ABSTRACT
El estridor en niños es un síntoma que puede indicar una obstrucción en la vía aérea, siendo esencial comprender sus características y evolución. Este artículo destaca la importancia de la anamnesis detallada, la evaluación clínica y los estudios instrumentales para diagnosticar y tratar eficazmente las causas subyacentes del estridor. Se discuten las características del estridor, los signos de gravedad y los pasos para una evaluación adecuada, incluyendo la nasofaringolaringoscopía flexible y la laringotraqueobroncoscopía. Se concluye que una evaluación integral es fundamental para abordar el estridor en niños de manera óptima.
Stridor in children is a symptom that may indicate an obstruction in the airway, and it is essential to understand its characteristics and evolution. This article highlights the importance of a detailed history, clinical evaluation, and instrumental studies in effectively diagnosing and treating the underlying causes of stridor. The characteristics of stridor, signs of severity, and steps for proper evaluation, including flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy and laryngotracheobronchoscopy, are discussed. It concludes that a comprehensive evaluation is essential to address stridor in children optimally.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Respiratory Sounds/diagnosis , Respiratory Sounds/etiology , Airway Management , LaryngoscopyABSTRACT
<p><b>Background:</b>Patients with potential difficult mask ventilation (DV) and difficult intubation (DI) are often managed with awake intubation, which can be stressful for patients and anesthesiologists. This prospective randomized study evaluated a new approach, fast difficult airway evaluation (FDAE). We hypothesized that the FDAE approach would reduce the need for awake intubation.</p><p><b>Methods:</b>After obtaining informed consent, 302 patients with potential DV/DI undergoing elective surgeries were randomly assigned to the FDAE group (Group E) and the control group (Group C). In Group E, patients were gradually sedated, and adequacy of manual mask ventilation during spontaneous breathing was assessed at various sedation levels. Awake intubation was applied in those with inadequate mask ventilation. In Group C, DI was evaluated under local anesthesia. However, the care team could intubate under general anesthesia if the vocal cords were visible. The primary outcome was the rate of awake intubations in both groups and the induction efficiency assessed by the induction time. The secondary outcome was the incidence of serious complications.</p><p><b>Results</b>The rate of awake intubation was significantly lower in Group E than that in Group C (5.81% vs. 36.05%, χ = 42.3, P < 0.001). The induction time was much shorter in Group E than in Group C (11.85 ± 4.82 min vs. 18.71 ± 7.85 min, t = 5.39, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of intubation related complications between the two groups. Patients in Group E had a much lower incidence of recall (9.68% vs. 44.90%, χ = 47.68, P < 0.001) of the induction process and higher satisfaction levels than patients in Group C (t = 15.36, P < 0.001).</p><p><b>Conclusions</b>The FDAE significantly reduces the need for awake intubation and improves the efficiency of the intubation process without comprising safety in patients with potential difficult mask ventilation and DI.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b>No. ChiCTR-TRC-11001418; http://www.gctr.org/cn/proj/show.aspx?proj=1562.</p>
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Airway Management , Intubation, Intratracheal , Methods , Laryngeal Masks , Methyl Ethers , Prospective Studies , Sevoflurane , WakefulnessABSTRACT
Objective To explore the application of video laryngoscope in patients with pituitary adenoma during endotracheal intubation.Methods Fifty-one patients (19 males, 32 females, aged 18-71 years, ASA physical status I or II) scheduled for resection of pituitary adenoma under general anesthesia were enrolled.These patients were randomly divided into two groups: Macintosh laryngoscope Group (group M, n=25) and Video laryngoscope Group (group VL, n=26).When performing endotracheal intubation, Macintosh laryngoscope was used to expose the glottis in group M, and video laryngoscope was used in group VL.Head tilted backward angle, mouth opening, thyromental distance, neck circumference, mandibular ramus length, modified Mallampati classification and the difficulty classification of mask ventilation of the patients in two groups were recorded during peri-operation period.The Cormark-Lehane grade, needed pressing of the cricoids cartilage, the ratio of a second attempt during intubation and the intubation time consumed were recorded.Results Less patients in group VL needed cricoids cartilage press (7.7% vs 48.0%) during the intubation than that in group M (P<0.01).Compared with group M, the Cormack-Lehane grade was significantly lower (P<0.01) and the intubation time consumed was significantly shorter in group VL [(32.4±11.7)s vs (45.8±12.6)s] (P<0.01).Conclusion In patients with pituitary adenoma,video laryngoscope may improve the glottis exposure and the success rate of intubation, as well as shorten the intubation time.