ABSTRACT
O alopurinol, de uso contínuo oral, é o tratamento de escolha para os distúrbios hereditários do glicogênio. Apesar de não ser comum, a reação de hipersensibilidade ao alopurinol se torna um problema quando esta é a única medicação disponível para o controle da doença de base. Nestes casos, a dessensibilização é uma alternativa viável. No presente relato, descrevemos o caso de um paciente com diagnóstico de doença de depósito de glicogênio tipo I, com exantema pruriginoso generalizado ao alopurinol, tratado com um protocolo de dessensibilização oral acelerado. Este tratamento permitiu o uso contínuo deste medicamento sem novas reações em longo prazo.
Continuous oral allopurinol use is the first-line treatment for hereditary glycogen disorders. While hypersensitivity reactions to allopurinol are uncommon, they can pose challenges when this medication is the only available option for the long-term treatment of the underlying disorder. In such cases, desensitization emerges as a viable alternative. We report the case of a patient with glycogen storage disease type I who developed a generalized pruritic rash due to allopurinol. Drug intolerance was successfully managed using a rapid oral desensitization protocol, which allowed an uneventful long-term use of allopurinol.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: A anafilaxia é uma reação alérgica multissistêmica grave, de início agudo e potencialmente fatal. Poucos são os dados sobre sua epidemiologia no Brasil. O Registro Brasileiro de Anafilaxia da Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (RBAASBAI) teve como objetivo ampliar o conhecimento sobre anafilaxia em indivíduos brasileiros. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional transversal com questionário online sobre dados demográficos, desencadeantes suspeitos, manifestações clínicas, atendimento durante a reação, investigação diagnóstica e aconselhamento após a reação de pacientes que experimentaram uma reação anafilática. RESULTADOS: Entre junho/2021 e abril/2023, foram incluídos 237 pacientes (131 femininos): 99 crianças/adolescentes; 127 adultos e 11 idosos. Houve predomínio de meninos entre crianças/adolescentes (55,5%), e de mulheres entre os adultos (64,5%), e mediana de idade de 22 anos (< 1 a 77 anos). As manifestações cutâneas (92,8%) foram as mais frequentes, seguidas pelas respiratórias (70,1%), gastrointestinais (52,3%), neurológicas (36,3%) e cardiovasculares (35,3%). Os principais desencadeantes foram: alimentos (43,0%), medicamentos (26,2%), himenópteros (21,6%) e látex (2,5%); os alimentos entre crianças (leite, ovo, amendoim/castanhas), e os fármacos (anti-inflamatórios e antibióticos) entre os adultos. Quanto ao tratamento, 61,1% recebeu adrenalina (52,7% por profissional e 8,4% via autoinjetor de adrenalina -AIA). Uma adolescente (12 anos) faleceu após picada de abelha. A maioria recebeu plano escrito de emergência (78,1%) e foi ensinada a usar o AIA (70%). CONCLUSÃO: Os alimentos foram os desencadeantes mais comuns entre crianças/adolescentes, e os fármacos entre adultos brasileiros. A adrenalina continua sendo subutilizada, reforçando a necessidade de maior disseminação do tratamento adequado da anafilaxia.
INTRODUCTION: Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening, acute, severe multisystem allergic reaction.There is little data on its epidemiology in Brazil. The Brazilian Anaphylaxis Registry of the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (RBA-ASBAI) was devised to expand knowledge about anaphylaxis in Brazilian individuals. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study using an online questionnaire to collect data on demographics, suspected triggers, clinical manifestations, treatment during the reaction, diagnostic workup, and post-reaction counseling in patients who have experienced an anaphylactic reaction. RESULTS: Between June 2021 and April 2023, 237 patients were included (131 female): 99 children/adolescents (<18yo), 127 adults (18-64yo), and 11 older adults (65-77yo). There was a male predominance in the pediatric group (55.5%), while females were predominant among adults (64.5%). The median age was 22 years (range, <1 to 77). The most frequent clinical manifestations were cutaneous (92.8%), followed by respiratory (70.1%), gastrointestinal (52.3%), neurological (36.3%), and cardiovascular (35.3%). The most common triggers were foods (43.0%), drugs (26.2%), venoms (21.6%), and latex (2.5%). Foods (milk, egg, peanuts/tree nuts) predominated among children, versus drugs (mostly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics) among adults. Regarding treatment, 61.1% received epinephrine (52.7% by a healthcare professional and 8.4% via epinephrine auto-injector [EAI]). One teenager (12yo) died due to a bee sting. Most patients received a written emergency plan (78.1%) and were taught how to use the EAI (70%). CONCLUSION: Foods were the most common triggers of anaphylaxis among Brazilian children and adolescents, while drugs predominated among adults. Epinephrine continues to be underused, highlighting the need for greater awareness of proper treatment of anaphylaxis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Societies, MedicalABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To characterize drug hypersensitivity associated with dental treatments. Material and Methods: Data from 5,302 dental patients extracted from the Faculty of Dental Medicine were used to investigate drug use history, drug hypersensitivity, and associations with oral health outcomes. The chi-square test was used, and values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The frequency of patients' self-reported drug hypersensitivity was 26.42% (n = 1,401). The highest frequencies were for opioid/narcotic analgesics (20.84%, n = 292), antibiotics (18.13%, n = 961), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (10.46%, n = 141). Most of the patients (68.65%, n = 3,640) reported using medications, mostly for cardiovascular disease (43.1%, n = 1,569), for psychiatric/neurological disorders (39.75%, n = 1,447), drugs that affect the endocrine system (32.55%, n= 1,185), and drugs for pain (24.92%, n = 907). Higher drug hypersensitivity frequencies were associated with older White female subjects (p<0.0001). Associations were also identified between drug hypersensitivity and history of the following dental procedures: tooth extractions (p=0.003), root canal treatment (p=0.0004), prosthodontic treatments (p<0.0001), and orthodontic treatments (p=0.007). Conclusion: A high frequency of self-reported drug hypersensitivity in dental patients was found, with a higher occurrence in older White women and those with a history of more extensive and invasive dental care.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dental Care , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Chi-Square Distribution , Oral HealthABSTRACT
ABSTRACT A 69-year-old female was referred with sudden unilateral painless decreased vision that began 2 days after uncomplicated cataract surgery in the left eye. Visual acuity was hand motion and biomicroscopy showed a mild anterior chamber reaction, no hypopyon, and an intraocular lens that had been placed within the capsular bag. A dilated fundus examination revealed optic disk edema, widespread deep and superficial intraretinal hemorrhages, retinal ischemia, and macular edema. A cardiological evaluation was normal and thrombophilia tests were negative. After surgery, prophylactic vancomycin (1mg/0.1ml) had been injected intracamerally. The patient was diagnosed with hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis likely secondary to vancomycin hypersensitivity. Recognition of this entity is important to ensure early treatment and the use of intracameral vancomycin in the fellow eye should be avoided after cataract surgery.
RESUMO Esse caso se refere a uma paciente de 69 anos, sexo feminino, com relato de baixa acuidade visual súbita e indolor no olho esquerdo, de início 2 dias após cirurgia de catarata sem complicações. A acuidade visual era de movimento de mãos e a biomicroscopia mostrou reação de câmara anterior moderada, sem hipópio, e lente intraocular posicionada dentro do saco capsular. A fundoscopia evidenciou edema de disco óptico, hemorragias difusas intrarretinianas superficiais e profundas, isquemia retiniana e edema macular. A avaliação cardiológica foi normal e os testes para trombofilia foram negativos. Ao final da cirurgia foi injetado antibioticoprofilaxia com vancomicina (1mg/0,1ml) na câmara anterior. A paciente foi diagnosticada com vasculite hemorrágica oclusiva da retina secundária à hipersensibilidade a vancomicina. O reconhecimento dessa entidade é importante para o tratamento precoce e para evitar o uso de vancomicina intracameral em caso de cirurgia de catarata no olho contralateral.
ABSTRACT
Introdução: A reação a medicamentos com eosinofilia e sintomas sistêmicos (DRESS) trata-se de uma doença grave, sendo sua gravidade relacionada ao grau de acometimento visceral, e sua taxa de mortalidade de cerca de 10%. Seu diagnóstico é desafiador, e a utilização do escore RegiSCAR como ferramenta facilita a formação deste diagnóstico. Objetivo: Analisar os aspectos clínicos, laboratoriais, evolução e classificação dos casos segundo o RegiSCAR dos pacientes internados no serviço de Alergia e Imunologia do Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, com o diagnóstico de DRESS. Método: Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo baseado na análise de prontuários de pacientes atendidos no período entre janeiro de 2006 a janeiro de 2020. Resultados: Neste estudo verificou-se maior prevalência do sexo feminino, e a DRESS acometeu principalmente adultos e idosos, tendo como comorbidades mais frequentes as doenças cardiovasculares. Dos sintomas clínicos, 69,2% dos pacientes apresentava febre, e a alteração laboratorial mais encontrada foi a presença de eosinofilia. A lesão cutânea mais frequente foi o exantema maculopapular, e os medicamentos, os anticonvulsivantes. O tempo prévio de uso do medicamento foi de 2,1 semanas, e todos os pacientes receberam corticoide sistêmico como tratamento principal, e 3 pacientes fizeram uso da imunoglubulina humana como tratamento adicional. A mortalidade foi de 7% na fase aguda, e 14% por causas secundárias. Conclusão: A DRESS é uma síndrome complexa grave e potencialmente fatal, cujo diagnóstico é desafiador. O uso do escore preconizado pelo RegiSCAR demonstrou ser importante auxílio na confirmação do diagnóstico e na diferenciação de outras doenças. A mortalidade encontrada destaca a gravidade da doença. Reconhecer e excluir a droga implicada e iniciar um tratamento precoce permite maior chance de sobrevida para estes pacientes.
Introduction: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a serious disease. Its severity is related to the degree of visceral involvement and its mortality rate is approximately 10%. Diagnosis is a challenge, although RegiSCAR scores can facilitate the process. Objective: To analyze clinical and laboratory data, clinical course, and classify cases according to RegiSCAR scores among patients diagnosed with DRESS who were admitted to the Allergy and Immunology service of the Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo. Method: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of patients seen between January 2006 and January 2020. Results: There was a higher prevalence of women, with DRESS mainly affecting adults and older adults; cardiovascular diseases were the most frequent comorbidity. The most common clinical symptom was fever (69.2%), while the most common laboratory finding was eosinophilia. The most frequent skin lesion was maculopapular rash, and anticonvulsants were the main prescribed drug class. The drug was used for a mean of 2.1 weeks, and all patients received systemic corticosteroids as the main treatment. Human immunoglobulin was used as an additional treatment in 3 patients. Mortality was 7% in the acute phase and 14% due to secondary causes. Conclusion: DRESS is a severe, complex, and potentially fatal syndrome whose diagnosis is challenging. RegiSCAR scores helped confirm diagnosis and differentiate it from other diseases. The disease's mortality highlights its severity. Recognizing and excluding the implicated drug and initiating early treatment led to a greater chance of survival for these patients.
Subject(s)
HumansABSTRACT
Resumen El síndrome de reacción a medicamentos con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos (DRESS, por sus siglas en inglés) es una respuesta de hipersensibilidad multisistémica poco frecuente inducida por uno o varios medicamentos que puede inducir una reacción adversa cutánea grave, la cual es difícil de diagnosticar y pone en peligro la vida del paciente si no es identificada y no se recibe tratamiento. Frecuentemente, se manifiesta como una erupción cutánea amplia, linfadenopatía, signos de afectación de órganos viscerales y alteraciones hematológicas, como leucocitosis, eosinofilia y, en ocasiones, linfocitosis atípica que se presentan de 2 a 8 semanas posterior a la administración del fármaco responsable. Los medicamentos responsables con mayor número de reportes son la fenitoína, la carbamazepina, el alopurinol y el abacavir. Se han identificado algunos alelos específicos del antígeno leucocitario humano (HLA) que se asocian a la hipersensibilidad de estos fármacos. La fisiopatología del síndrome de DRESS aún no se conoce por completo, generalmente se trata de una respuesta de hipersensibilidad mediada por células T, al interactuar con el receptor del complejo principal de histocompatibilidad en individuos con factores de susceptibilidad genética, como ocurre en otros cuadros de reacciones graves secundarias a la ingesta de fármacos. Los criterios del European Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Drugs (RegiSCAR) son los más utilizados para su diagnóstico. El síndrome de hipersensibilidad inducido por fármacos (DiHS), el síndrome de Stevens-Johnson (SSJ), la necrólisis epidérmica tóxica (NET), y la pustulosis exantemática generalizada aguda (PEGA) deben considerarse ante cualquier exantema que aparezca posterior a la administración de cualquier fármaco. La terapia incluye la eliminación del agente causal lo antes posible, así como los corticosteroides sistémicos, los cuales son los pilares del tratamiento.. Los agentes ahorradores de esteroides, como la ciclosporina, las inmunoglobulinas intravenosas (IVIGs) y otros agentes inmunosupresores, se han utilizado con éxito para contribuir al tratamiento.
Abstract DRESS (drug reaction syndrome with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) is a rare drug-induced multisystemic hypersensitivity response that can induce a severe cutaneous adverse reaction that is difficult to diagnose and treat. It frequently manifests as an extensive skin rash, systemic symptoms, lymphadenopathy, visceral organ involvement, and hematological alterations, mainly leukocytosis, eosinophilia, and sometimes atypical lymphocytosis that manifest 2 to 8 weeks after continuous administration of the responsible drug. The most prevalent drugs related with this syndrome are phenytoin, carbamazepine, allopurinol, and abacavir. Some specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles have been identified that are associated with hypersensitivity to these drugs. The pathophysiology of DRESS syndrome is not yet fully understood; the main hypothesis is a T-cell mediated hypersensitivity response when interacting with the major histocompatibility complex receptor in individuals with genetic susceptibility factors. The criteria of the European Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Drugs (RegiSCAR) are the most commonly used for the diagnosis of DRESS syndrome. Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) should be considered for any rash that appears following the administration of any drug. Therapy of DRESS includes the elimination of the causative agent as soon as possible, as well as systemic corticosteroids which are the cornerstones of treatment. Steroid-sparing agents such as cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), and other immunosuppressive agents have been used successfully to contribute to treatment.
ABSTRACT
RESUMEN Introducción: La desensibilización farmacológica induce un estado temporal de hiposensibilidad a un medicamento que se realiza a pacientes con reacciones mediadas por Inmunoglobulina E. Reporte de caso: Presentamos el caso de un paciente con exacerbación respiratoria de fibrosis quística que presentó hipersensibilidad inmediata a colistina, un antibiótico esencial para su tratamiento, tanto por la sensibilidad del microorganismo, como la falta de disponibilidad de otros medicamentos. Se realizó el procedimiento en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de forma exitosa y el paciente completó el esquema del tratamiento. Conclusión: Actualmente el paciente se encuentra en tratamiento específico para su enfermedad de fondo y no ha presentado nuevos episodios de exacerbación ni neumonías.
ABSTRACT Introduction: Pharmacological desensitization induces a temporary hyposensitivity to the causative drug in patients with Immunoglobulin E-mediated drug reactions. Case of report: We present the case of a patient with respiratory exacerbation of cystic fibrosis who presented immediate hypersensitivity to colistin, an essential antibiotic for its treatment-both due to the sensitivity of the microorganism and the lack of availability of other drugs. The procedure was successfully performed in the Intensive Care Unit, and the patient completed the treatment schedule. Conclusion: Currently, the patient is undergoing specific treatment for his underlying disease and has not presented any new episodes of exacerbation or pneumonia.
ABSTRACT
Introdução: A hipersensibilidade a fármacos é uma condição clínica debilitante, acompanhada de experiência emocional intensa e pode afetar a qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde (QVRS). A repercussão das reações de hipersensibilidade a drogas (RHD) na qualidade vida (QV) pode ser verificada pela utilização de questionário específico, o Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire (DrHy-Q), desenvolvido originalmente na língua italiana. O objetivo foi traduzir, adaptar transculturalmente e validar a versão do DrHy-Q para a língua portuguesa (cultura brasileira, DrHy-Qb), verificando a consistência interna, validação de constructo e reprodutibilidade do DrHy-Qb, como instrumento específico de avaliação da QV nos pacientes brasileiros com hipersensibilidade a fármacos. Métodos: A adaptação do questionário consistiu na tradução e retrotradução realizadas de forma independente por três tradutores bilíngues, seguidas por pré-teste. A versão final, DrHy-Qb juntamente com o questionário de qualidade de vida resumido (SF-36), foi respondido por 84 pacientes (69% feminino, 40,3±15,2 anos) acompanhados em ambulatório especializado. Na análise fatorial, a validação de constructo foi realizada pelo cálculo do coeficiente de correlação de Pearson, de consistência interna pelo coeficiente alfa de Cronbach, e da reprodutibilidade pelo coeficiente de correlação intraclasse. Resultados: A análise estatística evidenciou consistência interna (α = 0,936) e reprodutibilidade (r: 0,984; IC95% = 0,963-0,993; p < 0,001) excelentes. A correlação entre o DrHy-Qb e o SF-36 total foi negativa e moderada (r = -0,394; p < 0,01). Conclusões: O DrHy-Qb foi adequadamente traduzido, adaptado e validado para a cultura brasileira, podendo ser útil na avaliação da qualidade de vida dos pacientes com hipersensibilidade a fármacos.
Introduction: Drug hypersensitivity is a clinical condition that can impair health-related quality of life. Originally developed in Italian, the Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire (DrHy-Q) measures the impact of drug hypersensitivity on quality of life. The objective of this study was to translate, crossculturally adapt, and validate the DrHy-Q to Brazilian Portuguese (DrHy-Qb). To be successful, the DrHy-Qb must be internally consistent, maintain construct validity, and be reproducible as an assessment tool for quality of life in Brazilian patients with drug hypersensitivity. Methods: Translation and back-translation were performed by 3 bilingual translators, followed by a pretest and a final version. The final version, the DrHy-Qb, and the 36-Item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) were administered to 84 patients (69% female, 40.3±15.2 years) from a specialized outpatient clinic. Factorial analysis included Pearson's correlation coefficient to validate the construct, Cronbach's alpha to assess the internal consistency, and intraclass correlation coefficient to determine reproducibility. Results: Statistical analysis showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.936) and reproducibility (r: 0.984; 95% CI: 0.963-0.993; p < 0.001). The correlation between the DrHy-Qb and the SF-36 was moderate and negative (r: -0.394; p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study showed that the DrHy-Qb was successfully translated, adapted, and validated into Brazilian Portuguese, and can be used to assess quality of life in patients with drug hypersensitivity.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
Os anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais (AINE) são os fármacos mais frequentemente associados a reações de hipersensibilidade (RH) na prática clínica. Na parte 2 dessa atualização sobre as RH aos AINE, discutiremos os aspectos clínicos dessas reações, com foco nos sinais e sintomas, como diferenciar os fenótipos clínicos, fazer a orientação desses pacientes e quando indicar procedimentos complementares, como testes cutâneos, de provocação e dessensibilização.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are a major cause of drug hypersensitivity reactions in clinical practice. In this "Update Part 2", we discuss the clinical picture, including the main signs and symptoms, how to distinguish clinical phenotypes, how to manage affected patients, and when to indicate additional procedures, such as skin testing, challenge, and desensitization.
Subject(s)
Humans , Desensitization, ImmunologicABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peripheral neuropathy is a rare condition with many etiologies. Common symptoms are numbness, paresthesia, weakness and neuropathic pain. Treatment consists in frst-line agents such as anticonvulsants and some antidepressants. Te aim of this study was to report a case of chronic pain refractory to several therapies in a patient with absolute contraindication to the use of all anticonvulsants and antidepressants drugs. CASE REPORT: Female patient, a 40-year-old treated for trigeminal neuralgia with decompression that developed chronic occipital pain refractory to radiofrequency and onset of transient and bilateral T4 sensory and motor polyneuropathy after viral meningitis. In addition, she showed a severe pharmacodermy (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms- DRESS Syndrome) after using carbamazepine and other anticonvulsants, as well as allergy to all analgesics and opioids except morphine. Epidural puncture with insertion of a catheter was performed aiming at a 5-day test through intermittent epidural morphine bolus to assess the possibility of morphine pump implantation. CONCLUSION: The test was successful and the patient referred to the neurosurgery team. At the 6-month follow-up after the insertion of the morphine intrathecal pump, the strategy has proven to be efective in controlling pain secondary to polyneuropathy.
RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Neuropatia periférica é uma condição rara, de etiologia multifatorial. Dormência, parestesia, redução de força muscular e dor neuropática são sintomas comuns. O tratamento consiste em uso de anticonvulsivantes e antidepressivos. O objetivo deste estudo foi relatar o caso de dor crônica refratária a diversas terapias de uma paciente com contraindicação absoluta para uso de todos os fármacos anticonvulsivantes e antidepressivos. RELATO DO CASO: Paciente do sexo feminino, 40 anos, com história de neuralgia do trigêmeo abordada previamente com cirurgia, com cefaleia occipital crônica refratária à radiofrequência e polineuropatia bilateral T4 sensorial e motora após meningite viral. No curso do tratamento, apresentou grave farmacodermia (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms - Síndrome DRESS) após o uso de carbamazepina e outros anticonvulsivantes, além de reação alérgica a todos analgésicos e opioides, exceto morfina. Optou-se por analgesia teste por via peridural, durante 5 dias, com bolus intermitentes e diários de morfina para avaliação de possibilidade de implante de bomba de morfina. CONCLUSÃO: O teste foi considerado bem-sucedido e a paciente encaminhada para neurocirurgia. No seguimento de 6 meses após implante de bomba por via subaracnoidea, esta estratégia se mostrou eficaz no controle da dor secundária à polineuropatia.
ABSTRACT
El síndrome de hipersensibilidad a medicamentos, con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos (DRESS de sus siglas en inglés) es un síndrome muy infrecuente que se caracteriza por erupción dérmica, eosinofilia y compromiso sistémico. Inicialmente fue descrito asociado a medicamentos anticrisis (antiepilépticos), pero posteriormente ha sido descrito en asociación a otros medicamentos. Entre los medicamentos anticrisis, se ha descrito predominantemente su asociación a fármacos aromáticos o con estructura similar: fenitoína, carbamazepina, fenobarbital, oxcarbazepina y lamotrigina. Entre los medicamentos anticrisis no aromáticos, se ha descrito su presentación en algunos pacientes expuestos a gabapentina, zonisamida, valproato, rufinamida y raramente a levetiracetam. La severidad del síndrome se relaciona al tiempo de exposición al fármaco, por lo que su detección precoz es de vital importancia. Describimos el primer caso en nuestro país, de un paciente con DRESS inducido por levetiracetam y revisamos los infrecuentes reportes de DRESS en pacientes expuestos a levetiracetam descritos en la literatura.
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a very rare syndrome characterized by skin rash, eosinophilia and systemic compromise. This was initially described in association with antiseizures drugs, but later it was described in association with other drugs. Among antiseizure drugs, it has been described association with aromatic drugs as phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine; and non-aromatic antiseizure drugs as gabapentin, zonisamide, valproate, rufinamide and rarely to levetiracetam. The severity of the syndrome is related to the time of exposure to the drug, so early detection is of vital importance. We describe the first case in our country, of a patient with DRESS induced by levetiracetam, and we review the infrequent scientific reports of DRESS in patients exposed to levetiracetam.
ABSTRACT
Introducción. Entre el 80 y el 95 % de los pacientes infectados por el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana (HIV) desarrollan manifestaciones en la piel que sirven como marcadores de su estado inmunológico. Objetivos. Describir las manifestaciones dermatológicas y los factores clínicos y sociodemográficos de los pacientes hospitalizados con diagnóstico de HIV y su correlación con el recuento de linfocitos T CD4. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio observacional de corte transversal y retrospectivo a partir del registro de las historias clínicas de 227 pacientes mayores de edad con diagnóstico de HIV, evaluados por dermatología en un hospital de Medellín, Colombia. Resultados. Los 227 registros daban cuenta de 433 manifestaciones dermatológicas, el 64,4 % de ellas infecciosas. Las tres manifestaciones más frecuentes fueron candidiasis oral, condilomas acuminados y reacciones a medicamentos. Se encontró una relación estadísticamente significativa entre el virus del herpes zóster (HZ) diseminado y la sífilis secundaria, con un recuento de CD4 entre 200 y 499 células/mm3 (p=0,04 y 0,028, respectivamente), y entre la candidiasis oral y un recuento de CD4 menor de 100 células/ mm3 (p=0,008). Conclusiones. La relación entre el herpes zóster diseminado y un recuento de CD4 entre 200 y 499 células/mm3 sugiere que, a pesar de los recuentos altos, se pueden presentar formas graves de la enfermedad debido a una posible disfunción de las células T y el agotamiento del sistema inmunológico. La relación entre la candidiasis oral y un recuento de CD4 menor de 100 células/mm3 plantea la posibilidad de considerar esta infección micótica como un marcador importante de debilitamiento inmunológico de los pacientes con HIV.
Introduction. About 80-95% of patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) develop skin manifestations, which are markers of the patients' immune status. Objective. To describe the dermatologic manifestations and the clinical and sociodemographic factors of hospitalized patients diagnosed with HIV and their correlation with CD4 T-lymphocyte count. Materials and methods. We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, and retrospective study of the medical records of 227 adult patients with HIV diagnosis evaluated by dermatology in a hospital in Medellín, Colombia. Results. We included 227 patient records with 433 dermatologic manifestations, 64.4% of them infectious. The most frequent manifestations were oral candidiasis, condylomata acuminata, and drug reactions. Moreover, a statistically significant relationship was found between disseminated herpes zoster virus and secondary syphilis with a CD4 count between 200-499 cells/mm3 (p=0.04 and 0.028, respectively). There was also a statistically significant relationship between oral candidiasis and a CD4 count of less than 100 cells/ mm3 (p=0.008). Conclusions. The relationship between disseminated herpes zoster with CD4 between 200-499 cells/mm3 suggests that, despite having high CD4 counts, severe forms of the disease may occur due to possible T-cell dysfunction and depletion of the immune system. Additionally, the relationship between oral candidiasis and CD4 less than 100 cells/mm3 indicates the potential role of oral candidiasis as an essential marker of weakened immune status in HIV patients.
Subject(s)
HIV , Dermatology , Epidemiology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , Immunosuppression Therapy , Drug Eruptions , Drug Hypersensitivity , InfectionsABSTRACT
Drug induced liver injury (DILI) can be can be triggered by many medications including antituberculosis drugs. We present the case of a 37-year-old woman with a smear- positive pulmonary tuberculosis who started treatment with first-line antituberculosis drugs and 4 weeks later presented jaundice, somnolence and a morbilliform generalized rash with progressive neurologic deterioration which had a fatal outcome. Antituberculosis drugs can cause DILI in 2 to 28% of patients and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS syndrome) in 1.2%. Acute liver failure (ALF) can occur in 35% of patients with DILI with an overall mortality of 9.7%. If the ALF is unresponsive to medical treatment, liver transplantation has shown promising results and can avoid progression of complications. DILI can be a serious medical condition in patients receiving antituberculosis drugs. If ALF develops and is unresponsive to medical treatment, liver transplantation should be considered as the treatment of choice.
La injuria hepática inducida por fármacos (IHIF) puede ser desencadenado por varios medicamentos incluyendo fármacos anti tuberculosos. Presentamos el caso de una paciente mujer de 37 años con un frotis positivo para tuberculosis pulmonar quien inició tratamiento de primera línea y 4 semanas después, presentó ictericia, somnolencia y un exantema generalizado de tipo morbiliforme con deterioro neurológico progresivo y un desenlace fatal. Los fármacos anti tuberculosos pueden producir injuria inducida por fármacos en 2 a 28% de pacientes y síndrome de DRESS (reacción de sensibilidad a medicamentos con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos) en 1,2%. La falla hepática aguda (FHA) en pacientes con injuria hepática inducida por fármacos, puede presentarse en un 35% con una mortalidad del 9,7%. Si la FHA no responde a tratamiento médico, el trasplante hepático ha mostrado resultados positivos y evita la progresión de complicaciones. La IHIF puede ser una condición médica grave en pacientes que reciben medicamentos antituberculosos. Si se desencadena una FHA y no responde a tratamiento médico, debe considerarse con urgencia la posibilidad de trasplante hepático.
ABSTRACT
El síndrome de erupción medicamentosa con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, DRESS), también conocido como síndrome de hipersensibilidad inducida por medicamentos, es una reacción rara potencialmente mortal que causa una erupción grave y que puede provocar insuficiencia multiorgánica. Como con otras erupciones medicamentosas graves, los linfocitos T específicos para un medicamento tienen una función crucial en el síndrome DRESS. El modelo de hapteno/pro-hapteno, el modelo de interacción farmacológica y el modelo alterado de repertorio de péptidos son tres modelos diferentes desarrollados para describir la relación/interacción entre un medicamento o sus metabolitos y el sistema inmunitario. Analizamos nuestra experiencia con el tratamiento con ciclosporina en un caso de síndrome DRESS resistente a esteroides causado por ácido valproico en una niña y sus resultados clínicos, de laboratorio y de antígeno leucocitario humano (HLA).
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, is a potentially life-threatening rare reaction that causes a severe rash and can lead to multiorgan failure. As in other severe drug eruptions, drug-specific T lymphocytes play a crucial role in DRESS. The hapten/pro-hapten model, pharmacological interaction model, and altered peptide repertoire model are three different models developed to describe the relationship/interaction between a medication or its metabolites and the immune system. We discuss our experience with cyclosporine treatment in a steroid-resistant DRESS syndrome caused by valproic acid in a girl, as well as her clinical, laboratory, and human leukocyte antigens (HLA) study results
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Eosinophilia/complications , Eosinophilia/chemically induced , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/etiology , Valproic Acid/adverse effects , Cyclosporine , Haptens/adverse effects , HLA Antigens/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Os anestésicos locais são essenciais em diversos procedimentos médicos e odontológicos. Funcionam estabilizando as membranas neuronais e inibindo a transmissão de impulsos neurais, o que permite a realização desses procedimentos com mais segurança e sem dor. As reações adversas a drogas são definidas pela Organização Mundial da Saúde como todos os efeitos nocivos, não intencionais e indesejáveis de uma medicação, que ocorrem em doses usadas para prevenção, diagnóstico e tratamento. As reações de hipersensibilidade são reações adversas do tipo B, imprevisíveis, que clinicamente se assemelham a reações alérgicas e podem ou não envolver um mecanismo imune. As reações de hipersensibilidade verdadeiras aos anestésicos locais são raras, apesar de superestimadas. Nesta revisão destacamos a necessidade de uma avaliação completa dos pacientes com suspeita de reação alérgica aos anestésicos locais, incluindo a investigação de outros possíveis alérgenos que tenham sido utilizados no procedimento, como analgésicos, antibióticos e látex. A estratégia de investigação e seleção de pacientes para testes deve se basear na história clínica. Dessa forma, poderemos fornecer orientações mais assertivas e seguras aos pacientes.
Local anesthetics are essential in many medical and dental procedures. They work by stabilizing neuronal membranes and inhibiting the transmission of neural impulses, which allows these procedures to be performed more safely and without pain. Adverse drug reactions are defined by the World Health Organization as all harmful, unintended and undesirable effects of a medication, which occur at doses used for prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Hypersensitivity reactions are unpredictable type B adverse reactions that clinically resemble allergic reactions and may or may not involve an immune mechanism. True hypersensitivity reactions to local anesthetics are rare, although overestimated. In this review, we highlight the need for a thorough evaluation of patients with suspected allergic reaction to local anesthetics, including investigation of other possible allergens that may have been used in the procedure, such as analgesics, antibiotics and latex. The investigation strategy and patient selection for testing should be based on clinical history. In this way, we will be able to provide more assertive and safe guidelines to patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Hypersensitivity , Anesthetics, Local , Patients , Safety , Therapeutics , Allergens , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Latex Hypersensitivity , Diagnosis, Differential , Analgesics , Anti-Bacterial AgentsABSTRACT
A Síndrome de DRESS (do inglês, Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) é uma patologia rara que consiste em uma severa reação medicamentosa mediada por células T. O presente relato de caso retrata uma paciente do sexo feminino, 59 anos, que apresentou icterícia, febre não termometrada, acolia, colúria, mialgia, placas hipercrômicas e lesões pruriginosas. Referiu uso recente de alopurinol, paracetamol e nimesulida, apresentando melhora importante e espontânea após a suspensão das medicações. A extensão do tempo de exposição ao medicamento agressor ocasiona um maior período de internação e risco de mortalidade. Além disso, os dados restritos sobre a Síndrome de DRESS impõe desafios ao seu diagnóstico. Sendo assim, este estudo busca destacar a importância do diagnóstico clínico precoce, a suspensão do medicamento agressor e a instituição da terapêutica adequada para um prognóstico favorável
The Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome is a rare pathology that consists of a severe drug reaction mediated by T cells. The present case report depicts a female patient, 59 years old, who presented jaundice, non thermometered fever, acholia, choluria, myalgia, hyperchromic plaques and pruritic lesions. She mentioned recent use of allopurinol, paracetamol and nimesulide, showing significant and spontaneous improvement after discontinuation of medications. The extension of time of exposure to the offending drug causes a longer period of hospitalization and risk of mortality. In addition, the restricted data on DRESS Syndrome poses challenges to its diagnosis. Therefore, this study seeks to highlight the importance of early clinical diagnosis, suspension of the offending drug and the institution of appropriate therapy for a favorable prognosis
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Allopurinol/adverse effects , Gout Suppressants/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/diagnosis , Liver Failure, Acute/chemically induced , Eosinophilia/blood , Exanthema/chemically induced , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/blood , Leukocytosis/bloodABSTRACT
Las reacciones a medicamentos han aumentado con el tiempo, estas implican ahora una carga importante de enfermedad, principalmente en los servicios de hospitalización. Los agentes quimioterapéuticos y biológicos son fármacos utilizados con frecuencia en enfermedades reumatológicas y neoplasias de diferente orden. Las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a quimioterapéuticos y monoclonales impactan en la calidad de vida, el pronóstico y la mortalidad de los pacientes con enfermedades autoinmunes y cáncer, es por eso que deben ser reconocidas y manejadas por un equipo de trabajo multidisciplinar. La desensibilización es una herramienta terapéutica que ofrece grandes beneficios a los pacientes con reacciones de hipersensibilidad, permitiéndoles la utilización de medicamentos de primera línea de manera segura y costoefectiva, con un impacto importante en la morbilidad y mortalidad de estos pacientes. El objetivo de este artículo fue revisar la información y evidencia más reciente sobre las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a quimioterapéuticos y biológicos, y los datos sobre las opciones de desensibilización con estos medicamentos y su desenlace
Drug reactions have increased over time, they now imply a significant burden of disease mainly in hospital services. Chemotherapeutic and biological agents are drugs frequently used in different rheumatological diseases and neoplasms. Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic and monoclonal drugs impact the quality of life, prognosis and mortality of patients with autoimmune diseases and cancer, that is why they must be recognized and managed by a multidisciplinary team. Desensitization is a therapeutic tool that offers great benefits to patients with hypersensitivity reactions, allowing them to use first-line drugs in a safe and cost-effective manner, with a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality. The objective of this article was to review the most recent information and evidence on hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutics and biologics, and data on desensitization options with these drugs and their outcome
Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Hypersensitivity , Biological Therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic , Hypersensitivity , Antineoplastic AgentsABSTRACT
Os betalactâmicos são a classe de drogas que mais causam reações de hipersensibilidade envolvendo um mecanismo imunológico específico, e são os principais desencadeantes entre os antimicrobianos. São representados pelas penicilinas, cefalosporinas, carbapenêmicos, monobactâmicos e inibidores da betalactamase. A estrutura química básica destes fármacos consiste na presença dos seguintes componentes: anel betalactâmico, anel adjacente e cadeias laterais, sendo todos potenciais epítopos. Os anticorpos da classe IgE e linfócitos T estão frequentemente envolvidos no reconhecimento desses epítopos. A reatividade cruzada depende da estabilidade dos produtos intermediários (determinantes antigênicos) derivados da degradação dos anéis betalactâmicos, anéis adicionais e da semelhança estrutural das cadeias laterais entre as drogas. Classicamente acreditava-se num grande potencial de reatividade cruzada dentro de cada classe e até entre as classes, mas estudos da última década mostraram que indivíduos alérgicos à penicilina (com testes cutâneos positivos) reagiam às cefalosporinas em aproximadamente 3% dos casos, aos carbapenêmicos em cerca de 1%, e praticamente não reagiam aos monobactâmicos. Essa reatividade ou tolerância parece estar vinculada ao grau de similaridade entre as cadeias laterais desses antibióticos. Nesta revisão, ressaltamos a importância da investigação sistematizada na confirmação ou exclusão de alergia aos betalactâmicos, descrevemos a prevalência da reatividade cruzada entre estes fármacos e sugerimos um algoritmo de abordagem desses pacientes baseados em sua estrutura química e nos dados publicados na literatura.
Beta-lactams are the drugs most commonly involved in hypersensitivity reactions mediated by a specific immune mechanism and are the main triggers among antibiotics. They include penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams and beta-lactam inhibitors. The basic chemical structure of these drugs consist on the presence of the following components: betalactam ring, an adjacent ring and side chains, all of which are potential epitopes. IgE antibodies and T lymphocytes are often involved in recognizing those epitopes. Cross-reactivity depends on the stability of intermediate products (antigenic determinants) derived from the degradation of the beta-lactam ring, on the adjacent rings, and on the structural similarity of the side chains between drugs. Classically, it was believed that there was a great potential for cross-reactivity within each class and even between classes, but studies from the last decade showed that individuals allergic to penicillin (with positive skin tests) reacted to cephalosporins in approximately 3% of cases, to carbapenems in about 1%, and rarely reacted to monobactams. This reactivity or tolerance seems to be linked to the degree of similarity between the side chains of these antibiotics. In this review, we emphasize the importance of systematic investigation to confirm or exclude allergy to beta-lactams, we describe the prevalence of crossreactivity between these drugs and we suggest an algorithm for approaching these patients based on their chemical structure and on data published in the literature.
Subject(s)
Humans , Penicillins , Monobactams , Immunoglobulin E , T-Lymphocytes , Carbapenems , Cephalosporins , beta-Lactams , Hypersensitivity , Patients , Pharmaceutical Preparations , PrevalenceABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction: drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, known as DRESS syndrome, are a hypersensitivity reaction to medications which can lead to skin lesions and internal organ involvement. This syndrome has typically been associated with a wide variety of medications, including aromatic anticonvulsants, allopurinol and antibiotics as the main culprits. Objective: we present the case of a patient with DRESS syndrome secondary to losartan, manifesting skin symptoms and mild hepatic involvement. Up until now, there have been no reports of losartan as the cause of this condition. Prompt treatment was instated including the withdrawal of the offending medication and initiation of oral systemic steroids, with a satisfactory response. Conclusion: caregivers should be alert to the appearance of skin lesions with the use of different groups of medications, not just those typically reported, since any medication could potentially cause a hypersensitivity reaction. (Acta Med Colomb 2021; 46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2021.2081).
ABSTRACT
El síndrome de intolerancia a múltiples medicamentos (MDIS, por sus siglas en inglés) se caracteriza por la intolerancia a dos o más medicamentos no relacionados. Tiene una prevalencia baja y es común en pacientes con polifarmacia. A pesar de que las reacciones adversas a los medicamentos son muy frecuentes, es raro que los pacientes debuten con este síndrome, el cual tiene implicaciones clínicas de leves a graves que afectan su vida; de acuerdo con esto varían el abordaje y su manejo. La sintomatología presentada varía desde síntomas gastrointestinales como reflujo gastroesofágico, dolores musculares y cefalea, hasta síntomas cutáneos; estos son los más frecuentes, tales como urticaria y erupciones maculopapulares o presentaciones menos comunes como el síndrome de Stevens-Johnson. El MDIS es causado por una amplia variedad de fármacos; por ello el conocimiento del síndrome, así como un adecuado interrogatorio de los antecedentes del paciente, es necesario para realizar un diagnóstico oportuno e instaurar un manejo adecuado y preventivo, evitando reacciones adversas que pongan en riesgo su vida. Con los hallazgos del cuadro clínico en la paciente, y basados en los antecedentes alérgicos presentados anteriormente a diferentes medicamentos no relacionados entre ellos, más la presentación de un rash maculopapular generalizado posterior a la administración de trimetoprim/sulfametoxazol se realiza el diagnóstico de MDIS. Se decide cambiar de medicamento por fosfomicina, con una consecuente evolución favorable. (AU)