Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Health Popul Nutr ; 2006 Sep; 24(3): 317-26
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-806

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the spatial, temporal and inter-individual variations in exposure to arsenic via drinking-water in Northern Argentina, based on measurements of arsenic in water, urine, and hair. Arsenic concentrations in drinking-water varied markedly among locations, from <1 to about 200 microg/L. Over a 10-year period, water from the same source in San Antonio de los Cobres fluctuated within 140 and 220 microg/L, with no trend of decreasing concentration. Arsenic concentrations in women's urine (3-900 microg/L, specific weight 1.018 g/mL) highly correlated with concentrations in water on a group level, but showed marked variations between individuals. Arsenic concentrations in hair (range 20-1,500 microg/kg) rather poorly correlated with urinary arsenic, possibly due to external contamination. Thus, arsenic concentration in urine seems to be a better marker of individual arsenic exposure than concentrations in drinking-water and hair.


Subject(s)
Argentina/epidemiology , Arsenic/analysis , Biomarkers , Environmental Exposure , Hair/chemistry , Humans , Urinalysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Supply/analysis
2.
J Health Popul Nutr ; 2006 Jun; 24(2): 236-45
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-958

ABSTRACT

This study assessed the exposure of pregnant women to arsenic in Matlab, Bangladesh, an area with highly-elevated concentrations of arsenic in tubewells, by measuring concentrations of arsenic in urine. In a defined administrative area, all new pregnancies were identified by urine test in gestational week 6-8, and women were asked to participate in the assessment of arsenic exposure. Urine for analysis of arsenic was collected immediately and in gestational week 30. In total, 3,426 pregnant women provided urine samples during January 2002-March 2003. There was a considerable variation in urinary concentrations of arsenic (total range 1-1,470 microg/L, adjusted to specific gravity 1.012 g/mL), with an overall median concentration of 80 microg/L (25th and 75th percentiles were 37 and 208 microg/L respectively). Similar concentrations were found in gestational week 30, indicating no trend of decreasing exposure, despite the initiation of mitigation activities in the area. Arsenic exposure was negatively associated with socioeconomic classes and achieved educational level. There were marked geographical variations in exposure. The results emphasize the urgent need for efficient mitigation activities and investigations of arsenic-related reproductive effects.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Arsenic/adverse effects , Arsenic Poisoning/epidemiology , Bangladesh , Educational Status , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Epidemiologic Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/chemically induced , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Prevalence , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Rural Health/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Urinalysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/adverse effects , Water Supply/analysis
3.
J Health Popul Nutr ; 2006 Mar; 24(1): 36-41
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-583

ABSTRACT

The high prevalence of elevated levels of arsenic in drinking-water in many countries, including Bangladesh, has necessitated the development of reliable and rapid methods for the determination of a wide range of arsenic concentrations in water. A simple hydride generation-atomic absorption spectrometry (HG-AAS) method for the determination of arsenic in the range of microg/L to mg/L concentrations in water is reported here. The method showed linearity over concentrations ranging from 1 to 30 microg/L, but requires dilution of samples with higher concentrations. The detection limit ranged from 0.3 to 0.5 microg/L. Evaluation of the method, using internal quality-control (QC) samples (pooled water samples) and spiked internal QC samples throughout the study, and Standard Reference Material in certain lots, showed good accuracy and precision. Analysis of duplicate water samples at another laboratory also showed good agreement. In total, 13,286 tubewell water samples from Matlab, a rural area in Bangladesh, were analyzed. Thirty-seven percent of the water samples had concentrations below 50 microg/L, 29% below the WHO guideline value of 10 microg/L, and 17% below 1 microg/L. The HG-AAS was found to be a precise, sensitive, and reasonably fast and simple method for analysis of arsenic concentrations in water samples.


Subject(s)
Arsenic/analysis , Bangladesh , Consumer Product Safety , Drinking , Fresh Water/analysis , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spectrophotometry, Atomic/methods , Water/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL