Grado de control de factores de riesgo cardiovascular en una población de pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 1 y 2 de difícil manejo / Degree of control of cardiovascular risk factors among a patient population with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2

Objetivo: Evaluar la medida en que se alcanzan las metas de control en un grupo de pacientes seleccionados con diabetes tipo 1 o 2. Métodos: Estudio transversal y descriptivo en el que se incluyeron pacientes atendidos de manera consecutiva en la Consulta Externa de Diabetes del Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán entre abril y julio de 2005; la población seleccionada era de difícil control metabólico; todos los pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 recibían fármacos para controlar la glucemia, incluyendo insulina en 43% de ellos. Analizamos los criterios de control recomendados por la Asociación Americana de Diabetes, las cifras de colesterol no-HDL y el índice aterogénico. Resultados: Se incluyeron 530 pacientes: 468 (mujeres 58.8%) tenían diabetes tipo 2, con edad promedio de 58.5 años, y 62 (mujeres 65%) tenían diabetes tipo 1, con edad promedio de 31.2 años. El valor promedio de HbA1c fue de 10.2±2.8 y 9.0±2.4 para diabéticos tipo 1 y tipo 2. Las proporciones de pacientes con diabetes tipos 1 y 2 dentro de las metas de tratamiento fueron de 12.9 y 23.7% para HbA1c (p=0.02), 82.2 y 57.2% para presión arterial sistólica y diastólica (p=0.0001), 75.8 y 49.3% para triglicéridos (p=0.0001), 45.1 y 35.6% para c-LDL (p=0.16), 51.6 y 53.4% para c-HDL (p= 0.79), 56.4 y 43.3% para c-no-HDL (p=0.03) y 58.0% versus 55.1% para índice aterogénico (p=0.66). La proporción de pacientes que alcanzaron metas de colesterol no-HDL, HbA1c, presión arterial y triglicéridos fue de 6.4% para diabéticos tipo 1 y de 4.4% para diabéticos tipo 2 (p=0.6). En el análisis de regresión logística múltiple, las variables asociadas con mayor probabilidad de alcanzar las metas de control fueron el tratamiento con antihipertensivos, el uso de hipolipemiantes, de insulina y el antecedente de enfermedad vascular cerebral. Conclusiones: Si bien nuestros resultados no pueden ser directamente comparables con los publicados en otras series en poblaciones abiertas, muestran que el grado de control de los factores de riesgo considerados no es aceptable, sobre todo en los niveles de glucemia; es necesario implementar programas que ayuden a cumplir estas metas en pacientes diabéticos.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree of control of metabolic goals in a group of very selected type 1 and 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional and descriptive study was done. Patients were enrolled consecutively in the Diabetes Clinic in a tertiary-care hospital in México City during the period between april and july 2005. The population at this clinic is very selected as demonstrated by the fact that all type 2 diabetic patients were treated with drugs for diabetic control, including insulin in 43% of them. We used the goals recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as parameters to analyze and additionally included non-HDL cholesterol and the atherogenic index. RESULTS: A total of 530 patients were included; 468 (58.8% female) had type 2 diabetes, with an average age of 58.5 years; 62 (65% female) patients had type 1 diabetes, with an average age of 31.2 years. The mean HbA1c values were 10.2 +/- 2.8 and 9.0 +/- 2.4 in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, respectively. The proportion of diabetic type 1 and 2 patients reaching treatment goals were 12.9% and 23.7% for HbA1c (p=0.02), 82.2% and 57.2% for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p=0.0001), 75.8% and 49.3% for triglycerides (p=0.0001), 45.1% and 35.6% for LDL-c (p=0.16), 51.6% and 53.4% for HDL-c (p=0.79), 56.4% and 43.3% for non-HDL cholesterol (p=0.03) and 58.0% and 55.1% for atherogenic index (p=0.66), respectively. The proportion of patients reaching all the optimal treatment goals (non-HDL cholesterol, HbA1c, arterial blood pressure and triglycerides) was 6.4% for type 1 diabetic patients and 4.4% for type 2 patients (p=0.6). Factors associated with achieving goal values in a multiple regression analysis were drug treatment for high blood pressure, use of lipid lowering drugs, insulin use and a history of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are not comparable with other publications of series evaluating the same parameters in open populations. The results show that the degree of control of evaluated risk factors is not good, principally in the case of glucemic control; it is necessary to plan strategies that help to reach these goals in diabetic patients.

Frontiers in internal medicine

Clinical research in Internal Medicine has provided may scientific advances during the past few years. However, the newly generated information overrides the time available to read all of the medial literature regarding advances in Internal Medicine. The goal of this review is to summarize some of the most relevant improvements in clinical practice published over the last few years. From Cardiology to Pulmonary, the authors of this review expose in a succinct way what they and many of their peers consider to be the most trascendental information gathered from thousands of publications. The authors of this review article have attempted to avoid sensationalism by incluiding facts instead of just simply optimistic preliminary findings that can mislead clinicians' decision making. The review is focused on information obtained through well-designed, prospective clinical trials and cohorts where the effectiveness of medical interventions and diagnostic procedures were tested