Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 39(4): 513-518, Jul-Aug/2013. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-687309

ABSTRACT

Purpose To evaluate the long term efficacy and safety of the use of propiverine and terazosine combination in patients with LUTS and DO by a placebo controlled study. Materials and Methods One hundred patients were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into two groups (each group consisted of 50 patients). Terazosine and placebo were administered to the patients in Group 1 and terazosine plus propiverine HCL was administered to Group 2. The patients were evaluated by international prostate symptom score (IPSS), the first four questions of IPSS (IPSS4), the 8th question of IPSS (quality of life-QoL), overactive bladder symptom score questionnaire (OAB-q V8), PSA test, urodynamic studies, post voiding residue (PVR). All patients were followed for one year and were reassessed for comparison. Results IPSS, IPSS4, OAB symptoms, QoL score, PVR, and Qmax scores of the groups did not differ. After one year treatment, there was significant improvement in IPSS, IPSS4, OAB symptoms, QoL and Qmax values in Group 2. No significant improvement was noted for the same parameters in Group 1. Conclusion This is the first study to show long term safety and efficacy of anticholinergic therapy for patients with LUTS. In patients with OAB or DO, long term anticholinergic treatment may be regarded as a treatment option. .


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Benzilates/therapeutic use , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/drug therapy , Muscarinic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prazosin/analogs & derivatives , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Prazosin/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 38(6): 795-801, Nov-Dec/2012. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-666015

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To compare totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy procedures on many parameters. Materials and Methods

Percutaneous nephrolitotomy was performed on 195 patients between June 2009 and May 2012. The data of those patients were evaluated retrospectively. Totally tubeless cases were enrolled to Group 1, and Group 2 consisted of non-tubeless cases (re-entry or Foley catheter). Results

Group 1 included 85 cases and group 2 a total of 110 patients. Paper tracing values for the kidney stones were 321.25 ± 102.4 mm2 and 324.10 ± 169.5 mm2 respectively. Mean fluoroscopy time was 4.9 ± 1.9 min and 5.08 ± 2.7 min, mean operation time was 78.8 ± 27.9 min and 81.9 ± 28.77 min and mean decrease in hematocrit was 2.6 ± 1.6 and 3.74 ± 1.9 respectively. All these comparisons were statistically significant. Length of hospitalization was 1.6 ± 1.1 and 3.5 ± 1.5 days for Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Mean superficial pain score was 5.8 ± 1.6 and 6.7 ± 1.2 respectively for both groups after 1 hour. At 6 hours, the scores changed to 3.87 ± 1.22 and 4.84 ± 1.3 respectively. The analgesic dose was 1.00 ± 0.7 and 1.53 ± 0.6 for the groups respectively at 6 hours. All the statistical differences were significant for these three parameters. Conclusions

We believe that, because of their post operative patient comfort and decreased length of hospital stay, totally tubeless procedures should be considered as an alternative to standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy. .


Subject(s)
Humans , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Length of Stay , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Operative Time , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Catheterization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL