Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Neonatal Medicine ; : 153-160, 2018.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-718344

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to examine the tolerability and effect of early highdose amino acid administration in extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWIs). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included ELBWI (birth weight < 1,000 g, n=142). Biochemical, nutritional, and neurodevelopmental data were compared between infants who received conventional low amino acid (LAA; 1.5 g/kg/day) and those who received high amino acid (HAA; 3 g/kg/day) within the first 48 hours after birth. Neurodevelopmental data included weight, height, and head circumference at discharge, 12 to 14 and 18 to 24 months of corrected age and the Korean Bayley Scale of Infant Development II (K-BSID-II) score at 18 to 24 months of corrected age. RESULTS: The HAA group demonstrated higher peak plasma albumin (3.0±0.4 vs. 3.2±0.5, P < 0.05) and lower serum creatinine (1.7±0.9 vs. 1.4±0.8, P < 0.05) during the first 14 days than the LAA group. Full enteral feeding was achieved significantly earlier in infants in the HAA group than in infants in the LAA group (46.2±23.0 days vs. 34.3±21 days, P < 0.01). There was no difference between the two groups in the z score changes in all growth indicators from birth to discharge and at 12 to 14 and 18 to 24 months of corrected age, as well as in the K-BSID-II score at 18 to 24 months of corrected age. CONCLUSION: Aggressive administration of amino acids during the first 2 days of life in ELBWI was well tolerated and correlated with earlier full enteral feeding, but did not improve growth and neurodevelopment.


Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Amino Acids , Child Development , Cohort Studies , Creatinine , Enteral Nutrition , Head , Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Parenteral Nutrition , Parturition , Retrospective Studies , Serum Albumin
2.
Journal of Korean Medical Science ; : 1288-1294, 2017.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-210873

ABSTRACT

Prophylactic surfactant is known to be effective to reduce chronic lung disease in preterm infants compared with rescue surfactant treatment. In Korea, early prophylactic surfactant therapy was introduced in 2011. However, recently, the increased utilization of antenatal steroids and early stabilization through continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the delivery room may have changed the risks and benefits of prophylactic surfactant therapy of infants at high risk of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). We compared the effects and safety of prophylactic surfactant therapy (within 30 minutes after birth) and early selective surfactant therapy (within 3 hours after birth) in preterm infants born at < 30 weeks gestation or with birth weight ≤ 1,250 g. The clinical data of 193 infants in period 1 (from 2008 to 2010, early selective surfactant therapy group) were collected retrospectively; those of 191 infants in period 2 (from 2012 to 2014, prophylactic surfactant therapy group) were collected prospectively. Compared to period 1, the rate of intubation and surfactant use were significantly increased in period 2. The use of multiple doses of surfactant in period 2 was significantly increased compared with period 1. Despite more invasive and aggressive management in period 2, there was no difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation, the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) or death, and the risk of other adverse neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups. In conclusion, the benefit of prophylactic surfactant therapy in infants treated under current practices is no longer clear compared to early selective surfactant therapy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Birth Weight , Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Delivery Rooms , Incidence , Infant, Premature , Intubation , Korea , Lung Diseases , Parturition , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Steroids
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL