Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Type of study
Language
Year range
1.
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases. 2015; 7 (4): 216-221
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-174210

ABSTRACT

The incidence of colorectal cancer is rising in several developing countries. In the absence of integrated endoscopy and pathology databases, adenoma detection rate [ADR], as a validated quality indicator of screening colonoscopy, is generally difficult to obtain in practice. We aimed to measure the correlation of polyp-related indicators with ADR in order to identify the most accurate surrogate [s] of ADR in routine practice. We retrospectively reviewed the endoscopic and histopathological findings of patients who underwent colonoscopy at a tertiary gastrointestinal clinic. The overall ADR and advanced-ADR were calculated using patient-level data. The Pearson's correlation coefficient [r] was applied to measure the strength of the correlation between the quality metrics obtained by endoscopists. A total of 713 asymptomatic adults aged 50 and older who underwent their first-time screening colonoscopy were included in this study. The ADR and advanced-ADR were 33.00% [95% CI: 29.52-36.54] and 13.18% [95% CI: 10.79-15.90], respectively. We observed good correlations between polyp detection rate [PDR] and ADR [r=0.93], and mean number of polyp per patient [MPP] and ADR [r=0.88] throughout the colon. There was a positive, yet insignificant correlation between advanced ADRs and non-advanced ADRs [r=0.42,p=0.35]. MPP is strongly correlated with ADR, and can be considered as a reliable and readily obtainable proxy for ADR in opportunistic screening colonoscopy programs

2.
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases. 2014; 6 (3): 144-150
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-152892

ABSTRACT

Early diagnosis and endoscopic resection of adenomatous polyps is the main approach for screening and prevention of colorectal cancer [CRC]. We aimed to assess polyp detection rate [PDR] and to characterize demographic, clinical, and pathological features of colorectal polyps in an Iranian population. We retrospectively analyzed the data from 5427 colonoscopies performed during 2007-2012 at Masoud Clinic, the main endoscopy center associated with Sasan Alborz Biomedical Research Center, in Tehran, Iran. Our sample included 2928 [54%] women and 2499 [46%] men, with the mean age of 48.3 years [SD=16.1]. The most common reasons for colonoscopy included screening in 25.0%, and gastrointestinal bleeding in 15.2%. Cecal intubation was successful in 86% of patients. The quality of bowel preparation was fair to excellent in 78.1% [n=4235] of colonoscopies. Overall PDR was 42.0% [95% CI: 40.6-43.3]. The PDR in men [51.1%, 95% CI: 49.1-53.1] was significantly higher than women [34.2%, 95% CI: 32.4-35.9, p<0.001]. Polyps were more frequently observed in patients after the 6th decade of life [F=3.2; p=0.004]. CRC was detected in 2.9% [73/2499] of men and 1.9% [57/2928] of women [p=0.02]. The mean age for patients with cancer was significantly higher than that for individuals with polyps, 60.9 [SD=13.4] year vs. 56.9 [SD=13.7] year, respectively [p=0.001]. Almost 82.8% of the lesions were precancerous with tubular type predominance [62.3%] followed by tubulo-villous [10.3%], villous [6.6%], and serrated [3.6%]. Hyperplastic/inflammatory polyps comprised 17.2% of lesions. Distal colon was more prone to develop polyps and cancer than proximal colon in our series. These findings provide a great infrastructure for next preventive programs and have implications for colorectal cancer screening at population-level

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL