ABSTRACT
Legionnaires' disease is a well recognized cause of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) all around the world. In Latin America its incidence remains unknown. This study analyzed a cohort of 9 patients with CAP due to Legionella pneumophila observed from 1997 to 2001, in the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, University of Buenos Aires. Clinical history included recent illnesses, work exposure, physical exam, prior antibiotic use and severity of illness criteria. None of the 9 patients had a history of recent travels, and 4 of them required admission in intensive care unit (ICU). Seven patients had a cigarette smoking history, four of them also had COPD, and one patient had a non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This study confirms the low specificity of clinical and general laboratory criteria to predict this etiology. Legionella isolation is difficult, and serological testing allows retrospective diagnosis but takes several weeks, while urinary antigen test gives a bed-side diagnosis. When Legionella appears in isolated cases, as happens in Argentina, it should be necessary to have a high index of suspicion to successfully arrive at an etiological diagnosis. Legionella pneumophila is a pathogen causing CAP in our area. A surveillance should be established preferably focused on selected populations including severe CAP, immunocompromised hosts and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
La enfermedad de los legionarios es una causa de neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC)reconocida en todo el mundo. En Latinoamérica su incidencia es desconocida. En este estudiose analizó a 9 pacientes con NAC por Legionella pneumophila atendidos entre 1997 y 2001 en el Hospital deClínicas José de San Martín de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Se registraron datos de antecedentes, enfermedad actual, contactos, exposición laboral, examen físico, pruebas de laboratorio y uso previo de antibióticos, y se tomó en cuenta la presencia de criterios de gravedad. Nueve pacientes presentaron diagnóstico de NAC por Legionella, ninguno refirió antecedentes de viajes recientes; cuatro de ellos debieron ser internados en unidades de cuidado intensivo. Siete pacientes tenían antecedentes de tabaquismo, 4 tenían EPOC y un paciente linfoma no-Hodgkin. Nuestra casuística corrobora la baja especificidad de la clínica y estudios complementarios para predecir esta etiología. El aislamiento de Legionella es dificultoso, la seroconversión permite eldiagnóstico retrospectivo y requiere plazos prolongados y el antígeno urinario aporta un diagnóstico inmediato.Cuando la legionelosis aparece en casos aislados, como ocurriría en Argentina, si no se piensa en esta etiologíano se llegará al diagnóstico. Legionella pneumophila es un patógeno de NAC en nuestro medio, debe buscarsemejor, particularmente en pacientes graves, inmunodeprimidos y en fumadores con enfermedad pulmonarobstructiva crónica (EPOC).
Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Legionnaires' Disease/complications , Legionella pneumophila , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Argentina , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tobacco Use Disorder/adverse effectsABSTRACT
The ability of the API 20 NE method (6.0 version, bio-Mérieux, Marcy LEtoile, France) to identify 188 strains of gram negative nonfermentative bacilli (NFB) was evaluated (Fenazinic pigment producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. were excluded). These were isolated from patients treated at the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín of the University of Buenos Aires during the period 1996-2001. Strains were identified according to the Schreckenberger P testing method. Out of 188 NFB strains, 175 (93.09
) were correctly identified by the API 20 NE method at the genus and species level (IC95 = 88.47-96.27) while 61 (32.45
) required additional testing for correct identification. Thirteen strains (6.91
; IC95 3.73-11.53) could not be correctly identified and none of them were classified as [quot ]non identified[quot ]. The API 20 NE method is a practical, easy to handle, fast and useful system for the identification of NFB since conventional manual methods take longer and require many biochemical, enzymatic and physiological tests which are sometimes not available depending on the size and capability of the laboratory. Although it is easy to handle, the API 20 NE identification system must be interpreted by an expert microbiologist who must compare the results obtained by this system with the information provided by the distinctive cultures and mobility patterns of these organisms.