ABSTRACT
Abstract Background: One of the main adverse reactions of adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer is radiodermatitis. Objective: To assess the incidence of radiodermatitis in women with breast cancer, identify factors associated with its severity and determine the time at which this event occurs. Methods: Prospective cohort study in 113 women with breast cancer who were evaluated before radiotherapy and at every fifth session until the end of treatment. Logistic regression and Cox proportional regression model were used for the assessment of risk factors; P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The incidence rate of radiodermatitis was 98.2% and it was demonstrated that for each additional point of the Body Mass Index (BMI), the chance of occurrence of grades II to IV radiodermatitis increases by 14% (OR = 1.14 [95% CI 1.04-1.26]; p = 0.004) and statin use increases the risk of more severe skin lesions by four-fold (OR = 4.27 [95% CI 1.11-16.42]; p = 0.035). The exclusive use of hydrogel for skin hydration was an independent factor in delaying the onset of radiodermatitis (HR = 0.55 [95% CI 0.36-0.82]; p = 0.004). Study limitations: The main limitation of this study was its external validity. The identified factors should be considered for services and populations similar to those in this study. Conclusions: There was a high incidence of radiodermatitis and its severity was related to higher BMI, statin use; there was a protective effect of hydrogel use.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy versus surgery alone in patients with stage pT 2-3N 0M 0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical resection. Methods:The search was conducted through Web of Science, Emabse, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Chongqing VIP, China Biomedical Literature Database, and Wanfang database, etc. The search time was ranged from the establishment of the database to December 2022. Searched studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for analysis.Results:Clinical data of 2 424 patients from 8 controlled clinical studies were finally included. Meta-analysis showed that postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy had higher 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival rates ( OR=2.33, 95%CI=1.71-3.17, P<0.001; OR=2.38, 95% CI=1.73-3.27, P<0.001) and 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates ( OR=1.89, 95% CI=1.37-2.60, P<0.01; OR=1.94,95% CI=1.50-2.49, P<0.001) than surgery alone. Meanwhile, the local recurrence rate ( OR=0.33, 95% CI=0.21-0.50, P<0.001) and distant metastasis rate ( OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.39-0.98, P=0.040) of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy group were lower than those in the surgery alone group. The incidence of radiation esophagitis (1.4%-9.5%), radiation pneumonitis (2.1%) and anastomotic stenosis (5.3%) was reported. Conclusions:For patients with stage pT 2-3N 0M 0 squamous cell carcinoma after radical resection of esophageal cancer, adjuvant radiotherapy may improve 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival rates and 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates compared with surgery alone. In addition, adjuvant radiotherapy may reduce the local recurrence and distant metastasis rates. Therefore, postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy is an optional treatment for stage pT 2-3N 0M 0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
ABSTRACT
Adjuvant radiotherapy has become an important part of the standard treatment for breast cancer. Compared with the traditional postoperative radiotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy has the theoretical advantages of more accurate target delineation, optimization of radiation strategy for breast reconstruction, increase of breast conservation surgery with tumor down-staging and avoiding breast surgery by improving pathological complete response rate, which have been confirmed by recent clinical research. Prospective studies are still needed for the optimal target delineation, dose fractionation, radiation-surgery interval, and combination with systemic therapies, aiming to provide the optimal treatment option for patients with early breast cancer.
ABSTRACT
Introdução: O câncer de mama é a neoplasia que mais acomete o sexo feminino, sendo a primeira causa de morte por câncer em mulheres.O carcinoma mamário representa um grupo heterogêneo de doenças. Casos individuais diferem uns dos outros na morfologia, fenótipo e prognóstico. As patologias malignas das mamas podem se manifestar como tumores unifocais, multifocais e/ou multicêntricos. A incidência de tumores multifocais e multicêntricos no câncer de mama varia de 13% a 70%. Relato do caso: Paciente L.C., sexo feminino, 65 anos, com relato de nódulo palpável em mama direita em setembro de 2015. O estudo anatomopatológicodo nódulo mostrou carcinoma intraductal. Realizada quadrantectomia, com anatomopatológico que identificou carcinoma papilífero bem diferenciado intracístico e invasivo damama, associado a componente intraductal cribriforme e papilar, com margens e linfonodo sentinela livres e imuno-histoquímica compatível com perfil triplo-negativo. Em fevereiro de 2019, apresentou duas novas lesões em mama contralateral, identificadas como carcinoma ductal invasivo multifocal com papiloma intraductal associado, e carcinoma ductal invasivo associado a componente intraductal in situ dos tipos papilar, sólido e cribriforme, com imuno-histoquímica com perfis moleculares distintos entre si, sendo uma lesão do tipo luminal A e a outra, luminal híbrido. Conclusão: Este estudo relata um caso de uma paciente que apresentou lesões neoplásicas em ambas as mamas, em tempos distintos e com perfis histológicos e imuno-histoquímicos diferentes. Dessa forma, destacam-se a raridade do caso e a relevância da terapia dirigida a alvos específicos, uma vez que a paciente apresentava lesões com perfis moleculares distintos.
Introduction: Breast cancer is the neoplasm that most affects females, being the first cause of death by cancer in women. Breast carcinoma is a heterogeneous group of diseases. Individual cases differ from each other in morphology, phenotype and prognosis. Malignant breast pathologies can manifest as single, multifocal and/or multicentric tumors. The incidence of multifocal and multicentric tumors in breast cancer varies from 13% to 70%. Case report: Patient L.C., female, 65 years old, with a palpable nodule in the right breast in September 2015. The anatomopathological study of the nodule showed intraductal carcinoma. She underwent quadrantectomy, with anatomopathological examination that identified well-differentiated intracystic and invasive papillary carcinoma of the breast, associated with a cribriform and papillary intraductal component, with free sentinel lymph node and margins and immunohistochemistry compatible with triple negative profile. In February 2019, she presented two new lesions in contralateral breast, identified as invasive multifocal ductal carcinoma, with associated intraductal papilloma, and invasive ductal carcinoma, associated with an in situ intraductal component of the papillary, solid and cribriform types, with immunohistochemistry with different molecular profiles, being one lesion classified as luminal A and the other, hybrid luminal. Conclusion: This study reports a case of a patient who had neoplastic lesions in both breasts, at different times and with distinctive histological and immunohistochemical profiles. Thus, the rarity of the case and the relevance of the therapy aimed at specific targets are highlighted, since the patient presented lesions with different molecular profiles.
Introducción: El cáncer de mama es la neoplasia que más afecta a las mujeres, siendo la primera causa de muerte por cáncer en las mujeres. El carcinoma de mama representa un grupo heterogéneo de enfermedades. Los casos individuales difieren entre sí en morfología, fenotipo y pronóstico. Las patologías mamarias malignas pueden manifestarse como tumores únicos, multifocales y/o multicéntricos. La incidencia de tumores multifocales y multicéntricos en el cáncer de mama varía del 13% al 70%. Relato del caso: Paciente L.C., mujer, 65 años, con un nódulo palpable en el seno derecho en septiembre de 2015. El estudio anatomopatológico de la lesión mostró carcinoma intraductal. La paciente se sometió a una cuadrantectomía, con un examen anatomopatológico que identificó un carcinoma papilar invasivo e intraquístico bien diferenciado de mama, asociado con un componente intraductal cribiforme y papilar, con ganglio linfático y márgens libres y inmunohistoquímica compatible con perfil triple negativo. En febrero de 2019, presentó dos nuevas lesiones en el seno contralateral, identificadas como carcinoma ductal multifocal invasivo, con papiloma intraductal asociado y carcinoma ductal invasivo, asociado con un componente intraductal in situ de los tipos papilar, sólido y cribiforme, con inmunohistoquímica con diferentes perfiles moleculares, siendo una lesión del tipo luminal A y la otra, luminal híbrida. Conclusión: Este estudio reporta un caso de una paciente que tenía lesiones neoplásicas en ambos senos, en diferentes momentos y con diferentes perfiles histológicos e inmunohistoquímicos. Por lo tanto, se destaca la rareza del caso y la relevancia de la terapia dirigida a objetivos específicos, una vez que la paciente presentó lesiones con diferentes perfiles moleculares.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast , Mastectomy, Segmental , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating , Radiotherapy, AdjuvantABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The use of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) has been debated because it may be a causative factor in adjuvant treatment delay and may subsequently increase the probability of recurrence. We investigated whether IBR was related to adjuvant treatment delay and survival outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the duration from operation to adjuvant treatment administration and survival outcomes according to IBR status among patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy from January 2005 to December 2014. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the clinicopathologic baseline characteristics between patients who did and did not undergo IBR. RESULTS: Of 646 patients, 107 (16.6%) underwent IBR, and the median follow-up was 72 months. The median duration from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly longer in patients who underwent IBR than in those who did not (14 vs. 12 days, respectively, p = 0.008). Based on propensity score matching, patients who underwent IBR received adjuvant therapy 3 days later than those who did not (14 vs. 11 days, respectively, p = 0.044). The duration from surgery to post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Local recurrence-free survival, regional recurrence-free survival, systemic recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were also not significantly different between the 2 groups (p = 0.427, p = 0.445, p = 0.269, and p = 0.250, respectively). In the case-matched cohort, survival outcomes did not change. CONCLUSION: IBR was associated with a modest increase in the duration from surgery to chemotherapy that was statistically but not clinically significant. Moreover, IBR had no influence on PMRT delay or survival outcomes, suggesting that it is an acceptable option for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer undergoing mastectomy.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Breast Implants , Breast Neoplasms , Breast , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Drug Therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Mammaplasty , Mastectomy , Propensity Score , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Recurrence , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Because of the high malignancy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, the cancer-related mortality of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is increasing year by year. Despite advance in surgical techniques, the 5-year survival rate of patients after resection is still less than 30%. Recent studies have found that pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a systemic disease, which may not be cured completely by up-front resection, but requires perioperative multidisciplinary therapy. With the concept of "potentially curable pancreatic cancer" , clinicians need to evaluate the resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma accurately before operation, and use the innovative multidisciplinary therapy including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy,surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to improve the R0 resection rate and reduce the risk of early metastasis. Therefore, the therapeutic goal of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is no longer "simple resection" , but long survival through perioperative multidisciplinary treatment. In this article, we briefly introduce the progress of resectability assessment, surgical techniques and perioperative adjuvant therapy of "potentially curable pancreatic cancer" .
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in women with uterine-confined endometrial cancer with uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) or clear cell carcinoma (CCC). METHODS: Medical records of 80 women who underwent surgical staging for endometrial cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Stage I UPSC and CCC were pathologically confirmed after surgery. Survival outcomes were compared between the adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy groups. RESULTS: Fifty-four (67.5%) and 26 (32.5%) women had UPSC and CCC, respectively. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 59/80 (73.8%) women (25 radiotherapy and 34 chemotherapy). High preoperative serum cancer antigen-125 level (25.1±20.2 vs. 11.5±6.5 IU/mL, p 0.999) and overall survival (77.5% vs. 87.8%, p=0.373) rates were similar between the groups. Neither radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]=1.810; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.297–11.027; p=0.520) nor chemotherapy (HR=1.638; 95% CI=0.288–9.321; p=0.578) after surgery was independently associated with disease recurrence. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed similar survival outcomes for adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in stage I UPSC and CCC of the endometrium. Further large study with analysis stratified by MI or LVSI is required.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell , Adenocarcinoma, Papillary , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms , Endometrium , Medical Records , Radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Recurrence , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The multimodality therapy with surgery as the core has gradually become the standard therapy for pancreatic cancer without distant metastasis. At present, many large-sample retrospective clinical studies have shown the value of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer, and many international guidelines have recognized neoadjuvant therapy as a fundamental part of pancreatic cancer treatment. There are many ongoing large-scale, prospective, multi-center clinical trials, and the primary results of several studies have shown that neoadjuvant therapy can increase the radical resection rate of tumor and improve overall survival. However, there are still controversies over the value of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer, especially resectable pancreatic cancer. In addition, no consensus has been reached on the selection of neoadjuvant regimen, the duration of neoadjuvant therapy, and neoadjuvant regimen after surgery for pancreatic cancer. It is believed that with the appearance of high-level evidence, neoadjuvant therapy will be widely used in pancreatic cancer.
ABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivo Analisar, por meio da comparação entre a abertura máxima mandibular, a efetividade de programa terapêutico miofuncional oral em pacientes com câncer de boca ou orofaringe submetidos à radioterapia adjuvante. Método Estudo prospectivo envolvendo cinco pacientes adultos e cinco idosos em pós-operatório de cirurgia de boca/orofaringe que aguardavam início da radioterapia ou até a quinta sessão. No início e no final do programa, os participantes tiveram suas medidas de abertura máxima mandibular mensuradas por meio de paquímetro e foram selecionados cinco exercícios - dois de mobilidade e três de tração mandibular - com controle presencial durante oito semanas, perfazendo um total de dez semanas. Dados descritivos e a comparação das medidas pré e pós-fonoterapia por meio do teste de Wilcoxon foram considerados na análise dos dados. Resultados Dez pacientes finalizaram o programa terapêutico (duas mulheres e oito homens), com média de idade de 58,4 anos, mediana de 57,0 anos. Apresentaram média de abertura máxima mandibular de 31,6 ± 11,7 mm antes do tratamento e 36,4 ± 8,0 mm no pós-terapia (p=0,021). Conclusão O programa terapêutico miofuncional oral proposto promoveu aumento da abertura máxima vertical da mandíbula de pacientes submetidos à radioterapia e/ou quimioterapia adjuvante para tratamento de câncer de boca e orofaringe.
ABSTRACT Purpose Assess the effectiveness of an orofacial myofunctional therapeutic program in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer submitted to adjuvant radiotherapy through pre- and post-program comparison of maximum mandibular opening. Methods Prospective study involving five adult patients and five elderly patients postoperatively to oral cavity/oropharynx surgery who were awaiting the beginning of radiotherapy or had undergone fewer than five treatment sessions. The study participants had their maximum jaw opening measured using a sliding caliper at the beginning and end of the program. Two mobility exercises and three mandibular traction exercises were selected and weekly monitored presentially for 10 weeks. Descriptive data and pre- and post-therapy comparative measures were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon test. Results Ten patients (two women and eight men) with mean age of 58.4 years, median of 57.0 years, completed the therapeutic program. They presented mean maximum mandibular opening of 31.6 ± 11.7 and 36.4 ± 8.0 mm pre- and post-therapy, respectively (p =0.021). Conclusion The proposed orofacial myofunctional therapeutic program increased the maximum jaw opening of patients referred to adjuvant radiotherapy for oral cavity or oropharynx cancer treatment.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Radiation Injuries/rehabilitation , Trismus/rehabilitation , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Statistics, Nonparametric , Myofunctional Therapy/methods , Radiation Injuries/physiopathology , Speech Therapy/methods , Trismus/etiology , Trismus/physiopathology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Exercise Therapy/methods , Middle Aged , Mouth/radiation effects , Mouth/physiopathologyABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivo: estudar a condroradionecrose de laringe por complicação de radio-quimioterapia para tratamento do câncer de laringe e propor um fluxograma de tratamento com a utilização de câmara hiperbárica. Métodos: estudo retrospectivo de pacientes portadores de carcinoma de laringe admitidos em dois hospitais terciários num período de cinco anos. Resultados: de 131 pacientes portadores de câncer de laringe, 28 foram submetidos à radio e quimioterapia exclusiva e destes, três evoluíram com condroradionecrose. O tratamento destes pacientes foi realizado com câmara hiperbárica e com desbridamento cirúrgico, conforme proposição do fluxograma. Todos os pacientes tiveram a laringe preservada. Conclusão: a incidência de condroradionecrose de laringe por complicação de radioterapia e quimioterapia em nossa casuística foi de 10,7% e o tratamento com oxigenoterapia hiperbárica, com base no nosso fluxograma, foi efetivo no controle desta complicação.
ABSTRACT Objective: to study larynx chondroradionecrosis related to radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatment and provide a treatment flowchart. Methods: retrospective study with clinical data analysis of all larynx cancer patients admitted in a two tertiary hospital in a five years period. Results: from 131 patients treated for larynx cancer, 28 underwent chemoradiotherapy with curative intent and three of them presented chondroradionecrosis. They were treated with hiperbaric oxigen therapy and surgical debridment following our flowchart, preserving the larynx in all. Conclusions: the incidence of chondroradionecrosis as a complication of chemoradiotherapy in our series was 10,7% and the treatment with hiperbaric oxigen therapy, based in our flowchart, was effective to control this complication.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/pathology , Laryngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Laryngeal Cartilages/radiation effects , Laryngeal Cartilages/pathology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , NecrosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognosis of surgically-staged non-invasive uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), and to determine the role of adjuvant therapy. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective department database review was performed to identify patients with UCCC who underwent surgical treatment between 1997 and 2016 at 8 Gynecologic Oncology Centers. Demographic, clinicopathological, and survival data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 232 women with UCCC were identified. Of these, 53 (22.8%) had surgically-staged non-invasive UCCC. Twelve patients (22.6%) were upstaged at surgical assessment, including a 5.6% rate of lymphatic dissemination (3/53). Of those, 1 had stage IIIA, 1 had stage IIIC1, 1 had stage IIIC2, and 9 had stage IVB disease. Of the 9 women with stage IVB disease, 5 had isolated omental involvement indicating omentum as the most common metastatic site. UCCC limited only to the endometrium with no extra-uterine disease was confirmed in 41 women (73.3%) after surgical staging. Of those, 13 women (32%) were observed without adjuvant treatment whereas 28 patients (68%) underwent adjuvant therapy. The 5-year disease-free survival rates for patients with and without adjuvant treatment were 100.0% vs. 74.1%, respectively (p=0.060). CONCLUSION: Extra-uterine disease may occur in the absence of myometrial invasion (MMI), therefore comprehensive surgical staging including omentectomy should be the standard of care for women with UCCC regardless of the depth of MMI. Larger cohorts are needed in order to clarify the necessity of adjuvant treatment for women with UCCC truly confined to the endometrium.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Endometrium , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Omentum , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Standard of Care , Uterine DiseasesABSTRACT
Abstract Objective: To perform a comparative dosimetric analysis, based on computer simulations, of temporary balloon implants with 99mTc and balloon brachytherapy with high-dose-rate (HDR) 192Ir, as boosts to radiotherapy. We hypothesized that the two techniques would produce equivalent doses under pre-established conditions of activity and exposure time. Materials and Methods: Simulations of implants with 99mTc-filled and HDR 192Ir-filled balloons were performed with the Siscodes/MCNP5, modeling in voxels a magnetic resonance imaging set related to a young female. Spatial dose rate distributions were determined. In the dosimetric analysis of the protocols, the exposure time and the level of activity required were specified. Results: The 99mTc balloon presented a weighted dose rate in the tumor bed of 0.428 cGy.h-1.mCi-1 and 0.190 cGyh-1.mCi-1 at the balloon surface and at 8-10 mm from the surface, respectively, compared with 0.499 and 0.150 cGyh-1.mCi-1, respectively, for the HDR 192Ir balloon. An exposure time of 24 hours was required for the 99mTc balloon to produce a boost of 10.14 Gy with 1.0 Ci, whereas only 24 minutes with 10.0 Ci segments were required for the HDR 192Ir balloon to produce a boost of 5.14 Gy at the same reference point, or 10.28 Gy in two 24-minutes fractions. Conclusion: Temporary 99mTc balloon implantation is an attractive option for adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer, because of its availability, economic viability, and similar dosimetry in comparison with the use of HDR 192Ir balloon implantation, which is the current standard in clinical practice.
Resumo Objetivo: Análise dosimétrica comparativa entre técnicas de implantes temporários de reforço por meio de balões de 99mTc e de 192Ir de alta taxa de dose (high dose rate - HDR) mediante simulação computacional. A hipótese é que ambos produzem dosimetria equivalente em condições pré-estabelecidas de atividade e exposição. Materiais e Métodos: Simulações de implantes com balão preenchido com 99mTc e balão HDR-192Ir foram elaboradas no Siscodes/ MCNP5, modelando em voxels um tórax feminino reproduzido de ressonância magnética de mama jovem. Distribuições espaciais de taxas de dose absorvidas foram geradas. Análises dosimétricas dos protocolos foram apresentadas especificando tempo acumulado e atividade requerida. Resultados: Implante temporário com balão-99mTc apresentou taxa de dose ponderada no leito do tumor, na adjacência do balão, de 0,428 cGyh-1.mCi-1, e a 8-10 mm distante, de 0,190 cGyh-1.mCi-1, enquanto o implante de balão com 192Ir apresentou 0,499 e 0,150 cGyh-1.mCi-1, respectivamente. A exposição de 24 horas para balão-99mTc foi necessária para produzir o reforço de 10,14 Gy com 1,0 Ci, ao passo que para balão HDR-192Ir foram necessários 24 minutos com segmentos de 10,0 Ci para gerar 5,14 Gy no mesmo ponto de referência, ou 10,28 Gy em duas frações de 24 minutos. Conclusão: Implante temporário com balão-99mTc é atrativo para a radioterapia adjuvante do câncer de mama, devido a disponibilidade, viabilidade econômica e equivalência radiodosimétrica ao balão HDR-192Ir, protocolo presente na prática clínica.
ABSTRACT
As a milestone in the development of personalized comprehensive treatment for breast cancer, molecular subtype classification quantitatively characterizes breast cancer as heterogeneous diseases rather than a single disease in terms of onset risk, natural course, and treatment response. The significance of molecular subtype classification has been widely confirmed in prediction of the efficacy of systemic treatment and prognosis of systemic metastases and risk of death. However, the association between molecular subtype and local?regional recurrence ( LRR) risk as well as the impact of molecular subtype classification on radiotherapy strategy still needs more attention. This review discusses the association between molecular subtype and LRR risk as well as the significance of molecular subtype classification in guiding radiotherapy strategy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate clinical efficacy and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant treatment on early stage bulky cervical carcinoma.Methods A total of 155 cases with bulky stage Ⅰ b2 or Ⅱ a2 cervical carcinoma in Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Shantou University Medical College from Nov.2010 to Feb.2015 was reviewed and divided into two groups according to pre-operative treatment 108 cases in the neoadjuvant treatment group and 47 cases in the control group who underwent radical surgery directly.The clinical,pathologic,and follow-up data were analyzed retrospectively.Results The total response rate of neoadjuvant treatment was 75.0%.Histological grade in neoadjuvant treatment group was better than the other group and the rate of deep myometrial infiltration was tend to low in neoadjuvant treatment group.There was no difference in pathological type,parametrial involvement,lymph node metastasis,and lymph vascular space invasion between two groups.The rate of postoperative treatment was similar (92.6% vs 87.2%,P > 0.05).The overall survival rate of neoadjuvant treatment group was 96.4% and the other group was 88.9% (P =0.069).Conclusions Neoadjuvant treatment was effective for early stage bulky cervical carcinoma.It might reduce tumor histological grade and maybe improve the overall survival of patients.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of radiotherapy (RT) in patients who underwent hysterectomy for uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). METHODS: Patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I–IVa UCS who were treated between 1990 and 2012 were identified retrospectively in a multi-institutional database. Of 235 identified patients, 97 (41.3%) received adjuvant RT. Twenty-two patients with a history of previous pelvic RT were analyzed separately. Survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Patients with a previous history of pelvic RT had poor survival outcomes, and 72.6% of these patients experienced locoregional recurrence; however, none received RT after a diagnosis of UCS. Univariate analyses revealed that pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) and para-aortic lymph node sampling were significant factors for locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Among patients without previous pelvic RT, the percentage of locoregional failure was lower for those who received adjuvant RT than for those who did not (28.5% vs. 17.5%, p=0.107). Multivariate analysis revealed significant correlations between PLND and LRRFS, distant metastasis-free survival, and DFS. In subgroup analyses, RT significantly improved the 5-year LRRFS rate of patients who did not undergo PLND (52.7% vs. 18.7% for non-RT, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant RT decreased the risk of locoregional recurrence after hysterectomy for UCS, particularly in patients without surgical nodal staging. Given the poorer locoregional outcomes of patients previously subjected to pelvic RT, meticulous re-administration of RT might improve locoregional control while leading to less toxicity in these patients.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Carcinosarcoma/mortality , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Hysterectomy , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymph Node Excision , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Uterine Neoplasms/mortalityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to validate the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) criteria for adjuvant treatment in a different cohort of patients and to evaluate the simplified risk criteria predicting the prognosis and tailoring adjuvant treatment in patients with surgically staged endometrial cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 261 consecutive patients with surgically staged endometrial cancer between January 2000 and February 2013. All patients had complete staging procedures and were surgically staged according to the 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system. Clinical and pathologic data were obtained from medical records. We designed the simplified risk criteria for adjuvant treatment according to the risk factors associated with survival. The patients were divided into low and low-intermediate, high-intermediate, and high-risk groups according to the GOG criteria and simplified criteria and their survivals were compared. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic significance of both criteria. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 48 months (range, 10 to 122 months). According to the GOG criteria, we identified 197 low and low-intermediate risk patients, 20 high-intermediate risk patients, and 44 high-risk patients. There were significant differences in disease-free (p<0.001) and overall survival (p<0.001) among the three groups. Using the simplified risk criteria, we identified 189 low and low-intermediate risk patients, 28 high-intermediate risk patients, and 44 high-risk patients. There were significant differences in disease-free (p<0.001) and overall survival (p<0.001) among the three groups. The performance of the simplified criteria (area under the curve [AUC]=0.829 and 0.916 for disease recurrences and deaths, respectively) was as good as the GOG criteria (AUC=0.836 and 0.921 for disease recurrences and deaths, respectively). CONCLUSION: The simplified criteria may be easily applicable and offer useful information for planning strategy of adjuvant treatment in patients with surgically staged endometrial cancer as the GOG criteria.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
The purpose of the current study was to detect the potential therapeutic role of a survival benefit for women with advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma for their poor prognosis.A number of published studies for women with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancers were reviewed.We found that surgery had been the primary treatment of choice for an endometrial carcinoma.Where disease has spread to the uterine cervix,extended or radical surgery may be curative.The systematic lymph node resection improves the survival of women with intermediate/high-risk endometrioid uterine cancer,especially non-endometrioid carcinoma.The omentectomy may be beneficial for non-endometrioid cancer.A number of studies report a survival benefit from surgical cytoreduction in women with advanced and recurrent disease,although the degree of surgical effort is required in order to achieve an optimal result varies.Laparoscopic and robotic surgical staging for uterine cancer might be considered as a standard of care for endometrial cancer without extra-uterine metastasis.Laparotomy should be the first choice for extra-uterine metastasis and recurrent disease.Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy have a potential role in the management of high-risk,advanced,and recurrent disease.Efficacy of targeted and endocrinal treatment in women with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer has been proved.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between adjuvant radiotherapy after complete resection of thymoma and the overall survival. Methods: A retrospective analysis and follow-up were performed in 153 patients receiving complete resection of thymoma between June 2001 and December 2008. Of the 153 patients, 82 received adjuvant radiotherapy with a median dose of 50 Gy after complete resection of thymoma. The 5-year survival rate was compared between adjuvant radiotherapy group and no-adjuvant radiotherapy group by different Masaoka stages and 2004 WHO histological types. Results: The 5-year survival rates of patients receiving and not receiving adjuvant radiotherapy were 92% and 89%, respectively (P = 0.756). The 5-year survival rates between the patients receiving and not receiving adjuvant radiotherapy by different Masaoka stages and 2004 WHO histological types were all not significantly different (P > 0.05). The multivariate analysis revealed that Masaoka stage was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.001), but the 2004 WHO histological type, myasthenia gravis and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: As compared with single complete resection of thymoma, adjuvant radiotherapy after complete resection of thymoma can not improve the overall survival. Copyright© 2014 by TUMOR.
ABSTRACT
Context Despite progress in recent years in methods of diagnosis and surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, there is still controversy about the benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Objective To analise the survival of patients submitted to esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Method A retrospective, non-randomized study conducted using the medical charts of patients operated for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus at the School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil between 1979 and 2006. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate survival curves and the log-rank test to compare data in each group. The significance level was settled as 5%. Results A total of 123 patients were evaluated in this study, divided into three groups: I - 26 (21.2%) patients submitted to esophagectomy alone; II - 81 (65.8%) patients submitted to neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus esophagectomy and III - 16 (13%) patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus esophagectomy. A statistically significant survival was recorded between the groups (log rank = 6.007; P = 0.05), survival being greatest in the group submitted to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by the group submitted to neoadjuvant radiotherapy compared to the group submitted to esophagectomy alone as the initial treatment of choice. Conclusion Radiotherapy and chemotherapy neoadjuvants in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus offers benefits and increases survival. .
Contexto Apesar dos progressos realizados nos últimos anos em métodos de diagnóstico e tratamento cirúrgico do câncer de esôfago, ainda há controvérsias sobre os benefícios reais da quimioradioterapia neoadjuvante. Objetivo Avaliar o tempo de sobrevida em pacientes operados de carcinoma de células escamosas do esôfago com ou sem quimioradioterapia neoadjuvante. Método Estudo retrospectivo, não randomizado, realizado com os prontuários dos pacientes submetidos a esofagectomia por carcinoma de células escamosas do esôfago na Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil, entre 1979 e 2006. Na análise estatística, o estimador de Kaplan-Meier foi utilizado para calcular as curvas de sobrevivência e do teste log-rank para comparar a sobrevivência em cada grupo. O nível de significância foi estabelecido em 5%. Resultados O total de 123 pacientes foi avaliado neste estudo, dividido em três grupos: I - 26 (21,2%) pacientes submetidos a esofagectomia, II - 81 (65,8%) pacientes submetidos a radioterapia neoadjuvante seguido de esofagectomia e III - 16 (13%) submetidos a quimioradioterapia neoadjuvante seguido de esofagectomia. Diferença estatisticamente significativa na sobrevida foi registrado entre os grupos (log rank = 6,007, P = 0,05), tendo maior sobrevida o grupo submetido a quimioradioterapia neoadjuvante, seguida pelo grupo submetido a radioterapia neoadjuvante em comparação com o grupo submetido a esofagectomia apenas como o tratamento inicial de escolha. Conclusão A radioterapia e a quimioterapia neoadjuvantes em pacientes com carcinoma de células escamosas do esôfago oferecem benefícios e aumenta a sobrevida. .
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Esophagectomy , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objective To compare the difference in ischemic heart disease (IHD) incidence between left and right breast cancer treated with post-op radiation therapy.Methods We retrospectively reviewed electronic database of breast cancer patients treated in our cancer center from October 2006 to December 2011.Clinical data were recorded including clinical features,radiation fraction,and IHD.Statistical analysis was performed to compare the difference in IHD incidence between left and right breast cancer.Results Age on diagnosis was significantly associated with IHD (P < 0.05).Compare to younger patients (≤60),the increased hazard ratio of IHD in older patients (>60) was 3.84.The left breast cancer patients had greater incidence of IHD with the increased hazard ratio of 1.57 although this difference did not reach statistical power (P > 0.05).No patients got IHD in the intensity-modulated radiation therapy group.Conclusions Left-side breast cancer patients may have more probability to get IHD after thoracic radiation therapy compared to right-side patients.We recommend that left-side breast cancer patients should be treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy to spare heart if they receive prophylactic radiation therapy after surgery.