ABSTRACT
We use a dense and fully connected convolutional network with good feature learning in small samples, to automatically pre-deline CTV of cervical cancer patients based on CT images and evaluate the effect. The CT data of stage IB and IIA postoperative cervical cancer with similar delineation scope were selected to be used to evaluate the pre-sketching accuracy from three aspects:sketching similarity, sketching offset and sketching volume difference. It has been proved that the 8 most representative parameters are superior to those with single network and reported internationally before. Dense V-Net can accurately predict CTV pre-delineation of cervical cancer patients, which can be used clinically after simple modification by doctors.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Automation , Machine Learning , Patients , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Objective To explore the feasibility of the volume modulated arc therapy ( VMAT) auto-planning based on template library ( TL). Methods VMAT plans of 68 patients diagnosed with postoperative rectal cancer in Eclipse system were retrospectively selected. The prescription dose was 50 Gy/25F. In 19 patients, the feature values of target and organs at risk were extracted as the vectors. The final optimized restricted conditions were saved as the TL. Then, the plans of 15 rectal cancer patients (10 cases from TL and 5 outside TL) were automatically optimized. According to the multi-dimensional vector similarity principle, the similarity parameter αwas defined. The designed program automatically selected the optimal-object template in an in-house software developed with Matlab. The dosimetric parameters of the auto-optimized plans with the optimal-object template (ATP) and the clinical plan (CP) were compared by the paired t-test. The changes in the dosimetric parameters and similarity parameter α were statistically compared by Pearson′s correlation analysis. The linear fitting of the dosimetric parameters with α was used by least squares method to explore the tendency of the ATP dosimetric parameters relative to CP. Results The dosimetric parameters of ATP for 13 cases were slightly worse than those of CP. The conformal index (P=0. 004), heterogeneous index (P= 0. 015),V40(P= 0. 003) and mean dose (P= 0. 022) of the intestine significantly differed. The α values of these 13 cases were 2. 67,2. 60,2. 60,2. 49,2. 67,2. 74,2. 72,2. 48, 2. 53,2. 86,2. 68,2. 56 and 2. 63. The α value was significantly correlated with the V40 or mean dose of the bladder (r= 0. 649 and 0. 603,P= 0. 016 and 0. 029).Along with the increase of α value ,V40 and mean dose of the intestine for ATP were gradually deteriorated than those of CP . The remaining dosimetric para-meters of ATP were close to or superior to those of CP. Conclusions The results of ATP are slightly worse than those of CP, whereas can satisfy the clinical requirements. The TL, the quality of TL and ATP remain to be further optimized.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the plan quality between two treatment planning systems (TPSs) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods VMAT plans based on Varian Eclipse and Philips Pinnacle TPS were designed for 10 cervical cancer patients (2, 3 Arcs) and 10 prostate cancer patients ( 1, 2 Arcs) . The delivery system of VMAT was Varian ClinaciX machine, and RapidArc was used. The treatment plan quality between the two TPSs was evaluated based on dose distribution, delivery efficiency, and parameter settings. The differences between the two TPSs were compared using paired t-test. Results For cervical cancer patients, the 2-Arc VMAT plans based on the Pinnacle was slightly better than those based on the Eclipse in terms of the conformal index ( CI) of planning target volume ( PTV) , rectum V30 and V40 , and bladder V30 and V40 , and the homogeneity index ( HI) of PTV and PTV1 as well as CI of PTV1 in the Eclips were slightly better than those in the Pinnacle( P<005) Pinnacle were slightly worse than those in the Eclipse ( P>005) . The number of monitor units with 2-Arcs and 3-Arcs plans of the Eclipse was significantly smaller than those in the Pinnacle (P<005). For prostate cancer patients, The 1-arc VMAT plans of the Pinnacle TPS were slightly superior to those of the Eclipse TPS in terms of the HI of PTV, rectumV30 and V40 , and bladderV30 and V40 , but the former was slight inferior to the latter in terms of the CI of PTV (P<005). The number of monitor units of 1-arc and 2-Arcs plans showed no significant difference between the two TPSs (P>005). Conclusions For patients with cervical cancer and prostate cancer, the VMAT plans based on Varian Eclipse and Philips Pinnacle TPS can achieve a clinically acceptable dose distribution and show a little difference in the treatment plan quality. However, we will still need more cases to further study and determine the performance characteristics of the commercial TPSs for optimizing VMAT.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the difference of the constructed doses between electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and dynalogs files of linac for in vivo phantom dosimetry.Methods Twelve pelvic patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were selected and the information of each plan was copied to theCheese phantom to recalculate the doses before delivered on Varian RapidArc Linac.TheCheese phantom was placed on the isocenter and the electronic portal image (EPI) formed by the EPID was sent to EPIgray software to reconstruct the actual delivered doses.Meanwhile,dynalogs files were respectively imported to the Mobius software to reconstruct the actual delivered doses too.The point dose in the center of each VMAT plan (the center of the effective sensitive volume of ionization chamber) was measured by the A1SL ionization chamber.At the same time,the dose of sensitive volume of ionization chamber from treatment planning systcm (TPS) was recorded.Results The relative deviation between the dose from TPS and the measurement results by the ionization chamber was 1.13％.The difference between the reconstructed doses of EPID-based or the dynalogs file-based with the measurement results by the ionization chamber was not statistically significant (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions The two methods of dose reconstruction can provide reference for in vivo dosimetry of VMAT.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the dosimetric feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)with a simultaneous integrated boost(SIB-VMAT58.75 Gy)for preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer(LARC),and to provide a basis for clinical practice.Methods Nine patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ rectal cancer who underwent preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy were involved in the study,and two plans were performed for each patient:SIB-VMAT58.75 Gy and VMAT50.00 Gy. For the SIB-VMAT58.75 Gy plan,the prescribed dose was 58.75 Gy(2.35 Gy/fraction)for the local rectal tumor and positive lymph nodes(GTV 58.75 Gy),and 50 Gy(2 Gy/fraction)for the regions at high risk of harboring microscopic disease(pelvic lymphatic drainage area)(PTV 50Gy).For the VMAT50.00 Gy plan,the prescribed dose was 50 Gy(2 Gy/fraction)for the regions at high risk of harboring microscopic disease(pelvic lymphatic drainage area)without a boost. The conformity index(CI),homogeneity index (HI),and dose for target areas and organs at risk(OAR)were assessed according to the dose-volume histogram. The paired t-test or nonparametric rank test was used to compare the differences between the two plans. Results Both plans met the prescription goal for PTV dose coverage. There was no significant difference in CI for the PTV between the two plans(1.0±0.0 vs. 1.0±0.0,P>0.05).The SIB-VMAT58.75 Gy plan had a worse HI than the VMAT50.00 Gy plan(0.2± 0.2 vs. 0.1± 0.0,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in V10-V50of the small intestine,bladder,femoral heads,and pelvis between the two plans(P>0.05),but D 2 cm3of the small intestine was significantly higher in the SIB-VMAT58.75 Gy plan than in the VMAT50.00 Gy plan(P=0.038). Conclusions The SIB-VMAT58.75 Gy plan for LARC achieves required target volume dose coverage and OAR dose constraints,which is safe and feasible in terms of dosimetry,and its clinical efficacy and adverse effects need further evaluation.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the plan quality between two treatment planning systems (TPSs) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods VMAT plans based on Varian Eclipse and Philips Pinnacle TPS were designed for 10 cervical cancer patients (2, 3 Arcs) and 10 prostate cancer patients ( 1, 2 Arcs) . The delivery system of VMAT was Varian ClinaciX machine, and RapidArc was used. The treatment plan quality between the two TPSs was evaluated based on dose distribution, delivery efficiency, and parameter settings. The differences between the two TPSs were compared using paired t-test. Results For cervical cancer patients, the 2-Arc VMAT plans based on the Pinnacle was slightly better than those based on the Eclipse in terms of the conformal index ( CI) of planning target volume ( PTV) , rectum V30 and V40 , and bladder V30 and V40 , and the homogeneity index ( HI) of PTV and PTV1 as well as CI of PTV1 in the Eclips were slightly better than those in the Pinnacle( P<005) Pinnacle were slightly worse than those in the Eclipse ( P>005) . The number of monitor units with 2-Arcs and 3-Arcs plans of the Eclipse was significantly smaller than those in the Pinnacle (P<005). For prostate cancer patients, The 1-arc VMAT plans of the Pinnacle TPS were slightly superior to those of the Eclipse TPS in terms of the HI of PTV, rectumV30 and V40 , and bladderV30 and V40 , but the former was slight inferior to the latter in terms of the CI of PTV (P<005). The number of monitor units of 1-arc and 2-Arcs plans showed no significant difference between the two TPSs (P>005). Conclusions For patients with cervical cancer and prostate cancer, the VMAT plans based on Varian Eclipse and Philips Pinnacle TPS can achieve a clinically acceptable dose distribution and show a little difference in the treatment plan quality. However, we will still need more cases to further study and determine the performance characteristics of the commercial TPSs for optimizing VMAT.
ABSTRACT
To investigate the patient-specific dose verification method using ArcCHECK for total marrow irradiation (TMI) with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Helical Tomotherapy (HT). The kVCT images collected from 8 patients were respectively designed for RapidArc and Tomotherapy plans in total marrow irradiation. ArcCHECK was used for dose verification for the head-neck, chest-abdomen and pelvic. The merging function of ArcCHECK was used in VMAT and the method of double plans (reference and delivery plans) were used in HT. The γ-analysis passing rates for the head-neck, chest-abdomen, pelvic were 98.9% ± 1.9%, 98.4% ± 1.8%, 97.4% ± 2.1% for VMAT plans and 94.3% ± 1.5%, 96.5 ± 1.2%, 94.1% ± 1.9% for HT plans. The results show that using the merging function of ArcCHECK can achieve the dose verification well for VMAT plans with TMI. The method of double plans was done for the dose verification of HT plans with TMI as well as the plans with the targets keeping away from the set-up center.
Subject(s)
Humans , Bone Marrow , Radiation Effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedABSTRACT
To investigate the dose effect of isocenter difference during IMRT dose verification with the 2D chamber array. The samples collected from 10 patients were respectively designed for IMRT plans, the isocenter of which was independently defined as P(o), P(x) and P(y). P(o) was fixed on the target center and the other points shifted 8cm from the target center in the orientation of x/y. The PTW729 was used for 2D dose verification in the 3 groups which beams of plans were set to 0 degrees. The γ-analysis passing rates for the whole plan and each beam were gotten using the different standards in the 3 groups, The results showed the mean passing rate of γ-analysis was highest in the P(o) group, and the mean passing rate of the whole plan was better than that of each beam. In addition, it became worse with the increase of dose leakage between the leaves in P(y) group. Therefore, the determination of isocenter has a visible effect for IMRT dose verification of the 2D chamber array, The isocenter of the planning design should be close to the geometric center of target.