ABSTRACT
Objective To carry out a meta-analysis,in order to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy(PPPD) for surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis.Methods Medline,EMBASE,Cochrane library and other medical databases were searched for the clinical trials (randomized controlled trials) of comparing DPPHR Versus PD/PPPD.A total of 5 clinical trials (8 references) met the inclusion criteria.The data were analyzed using the RevMan 5.3 software.Results The two methods don't have statistical differ ence in terms of operation time (P=0.007),postoperative morbidity (P=0.35) and mortality (P=0.18),pain relief(P=0.36),new onset of diabetes(P=0.11),exocrine insufficiency(P=0.18),short-term(P=0.14) and long-term(P=0.16) quality of life score,the length of hospital stay (P=0.69),and pancreatic fistula (P=0.78).Weight gain (P＜0.000 01) and occupational rehabilitation (P=0.03)were significantly improved in the DPPHR group.However,PD/PPPD group was associated with fewer readmission due to pancreatic diseases.Conclusions DPPHR offers more advantages with regard to the quality of life.However,it needs more high-quality clinical trials to verify the results.