Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-743528

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the application of Aptima high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) E6/E7 mRNA (AHPV) and its genotyping (GT) in the risk assessment of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL).Methods:The AHPV and its genotype (AHPV-GT) incervical exfoliated cells were detectedin 529 women with LSIL.The DNA-Based Hybrid Capture 2 HPV Test (HC2-HPV), colposcopy and cervical biopsy were performedsimultaneously.Results:① In 529 patients with LSIL, the positive rate of HC2-HPV in the group of <30 years old was significantly higher than that in the group of ≥30 years old (92.2% vs 83.6%, P=0.026).There was no significant difference in AHPV positive rate among different age groups (82.5% vs 77.7%, P=0.284).No significant difference of the genotyping (AHPV-GT) was detected between the two groups, either.In the 529 cases, 83 cases of HSIL+were confirmed by histology.81 cases (97.6%) were AHPV positive in the patients with HSIL+;② Compared with other 11 positive types of HR-HPV, the incidence of HSIL+in GT+ women increased significantly (P<0.05).In the group ≥30 years old, the OR value of HSIL+exposure risk of AHPV16 positive women was the highest (141.00), which was significantly higher than that of 18/45+, GT +, AHPV + (P=0.005, 0.000, 0.000).However, in the group of <30 years old, the OR value of HSIL+exposure risk of AHPV16 positive women was 8.50, which showed no significant difference from that of 18/45+ and AHPV-(P=1.000, 0.070).③ In group over 30 years old, the specificity of detecting HSIL+by AHPV was higher than that by HC2-HPV (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in detection specificity between AHPV and HC2-HPV in women under 30 years old.Conclusions:AHPV and its GT detection are reliable methods for colposcopic screening and risk stratification in women aged over 30 years old with LSIL, more attention should be focused on AHPV16 positive.Better biological markers should be explored for younger women.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL