ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of the different surgical treatment for patients with inguinal hernia.Methods98 patients with inguinal hernia were randomly divided into two groups and 49 cases in each group.The observation group was given filling tension-free hernia repair,the control group using traditional hernia repair.The postoperative follow-up were compared in clinical efficacy and recurrence.ResultsIn the observation group and control group,the duration of postoperative pain,surgical time and patient recovery time was 93.9％ (46/49) vs 81.6％ (40/49) (x2 =2.645,P＜0.01),(45.2 ±7.2)min vs (51.4 ±6.4)min(P ＜0.05),(60.8±5.4) min vs (71.4 ± 6.7) min ( P ＜ 0.05 ),( 2.0 ± 2.1 ) d vs (4.9 ± 1.8) d ( P ＜ 0.05 ).Postoperative follow-up found that both groups of patients relapse rate was statistically significant( x2 =3.279,P ＜0.01 ).ConclusionTwo different surgical treatment of inguinal hernia,the tension-free hernia repair compared with the traditional hernia repair was more suitable for the body,surgery time and recovery time was short,reducing the relapse rate in patients with inguinal hernia,was an effective means of treatment.