An audit of transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl prescribing at a university hospital

Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl（TIRF）can be a key-drug for breakthrough cancer pain. Prescription audit is needed because there are concerns about tolerance or serious adverse events including respiratory suppression and addiction due to inappropriate use of these drugs. The aim of this audit study is to evaluate appropriateness of TIRF prescriptions, reasons of violation, and adverse events in the real-world setting. A retrospective chart review was conducted in 31 patients who had breakthrough cancer pain and were treated with TIRF. A 2-step algorithm was generated：baseline pain and administration situation of other opioid rescues. TIRF was prescribed appropriately in six patients（19.4％）. Reasons of violation were as follows：prescriptions only for using same drug with around-the-clock opioids（fentanyl transdermal patches, <i>n</i>＝19）, and patients could take oral medicines and use of morphine or oxycodone rescues would be preferable（<i>n</i>＝12）. TIRF was initiated with a minimum dose in all patients and no serious adverse events were observed. Although TIRF was used widely for breakthrough cancer pain, prescription was not necessarily done appropriately. Detailed assessment of breakthrough cancer pain and consideration of the use the other rescue medication would be required.

Two advanced cancer patients in whom escitalopram was useful for depression

<b>Purpose</b>: Escitalopram has been inadequately evaluated in cancer patients. Here, we report two patients with advanced cancer who benefited from escitalopram for depression. <b>Case 1</b>: A man aged in his 50s had postoperative recurrence of rectal cancer. He was diagnosed with a major depressive episode according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). The score of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) was 20 points. He began treatment with 10 mg/day of escitalopram. His symptoms began to improve at about 14 days, and the HAMD-17 score was 4 points at 23 days, suggesting a marked improvement. <b>Case 2</b>: A woman aged in her 50s had cancer of the external auditory canal. She was diagnosed with a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV-TR. The score of HAMD-17 was 26 points. She began treatment with 10 mg/day of escitalopram. Her symptoms began to improve at 15 days, and the HAMD-17 score at 28 days was 13 points, suggesting a marked improvement. In both cases, serious side effects, clear exacerbation of depression, and withdrawal syndrome due to acute drug deprivation associated with worsening of the symptoms were not noted. <b>Conclusion</b>: Escitalopram is considered a useful drug for depression in patients with advanced cancer.