ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of couch rotation angle on non-coplanar static intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan for gastric cancer and to provide a reference for clinical planning. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who recently underwent postoperative IMRT for gastric cancer. Twenty patients who received radiotherapy in the centre of Radiation Oncology of Huanggang Central Hospital from August 2022 to January 2023 were selected. That were selected to receive a seven-field coplanar static IMRT plan based on a couch rotation angle of 0° as the control group. Then, based on the coplanar IMRT plan, only the couch rotation angle of gantry angles 30° and 330° was changed to 10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, 70°, 80°, and 90°, respectively, and nine different non-coplanar plans were established. The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) of the target volume, and monitor unit (MU), as well as Dmean, V20, and V30 of the left and right kidneys, Dmax, Dmean, V10, V20, and V30 of the spinal cord, and Dmax, Dmean, V10, V20, V30, and V40 of the small intestine and liver were compared among the 10 plans. The MU and the dosimetric parameters of the target volumes and When the couch rotation angle was 60°, the minimum HI and maximum CI of the target volume were 0.0714±0.0089 and 0.9271±0.0108, respectively, and the minimum MU was 438±26, with the best homogeneity and conformity in the target volume and the shortest machine treatment time (P＜0.05). When the couch rotation angle was 10°, the Dmax of the small intestine was lowest, being (4620.73±99.27) cGy. When the couch rotation angle was 60°, the Dmean of the left and right kidneys was lowest, being (1246.30±130.35) cGy and (1001.52±103.33) cGy, respectively; the V20 of the left and right kidneys was lowest, being 22.87±6.29 and 19.69±1.84, respectively; the V10 and V30 of the spinal cord were lowest, being 40.08±4.92 and 1.68±0.34, respectively (P＜0.05). Conclusion The couch rotation angle has some influence on the postoperative treatment planning for patients with gastric cancer. In the design of non-coplanar plan for gastric cancer, the couch rotation angle of 60° contributes to establishing a better radiotherapy plan.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the dosimetric differences of four fluence smoothing (FS) levels of the Monaco system in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) after rectal cancer surgery, and to provide a reference for FS selection in clinical practice. Methods A total of 15 postoperative patients with rectal cancer admitted in 2020 were selected. Under the same optimal conditions, FS was set to Off, Low, Medium, and High for IMRT planning. The data were analyzed by SPSS 20.0 software. The dosimetric parameters of planning target volume and organs at risk (OARs), the number of Segments, the number of monitor units (MUs), the estimated total delivery time (ETDT), and the gamma pass rate were compared between the four FS levels. Results The four FS levels resulted in clinically acceptable dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume and OARs, and there was no significant difference in dose distribution between FS levels. From FS-Off to FS-High, number of Segments, number of Mus, and ETDT decreased by 15.2%, 11.8%, and 6.7%, respectively, whereas gamma pass rate increased by 1.6%. Conclusion The IMRT plans at four FS levels can meet the clinical requirements. Considering the planning quality and execution efficiency, FS-High is recommended for postoperative IMRT of patients with rectal cancer.
ABSTRACT
Aim: The aim of this study is to identify an ideal location of isocenter in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans. Materials and Methods: A total of 28 clinical target volumes and 4 English capital letters (C, L, T, and H) target volumes were considered in this study. Two IMRT treatment plans were generated for each target volume in the ECLIPSETM treatment planning system (TPS), first one with isocenter automatically placed (ISOAUTO) by TPS and the second one with geometric center-based isocenter (ISOGEOM). The geometric center of a cuboid volume, which was formed encompassing around the target volume in sagittal, transverse, and frontal planes, is considered as the geometric center of the target volume as well as the isocenter (ISOGEOM) of the IMRT plans. While performing the IMRT treatment plans using the beam angle optimization and dose volume optimization, the normal tissue objectives and target volume objectives were kept similar in both the plans. The dosimetrical parameters between the two groups of plans were compared. Results: The distance between ISOGEOM and ISOAUTO ranged from 0.16 cm to 3.04 cm with a mean and median of 0.85 cm and 0.69 cm, respectively. The ISOGEOM-based IMRT plans exhibited statistically significant advantages in total monitor units reduction (100% of cases, P ≤ 0.001), total number of field reduction (66% of cases, P ≤ 0.001), and reduction of patient mean dose (69% of cases, P ≤ 0.001) over ISOAUTO-based IMRT plans. The conformity index, homogeneity index and target mean dose were comparable between both group of plans. Conclusion: Significant dosimetrical advantages may be observed, when the geometric centroid of target volume is considered as isocenter of IMRT treatment plan.
ABSTRACT
With the development of technology, several treatment plans can be got easily. There are many parameters related to the treatment in each plan and it is not only complex but also time-consuming to analyze them. So it is difficult for radiation oncologists to choose a plan. In order to solve the problem, a fast tool was developed integrating parameters such as conformity index and homogeneity index. This paper reviewed the type development, formula and features of conformity index and homogeneity index, in order to provide reference for users.
ABSTRACT
With the development of technology, several treatment plans can be got easily. There are many parameters related to the treatment in each plan and it is not only complex but also time-consuming to analyze them. So it is difficult for radiation oncologists to choose a plan. In order to solve the problem, a fast tool was developed integrating parameters such as conformity index and homogeneity index. This paper reviewed the type development, formula and features of conformity index and homogeneity index, in order to provide reference for users.