Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 35(1): 24-35, Jan.-Feb. 2009. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-510259

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Pheochromocytomas are tumors derived from chromaffin cells that often secrete catecholamines and cause hypertension. The clinical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma depends on the presence of excessive production of catecholamines. Conventional imaging modalities that have been used in the preoperative evaluation include CT, MRI, and 131I-MIBG scintigraphy. Surgical resection is the definitive treatment for patients with pheochromocytoma. The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term follow-up of 24 patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Materials and Methods: From January 1995 to September 2006, 24 patients underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal pheochromocytoma. Twenty (83.3 percent) patients had arterial hypertension. The inclusion criteria of patients in this retrospective study were laparoscopic approach, unilateral or bilateral adrenal tumor, pathological diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Results: Intra-operative complications occurred in 4 (16.7 percent) patients. Two (8.3 percent) patients had postoperative complications. Two patients (8.3 percent) had blood transfusion. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.8 days (range 1 to 11). Eighteen (90 percent) of the twenty patients who had symptomatic hypertension, returned to normal blood pressure immediately after surgery, during the hospital stay. In one patient, the high blood pressure levels remained unchanged. Another patient persisted with mild hypertension, well controlled by a single antihypertensive drug. Conclusions: Our results confirmed that laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma is a safe and effective procedure, providing the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. In our study, the initial positive results obtained in the treatment of 24 patients were confirmed after a mean follow-up of 74 months.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Young Adult , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/surgery , Adrenalectomy/methods , Pheochromocytoma/surgery , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/complications , Catecholamines/analysis , Follow-Up Studies , Hypertension/etiology , Laparoscopy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pheochromocytoma/complications , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Young Adult
2.
Clinics ; 64(1): 23-28, 2009. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-501883

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted to these three approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 live donor renal transplantations were prospectively evaluated from May 2001 to January 2004. Donors were compared with regard to operative and warm ischemia time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and complications. Recipients were compared with regard to graft function, acute cellular rejection, surgical complications, and graft and recipient survival. RESULTS: The mean operative and warm ischemia times were longer in the video-laparoscopic group (p<0.001), whereas patients of the flank incision group presented more postoperative pain (p=0.035), required more analgesics (p<0.001), had longer hospital stays (p<0.001), and suffered more pain on the 90th day after surgery (p=0.006). In the sub-costal and flank incision groups, there was a larger number of paraesthesias and abdominal wall asymmetries (p<0.001). Recipient groups were demographically comparable and presented similar acute tubular necrosis incidence and delayed graft function. The incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in the video-laparoscopic and flank incision groups (p=0.013). There was no difference in serum creatinine levels, surgical complications, or recipient or graft survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The video-laparoscopic and sub-costal approaches proved to be safe, and to provide donor advantages relative to the flank incision approach. Among recipients, the complication rate, graft survival, and recipient survival were similar in all groups.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Living Donors , Nephrectomy/methods , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Creatinine/blood , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Laparoscopy , Length of Stay , Pain, Postoperative , Prospective Studies
3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 32(1): 23-30, Jan.-Feb. 2006. ilus, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-425493

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Compare two different techniques for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN), related to the operative costs and learning curve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April/2000 and October/2003, 61 patients were submitted to LDN in 2 different reference centers in kidney transplantation. At center A (CA), 11 patients were operated by a pure transperitoneal approach, using Hem-O-Lokomicron clips for the renal pedicle control and the specimens were retrieved manually, without using endobags. At center B (CB), 50 patients were also operated by a pure transperitoneal approach, but the renal pedicles were controlled with endo-GIA appliers and the specimens were retrieved using endobags. RESULTS: Operative time (231 ± 39 min vs. 179 ± 30 min; p < 0.000), warm ischemia time (5.85 ± 2.85 min vs. 3.84 ± 3.84 min; p = 0.002) and blood loss (214 ± 98 mL vs. 141 ± 82 mL; p = 0.02) were statistically better in CB, when compared to CA. Discharge time was similar in both centers. One major complication was observed in both centers, leading to an open conversion in CA (9.1 percent). One donor death occurred in CB (2 percent). Regarding the recipients, no statistical difference was observed in all parameters analyzed. There was an economy of US$1.440 in each procedure performed in CA, when compared to CB. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the learning curve, the technique adopted by CA, showed no deleterious results to the donors and recipients when compared with the CB. On the other hand, this technique was cheaper than the technique performed in the CB, representing an attractive alternative for LDN, mainly in developing centers.


Subject(s)
Humans , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/economics , Living Donors , Laparoscopy/economics , Nephrectomy/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Nephrectomy/methods
4.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 30(1): 22-28, Jan.-Feb. 2004. ilus, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-359780

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To present the initial experience of videolaparoscopic nephrectomy in live renal donor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period from April 2000 to August 2003, 50 left nephrectomies in live donor were performed by videolaparoscopy for transplantation. Twenty-eight patients were male (56 percent) and 22 female (44 percent). Mean age was 37.2 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.1 kg/m². RESULTS: Mean surgical time was 179.5 minutes, and warm ischemia time of the graft was 3.79 minutes. The mean estimated bleeding was 141 mL. There was no need of blood transfusion or conversion to open surgery. In 42 cases (84 percent), the vascular portion of the graft was considered good by the recipient's surgical team and in all cases, the ureter was considered of proper size, though in one of them (2 percent) its vascularization was considered improper. The transplanted kidneys produced urine still in the surgical room in 46 of the 50 transplantations considered. In only 2 cases opioid was required for analgesia. In average, 3.1 doses of dipyrone were used for each patient during hospital stay, and hospital discharge occurred, in average, after 3.2 days post-operatively. Two patients required re-operations and one of them evolved to death. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic nephrectomy in live donor for renal transplantation is an alternative to conventional open surgery. In relation to the graft, no alteration, either anatomic or functional, was detected. Though there is already a large documentation in the international literature regarding this procedure, in our setting a prospective randomized study with the usual surgical study is still necessary in order to prove the advantages and disadvantages of the method.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Living Donors , Laparoscopy/methods , Nephrectomy/methods , Body Mass Index , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Rev. Hosp. Clin. Fac. Med. Univ. Säo Paulo ; 50(6): 299-304, nov.-dez. 1995. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-175877

ABSTRACT

Procedimentos colorretais realizados por acesso video-laparoscopico constituem inovacao recente e figuram, em sua maioria, como operacoes realizadas em pacientes selecionados. Constitui objetivo do presente analisar os resultados advindos da experiencia inicial dos autores com o metodo. Entre 1992 e 1995, 33 doentes selecionados foram submetidos a resseccao de segmento colorretal por acesso video-laparoscopico. Foram arrolados para cada doente o diagnostico, a operacao realizada, a ocorrencia de complicacoes e a necessidade de conversao bem como a sua evolucao pos-operatoria. A doenca diverticular constituiu a indicacao cirurgica mais frequente (54,5 por cento) para esta serie de doentes seguida da doenca maligna (27,3 por cento). A operacao mais frequentemente realizada foi a colectomia esquerda em 19 doentes (57,6 por cento). A reconstrucao do transito apos resseccao foi realizada em sua maioria pela tecnica do duplo grampeamento...


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Colectomy , Laparoscopy , Dissection/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL