Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop;54: e00902021, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1288081

ABSTRACT

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance has worsened since the onset of COVID-19. METHODS: This study involved patients admitted to the adult intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary hospital. Pre- and post-COVID-19 data were analyzed. The healthcare-related infections (HCRIs) reported between January 2018 and January 2020 and during the pandemic between February and July 2020 were compared. RESULTS: Antimicrobial resistance increased during the pandemic, especially for Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, with a rate increase from 5% to 50% for Polymyxin B. CONCLUSIONS: The susceptibilities of the main pathogens associated with HCRIs in the ICU changed and should be considered in managing severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Cross Infection/drug therapy , COVID-19 , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Delivery of Health Care , Tertiary Care Centers , SARS-CoV-2 , Intensive Care Units , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
2.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop;54: e02102021, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1288083

ABSTRACT

Abstract INTRODUCTION: This epidemiological household survey aimed to estimate the prevalence of the current and past SARS-CoV-2 infections in Ribeirão Preto, a municipality of southeast Brazil. METHODS: The survey was conducted in two phases using a clustered sampling scheme. The first phase spanned May 1-3 and involved 709 participants. The second phase spanned June 11-14, 2020, and involved 646 participants. RESULTS: During the first phase, RT-PCR performed on nasopharyngeal swabs was positive at 0.14%. The serological tests were positive in 1.27% of the patients during the first phase and 2.79% during the second phase. People living in households with more than five members had a prevalence of 10.83% (95%CI: 1.58-74.27) higher than those living alone or with someone other. Considering the proportion of the positive serological test results with sex and age adjustments, approximately 2.37% (95%CI: 1.32-3.42) of the population had been cumulatively infected by mid-June 2020, which is equivalent to 16,670 people (95%CI: 9,267-24,074). Considering that 68 deaths from the disease in the residents of the city had been confirmed as at the date of the second phase of the survey, the infection fatality rate was estimated to be 0.41% (95%CI: 0.28-0.73). Our results suggest that approximately 88% of the cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of the survey were not reported to the local epidemiological surveillance service. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study provide in-depth knowledge of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and are helpful for the preventive and decision-making policies of public managers.


Subject(s)
Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Brazil/epidemiology , Prevalence , Pandemics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL