Evaluation effect of position change and pneumoperitoneum pressure on respiratory function in patients with DaVinci assisted radical prostatectomy / 中国实用护理杂志

Objective:To evaluate the effect of position change and pneumoperitoneum pressure on the respiratory system of patients undergoing DaVinci assisted laparoscopic prostate cancer surgery.Methods:Peak airway pressure, lung compliance and airway resistance were recorded by ventilator as the basic values to evaluate the change of respiratory function. When the artificial pneumoperitoneum pressure was 10 mmHg or 15 mmHg, the changes of respiratory function were recorded in five different positions: trendelenburg position (head low foot height) 30°, 15°, supine position, anti-trendelenburg position (head high foot height) 15° and 30°, peak airway pressure, lung compliance, airway resistance and so on.Results:At 10 mmHg and 30° trendelenburg, peak airway pressure, lung compliance and airway resistance were 28.13 cmH 2O, 23.33 ml/cmH 2O,16.06 cmH 2O·L -1·Sec -1, respectively. When the pneumoperitoneum pressure was adjusted to 15 mmHg, peak airway pressure increased to 32.03 cmH 2O, lung compliance decreased to 20.14 ml / cmH 2O, and airway resistance increased to 117.24 cmH 2O·L -1·Sec -1( P<0.01). At 10 mmHg and trendelenburg returned to 15°, peak airway pressure, lung compliance and airway resistance were 26.66 cmH 2O, 24.95 ml/cmH 2O,15.50 cmH 2O·L -1·Sec -1, peak airway pressure increased to 30.61 cmH 2O, the lung compliance decreased to 20.89 ml/cmH 2O and airway resistance increased to 16.66 cmH 2O·L -1·Sec -1 ( t value was -43.81, 24.638, -12.812, P<0.01). Conclusion:With the increase of trendelenburg position angle and artificial pneumoperitoneum pressure, the peak airway pressure and airway resistance are increased, while the lung compliance decreases gradually. Compared with trendelenburg position, the change of artificial pneumoperitoneum pressure has more influence on respiratory function.

Clinical Comparison of Airway Stent Placement in Intervention Room and Operating Room / 中国肺癌杂志

BACKGROUND@#Airway stent placement is the effective regimen for central airway obstruction (CAO), while its application scenarios varied. This study aimed to make clinical comparison of airway stent placement in the intervention room and operating room.@*METHODS@#Patients underwent airway stent placement between 2014 and 2018 were included in this retrospective case-control study. Clinical performance of airway stent placement in intervention room and operating room were compared.@*RESULTS@#82 patients were included in this study, including 39 in the intervention room and 43 in the operating room. Patients treated in the intervention room had lower Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (P=0.018) and received less Y-shaped stents (P<0.001). Better clinical response (P=0.026), more stents placed (P<0.001) and longer length of stent (P<0.001) were observed in operating room, while there was no significantly statistical difference of stent-related complications and post-stent survival rate between the two groups. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) supported airway stent placement procedures were performed in the operating room, which provided definitive safety support for high-risk intervention.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Patients with CAO could benefit from the operating room scenario, and airway stent placement in the operating room is more suitable for patients with higher CCI scores and receiving more complicated procedures.