ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the outcome of double Endobutton plate versus clavicular hook plate (CHP) in treatment of Tossy grade Ⅲ acromioclavicular dislocation.Methods A cohort of 82 patients with Tossy grade Ⅲ acromiocavicular dislocation treated between January 2010 and August 2012 were reviewed retrospectively.Based on the treatment choices,the patients were divided into double Endobutton group (36 cases) and CHP group (46 cases).Operative situation,in-hospital parameters,and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) of the shoulder,shoulder abduction-rise or anteflexionrise,Constant-Murley shoulder score as well as complications were evaluated.Results There were no statistical differences between the two groups in aspects of operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and length of stay.Mean time to return to work was (13.1 ± 1.4) weeks in double Endobutton group,shorter than (15.5 ±2.6) weeks in CHP group (P ＜0.01).No statistical difference was observed for postoperative complications between the two groups.At postoperative 12 months,VAS was lower in double Endobutton group [(2.1 ± 0.7) points] vs CHP group [(2.9 ± 0.8) points,P ＜ 0.05],but abductionrise and anteflexion-rise were higher in double Endobutton group [(138.6 ± 15.7) °,(140.3 ± 17.6) °] vs CHP group [(91.7 ±8.4)°,(96.7 ± 10.5)°,P＜0.05].Conclusion To treat Tossy grade Ⅲ acromioclavicular dislocation,double Endobutton plate is associated with less shoulder pain,quicker recovery,better shoulder function restoration compared with CHP and there is no need for a second surgery to remove it.