ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background Reduced or null expression of E-cadherin protein is a frequent cause of diffuse gastric cancer (DGC). More than 50% of patients with DGC present somatic variants in CDH1 gene. Objectives The objectives of this study were to study E-cadherin expression and identify variants in the CDH1 gene in gastric tumors of patients with DGC. Methods We studied 18 Mexican DGC patients who attended a hospital of the Mexican Social Security Institute; E-cadherin expression was determined by immunohistochemistry, and variants were identified by Sanger sequencing in promoter and coding regions. Predictive analysis was performed using PolyPhen-2 and HOPE software. Results We found that 56% of DGC patients showed reduced expression of E-cadherin. All patients carried CDH1 variants; overall, 12 different CDH1 variants were identified. Predictive analysis revealed that the rs114265540 variant was probably damaging, with a value of 0.985, indicating a functional impact on the E-cadherin protein. Variants rs34939176 and rs33964119 were identified as risk factors for DGC (odds' ratios [OR] = 31.3, 95% CI 6.3-154.0, p < 0.001; OR = 6.1, 95% CI 2.0-19.0, p < 0.001, respectively) given their elevated frequency and by comparing it with those reported for MXL population in the 1000 Genomes Project database. Conclusions In this Mexican population, the percentage of diffuse gastric tumors with reduced expression of E-cadherin was similar to that reported in other populations. All gastric tumors of DGC patients studied had somatic CDH1 gene variants; however, the rs114265540, rs34939176, and rs33964119 variants were importantly related to DGC.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: Early-onset diffuse gastric cancer (EODGC) occurs at or before 50 years of age. Pathogenic mutations and germline deletions in the CDH1 gene (E-cadherin) are well-documented genetic factors associated with the causes of EODGC. Objective: The objective of the study was to study CDH1 germline variants and their potential functional impact in patients with EODGC in a Mexican population. Methods: We studied seven EODGC patients from a biomedical research center in western Mexico. Variants were identified by Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. The DeepSEA and SNPClinic v.1.0 software and the Ensembl (1000 Genomes Project, 1kGP) and ClinVar databases were used to predict functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The genetic admixture of the Mexican patients was corroborated by 22 short tandem repeat loci genotyping and structure analysis. Results: We found 12 germline CDH1 variants in all EODGC patients, and all of them are considered as polymorphisms: rs34561447, rs5030625, rs16260, rs1330727101, rs28372783, rs942269593, rs3743674, rs1801552, rs34939176, rs33964119, rs3556654, and rs1801026. The prediction of regulatory SNPs in the promoter suggests a role for a retrovirus in EODGC that induces the transcription of interferon-related genes through toll-like receptor-interferon response factor 3 signaling, as three SNPs in the CDH1 promoter alter three binding sites for this transcription factor. In addition, SNPs rs28372783 and rs1801026 could alter upstream stimulatory factors 1 (USF1)/USF2-mediated telomerase-dependent lymphocyte activation in EODGC. Other interesting result is a CTCF-dependent shorter CDH1 isoform lacking exon 14, probably due to exon-skipping mediated by rs33964119. Conclusions: Classical pathogenic germline mutations in the CDH1 gene were not found in these 7 EODGC patients. However, the in silico approaches revealed the possible involvement of a retrovirus and a shorter E-cadherin isoform in EODGC. Nevertheless, further in vitro and in vivo assays are needed to confirm these predictions.