ABSTRACT
Objective To provide authors with more quality services,so as to improve management efficiency,reduce management time and manpower cost,ultimately achieve the expected delicacy management of scientific papers.Methods Indicators of traditional management pattern and "double track parallel" management mode of the scientific papers management process were compared through retrospective study.Such indicators include authors' operation,data error rate,average working cycle,management cost,user experience,data barriers,self-management consciousness and others.Resuits Significant improvements were shown in the data accuracy,management cost savings,user satisfaction,and data sharing in the "double track parallel" management model.Conclusions 5 years of practice demonstrated that the "double track parallel" management model not only effectively connects hospital policy and technical method,but also solves the key problems of data barriers,disjointed management and low efficiency.Scientific paper management is expected to be more refined and effective.
ABSTRACT
In recent years,the state has a substantial increase in investment in Medical Research.The number of hospital-borne scientific research,funding amounts and types of projects is also increasing..Our hospital scientific management based oriented clinical needs,Construction Institute hospital as a work positioning,the whole process of quality management as the implementation of safeguards.Through a series of positive measures,gradually formed which are consistent with the management of the hospital research and development,and scientific research achievements into clinical practice.The research management changed from passive management model to proactively manage; from the emergency management to the whole process of managing; from the targeted management to guide the management of clinical needs.These measures effectively improve the level of scientific research in hospitals.