ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has been proposed to resolve rotatory instability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ACLR and ACLR with LET using the modified Lemaire technique. Materials and Methods We performed a meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) staement. The literature search was performed on the PubMed, EBSCOHost, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and WileyOnline databases. The data extracted from the studies included were the study characteristics, the failure rate (graft or clinical failure) as the primary outcome, and the functional score as the secondary outcome. Comparisons were made between the patients who underwent isolated ACLR (ACLR group) and those submitted to ACLR and LET through the modified Lemaire technique (ACLR + LET group). Results A total of 5 studies including 797 patients were evaluated. The ACLR + LET group presented a lower risk of failure and lower rate of rerupture than the ACLR group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.26 to 0.75; I2 = 9%; p = 0.003). The ACLR + LET group presented higher scores on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) regarding the following outcomes: pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sports, and quality of life (QOL), with mean differences of 0.20 (95%CI: 0.10 to 0.30; I2 = 0%; p < 0.0001), -0.20 (95%CI: -0.26 to -0.13; I2 = 0%; p < 0.00001), 0.20 (95%CI: 0.02 to 0.38; I2 = 0%; p = 0.03), and 0.50 (95%CI: 0.29 to 0.71; I2 = 0%; p < 0.00001) respectively when compared with the ACLR group. Conclusion Adding LET through the modified Lemaire technique to ACLR may improve knee stability because of the lower rate of graft rerupture and the superiority in terms of clinical outcomes. Level of Evidence I.
Resumo Objetivo A tenodese extra-articular lateral (TEL) foi proposta para resolver a instabilidade rotatória após a reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior (RLCA). Esta metanálise teve como objetivo comparar os resultados clínicos da RLCA e da RLCA com TEL por meio da técnica de Lemaire modificada. Materiais e Métodos Esta metanálise foi feita de acordo com a declaração dos Itens Principais para Relatar Revisões Sistemáticas e Metanálises (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, PRISMA, em inglês). A pesquisa bibliográfica foi realizada nos bancos de dados PubMed, EBSCOHost, Scopus, ScienceDirect e WileyOnline. Dos estudos incluídos foram extraídas informações sobre as características do estudo, a taxa de falha (falha clínica ou do enxerto) como resultado primário, e o escore funcional como resultado secundário. Foram feitas comparações entre os pacientes submetidos apenas à RLCA (grupo RLCA) e à RLCA e TEL pela técnica de Lemaire modificada (grupo RLCA + TEL). Resultados Foram avaliados 5 estudos que incluíam 797 pacientes. O grupo RLCA + TEL apresentou um risco menor de falha e menor taxa de rerruptura do que o grupo RLCA (razão de risco [RR] = 0,44; intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%] 0,26 a 0,75; I2 = 9%; p = 0,003). O grupo RLCA + TEL obteve pontuações maiores no Escore de Desfechos de Osteoartrite e Lesão no Joelho (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, KOOS, em inglês) com relação aos seguintes desfechos: dor, atividades cotidianas (AC), esportes, e qualidade de vida (QV), com diferenças médias de 0,20 (IC95%: 0,10 a 0,30; I2 = 0%; p < 0,0001), -0.20 (IC95%: -0,26 a-0,13; I2 =0%; p < 0,00001), 0,20 (IC95%: 0,02 a 0,38; I2 = 0%; p = 0,03) e 0,50 (IC95%: 0,29 a 0,71; I2 = 0%; p < 0,00001), respectivamente, quando comparado com o grupo RLCA. Conclusão O acréscimo de TEL pela técnica de Lemaire modificada à RLCA pode melhorar a estabilidade do joelho devido à menor taxa de rerruptura do enxerto e à superioridade dos resultados clínicos. Nível de evidência I.
Subject(s)
Humans , Treatment Outcome , Tenodesis , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Joint Instability , Knee JointABSTRACT
Background: Many studies have reported the role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) in treating fractures. In case with bone defect, fracture healing needs not only osteogenic but also osteoconductive component (scaffold). Hydroxyapatite calcium sulphate (HA-CaSO4) being widely used as bone void filler, may serve as scaffold for MSC. However, the effect of this scaffold to the viability of MSC has not been evaluated before. Methods: MSC were isolated from the iliac marrow of a Giant Flamish rabbit, and expanded in DMEM using histogradient density. After one week, they were sub-cultured in a 25cc TC flask (passage 1) and have the medium replaced every 3 days. During the subculture, we embedded a HA-CaSO4 pellet into the flask. The cells were evaluated under inverted microscope at a weekly interval. Results: At the first week, MSC are difficult to be identified in microscope due to the large number of HA-CaSO4 crystals. By the third week however MSC have grown and the HA-CaSO4 crystals can readily be washed off by medium replacement. By the fourth weeks, MSC can be still seen on microscope. Conclusion: HA-CaSO4 could serve as a good scaffold due to its pellet shape and easily absorbed, thus providing revascularization which is essential for bone healing.In addition, HA-CaSO4 does not interfere with MSC survival.
Subject(s)
Mesenchymal Stem CellsABSTRACT
Background: Many studies have used iliac crest as the source of mesenchymal stem cells. In cases of long bone shaft fracture, obtaining marrow from the fracture site offers more advantages. Nevertheless, due to the high number of fat cells in long bones, the yellow marrow of long bones is believed to contain lower number of mesenchymal stem cells than red marrow. Therefore the aim of this study is to compare the potency between red and yellow marrow as the donor site for the isolation of mesenchymal stem cell. Methods: Bone marrow of eight giant Flemish rabbits was aspirated from the iliac crest and femoral shaft. Mononuclear cells were isolated from both aspirates and expanded in low glucose DMEM. After eight weeks, the cells were harvested and counted using improved Neubauer hemocytometer. Comparison of the cell number between the two donor sites was then performed by t-test. Results: After 8 weeks, an average number of 2.93 ± 0.91 x 104 and 3.7 ± 2.50 x 104 cells were obtained from the iliac and femoral group respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between those two groups (p = 0.45). Conclusion: Plastic-adherent cells can be isolated and expanded from both iliac crest and femoral shaft.