes and technological innovation during the rapid development of liver transplantation in China. Our center performed liver re-transplantation in January 1999, reduced-size pediatric liver transplantation in August 2000. In May 2001, we organized the formulation for the preventive and treatment plan for hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation. We performed combined liver and kidney transplantation in July 2002, split liver transplantation (SLT) in April 2004, the first domino liver transplantation (DLT) in August 2005. Pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was initiated in October 2006, adult LDLT was carried out in August 2007. In September 2007, the first living donor combined liver and kidney transplantation from the same donor in Asia was performed. The first domino+living donor double grafts liver transplantation in the world was performed in January 2009. In March 2011, we performed laparoscopically assisted right hepatic lobe liver transplantation (LDLT) with middle hepatic vein. In May 2014, living donor laparoscopic left lateral lobe procurement was successfully established. In April 2016, simultaneous liver, pancreas and kidney multi-organ transplantation was completed. Domino donor-auxiliary liver transplantation was performed in February 2017. In December 2017, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-supported liver transplantation in a patient with severe pulmonary hypertension was successfully completed. Liver transplantation combined with partial splenectomy was established in April 2018. Cross-domino liver transplantation (hypersensitive kidney transplantation with auxiliary liver transplantation+pediatric liver transplantation) was performed in May 2018. During the 20 years, the team has performed or assisted other centers in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen to carry out more than 10 000 cases of liver transplantations. A total of 7 043 cases of various types of liver transplantation were performed in the single center of the hospital (6 005 adult liver transplantations and 1 038 pediatric liver transplantations). Concerning adult liver transplantation, the cumulative 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rate from September 1998 to March 2003 were 83.1%, 73.0% and 69.0%, from April 2003 to March 2009 were 85.3%, 76.2% and 72.1% and from April 2009 to September 2018 were 87.5%, 79.2% and 75.1%, respectively. The cumulative 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rate for pediatric liver transplantation were 93.5%, 92.2% and 90.2%, respectively. The nucleoside (acid) analogue combined with low dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) was developed to prevent the recurrence of hepatitis B after liver transplantation, this plan has reduced the recurrence rate of hepatitis B and the 5-year re-infection rate of hepatitis B virus (HBV) after liver transplantation significantly. The risk assessment system for tumor recurrence after liver transplantation was established and individual treatment method was established based on this assessment system. Continuous exploration and improvement of liver transplantation for liver cancer, liver re-transplantation, liver transplantation with portal vein thrombosis, SLT, DLT and multi-organ combined transplantation have significantly improved the clinical efficacy of patients and the post-operative survival rate. Conclusions The liver transplantation team of Tianjin First Center Hospital has carried out a scientific and technological exploration on the key problems and technical difficulties of clinical liver transplantation. This work strongly has initiated and promoted the rapid development of liver transplantation in China. The restrictive barrier of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation has been overcome. The risk prevention and control system of tumor recurrence after liver transplantation has been established. A series of innovative achievements that can be popularized have been achieved in the field of complex liver transplantation and expansion of donor liver source. The iterative progress and sustainable development of liver transplantation have been realized.

Comparison of clinical effects between pediatric living donor liver transplantation and deceased donor liver transplantation / 天津医药

Objective To analyze and evaluate the efficacy of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Methods The clinical data of prognosis and influencing factors of 320 children with liver transplantation were analyzed retrospectively. The 320 children were divided into LDLT group (n=252) and DDLT group (n=68) based on their operation styles. In LDLT group, all donors to recipients were immediate relatives within three generation. In DDLT group, all livers were obtained from cardiac death or brain death donors. The survival and incidence of complications were observed between two groups. Results The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year cumulative survival rates for recipients were 95.1%, 93.5% and 93.5% in LDLT group, and 92.3%, 92.3% and 82.4% in LDLT group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (Log-rank χ2=0.69,P=0.41). During the follow-up period,14 cases died (5.56%) in LDLT group, in which 8 deaths due to respiratory complication, 3 deaths due to multiple organ failure, and 3 deaths due to graft failure. In DDLT donor group, 5 cases died (7.35%), in which 1 death due to respiratory complication, 2 deaths due to multiple organ failure, 1 death due to intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and 1 case of unknown cause of death. There were no significant differences in portal vein thrombosis (PVT), outflow tract obstruction, biliary tract complications and pulmonary infection between the two groups (P>0.05). The ratio of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was lower in LDLT group than that of DDLT group (1.98%vs. 10.29%,χ2=10.245,P<0.01). Conclusion Living donor liver transplantation is an effective method to treat end-stage liver disease.

The risk factors of splenic arterial steal syndrome after orthotopic liver transplantation / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To discuss the risk factors of splenic arterial steal syndrome (SASS) after orthotopic liver transplantation.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Twenty-four cases who confirmed SASS after liver transplantation in Tianjin First Central Hospital between June 2005 and June 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. Another 96 cases were selected randomly from those patients of the same time with no complication of SASS patients postoperatively as control group. Clinical data of two groups including diameter of splenic artery and hepatic artery preoperatively, weight of graft, weight of recipients, cold/warm ischemia time, an hepatic period and operation time and so on were collected. Others including hepatic artery peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), blood flow resistance index and portal vein average velocity (PVF) on the first day after liver transplantation, the day before diagnosis, the day when diagnosed, the 1, 3, 7 days after treatment in SASS group and on 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 14 days after liver transplantation in control group. Statistical analysis were made between two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The splenic artery/hepatic artery ratio preoperatively and weight of donor liver,and the GRWR in SASS group and control group were 1.26 and 1.00, 1 032 g and 1 075 g, (1.40±0.30)% and (1.82±0.21)% respectively, with significantly statistical differences (Z=-6.40, Z=-2.22, t=-6.50; all P<0.05). The warm ischemia time, the cold ischemia time, the anhepatic period and operation time in SASS group and control group were 3.5 minutes and 4.0 minutes, 10.25 hours and 10.10 hours, 43 minutes and 45 minutes, 8.7 hours and 8.7 hours, with no significantly statistical differences (all P>0.05). RI of hepatic went up gradually in the early time after transplantation while dropped obviously when spleen artery spring coils embolization was received (P<0.01) and trended to stable two weeks later.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Splenic artery/hepatic artery ratio and GRWR are the positive and negative risk factors respectively for SASS. The gradual rising of hepatic RI in the early time after transplantation may be the warning signal SASS and spleen artery spring coils embolization is the effective strategy for SASS after liver transplantation.</p>

Changes and significance of urine kidney injury molecule-1in liver transplant recipients concurrent with early-stage acute kidney injury / 中华器官移植杂志

ObjectiveTo investigate the changes and significance of urine kidney injury molecule-1(KIM-1) in liver transplant recipients concurrent with early-stage acute kidney injury (AKI).MethodsThe clinical data of orthotopic liver transplantation in 50 cases was retrospectively analyzed.According to the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria and whether there was AKI for recipients after operation,the recipients were divided into AKI group (27 cases) and non-AKI group (23 cases).Serum creatinine (SCr),urine creatinine (UCr) and urine KIM-1were determined at the scheduled time points,and relationship between urine KIM-1and AK1was analyzed.By using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC),the diagnostic accuracy of urine KIM-1for AKI was evaluated.ResultsThe level of SCr reached the highest in two groups at 24 h postoperation,that in AKI group was significantly higher than in non-AKI group (P＜0.05),and then gradually decreased to the preoperative level.The level of urine KIM-1was significantly increased immediately at the time of portal vein reperfusion in two groups,and that in AKI group reached the peak at 2nd h after portal vein reperfusion,significantly higher than in non-AKI group (P＜0.01),which continued 12 h after the portal vein reperfusion.The results showed that the sensitivity was 82.6％ and the specificity was 88.9％ when the urine KIM-114.19 ng/g Ucr was taken as the cutoff to the diagnosis of AKI two h after portal vein repeffusion.ConclusionThe level of urine KIM-1is a reliable biomarker to diagnose AKI after liver transplantation.The intraoperative changes of urine KIM-1may be helpful to early prediction of AKI,for recipients with preoperative normal renal function.